Tweet

Africa’s Infrastructure-Incremental or Entrepreneurial?

Guest post by: Benin Mwangi

Article Overview: Ordinarily, when I run into the opening phrase, ” what Africa needs is…” my mind is then prepared to hear all manners of conjecture next-maybe because the phrase connotes one big homogeneous landscape, where there is uniformity throughout the furthest reaches of the continent. However, that all changed the moment that I stumbled onto Andrew Mack’s blog, yesterday. For his post seemed to start in a similar way, but what came next made a lot of sense to me. This post was inspired by a post on Ethan’s blog, however, Andy holds a slightly different view of the continents infrastructure related challenges.

Africa’s Infrastructure-Incremental or Entrepreneurial?

Ordinarily, when I run into the opening phrase, ” what Africa needs is…” my mind is then prepared to hear all manners of conjecture next-maybe because the phrase connotes one big homogeneous landscape, where there is uniformity throughout the furthest reaches of the continent. However, that all changed the moment that I stumbled onto Andrew Mack’s blog, yesterday. For his post seemed to start in a similar way, but what came next made a lot of sense to me. This post was inspired by a post on Ethan’s blog, however, Andy holds a slightly different view of the continents infrastructure related challenges.

And, oh before I get ahead of myself let me say a little bit about this blogger for those of you who may not be familiar with his work. Andrew Mack blogs at Andy’s World View, where he shares his insights derived from a proffesional development background spanning 20 years. During that time frame he has worked primarily in Africa as a banker and official for the World Bank. Presently he holds the title of founder and principal of AM Global.

The following excerpt from Andy’s Global View, captures the essence of his argument:

Incremental or not, what Africa needs is Entrepreneurial Infrastructure

He cites the logistical and budgetary problems of many nations as they seek to build out not just the famous “last mile”, but in cases like DRC, many of the basic earlier miles that need to be in place if a country wants to be connected – by road, by power grid, or by wireless. And, while he doesn’t dwell on one of the real reasons for this failure – Government disorganization or outright corruption – he hints at it as a driving force which creates both the space and the need for other approaches.

However, while the idea of incremental infrastructure is interesting, I would argue that at least to some extent, Ethan’s argument misses the larger point. It is not incremental infrastructure so much as “entrepreneurial infrastructure” that Africa needs and has shown it wants. Moreover, there are issues of economy of scale and policy. Consider the case of neighboring Uganda. In Uganda, cellphone licenses were bid out, encouraging competition, and cellphone use has grown from some 5,000 lines in 1998 to more than 2.6 MILLION today. The major carriers have invested – and made – millions, and I would argue, have done more for Uganda’s development than most of the major donors over the last decade. A licensing regime that favored incremental providers might have brought service to a few villages, but today, CelTel is the largest taxpayer in the country, serving the entire nation and recently, offering no-roaming service across the sub-region – in Kenya, Tanzania, and recently also in DRC. An incremental approach would not have been able to provide this service, pure and simple.

What we need to do is re-orient our thinking, I believe. Rather than focusing on the challenges – and there are many – we need to step out of our past frame and see the markets as what they are: big and underserved. What we need is not so much small (incremental) infrastructure as infrastructure that is constructed by people with an entrepreneurial mindset. If the Government of Kenya is prepared to invest in wiring classrooms and has both the scale and technical savvy to pull it off, that’s great. If the private sector can do it better, then the Government should act as facilitator. In some instances, a public-private approach will be the best.

There is one thing that I really like about Andy’s post. He hammers home the point that “incremental infrastructure” is not as scalable or may not be as efficient as entrepreneurial infrastructure. I also like that he points out that entrepreneurial infrastructure could allow a community or a nation to sidestep government inadequacies.

What I am not so sure about however, is his supposition that Ethan’s argument somehow diminishes the importance of entrepreneurship in Africa. In one sense what Ethan describes when he talks about over building for ones personal needs with the goal of selling extra capacity to your neighbors sounds like what some would call a cottage industry. In another sense, it seems like an affordable answer to supplying a need There is something deeper, though, which causes me to resonate with Ethan’s premise. There is an example that I was hoping Ethan would mention, while I read his post the first time-private security. In nations where the public security or police force is not meeting the demands of shop keepers within a small confined geographic area, I have heard of small groups of merchants pooling their funds to pay for private security. The interesting thing about it is that surrounding merchants or consumers who didn’t pay for the services derive nearly the same benefit from the heightened security and reduced crime as the businesses that paid. Another thing that I’d like to point out is that this solution does rely heavily upon the entrepreneurial function, yet if we use Ethan’s definition it is an incremental approach to building infrastructure. To me this would indicate that incremental and entrepreneurial infrastructure are necessarily mutually exclusive.

