5.6 Deciding on the right approach: Enterprise solutions to poverty
5.6 Deciding on the right approach: Enterprise solutions to poverty
our model (viability, scaleability, business DNA
and Shell Group assets) to develop a ‘market entry’
strategy into the Ugandan and South African energy
SME sector. This strategy had four components:
to look for local sources of finance and business
know-how (DNA) as partners (because they are
better at delivering on our charitable objectives
than non-profits);
harness the convening power and other assets of
local Shell companies in ways that lowered the
risk to local capital getting involved in SME
financing;
organise the provision of financing and BDA
around the needs of the entrepreneur;
design our initial forays into the sector in ways
that would provide robust evidence, learning
opportunities and a strong demonstration effect
so that local capital would be willing to
undertake subsequent scale-up activities.
The evolution of the Investment Partnership
programme since 2002 first in Uganda and then
in South Africa has robustly tested and validated
the soundness of Shell Foundation’s approach by
delivering close to commercial returns from
investments in the risky SME sector.
Getting a foot in the right doors…
Having decided in Africa not to partner with nonprofits,
Shell Uganda and Shell South Africa’s local
knowledge helped the Foundation identify the
most promising partner candidates from among
the local financial institutions (FIs). But it was the
commercial credibility and convening power of
Shell that subsequently persuaded these FIs to
meet the Foundation to discuss the model.
Having got the banks’ attention, it was the packaging
of the Foundation’s funding and a sound
business plan that helped secure commitments
from local banks to join us at equal risk in
launching our funds.
In Uganda, DFCU Bank agreed to match the
Foundation’s $2m investment capital and agreed
to set up the $4m Uganda Energy Fund (UEF).
In South Africa, ABSA Bank and the Industrial
Development Corporation, each contributed
investment capital of $3.5m alongside $1m by
the Shell Foundation to create the $8m
Empowerment through Energy Fund (ETEF).
Because of the small size of these pilot funds, the
Foundation also provided a limited amount of
grant funding to cover start-up and ongoing
business development costs – a feature that will not
be necessary in the case of larger second-stage funds.
Another feature of the business plan that attracted
both sets of banks was that the funds were to be
commercially managed to achieve, as a prime
objective, financial viability of the funded
enterprises and the funds themselves.
This was starkly different from the developmental
goals the banks had previously been offered (and
rejected) to get involved with other SME funding
opportunities.Moreover, funded enterprises were to
be charged full commercial finance rates while the
banks were offered funds with a familiar seven-year,
closed-end structure but with net returns of 5%.
Such returns were clearly below normal commercial
expectations, but were still attractive to our banking
partners for two reasons. First, they were perceived
as realistic and attainable based on the size of the
market and risk conditions (compared with the
international rates of return some African venture
funds propose). Second, they were acceptable to
banks with a long-term view of investing in the
SME sector in order to grow their own business.
How Shell assets boosted bank
learning, market awareness and
deal flow
Having helped bring about a marriage between the
banks and the Foundation, Shell’s local knowledge
was brought further into play by introducing the
banks to the realities of SME energy sector
financing. This was achieved by providing the
banks with technical assistance relating to both the
supply and demand sides of the small scale and
rural energy sector.
In Uganda, this took the form of advising loan
officers about the financial risks related to various
energy technologies – an input hugely valued by
DFCU. And for ETEF in South Africa, Shell
became a useful source of client referrals – a critical
input to portfolio funds reliant on adequate deal
flow – while in both countries, fund governance
and marketing was strengthened with Shell support.
Another feature of the business model that proved
attractive to the banks and subsequently critical to
the success of the funds was the remit given to loan
officers on how and for what purposes the funds
could be used. Their broad specification was to
support SMEs that require energy-related inputs to
boost production or that sell pro-poor energy
services.
We put very few restrictions on the funds beyond
that, aiming to ensure they were flexible enough to
allow sufficient deal flow to make their portfolio
finance structure work. Hence the deal range was
broad: there were no restrictions on type of energy,
meaning all sources of energy could be financed
rather than just renewables (as was the case with
less successful funds); and non-energy assets could
be funded as well if they facilitated the productive
use of energy.
