Tweet

Executive Summary: Learning to change

Written by: International Labour Organization

Article Overview: In the context of mass poverty in most developing countries, the critical role of training in furnishing badly needed skills to improve productivity, incomes and equitable access to employment opportunities seems particularly obvious and straightforward.

Executive Summary: Learning to change

In the context of mass poverty in most developing countries, the critical role of training in furnishing badly needed skills to improve productivity, incomes and equitable access to employment opportunities seems particularly obvious and straightforward. Certainly, pronouncements abound on the fundamental importance of skills and capacity building in the development process, especially in the fight against poverty. However, a particularly striking feature of most poverty reduction strategies in developing countries is that the role of vocational education and training (VET) in its wide variety of forms is largely absent. This neglect is puzzling not only because of the extent of absolute poverty in most countries, but also because it is widely accepted that training is an essential instrument of public policy, especially for the most vulnerable groups in society. For many, it is precisely because the vast potential of training has not yet been realised that the role of VET has become so marginalised in most poverty reduction strategies. We are confronted, therefore, by what looks like a major contradiction: Just as governments and donors have begun to give due recognition to the need for concerted efforts to build the human assets/capabilities of poor, training is being accorded less and not more importance.

The main objective of this paper is to analyse the reasons for this alleged failure of national VET systems to provide the main target groups among the poor with the knowledge and skills needed to increase significantly their productivity and incomes. With such a large literature on training to overcome economic vulnerability in both developing and developed countries, one may wonder whether this is really necessary. However, despite widespread concerns about the performance of training institutions, particularly in the public sector, remarkably little attention has been focused on trying to understand the precise nature of this training crisis, and, more important still, what should be done to resolve it.

The first part of the paper focuses on the two main dimensions of this crisis, namely the failure to re-orient 'training systems' to support the poor and the limited outputs and impacts of most training interventions. While in many countries, low impact and limited reorientation are closely inter-related, the failure to separate clearly between the two has resulted in considerable confusion. Given the received wisdom that training for the poor has had fairly limited impact and training systems have not been reoriented to meeting the need of the poor, the key question is 'what is the scope for improvement with respect to both these dimensions of the training crisis?'

The paper discusses why the prevailing mood amongst most expert commentators is so pessimistic. Two types of pessimism are identified. 'Training impact pessimists' maintain that training interventions for the majority of the poor are only ever likely to be effective under the most exceptional circumstances. Consequently, there is little point in trying to reorient public training systems in support of these groups. Instead it is better to concentrate on areas of training that have high pay-offs (which are mainly in the formal sector) and provide other types of support for the poor (such as micro credit, primary education and health services) that have much greater impacts on poverty reduction. 'Training system pessimists', on the other hand, argue that, while the training record has not been good, considerable scope still exists to develop training interventions that can effectively address the skill needs of the poor. However, this can be achieved on a mass scale only if training systems are themselves comprehensively reformed. Their pessimism stems, therefore, from their assessment of the poor prospects for significant re-orientation of national training systems in the foreseeable future. Of particular concern is that, while the number of people living in absolute poverty continues to grow, the capacity of the state to support appropriate training appears to be declining in many developing countries. More generally, given dwindling resources and other pressing demands for training services from other sectors, there is a sense of being overwhelmed by the enormity of the skills challenge in support of the poor.

The report also considers other factors that have further compounded the pervasive concerns about lack of impact and/or re-orientation. In particular, there is considerable confusion about what exactly "training to overcome economic vulnerability" actually refers to and the availability of hard evidence on training provision, outputs and impacts, in itself, amounts to an information crisis. A clear distinction is made between the traditional formal training courses of both public and private sector providers and new types of 'participatory skill development' that emphasise the distinctive nature of skill formation among the poor and are premised on the belief that the poor already have many of the skills they need in order to improve their productivity and incomes. The efficacy of group empowerment is also central to this more radical approach.

The last part of the paper considers some of the main reforms that are needed in order to create a 'pro-poor' national training system. It is argued that the need for fundamental reform of VET provision in most developing countries is compelling and should, therefore, be addressed by governments and all other major stakeholders as a matter of urgency. However, remarkably little serious attention has been devoted to analysing what exactly the main features of a pro-poor training strategy and related national system should be. Current debates are excessively preoccupied with the 'higher' skills needed to achieve international competitiveness in a rapidly globalising world economy. The ILO should take the lead in initiating a more balanced and well- informed dialogue about skills development for the economically disadvantaged and socially excluded. The ILO's own conventions and recommendations on training will need, therefore, to be carefully scrutinised. It is suggested that serious consideration should be given to the formulation of new international labour standards (convention and recommendation) that specifically address training for the poor and other disadvantaged groups.

