Tweet

PAPER WRAP-UP: Beware of Bad Microcredit by Steve Beck and Tim Ogden

Guest post by: David Satterthwaite

Article Overview: In their short article published in the Harvard Business Review, Steve Beck and Tim Ogden warn that, though microcredit programs can be highly effective, companies need to exercise caution before investing in them because of the risk for such investments to backfire, both from a social development and a public relations standpoint.

PAPER WRAP-UP: Beware of Bad Microcredit by Steve Beck and Tim Ogden

By Steve Beck and Tim Ogden. Harvard Business Review, September 2007, Vol. 85 Issue 9, pp 20-22, 2 pages

In their short article published in the Harvard Business Review, Steve Beck and Tim Ogden warn that, though microcredit programs can be highly effective, companies need to exercise caution before investing in them because of the risk for such investments to backfire, both from a social development and a public relations standpoint.

Increasingly, companies are investing in microcredit initiatives as part of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) systems. They are attracted by the seemingly endless upsides: the prospect of alleviating poverty, the non-handout ideology of helping poor entrepreneurs help themselves and the lure of regaining their investments, thus helping more people with less money.

Mr. Beck and Mr. Ogden speak from experience when they state that microcredit has the potential to be effective in increasing school enrollment, empowering women, improving nutrition and increasing household incomes. The two currently work at Geneva Global, a seven-year-old charitable investment advisory firm that encourages its philanthropist clients to invest in, among other ventures, responsible microcredit programs. Mr. Beck is the CEO and Mr. Ogden is the Chief Knowledge Officer. Currently, Geneva Global has USD 58.3 million in client investment, 126 worldwide staff, and investments in 110 countries. According to the article, in the past three years, they have brokered investments in over 150 microcredit providers.

But, this article argues that despite the hype, poverty is resistant to silver bullets. Though a plethora of heart-warming case studies exists, there is little systemic evidence suggesting that microcredit borrowers escape poverty directly, quickly or frequently. While there is a shortage of data demonstrating the benefits of microcredit, there is also evidence that some programs may actually exacerbate problems by spiraling borrowers further into debt.

In a recent analysis by MIT’s Poverty Action Lab, researchers Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo evaluated dozens of studies on the economic habits of the poor. Their findings indicate that, regardless of country or continent, very little of each additional dollar of disposable income is spent on any kind of investment, or even on food and shelter. This confirms what many heads of microfinance institutions (MFIs) have admitted privately and what John Hatch, the founder of FINCA International, has said publicly-90 percent of microloans are spent on current consumption, not on stimulating enterprise. The authors cite Bangladesh as an example of the low impact that microcredit has on development. In 1991, Bangladesh was ranked 136th on the UN Development Programme’s Human Development Index. In 2006, despite high microcredit penetration (one in four households had a microloan in 2001), Bangladesh was ranked 137th.

The dangers of bad investment are twofold. From a social development perspective, investment in ineffective microcredit programs siphons funds from the best programs and threatens their continued operation. From a corporate public relations standpoint, companies that make low-value or harmful investments risk attack for the impact of their CSR activities. Recently, many companies have been exposed for attempts to “green wash.” As reporters cover more and more stories on failed microcredit ventures, organizations may receive bad press for “poverty washing.” Experts in the industry are also increasingly wary of the sweeping promises of microcredit. In this environment, an investment in the wrong microfinance provider could not only fail to help borrowers escape poverty, but also taint the reputation of even the most well-intentioned investor.

There are several promising trends in the industry, including improvements in outcome measurement and reporting, influx of capital with precise financial and social benefits requirements and growth of commercial MFIs with the scale and discipline to drive down costs of service delivery. These trends are just emerging, and, as in any program, expert due diligence is critical.

The main challenge for CSR leaders looking to make informed investments in microcredit is still the lack of standardized, easily accessible, outcome-based measures that would foster better decision making.

In order to make the best possible investments, the authors encourage leaders and their organizations to do three things.

1) Insist on a set of clearly-defined measures of success (income growth, quality of housing, school enrollment and nutrition) and be willing to pay for the measurement.

2) Invest in improving the effectiveness of the entire microcredit industry, for example, by supporting literacy training for borrowers or improving access to technology that decreases the cost of lending.

3) Seek out opportunities to support small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in regions of poverty.

Ultimately, the article concludes, businesses that create stable jobs and strong economies are the only proven poverty reducers.

Related Articles
  Mad Marketing TV featuring Steve Gershik of 28Marketing
  Branding 101 | Why EVERY Executive Needs a Good About.Me Profile
  Innovation Creates Leaders - Sales and Marketing Tips
  What is microfinance? FAQ
  When is microfinance NOT an appropiate tool? FAQ

Article Tags: advisory firm, article argues that, borrowers, chief knowledge officer, client investment, corporate social responsibility, effective companies, empowering women, evidence suggesting that, harvard business review, household incomes, increasing school, microcredit programs, philanthropist, plethora, poor entrepreneurs, school enrollment, silver bullets, steve beck, worldwide staff



Related Forum Posts
Re: Buy An Established Affiliate Marketing Website - Hi David and GT, thanks for posting this here. My site is going for way below value and will be a great deal for someone. The links provided are a great resource for anyone looking to buy and sell websites. The Internet is all about information and you can know what you are getting before you buy. It's a little better than days past where it was "Buyer Beware". Steve
How to Do Great Marketing with (Amost) No Money - I've given this presentation to CEOs many times. Now i can share it with you. But I cannot because I do not yet have 20 posts. Jeff Ogden, President Find New Customers
Re: Citizen Journalism: There's no such thing - This clearly shows that if Steve Jobs sneezes the price of the stock will drop. Since Apple is a great company why do they have to link the rise and fall of the stock to one man? So eventually when Steve passes on what is going to happen to Apples stock?
Re: What If Steve Jobs Hadn't Returned To Apple In 1997? - Thanks for sharing with us Yinko. Steve Jobs is definitely a visionary. Not only his products are innovative in a technological sense, but he's managed to turn a tech-company's products into a lifestyle.... a lifestyle!! [quote:zfqoq43n]Fast Forward to today. Apple has the sexiest products in the business: iMacs, Macbooks, iPhones, iPods and more.[/quote:zfqoq43n] I think not only tech would be different (music players and phones), but ways we can think of marketing and branding. What Steve Jobs did was of course no easy task for the smaller businesses, but he did start somewhere. What I did not know was that Apple is worth about as much as Google. How do you think Apple accomplish what they did? In terms of strategy wise? If you could advice Steve on one thing, what would it be?
Re: Citizen Journalism: There's no such thing - [quote="ideasuniversity":2zpdpyk9]This clearly shows that if Steve Jobs sneezes the price of the stock will drop. Since Apple is a great company why do they have to link the rise and fall of the stock to one man? So eventually when Steve passes on what is going to happen to Apples stock?[/quote:2zpdpyk9] That's a very good point. He needs to appoint a successor now or in some way affirm that the company will exist even if he goes under!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Halloween Howl Seven by Author Paige Agnew

Live To Work Or Work To Live?

Adapting to Technology and the Internet

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.