These criteria thus allowed the funds to support a
very broad range of SME activity. So, for example,
financing was provided that allowed small farmers
in eastern Uganda to acquire solar-powered
agricultural crop driers. And in South Africa, funding covered the capital costs incurred by an
enterprise that wanted to use the waste products
of shelled peanuts to make cheaper and cleaner
alternative briquettes to charcoal. (A full list of
enterprises assisted via our SME funds is available
at www.shellfoundation.org)
56 Deciding on the right approach Enterprise solutions to poverty - To learn more about this author, visit Shell Foundation's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
We took explicit account of this reality in adapting
our model (viability, scaleability, business DNA
and Shell Group assets) to develop a ‘market entry’
strategy into the Ugandan and South African energy
SME sector. This strategy had four components:
to look for local sources of finance and business
know-how (DNA) as partners (because they are
better at delivering on our charitable objectives
than non-profits);
harness the convening power and other assets of
local Shell companies in ways that lowered the
risk to local capital getting involved in SME
financing;
organise the provision of financing and BDA
around the needs of the entrepreneur;
design our initial forays into the sector in ways
that would provide robust evidence, learning
opportunities and a strong demonstration effect
so that local capital would be willing to
undertake subsequent scale-up activities.
The evolution of the Investment Partnership
programme since 2002 first in Uganda and then
in South Africa has robustly tested and validated
the soundness of Shell Foundation’s approach by
delivering close to commercial returns from
investments in the risky SME sector.
Getting a foot in the right doors…
Having decided in Africa not to partner with nonprofits,
Shell Uganda and Shell South Africa’s local
knowledge helped the Foundation identify the
most promising partner candidates from among
the local financial institutions (FIs). But it was the
commercial credibility and convening power of
Shell that subsequently persuaded these FIs to
meet the Foundation to discuss the model.
Having got the banks’ attention, it was the packaging
of the Foundation’s funding and a sound
business plan that helped secure commitments
from local banks to join us at equal risk in
launching our funds.
In Uganda, DFCU Bank agreed to match the
Foundation’s $2m investment capital and agreed
to set up the $4m Uganda Energy Fund (UEF).
In South Africa, ABSA Bank and the Industrial
Development Corporation, each contributed
investment capital of $3.5m alongside $1m by
the Shell Foundation to create the $8m
Empowerment through Energy Fund (ETEF).
Because of the small size of these pilot funds, the
Foundation also provided a limited amount of
grant funding to cover start-up and ongoing
business development costs – a feature that will not
be necessary in the case of larger second-stage funds.
Another feature of the business plan that attracted
both sets of banks was that the funds were to be
commercially managed to achieve, as a prime
objective, financial viability of the funded
enterprises and the funds themselves.
This was starkly different from the developmental
goals the banks had previously been offered (and
rejected) to get involved with other SME funding
opportunities.Moreover, funded enterprises were to
be charged full commercial finance rates while the
banks were offered funds with a familiar seven-year,
closed-end structure but with net returns of 5%.
Such returns were clearly below normal commercial
expectations, but were still attractive to our banking
partners for two reasons. First, they were perceived
as realistic and attainable based on the size of the
market and risk conditions (compared with the
international rates of return some African venture
funds propose). Second, they were acceptable to
banks with a long-term view of investing in the
SME sector in order to grow their own business.
How Shell assets boosted bank
learning, market awareness and
deal flow
Having helped bring about a marriage between the
banks and the Foundation, Shell’s local knowledge
was brought further into play by introducing the
banks to the realities of SME energy sector
financing. This was achieved by providing the
banks with technical assistance relating to both the
supply and demand sides of the small scale and
rural energy sector.
In Uganda, this took the form of advising loan
officers about the financial risks related to various
energy technologies – an input hugely valued by
DFCU. And for ETEF in South Africa, Shell
became a useful source of client referrals – a critical
input to portfolio funds reliant on adequate deal
flow – while in both countries, fund governance
and marketing was strengthened with Shell support.
