Tweet

2.2.1 Training provision, outputs and impacts: Contributory factors

Written by: International Labour Organization

Article Overview: There are a number of additional factors that have further compounded the pervasive concerns about lack of impact and re-orientation. In particular, there is considerable confusion about what exactly "training to overcome economic vulnerability" actually refers to and the availability of hard evidence on training provision, outputs and impacts continues to be 'lamentable' (CINTERFOR, 1998).

2.2.1 Training provision, outputs and impacts: Contributory factors

There are a number of additional factors that have further compounded the pervasive concerns about lack of impact and re-orientation. In particular, there is considerable confusion about what exactly "training to overcome economic vulnerability" actually refers to and the availability of hard evidence on training provision, outputs and impacts continues to be 'lamentable' (CINTERFOR, 1998).

2.2.1 Training provision, outputs and impacts

There is an extraordinary lack of good quality, comprehensive data about the provision of training to the poor and the outputs and impacts of this training effort which, in itself, amounts to an information crisis. Not surprisingly, therefore, most attempts to review the global experience of training for the poor are characterised by sweeping, unsubstantiated observations, generalisations and recommendations and chronic anecdotalism,(2) with most reports recycling the same examples of successful and unsuccessful interventions(3).

Both ministry-based training institutions and NGOs and other private sector providers are equally culpable. Despite the alleged superiority of NGO training interventions, there is no evidence to suggest that they are any better at monitoring and evaluating outputs and impacts. Out of a total of 30 international NGOs who were asked as part of this study to provide evaluations of training and other skill development projects, not one was able to furnish any robust evidence.

Given this paucity of information, it is not possible to draw any solid conclusions about recent trends in the provision of training to well delineated target groups. However, a proper enumeration of all types of training activities that directly and indirectly impact on the poor would almost certainly reveal a far greater level of training provision than is commonly assumed.(4).

It is frequently stated that social and private returns to training for the poor are low, but there is little or no hard evidence to support these claims. The alleged limited net benefits to training are in striking contrast to the claims that are repeatedly made with respect to primary education and other interventions in support of the poor (most notably micro credit). What is interesting here is that the evaluation playing field is so uneven. Since most training interventions for the poor are assumed to have measurable and fairly immediate income and productivity pay-offs, it is normally expected that they should be rigorously evaluated. However, usually intractable methodological problems make it virtually impossible to measure the actual impacts of individual primary education projects. Thus, faute de mieux, as long as the outputs of primary education projects are reasonably good, it is usually assumed that the medium-long term impacts will be broadly in line with the social rates of return and externality evidence.

Moreover, since poverty is correctly seen as the consequence of unequal relations in different institutional arenas (the household, community and the state), it is widely believed (at least implicitly) that primary education (particularly for girls) has greater potential for changing these social relationships than training. In fact, because of the prevalence of stereotyped training for women, these kinds of training activities have been criticised for actually reinforcing the subordination of women.

There are a number of reasons for the paucity of information about training outcomes and impacts. These include fragmented provision, the complexity of evaluation methodologies and lack of commitment.

Fragmented provision: Even in quite small countries, training activities in support of the poor are widely dispersed across very large numbers of public and private organisations. Not only is reporting by local NGOs to parent organisations or funders partial and rudimentary, it is equally rare for governments to maintain any kind of basic data base on formal training courses and other types of training services offered by individual ministries.

Private sector training centres have burgeoned in many countries during the last decade. Public training provision has been unable to keep pace with demand (especially among school leavers) and governments have lowered regulatory barriers to entry for aspiring training entrepreneurs. Many private training centres are not registered and, even among those that are, little is usually known about the training that is offered and the clienteles that are served. It has been suggested that 'back yard' training is affordable for the poor and widespread, particularly in urban areas. However, this training is often indistinguishable from on-the-job training, and formal provision (where fees are payable for discrete 'courses') is probably quite limited, especially in rural areas.(5)

Evaluation methodologies: Evaluating training programs is very complex. This gives rise to a number of serious methodological problems which, invariably, are not properly dealt with. In particular, attribution of the precise impact of training activities is virtually impossible when a package of services are made available (credit, tools, technical assistance, training courses). And, given the current "fascination with micro-finance" (Buckley, 1997) there is a real danger that credit may take all (or certainly more than its fair share) of the credit! Selecting a control group in order to compare training and no-training outcomes is also often very difficult and is frequently not done well. Similarly, the nature and incidence of 'displacement effects' are usually ignored altogether.