Now here is an excerpt from Ethan’s post, the one that inspired Andy’s writing:

My friend and colleague Mike Best has challenged me on the idea of whether the examples I’m offering are really “micro” enough. By that definition, he’s most interested in “picoinfrastructure”, ways that small communities can build data infrastructure for a few thousands of dollars, not the single-digit millions I’ve pointed to in my examples from the mobile phone business. The examples Mike is offering mostly outline a model of “self-provisioning”, one where you’re building a network to meet your own needs because no one else has built that infrastructure. Where self-provisioning meets incremental infrastructure, I think, is where you overbuild for your personal needs with the goal of selling that capacity to your neighbors. Mining and oil companies self-provision infrastructure all over the African continent. Visit a gold mining center in Ghana and you’ll find infrastructure that outpaces that in many secondary cities. But that infrastructure isn’t shared and resold - it might be vastly more cost-effective if it were, and would likely address some community concerns about the impact of extractive industries. That said, I can imagine incremental infrastructure being built at mini, micro and pico-levels. A farmer investing in water pumping equipment that could irrigate both his fields and neighboring fields might be builting pico-level incremental infrastructure, while a mobile phone company that built power plants to provide energy to mobile phone base stations, and used excess capacity to run irrigation pumps might be working on a micro or mini scale.

I guess what it may come down to is not whether one should use an infrastructural or and entrepreneurial approach, but when one should use an incremental versus an entrepreneurial approach. To me the answer to this question is-”whose paying?”. If the local government, assuming that a certain level of transparency and accountability exist, is accepting bids from private suppliers to build infrastructure; then we are talking entrepreneurial infrastructure. Whereas, if the government can’t or won’t be paying for the service but several smaller interests do have a tangible need for a specific type of infrastructure-like feeder roads; then the enterprising contractor might do well to approach these smaller interests and build the infrastructure in smaller increments as opposed to having no jobs at all.

In closing, I would say that both arguments make a great deal of sense. But in the end, I’d say that there isn’t a one size fits all approach to development and I can see areas where either would work.

That’s my take on it, what do you think?

Related Articles
  SMEs - a challenge for African countries
  Staying in the Entrepreneurial Mindset Online
  Building Entrepreneurial Communities is a 20 year journey
  Preserving the Entrepreneurial Mindset
  SME's - does protectionism help

Article Tags: Africa, Africa, Andrew Mack, Andy, entrepreneurial infrastructure, entrepreneurial infrastructure, infrastructure