Another feature of the business model that proved
attractive to the banks and subsequently critical to
the success of the funds was the remit given to loan
officers on how and for what purposes the funds
could be used. Their broad specification was to
support SMEs that require energy-related inputs to
boost production or that sell pro-poor energy
services.
We put very few restrictions on the funds beyond
that, aiming to ensure they were flexible enough to
allow sufficient deal flow to make their portfolio
finance structure work. Hence the deal range was
broad: there were no restrictions on type of energy,
meaning all sources of energy could be financed
rather than just renewables (as was the case with
less successful funds); and non-energy assets could
be funded as well if they facilitated the productive
use of energy.
These criteria thus allowed the funds to support a
very broad range of SME activity. So, for example,
financing was provided that allowed small farmers
in eastern Uganda to acquire solar-powered
agricultural crop driers. And in South Africa, funding covered the capital costs incurred by an
enterprise that wanted to use the waste products
of shelled peanuts to make cheaper and cleaner
alternative briquettes to charcoal. (A full list of
enterprises assisted via our SME funds is available
at www.shellfoundation.org)
56 Deciding on the right approach Enterprise solutions to poverty - To learn more about this author, visit Shell Foundation's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
its great!i got what i was looking for in just a click,thanx!
Commented on 56 Deciding on the right approach Enterprise solutions to poverty. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Leanne Hoagland-SmithAre your sales where you want them to be? Will you be one of the few who achieves sales or business success or one of the many who have failed to change? Are you tired of being told you are like everyone else? Then you may find my first book on sales of interest. Be the Red Jacket in the Sea of Gray Suits, The Keys to Unlocking Sales available at Amazon or at http://www.processspecialist.com/red-jacket.htm. This book is a reflection of my no-nonsense approach to improving sales to overall business results. If you are truly committed to making sustainable changes, then I can help you secure a positive return on your investment because I focus on executable solutions not telling you the problems you already know you have. From training to corporate (group) coaching to executive one on one coaching, my approach is to assess, create awareness, build a goal driven action plan and then execute. The bottom line question is "Not do you or your employees know it, but do you or they want to do it?" Please call for a free strategy session at 219.759.5601. - Visit Leanne Hoagland-Smith's Website |
|||
Kim CastleWith nearly two decades in the advertising and design business, with clients like Domino's Pizza, General Motors, Direct TV, Pedigree, Wolfgang Puck, Higher Octave Music, Hollywood Celebrity Products, Disney, and Paramount, as well as thousands of entrepreneurs around the world define, structure, communicate, and position their business for greater profits, BrandU(R) co-creators Kim Castle and W. Vito Montone discovered that entrepreneurs could experience the same power that big brands command for a fraction of the cost with the world's only process-based results-drive Integral approach to business creation. BrandU(R) is helping entrepreneurs grow with the power of extreme clarity from idea...to brand...to market(TM) and helping one million entrepreneurs become successful and whole so that they can make a difference in the world. Are you one of them? If you want to experience clarity all the way to the bank(TM), get started now at http://www.brandu.com. - Visit Kim Castle's Website |
|||
Linda RichardsonLinda Richardson is the Founder and Executive Chairwoman of Richardson, a global sales training and performance improvement company. As a recognized leader in the industry, she has won the coveted Stevie Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sales Excellence and she was identified by Training Industry, Inc. as one of the “Top 20 Most Influential Training Professionals.” Ms. Richardson is credited with the movement to Consultative Selling and is the author of ten books on selling and sales management, including Sales Coaching — Making the Great Leap from Sales Manager to Sales Coach, and Stop Telling, Start Selling. She teaches sales and management at the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania and the Wharton Executive Development Center. Linda is a frequent speaker at industry and client conferences, has been published extensively in industry and training journals, and has been featured in numerous publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Nation’s Business, Selling Power, Success, and The Conference Board Magazine. Learn more about Richardson's sales training and performance improvement solutions at http://www.richardson.com web - Visit Linda Richardson's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Shell's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
|
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 DCJA Consultancy Case Study Professional Networking Instant Direct Mail Evolution of Networking Radical Green Business |
|
 | ||
 |
Write The PR
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Top 50 Blogs For Startups
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
