Feedback Form
Home Features Mastermind Videos About Advertise Blog Network Contact
   

Have A Suggestion?
Toronto Salsa Classes / Toronto Salsa Lessons Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
Have A Suggestion?

Featured Ebook


ebook Famous Entrepreneurs - Modern Empire Builders


Featured Ebook

More Evan Carmichael
Have A Suggestion?

Sales Lessons From Starbucks And Dell

5.2 Is it factor accumulation or total factor productivity that drives growth in Africa?: Economic Report on Africa 2007

 
African Accounts - Meet The Authors
Microfinance , Resource Microfinance Gateway
Resource
Gavin , Whythawk Ratings Gavin Chait
Whythawk Ratings
Makerere University , Resource Makerere University Business School
Resource
G Kofi , Annansi Chronicles G Kofi Annan
Annansi Chronicles
African Accounts - Meet The Authors
5.2 Is it factor accumulation or total factor productivity that drives growth in Africa?: Economic Report on Africa 2007
   

To investigate the link between growth and diversification, it was important to first quantify the contribution of TFP to economic growth. This section analyses the sources of growth for African countries using the standard growth accounting method, making it possible to disaggregate the shares of growth contributed by TFP, capital and labour. Growth in output is the sum of the growth in capital, labour and TFP. Capital accumulation is an essential element in the growth process, as it enlarges the economy’s capacity to produce. Increases in labour or labour force have traditionally been considered a positive factor in stimulating economic growth.

Technical progress through TFP is also important and is the main factor in the growth process. Advances in technology continue to stimulate growth in the rich industrial countries, especially as their population growth rates are close to replacement levels. In Africa on the other hand, there is accumulating evidence that it is factor accumulation that drives economic growth, with below-average contribution by TFP growth. Diversification is expected to have a positive contribution to TFP growth, and by extension, to economic growth. This report has identified the determinants of diversification and suggests that it may be possible to influence the rate at which TFP contributes to diversification and growth, by influencing these determinants.

Before decomposing the contribution of capital, labour and TFP to growth, it was necessary to find out the historical shares of capital and labour in Africa’s output.

As in other studies on Africa, the share of capital was found to be 0.39 and that of labour to be 0.61. Estimation of these shares allows us to see the growth that is not accounted for by labour or capital but by TFP.

Some results were derived from the growth accounting for individual countries for five-year averages from 1981 to 2000 (see Ben Hammouda et al. 2006a). The results confirmed that economic growth in Africa is driven by accumulation of the factors of production. The average contribution of TFP to growth is negative for the majority of African countries, with the exception of a few countries such as Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Senegal, Swaziland, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Another important result is that in the majority of countries, the contribution of TFP growth to growth was positive in the 1980s, especially for the period 198111985. By the early 1990s, most of them experienced negative contributions from TFP. Even for a country such as Botswana, the first half of the 1990s saw a negative TFP contribution. There was therefore a reversal in the sources of growth across the continent in that the TFP contribution declined significantly from the second half of the 1980s. In a good proportion of the countries, TFP contributed at least 30

per cent of the growth, and in some cases, more than half of the total growth. This clearly changed especially at the beginning of the 1990s and to a significant extent in the second half of the 1980s. Thus, in Botswana, except for the period 1991-1995, TFP contributed more than one-third of the growth. For Burkina Faso, in 198111985 and 1991-1995, TFP contributed half of the growth. Another important observation worth pointing out is that the period 1996-2000 witnessed a return to positive contribution to growth by TFP, although lower than its contribution in the 1981-1985 period.

How can one explain the transition of TFP contribution to economic growth from positive to negative? As indicated, it was in the late 1980s and early 1990s that the transition to negative TFP contribution occurred. To understand the causes of this transition, it is worth recalling that the stylized facts of African economic diversification indicate that the diversification efforts of the 1970s yielded favourable results as Africa entered the 1980s. The favourable though fragile results of the diversification efforts in the early 1980s correlated with the favourable growth results of the same period. Thus, the positive and significant contribution of TFP in the early 1980s explains the better diversification results at the time. However, these gains could not be sustained in the later years of the 1980s. Two explanations come to mind. First is the direct impact of the economic crises of the early 1980s itself and second is the fact that the adjustment measures addressing these crises had some constraining consequences.

The adjustment measures instituted to deal with the economic crises required stringent macroeconomic policies, which took the form of fiscal and monetary conservativeness. This meant, on the fiscal front, that countries had to make hard choices, such as cutting development expenditure and curtailing the rate of growth of private sector credit. Reduced development spending by the public sector and weak private sector investment might have led to the weakened TFP contribution to growth.

The tight macroeconomic policies reduced the flexibility to pursue diversificationenhancing programmes. This may have contributed to the transition from positive to negative TFP contribution to growth. In the next section, the link between diversification and growth through the TFP is explored and discussed further. The significance of this transmission mechanism is that it can validate the proposition that the hard macroeconomic choices that countries had to make to deal with the economic crises invariably affected the role of TFP in Africa’s growth, by undermining the diversification efforts at the time. To learn more about this author, visit United Nations Economic Commission for Africa's Website.

Like this article? Share it with your friends
[Get Copyright Permissions] E-Mail | Print | More  


Related Articles Related Articles
V. D. The Future of China-Africa Economic Relations: FACTORS INFLUENCING THE GROWING TIES
  China’s growing role in Africa is not transitory. As China-Africa economic relations are increasingly based on trade and investment, and trade is based on more than just commodities, the relationship is likely to ...
4.0 Diversification trends in Africa: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  The diversification of African economies is one way through which the recent economic growth achievements could be sustained. Africa’s economic transformation can be achieved through both horizontal and vertical d...
5.2 Growth, productivity and diversification: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  There is abundant literature that suggests that there is a two-way relationship between exports and growth. However, an important aspect of this evidence is that it is not just the level of exports that leads to g...
5.0 Diversification and Growth: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  The presentation in the previous chapter has painted a varied picture of the results of Africa’s efforts to diversify its economies. At the same time, regional differences between Africa, Asia and Latin America we...
6.0 The Way Forward: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  Policies for Achieving Diversification

Related Forum Posts Related Forum Posts
Re: need advice Re: need advice
Kiva Kiva
Re: New top Banner - my feedback Re: New top Banner - my feedback
Re: Government Grants; sources and experiences Re: Government Grants; sources and experiences
SEO forum category? SEO forum category?
Re: Boomers Are Not Bloggers Re: Boomers Are Not Bloggers
Giving back Giving back
Re: Retired Executives Re: Retired Executives

Related Forum Posts Related Businesses - Evan Elite Authors

The Evan Elite Authors program is currently in beta phase. For details please contact us.


 
About the Author


United Nations Economic Commission for Africa
(Visit United Nations's Website)
The United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) is the regional arm of the United Nations, mandated to support the economic and social development of its member States, foster intra-regional integration, and promote international cooperation for Africa's development.
Have A Suggestion?

View Author's Video
Become An Author

Free Downloads


United Nations Economic Commission for Africa's

Complete
List Of
African-Accounts
Articles


First Name
Last Name
Email
 
If you enjoyed this article, get United Nations Economic Commission for Africa's Complete List of African-Accounts Articles For FREE!
Become An Author