2.3 Looking for Financial Sustainability: Microfinance in Africa - Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries
2.3 Looking for Financial Sustainability: Microfinance in Africa - Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries
The technologies described above, based on the formalization of informal techniques and on
group-based instruments, have been used to promote financial sustainability of MFIs. They
have the advantage of addressing a number of problems faced by financial institutions when
operating with the poor or with the informal sector, for example, asymmetry of information,
lack of collateral, and difficult enforcement of legal rights.
The linking of savings and credit programs is often used as a way to overcome the problems
caused by asymmetry of information between lenders and borrowers, and by the borrowers’
lack of collateral, although this limits the flexibility in allocating loanable funds. In
particular, the weakest performers could drag down the performance of the entire group.
However, by making the group responsible for loan recovery and repayment, peer pressure
acts as a substitute for collateral. MFIs can then save on transaction costs and increase the
repayment rate. Hence, group-based microfinance techniques may also be viewed as a
response to portfolio performance problems experienced with individual loans. At the same
time individual lending technologies have also been successfully adapted to the microfinance
context. In Ghana for example, the RCBs had initially focused on standard commercial loans
to individuals and experienced a high volume of non-performing loans, but they later
improved performance by adjusting the terms of the loans, generally to short-term (4-6
months), and by requiring weekly repayments, and retaining a compulsory up-front savings
of 20 percent as a security.
Group lending with joint liability tends to encourage self-selection and group formation
among good credit risks, addressing partially the problem of imperfect information faced by
the lender, and thereby lowering the overall risk of the group lending scheme. This is because
the risk of a potential default by any one individual is borne by the whole membership. A
number of limits/risks may exist in group lending schemes with joint liabilities, where the
behavior of one individual may affect the repayment of the group as a whole:
• First, under a group lending scheme, the burden of risk borne by an individual
member of the group is higher than it would have been under a limited liability
scheme. Thus for a group lending-scheme to be the preferred alternative to a limited
liability scheme, the gains from lower overall risk under the former would have to
outweigh the default risk that borrowers pass on to the nonborrowers of the group
lending scheme.
• The second risk is a contagion effect whereby a default by one borrower affects the
credit rating of the group as a whole and causes it to default.
• The third risk is a coordination failure problem as individual borrowers have an
incentive to default when they expect other individual members of the group to fail.
This may prompt a default of the group even when all its members are solvent.
Some mechanisms have been designed to reduce the risk that individual behavior may
impose on the group as a whole. Sequential lending, when loans are provided sequentially to
different sub-groups of borrowers participating in a given group lending scheme, is one
example, that reduces contagion and coordination failure risks.6 Also, self-selection leads to
the formation of groups of relatively safe borrowers, hence limiting the transfer of risk from
the group to the individual borrower. One concern is that group lending schemes have been
argued to be overly conservative in risk-taking, selecting only the safest projects.
The obvious critical issue is whether MFIs have achieved financial sustainability, at least in
the sense of achieving “break-even” in their current operations, if not also in fully covering
their investment costs. There is little hard data available for African MFIs to answer this
question, and one has only partial data at best. There is some evidence that MFIs are able to
improve their financial performance, if they have autonomy over their management
decisions; are allowed to set their lending and deposit rates to maintain a spread consistent
with profitability; are vigilant in their efforts to avoid or reduce the incidence of
nonperforming loans; and focus on addressing their capacity and skills supply constraints.
• In Benin, following the financial rehabilitation programs of 1989-93 and that
launched in 1999 (described below in Box 4), many SLCs were able to substantially
expand their deposits and loan portfolios, recover their nonperforming loans, and
achieve break-even or positive net profits in their current operations.
• In Ghana, the performance in the rural microfinance (RMF) sector is reported to
have improved in recent years. The combination of (i) a more commercial
approach, (ii) a restructuring of the sector through re-capitalization and capacitybuilding,
and (iii) strengthened regulation contributed to reduce drastically the
proportion of distressed RCBs. At the level of S&Ls and credit unions, weak
financial performance, mostly due to a welfare focus and policies of low interest
rates, was reportedly improved through a greater commercial focus supported by
better management and financial reporting. From 1996 to 2001, the proportion of
“unsatisfactory” credit unions declined from 70 percent to 60 percent and that of
those in the worst categories from 42 percent to 15 percent.