Related Forum Posts
Re: Cash Comes from Creativity - Hi Yinka, Good post and a very Entrepreneurial approach if you like. It is true that with the every day gadgets, services and products that we use, it is easy to look at them just for what they are and not what they could be. We should always be on the look out for ideas that we can explore or existing products that we can maybe improve or re-design and that is also true with Internet Marketing. regards, Mal.
Re: Introducing myself, Scott Allison and Teamly - Sure, no problem GT. Here is some more about me: I founded my first business in my spare time while at University and since then entrepreneurship and business has become part of my blood. I am motivated by the desire to lead and build a valuable business using culture and values as a core foundation and to make products that make a difference to those who use them. I love entrepreneurship, and am keen to assist others fulfil their potential, that’s why I am on the board of non-profit, The Entrepreneurial Exchange, which aims to help entrepreneurs scale their high-growth potential business. I am also a volunteer business advisor to 18-25 year olds at the PSYBT, helping young kids who are just starting out. Prior to Teamly I was the managing director of abica, a remarkable business telecoms provider. abica was an exciting place to be with a clear vision of the future, and during that time I learned how to build and manage a great team, developed the company culture and core values, repositioned and re-branded the business, and delivered a new set of products to enhance long term shareholder value and bring in new recurring revenue streams. I left in October 2009, coinciding with the company winning a prestigious award for Excellence in Customer Service, which recognised the quality of our offering. My goal with Teamly is to be the leading online provider world-wide of teamwork software to small and medium sized businesses. I think the product we have built is the answer to the staff management issues a lot of new entrepreneurs are experiencing for the first time. Teamly's core purpose is to help businesses be more successful, and their people more aligned and effective through use of our online teamwork software.
Differences between men and women entrepreneurs - Hello Entrepreneurial Ladies, On another thread, someone asked me about the differences of coaching women entrepreneurs versus men. I thought it would be good to resurrect what I said here so you could comment about it. I'd love to hear what you identify with and what you might want to add. Obviously, there are some basic commonalities in entrepreneurial men and women. They just show up in different ways. My experience coaching men is limited, but I've certainly been observant to the differences. No one woman is the same, but I'll try to share a few things I've noticed are common to women. One thing I notice is that women are used to doing everything themselves and thus sometimes have a very difficult time delegating tasks. This can really hinder their success. For example, women will spread themselves too thin trying to keep up their business and do all their housework at the same time. (They forget they will be more effective when they take time to rejuvenate.) A man might find it a little easier to hire a housekeeper without being overloaded with guilt. [i:s1evs8gk]Guilt seems to be a woman's nemesis! [/i:s1evs8gk] A woman more readily puts herself at the bottom of her priority list. She sees the big picture and can be overwhelmed by the huge range of tasks at work and at home. Men seem to be more linear in their focus and are more apt to sacrifice their home life before they will sacrifice themselves. (Although they ultimately do sacrifice themselves when their whole life becomes all about work.) The caring nature of a woman can sometimes trip her up and she may be tempted to harden her heart so she can survive. She may even take on qualities which really aren't her personality and then struggle with the effects. The result is a business which doesn't really fit her original vision. She then wonders why she isn't satisfied with it, even if it is financially successful. Some women feel they need to become more "tough" and then hinder their creativity because they have stopped listening to what their inner voice is actually saying. This kind of creativity is key to the entrepreneur! I've also noticed that men expect to make a higher income. Women WANT a higher income, but don't always believe in the possibility. Believing in possibility is also key in moving forward with their ideas. I could say so much more, but this is a good start. I think I'll leave it up to someone else to contine. By the way, was there something in this that rang true to you as a woman? Warm regards, Tami
Re: Fashion - Nana, At you choice you may choose to research the fashion industry a bit more. There is obviously a Business side to it as well as a creative side to it. Find out all the types of roles that exist in the industry. Some that come to mind merchandiser, Window dresser, floor plan organizer (someone needs to determine the layout of a retail store to best sell the goods), fashion consultant (Yorkdale mall has fashion consultants that take you around and tell you what looks great on you - you also get a cut from the sales). This is what I've observed from the business side, you may know more. All these roles I've written about will help you grow as a business person and make the contacts in the industry...possible stepping stones. But further more you'll also notice that you need to develop some business acumen possibly tailored to the fashion industry. When I was at Ryerson I knew I wanted to be an entrepreneur someday too. I knew I needed some basic business courses to get a foundation to build from. I was in a Tech/Business Major (I'm sure Fashion has something similar - Fashion/Business Major) and then started to create my own minor. Here are some of the courses I took: Marketing, Law, Entrepreneurial, Management, consulting.. and a few more . Also, I'm sure that within the Fashion Major there are also courses you have to take where you can use your creative side and create designs. Typically within a Major there are focuses you can choose - ask the program coordinator. Your next step is to do some research. 1. Visit Commercial retail outlets like H&M, Banana Republic, or jacob. Tell the Manager your doing some research for University and would like to know what types of Corporate roles exist aside from the roles on the retail floor (like sales associates). If she asks you to elaborate then you can use some of the roles I mentioned above. 2. With this information in hand you can visit the Ryerson Fashion department and inquire with the Program Coordinator on what focus within the Fashion Degree would help you the most. In my program there were 5 different focuses within the Tech/Business program. Just a quick aside. A good friend of mine too has a dream of fashion. he want to create a niche fashion line tailored to skinny men (I can't mention the style). He's in Business school but not in the Fashion program... He's in International Business but all his Minor courses are tailored to running a successful business ... similar to the ones I mentioned above for myself. I have no doubt in my mind he'll make it 'cos his vision is that strong.
Focus Brings Long Term Results - Over the past 2 years of venturing out and running my own business and not working full-time in a job I have tried numerous business opportunities. I have tried businesses in providing student accommodation, share trading and options, renting and selling paddles to dragon boat clubs and selling toilet odour eliminator products online. This was opportunistic thinking and diminished my efforts as I got started by adding more work rather than focusing on one business. It was all very tempting to try and run them at the same time to see which one would take off. Unfortunately there was no focus and when times got tough I jumped across to work on the business that interested me more. Opportunistic Thinking Is Bad If you are like me and see that everything is possible and always keeping an open mind about business ideas, then you will find it irresistible to try new ideas. Trust me I’ve learnt the hard way. So how have I changed this? I’m a huge fan of Yaro Starak’s blog - entrepreneurs-journey.com and one day he wrote a post about his coach Rich Schefren who was launching a new coaching program. As usual most internet marketers have a system to launch their new products and give away a lot of free quality information that can be applied straight away. They do this so they can build rapport with you and show that their information is useful before they start their sales pitch on you. As I knew the information was free and they just wanted my email address, I downloaded Rich’s eBook, the “Internet Manifesto“. If you haven’t read it, I would recommend you get a copy of it immediately. The Change in Mindset After reading the “Internet Manifesto”, I had a profound moment that I would change the way I operate my business. My mindset went from “thinking opportunistic” to “thinking strategically” meaning if I wanted to build a long term business I would have to set up the right systems and hire staff to leverage my time. I realised that I couldn’t do everything myself. Rich’s famous flowchart accurately shows how most Solo Enterpreneurs run their Internet Businesseses today. (I’m one of them and have taken action to outsource a lot of my work since then) Rich Schefren's Internet Manifesto Since then I have taken action to sell my businesses that are not part of my goals and made a mental decision to not start new business opportunities. Focus Is Key Since I was compelled to find out more, I downloaded the rest of Rich’s series of books which are listed below: 1. Internet Manifesto 2. The Missing Chapter 3. The Final Chapter 4. Attention Age Doctrine Part 2 5. Maven Matrix Manifesto 6. The Entrepreneurial Emergency Through this series I learned that I needed to focus on one task at a time, not five at a time (today’s generation calls it multi-tasking). Making that shift helped me improve time efficiency and also get tasks completed that generated more money. Additionally, you need to use your strengths to focus on a task and learn to outsource the rest that you are not good at. This is the key to long-term success in any business. Tyrone Shum Focus Strategist


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Working Across Borders

Four Reasons Why Entrepreneurs Should Blog

Life is a Balancing Act!

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.