In thinking about what a pro-poor training strategy should look like, two sets of issues are considered in detail, namely overall resource availability and the development of the training system itself. The main functional components of this system (governance, planning, funding and actual delivery of training services) are discussed.

There is an emerging consensus that skills development for the poor must be part and parcel of community-based economic and political development. Communities need to mobilise around specific "development alternatives" that address key political, social, and economic constraints. Skills delopment should be driven by a 'people-centred' pedagogy' which mximises locally available skills and empowers the poor to learn for themselves. Support for skills development should be directly linked to the actual skills needs of the poor and, invariably, will need to be closely related to on-going production activities. However, many of the key characteristics of market-driven VET reform strategies can and should be incorporated into the design of pro-poor training strategies. In particular, the state should perform a largely regulatory and facilitatory role while actual training provision should, wherever possible, be contracted out to independent training providers.

EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
PAPERS
43
Learning to change: Skills
development among the
economically vulnerable and
socially excluded in
developing countries
Paul Bennell
Employment and Training Department
International Labour Office Geneva
First published 1999

Related Articles
  When Should You Write the Executive Summary of Your Business Plan?
  Sales Proposal Executive Summaries: Don¡¦t ¡K Unless
  Your Business Plan - Keeping Your Executive Summary Clear and to the Point
  Part 1: The Executive Summary
  How to write a killer business plan executive summary.

Article Tags: absolute poverty, capacity building, concerted efforts, critical role, developed countries, due recognition, economic vulnerability, fundamental importance, human assets, main objective, mass poverty, poverty reduction strategies, precise nature, pronouncements, striking feature, target groups, training institutions, vet systems, vocational education and training, vulnerable groups