• In Guinea, the four existing MFIs are reported to have strengthened their financial
performance over the period 1997–2003. They achieved this by lowering the share
of non-performing loans (NPLs) in their total credit and raising their lending rates, and improved their prospect of achieving a more sustainable financial position. The
share of NPLs in the four MFIs was considerably lower than that of the commercial
banks, and with the aim of achieving financial sustainability, the MFIs maintained a
wider interest rate spread than that prevailing in the banking sector.
23 Looking for Financial Sustainability Microfinance in Africa Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries - To learn more about this author, visit International Monetary Fund's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
(IMF Working Paper, Prepared by Anupam Basu, Rodolphe Blavy, and Murat Yulek1, September 2004)
The technologies described above, based on the formalization of informal techniques and on
group-based instruments, have been used to promote financial sustainability of MFIs. They
have the advantage of addressing a number of problems faced by financial institutions when
operating with the poor or with the informal sector, for example, asymmetry of information,
lack of collateral, and difficult enforcement of legal rights.
The linking of savings and credit programs is often used as a way to overcome the problems
caused by asymmetry of information between lenders and borrowers, and by the borrowers’
lack of collateral, although this limits the flexibility in allocating loanable funds. In
particular, the weakest performers could drag down the performance of the entire group.
However, by making the group responsible for loan recovery and repayment, peer pressure
acts as a substitute for collateral. MFIs can then save on transaction costs and increase the
repayment rate. Hence, group-based microfinance techniques may also be viewed as a
response to portfolio performance problems experienced with individual loans. At the same
time individual lending technologies have also been successfully adapted to the microfinance
context. In Ghana for example, the RCBs had initially focused on standard commercial loans
to individuals and experienced a high volume of non-performing loans, but they later
improved performance by adjusting the terms of the loans, generally to short-term (4-6
months), and by requiring weekly repayments, and retaining a compulsory up-front savings
of 20 percent as a security.
Group lending with joint liability tends to encourage self-selection and group formation
among good credit risks, addressing partially the problem of imperfect information faced by
the lender, and thereby lowering the overall risk of the group lending scheme. This is because
the risk of a potential default by any one individual is borne by the whole membership. A
number of limits/risks may exist in group lending schemes with joint liabilities, where the
behavior of one individual may affect the repayment of the group as a whole:
• First, under a group lending scheme, the burden of risk borne by an individual
member of the group is higher than it would have been under a limited liability
scheme. Thus for a group lending-scheme to be the preferred alternative to a limited
liability scheme, the gains from lower overall risk under the former would have to
outweigh the default risk that borrowers pass on to the nonborrowers of the group
lending scheme.
• The second risk is a contagion effect whereby a default by one borrower affects the
credit rating of the group as a whole and causes it to default.
• The third risk is a coordination failure problem as individual borrowers have an
incentive to default when they expect other individual members of the group to fail.
This may prompt a default of the group even when all its members are solvent.
Some mechanisms have been designed to reduce the risk that individual behavior may
impose on the group as a whole. Sequential lending, when loans are provided sequentially to
different sub-groups of borrowers participating in a given group lending scheme, is one
example, that reduces contagion and coordination failure risks.6 Also, self-selection leads to
the formation of groups of relatively safe borrowers, hence limiting the transfer of risk from
the group to the individual borrower. One concern is that group lending schemes have been
argued to be overly conservative in risk-taking, selecting only the safest projects.
The obvious critical issue is whether MFIs have achieved financial sustainability, at least in
the sense of achieving “break-even” in their current operations, if not also in fully covering
their investment costs. There is little hard data available for African MFIs to answer this
question, and one has only partial data at best. There is some evidence that MFIs are able to
improve their financial performance, if they have autonomy over their management
decisions; are allowed to set their lending and deposit rates to maintain a spread consistent
with profitability; are vigilant in their efforts to avoid or reduce the incidence of
nonperforming loans; and focus on addressing their capacity and skills supply constraints.
