|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Traditional Budgeting vs. Beyond Budgeting: Three Core Differences
|
| Guest post by: Arthur Rothberg |
Article Overview: Reviewed are two fundamentally different approaches to the budgeting process, Traditional Budgeting and Beyond Budgeting. The article addresses the general approaches, challenges and benefits of each approach.
![]() |
Free Download - Data Security & Outsource Service Providers By Arthur Rothberg |
Traditional Budgeting vs. Beyond Budgeting: Three Core Differences
Certainly there were considerable challenges encountered as the U.S. Government worked to pass a new budget.
Even though the Federal budget debate was acted out in the political arena, it illuminated the importance of budgeting processes in addressing needs and determining outcomes. It also served as a reminder that companies can benefit from looking at how their own internal budgeting processes impact liquidity, credit, and shareholder value.
This article looks at the differences between two general approaches to the budgeting process, one we'll call Traditional Budgeting, and the other being Beyond Budgeting.
Traditional Budgeting we all know well: the top-down, command and control approach with authority firmly seated at the executive level. The Beyond Budgeting approach is a significant shift: executives empower and coach decentralized teams that are more closely connected to customers and to changes in the marketplace.
Now just may be the time to get beyond the classic fixes - cost cutting, increasing sales quotas, and investing in better software - for regaining profitability and growth. At best, these are Band-Aid solutions. At worst, focusing on them may leave the core management approach issue unaddressed and limit future gains.
The following sections compare Traditional Budgeting with Beyond Budgeting in three key areas.
1. Management style: Command and control vs. empower and coach
The two management approaches are fundamentally different in how they position executive leadership.
a. Traditional Budgeting: command and control
Traditional Budgeting is grounded in command and control. The core approach: the executive team is best equipped to translate objectives into operational goals, plans, and initiatives for all business units and employees.
An underlying assumption can be that managers and employees do not have the skill sets, motivation, or honesty to act in a way that supports company objectives. Skepticism around how much employees can be trusted extends to how much information is shared and when, both factors tightly controlled at the C-level and relaxed only on an "as needed" basis.
A command and control approach is too often driven by an end-over-means focus on short-term profits that can foster questionable and even dishonest behaviors. Occurrences like these drove Sarbanes-Oxley reforms nearly a decade ago, but the new regulations did not prevent disastrous financial outcomes during the most recent financial crisis.
b. Beyond Budgeting: empower and coach
By contrast, Beyond Budgeting is grounded in empowering and coaching. The core approach: results improve when management relinquishes control and allows business units and teams to leverage customer proximity and act autonomously on goals, plans, and initiatives.
The executive role shifts toward a coaching role characterized by entrusting business units and teams with executing on high-level goals - and then challenging and supporting them as needed.
Managers and employees are seen as trustworthy and entirely capable of assuming responsibility for actions and outcomes. They see their work from a holistic, partner-based vantage point, and their efforts are characterized by high levels of collaboration and cooperation.
Executive management supports high levels of access to needed information as this transparency is essential to better and quicker decision making, as well as enhanced accountability.
The empower and coach approach emphasizes the means or process of reaching goals. The core belief is that business units and teams will act in more responsible and accountable ways to support company growth and success.
2. Seat of authority: centralized bureaucracy vs. decentralized teams
Applying an empower and coach model drives the seat of authority out to the business units and teams most in contact with internal and external customers.
a. Traditional Budgeting: centralized bureaucracy
Under a Traditional Budgeting approach, authority is centralized at the top of a management bureaucracy. Objectives, plans, and initiatives are handed down through multiple levels of the organization, and business units and teams are micromanaged to deliver results aligned with these mandates.
This centralized management structure is a hungry beast that consumes enormous amounts of dollars, resources, and time just to support it. And the layers of management structure insulate executives from fast-paced market developments that can lead to missed opportunities and business going to competitors.
b. Beyond Budgeting: decentralized teams
With a Beyond Budgeting approach, power is delegated to decentralized business units and teams that are now empowered to act autonomously. Because these groups are closer to customers and engaged with them on a daily basis, they are more aware of shifts in customer needs and able to respond to these shifts more effectively and more quickly.
The Beyond Budgeting approach is a change in where decisions are made rather than a change in the structure of the organization itself. Charged with innovating and experimenting based on more intimate day-to-day customer interactions, front-line groups are empowered to obtain the resources they need, as well as the freedom to act as they see fit.
The result: decentralized, front-line groups deliver better products and services more quickly. Satisfied customers are more likely to turn into loyal advocates and long-term champions.
3. Performance measurement: fixed targets vs. relative targets
With Beyond Budgeting, traditional fixed targets are replaced by relative comparisons to peers, benchmarks, and best practices.
a. Traditional Budgeting: fixed targets
Under a Traditional Budgeting approach, executive management sets fixed targets and assigns them to the appropriate business unit or individual in a silo-like or standalone manner. Executives see fixed stretch targets - in budgets, service level agreements, incentives, and other key performance indicators - as the best way to predict and manage to desired results.
But unforeseen shifts in the economy, new competitor offerings, or other constantly changing market conditions can result in significant plan-to-actual variances. When this happens, the focus on end-over-means, short-term results can set the stage for questionable management and accounting practices.
b. Beyond Budgeting: relative targets
A Beyond Budgeting approach foregoes fixed targets in favor of relative targets. Contrasted with comparing business unit and individual performance to fixed budgets, service level agreements, and incentives, Beyond Budgeting compares team performance to dynamic and more relevant performance indicators like peer performance, benchmarks, and best practices.
The goal is not to meet or exceed rigid stretch targets, but rather to achieve success by cooperating as a team to continuously improve relative performance. Evaluation criteria are cooperatively developed using comparative, weighted metrics that lead to incentives based on these relative goals.
While both approaches seek improved performance and shareholder value, the paths to achievement are very different. Beyond Budgeting and its shift of authority to front-line business units and teams results in quicker and more agile responses to customer needs. Employees gain motivation and pride as they experience greater ownership of strategizing, planning, and executing on product and service delivery. The bottom line: companies applying the principles of Beyond Budgeting see continuous improvement in performance and shareholder value.
Perhaps this is a time for executives to take a deep breath and consider a business paradox: less bureaucratic control can yield better long-term results.
|
About the Author: Arthur Rothberg RSS for Arthur's articles - Visit Arthur's website Arthur F. Rothberg is Managing Director CFO Edge, LLC, a provider of outsourced CFO services. Based in Los Angeles, CFO Edge engages with CEOs and CFOs on demand to address strategic planning, business management, and day-to-day financial operations challenges. Art is a CPA, an attorney, and a formerly-seated chief financial office with over 35 years of diversified financial and executive leadership experience. Prior to founding CFO Edge, Art was a CFO Partner at Tatum, LLC, where he provided chief financial officer services to companies in transition. He also served as a Partner in Audit Services at McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. At Fusura, LLC, an AIG subsidiary, as Vice President and CFO, Art was responsible for accounting, treasury and finance functions, and he was Senior Vice President, CFO and General Counsel at Answer Financial, Inc. Art is a CPA licensed in California and New York, and he is admitted to practice law in New York. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public Accountants. He earned his Juris Doctor from Pace University and his Bachelor of Science in Accounting from NYU. Click here to visit Arthur's website Negotiating Fair Covenants Why Would a CFO Hire a CFO? Reinventing Your Company |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
3 Health Insurance Misconceptions
How to Improve Your Time Management
How To Improve Your CTA (Call To Action)
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