Related Forum Posts
$1000 and a stupid idea - [quote="OmnivoreInk":8mkh1lv7]Bill and Heidi Dittmar: Executive Lifestyle founders of a magazine called Executive Lifestyle. Started in 1991. Revenue has grown more than 200% since 2004. 4 full time, 3 part time employees "We started off with $1,000 and a stupid idea." It began as This Month, a guide for tourists, and morphed into Executive Lifestyle.[/quote:8mkh1lv7] Hi Barbara, I find this story about Bill and Heidi Dittmar's success to be especially interesting! Would you happen to know what the catalyst or tipping point was for their change from a guide for tourists to an Executive Lifestyle magazine? Thanks
Re: Business Women Peer Mentoring Spotlight - Hi Everyone, Gosh, I REALLY appreciate your concrete feedback. This was far more than I expected and I'm glad you said what you thought straight out. Each of you have shared something of value and I want to take some more time to think and really go over what each of you have said. However, I can see there are some things I need to change right away. What an interesting point about a NEW program perhaps making people think they are guinea pigs! This is NOT what I want to convey! It's funny how we can see some things so clearly in others while not always seeing it for ourselves! I must admit there are a few things I've been meaning to change (like my bio which is very outdated). Obviously, these things need to be higher on my priority list. You caught me like the plumber who puts his clients first and doesn't get around to fixing his own tap! As far as my target market, I do feel quite strongly about working with Women Leaders and doing Leadership Coaching with them. It's non-negotiable in my books. In my Executive Coaching training, the terms "Leaders" and "Executives" are interchangable. To me, an Executive is a Leader and so is the Business Woman or Entrepreneur who is CEO of her own business. I love working with decision makers! What I did learn is that I need to avoid opening up the Leadership term beyond what I described above. I'm also wondering if there is a misunderstanding with the general public as to what Leadership Coaching really is. Leadership Coaching is all about developing your leadership skills, both as a people manager and in more effectively running and growing the business. There is ALWAYS room for growth in some way. As well, sometimes, we just need a sounding board to clarify what our next BEST step is. In fact, if a woman thinks she has nothing to work on, then we aren't a good Client/Coach fit anyway. How can she grow if she doesn't see the value of expressing ALL of the great ability within her? How can her company grow if she doesn't see the value of strategic planning for the next best level? Thanks again to you all! I will go back to my website and really question whether I am conveying the right message. I got more than I bargained for in this Spotlight... you generously offered way more than I was asking. I think we could be on to something great for the Forum. Now it's time to let someone else have the spotlight. It would be great if everyone took a turn! In gratitude, Tami
ARTICLE: Performance coaching in the workplace - To create lasting performance change it is necessary to first understand the positive and negative influence that a person’s personal behaviors has on their execution and what impact these have on their ability to achieve success. Only when we fully understand a person’s behavioral patterns and create positive self-managing coaching strategies can we assist a person to create lasting performance change. The vast majority of employers believe coaching can deliver significant benefits to both individuals and organizations. The majority of employers plan to increase the use of coaching over the next few years, according to a new survey by the Institute of Personnel and Development. Nearly nine out of ten interviewed companies expect their managers and supervisors to deliver performance coaching as part of their day-to-day work. In another large industry-wide study it was found that most managers reported that they were confident in their ability to coach. However, the study also showed that the managers’ actual skills levels as coaches were typically poor. As a consequence they were not nearly as effective in their coaching as they believe themselves to be. Often times, they believed that coaching consisted of just providing 1-to-1 instructional feedback to their staff members on what to do in a given situation to perform better. Many recent studies have shown that technical skills only represent at best 20% of the contribution into our performance. The remaining 80% comes from our ability to choose or make a decision, assertiveness, commitment to grow, ability to concentrate, honesty, optimism, persistence, ability to perform well under stress and so on. These traits are commonly called our soft skills or attitude. Few managers understand just how deeply rooted their own behavior patterns are, let alone how to positively change them in other people. Performance coaching is frequently confused with other types of coaching, such as Executive coaching and Life coaching. Performance coaching is a form of Directive coaching. Executive coaching and Life coaching are both forms of Non-directive coaching. Directive coaching is usually more suitable for a manager who sometimes acts as a coach. Performance coaching in the workplace has developed immensely from what it was only 4 years ago. To choose the right coach will make a huge difference. You also better make sure to know what you want. If your coach knows what (s)he is doing – you will get on your way to get it! [i:38tu5pgr]- Peter J Karlsson[/i:38tu5pgr]
5 Entrepreneur's success stories - My local paper's business section profiled 5 successful entrepreneurs in the Jan 6, 2008 issue of the paper. Thought I'd share just a bit of it here. Bill and Heidi Dittmar: Executive Lifestyle Jeff Wassmer: Spectrum Deloise Hawkins, Star Whitaker and Lenzy Hill: Touch of Elegance Stephen Brosius: Advanced Door Systems Pam Watson: Goodrich and Watson Insurers Bill and Heidi Dittmar: Executive Lifestyle founders of a magazine called Executive Lifestyle. Started in 1991. Revenue has grown more than 200% since 2004. 4 full time, 3 part time employees "We started off with $1,000 and a stupid idea." It began as This Month, a guide for tourists, and morphed into Executive Lifestyle. Jeff Wassmer: Spectrum Company specializes in computer network security and intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance. Wassmer was an 11-year Air Force guy, so he had "ins" in order to form this business. Deloise Hawkins, Star Whitaker and Lenzy Hill: Touch of Elegance Founded business in 1994. 12 employees. Their company designs and plans an average of 25 events each month in Hampton Roads and other parts of Virginia. Stephen Brosius: Advanced Door Systems Started company in 1995. 5 full-time employees, plus subcontractors. After having worked as a subcontractor for others in the construction business for 20 years, he decided to start his own business. Pam Watson: Goodrich and Watson Insurers At age 49, she was approached by an insurance colleague to buy out their employer's insurance division. They did so, and became employers themselves., witj 4 full-time people.
Re: Starbucks: Licensing vs Joint-Venture - Its "growing pains" on a successful franchise level. If you think about it, could anyone have actually ever predicted Starbuck's most recent outcome? They are now struggling to do something they did so well all along, simply change, or at least alter what direction they were headed. No matter what your idea of where your business should be is, for the future, outside determining factors will most certainly change - its your ability to change and follow the natural business course (if there is one) that then becomes significant. Simply, have a good idea of what it is you want to be in business, but don't force out change along the way. Adapt to it, or at least try and learn to adapt to the change.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Are You Too Good for Your Job?

Online Business Ideas: A Look At Various Options

Soda Vending Machine = Energy Hog

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.