• In Benin, following the financial rehabilitation programs of 1989-93 and that
launched in 1999 (described below in Box 4), many SLCs were able to substantially
expand their deposits and loan portfolios, recover their nonperforming loans, and
achieve break-even or positive net profits in their current operations.
• In Ghana, the performance in the rural microfinance (RMF) sector is reported to
have improved in recent years. The combination of (i) a more commercial
approach, (ii) a restructuring of the sector through re-capitalization and capacitybuilding,
and (iii) strengthened regulation contributed to reduce drastically the
proportion of distressed RCBs. At the level of S&Ls and credit unions, weak
financial performance, mostly due to a welfare focus and policies of low interest
rates, was reportedly improved through a greater commercial focus supported by
better management and financial reporting. From 1996 to 2001, the proportion of
“unsatisfactory” credit unions declined from 70 percent to 60 percent and that of
those in the worst categories from 42 percent to 15 percent.
• In Guinea, the four existing MFIs are reported to have strengthened their financial
performance over the period 1997–2003. They achieved this by lowering the share
of non-performing loans (NPLs) in their total credit and raising their lending rates, and improved their prospect of achieving a more sustainable financial position. The
share of NPLs in the four MFIs was considerably lower than that of the commercial
banks, and with the aim of achieving financial sustainability, the MFIs maintained a
wider interest rate spread than that prevailing in the banking sector.
23 Looking for Financial Sustainability Microfinance in Africa Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries - To learn more about this author, visit International Monetary Fund's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
John AlexanderJohn has taught keyword research and SEO skills to small groups of business owners and Webmasters from over 80 different countries world wide since 2002. John is also the Director of Search Engine Academy ; Co-director of Training at Search Engine Workshops offering live, SEO Workshops with his partner SEO educator Robin Nobles, author of the very first comprehensive online search engine marketing courses at SEO Training Online and the SEO Workshop Resource Center. I look forward to hearing from you! - Visit John Alexander's Website |
|||
Jay Kubassek(Jay's Full Bio: EvanCarmichael.com/jaykubassek) In five years, Canadian-born entrepreneur Jay Kubassek went from selling mufflers at a Midas franchise to revolutionizing Internet marketing with the 2004 launch of CarbonCopyPRO, a online marketing education company, now worth over $20 million with customers in over 160 countries.
As an independent film producer, his upstart film fund Aliquot Films is currently producing a films with Spike Lee and Abel Fererra (starring Ethan Hawke and Dennis Hopper.)
Jay's entrepreneurial spirit is irrepressible. He’s the owner of five companies, a professional speaker and trainer, international real estate developer/investor, extreme sport enthusiast and emerging philanthropist. Jay resides in NYC with his wife Jamie, son Milo and dog Cooper. Visit Jay's official website: www.JayKubassek.com - Visit Jay Kubassek's Website |
|||
Kim CastleWith nearly two decades in the advertising and design business, with clients like Domino's Pizza, General Motors, Direct TV, Pedigree, Wolfgang Puck, Higher Octave Music, Hollywood Celebrity Products, Disney, and Paramount, as well as thousands of entrepreneurs around the world define, structure, communicate, and position their business for greater profits, BrandU(R) co-creators Kim Castle and W. Vito Montone discovered that entrepreneurs could experience the same power that big brands command for a fraction of the cost with the world's only process-based results-drive Integral approach to business creation. BrandU(R) is helping entrepreneurs grow with the power of extreme clarity from idea...to brand...to market(TM) and helping one million entrepreneurs become successful and whole so that they can make a difference in the world. Are you one of them? If you want to experience clarity all the way to the bank(TM), get started now at http://www.brandu.com. - Visit Kim Castle's Website |
|||
Cheryl MatthynssensCheryl is a life skills coach, licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor and a 20 year entrepreneur. Cheryl's dedication to achieving a life of balance led to her expanding her teaching from the simple managing of life's daily challenges to adding financial well being as well. A direct marketer with DrinkACT, she is gaining ground in the online community with her concepts of making sure business owners, entreprenuers and employees have well rounded life styles. She opened up a small affiliate site - The Balance Guide- to help others find resources for mental and emotional well being. Visit Cheryl's blog to see more of the diversity beyond business she has began offering online at www.thebalanceguide.blogspot.com - Visit Cheryl Matthynssens's Website |