Tracer surveys of individuals once they have completed their training are essential. However, formal surveys of representative samples of graduate trainees are rare and low response rates invalidate the results of most that are undertaken.

Evaluation commitment: Most donor-supported training projects are formally evaluated. However, evaluations are usually undertaken too soon after projects have finished to be able to assess the extent to which there have been sustainable impacts on the well being of trainees. Rigorous evaluations are too time consuming and expensive for most projects. Moreover, there is usually little incentive to undertake them since it is the immediate post-project evaluation that is most critical in securing additional resources and project extensions.

EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
PAPERS
43
Learning to change: Skills
development among the
economically vulnerable and
socially excluded in
developing countries
Paul Bennell
Employment and Training Department
International Labour Office Geneva
First published 1999

Related Articles
  Training vouchers for Jua Kali enterprises in Kenya
  Do you need a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Program
  4.1 The potential for training interventions: The demand for training
  Executive Summary: Learning to change
  5.1 Is there a poverty reduction crisis? Training outputs and impacts

Article Tags: conclusions, confusion, development projects, economic vulnerability, evaluations, global experience, hard evidence, international ngos, interventions, limite, ngo training, paucity, private returns, private sector providers, provision, robust evidence, skill development, superiority, target groups, training institutions



Related Forum Posts
7 words or less for Structogram - Some "7 words or less" (more or less) for Structogram for your comments: Training to get your message across(6) Secrets to get your message across (6) Training so people will listen to you (7) Helping you get your message across (6) Training to learn to get your message across (8) Communications training for yourself and your team (7)
Re: Franchise Territories - [quote="litekepr":24ik1lrb] Any franchises that I'm familiar with have a territory or distance provision that prevents franchisees from overlapping their territories. [/quote:24ik1lrb] Quizno's didn't have this provision included in their UFOC. Some Quizno's owner ended up having another Quizno's restaurant a few blocks away, which of course doesn't make sense at all. I believe they have now changed their UFOC, and their general franchise policy.
Franchise Territories - [quote="franchisebrief.com":1dfdbmhp]This information will be included in the UFOC. If the UFOC states that there is no protected territory, then I would be suspicious. If UFOC states that each franchisee will have its own territory, then there should not be any problem.[/quote:1dfdbmhp] Any franchises that I'm familiar with have a territory or distance provision that prevents franchisees from overlapping their territories. This is only a problem when you have an underproducing franchisee - but they should also have a provision to give a franchisee a set amount of time to make a go of the location and territrory. Shri
Poll: How many search results do you analyze of competitors - If you are trying to emulate your competition or let's say a competitor who is in the top search results you may examine certain factors in the SERPs such as keyword usage in the Title Tag, on page factors like keyword density, keyword prominence or keyword proximity in the body text, plus other on page factors. I know quite a few students of SEO like to do this as a way to improve their own search visibility. Here is this Poll question. If you were to examine competitors within the top results, how far down the list of SERPS would you care to explore for various factors?
Re: Website Ranking Optimization - You are right SEO is a combination of many factors. This is because the Google algorithm considers 100s of ranking factors. SEO can be learnt with plenty of research and over time if you continue optimising you will get results. As with anything do-it-yourself it can take longer. A professional will have the experience to know how to show results fastest, which is essentially if you want to make money quicker.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

How To Calculate A Minimum Fee For Your Services

12 Principles to Spark Innovation

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.