|||
Stephanie RobeyStephanie Robey is President and CoFounder of Pivot Positive, LLC - an Internet marketing business focused on helping people start work at home ventures. Previously, she was employed at The Search Agency with over 20 years experience in graphic design and 10 years experience in online marketing. She was responsible for launching the Conversion Path Optimization (CPO) unit where she and her team have conducted hundreds of optimization tests for online companies across multiple verticals. She is a successful entrepreneur having started and sold 2 companies and remains on the board of directors of the third, PhotoSpin.com Stephanie began her career in the direct marketing realm creating and producing direct mail for many of the major cable television companies and directly attributes her understanding of Internet marketing to those early offline experiences. Stephanie is a graduate of San Diego State University with a BFA in Graphic Arts and also holds an Executive MBA from the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University. Read Steph's Blog Meet Steph and Dave Sign up for our Free 7-Day BootCamp: Self Employed & Rich - Visit Stephanie Robey's Website |
|||
Anne BarrAnne Barr has over 26 years experience in sales and marketing, six years as a franchisee. She has assisted over 367 business owners and purchasers to achieve their goals in career change, transition and exit strategy. She holds the designation of Certified Franchise Executive from the International Franchise Association, Certified Business Intermediary from the International Business Brokers Association and Board Certified Broker from the Texas Association of Business Brokers. Anne is active in professional organizations, networking groups and volunteers for non-profit entities. As owner/operator of four successful businesses, Anne has proven people skills and enjoys helping clients find the right "fit" in business ownership. Visit www.FranchiseOpportunitySpecialist.com for more information about me and my company. - Visit Anne Barr's Website |
|||
John PowerJohn Power, founder of Biltmore Franchise Consulting, has extensive experience developing and marketing franchises and business opportunities. He has been in and around franchising for over twenty years. From 1980 through 1990 he conceptualized, organized, and developed the American Video Association. He grew AVA to 2,000 national members, before selling the company it 1990. It was later merged into another home video marketing company. From 2000 to 2005 he worked as a contract marketing and human resources consultant to several local and national companies. In 2005 Mr. Power began working as a franchise development consultant on a full-time basis. Since that time he has helped more than three dozen companies initiate and develop their franchising program. He notes that there are many companies interested in developing a franchise program, and who need his specialized assistance. Mr. Power is a “hands-on” franchise consultant. He said, “I am the ‘nuts and bolts’ person who tends to the details for my clients.” Mr. Power holds a B.S. degree with a major in Marketing. See: www.biltmorefranchise.com You may contact Mr. Power at: jpower@biltmorefranchise.co - Visit John Power's Website |
|||
David AchesonDavid Acheson is the founder of DCJA Consultancy. DCJA Consultancy is a management consultancy business specialising in B2B sales consultancy. They offer bespoke and packaged sales consultancy including Sales Optimisation Review, Interim Sales Management, Sales & Marketing Review, 1:1 Sales & Management Staff Analysis, Management Training, Solution Sales Training, Creation of New Pay Plan, KPI's, run Customer Feedback Campaigns, assist with Recruitment, Coaching, Appraisals and set up Strategic Marketing Campaigns. David spent his early career in accountancy and then moved into sales in 1982, working in Office Equipment, IT, Advertising, Training, Outsourcing and Consultancy. He has held many Senior Positions in SMBs and Global Organisations including Head of Sales Operations & Head of Business Development. His knowledge, skills and great experience of the Sales Industry has led to David making keynote speeches and running educational sessions to key businesses through organisations including The Chamber of Commerce and Business Link. - Visit David Acheson's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to International's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
|
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Instant Press Release Opposing a Franchisor’s Motion Setting Priorities Worksheet Law of Attraction in Action Measure Customer Loyalty |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 Blogs For Startups
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | |
 |
Email The Reporters
Press Release Builder | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||