Tweet

Why do MFIs charge such high interest rates to poor people? FAQ

Written by: Microfinance Gateway

Article Overview: Providing financial services to poor people is quite expensive, especially in relation to the size of the transactions involved. This is one of the most important reasons why banks don't make small loans. A $100 dollar loan, for example, requires the same personnel and resources as a $2,000 one thus increasing per unit transaction costs. Loan officers must visit the client's home or place of work, evaluate creditworthiness on the basis of interviews with the client's family and references, and in many cases, follow through with visits to reinforce the repayment culture. It can easily cost US$25 to make a microloan. While that might not seem unreasonable in absolute terms, it might represent 25% of the value of the loan amount, and force the institution to charge a “high” rate of interest to cover its cost of loan administration.

Why do MFIs charge such high interest rates to poor people? FAQ

Providing financial services to poor people is quite expensive, especially in relation to the size of the transactions involved. This is one of the most important reasons why banks don't make small loans. A $100 dollar loan, for example, requires the same personnel and resources as a $2,000 one thus increasing per unit transaction costs. Loan officers must visit the client's home or place of work, evaluate creditworthiness on the basis of interviews with the client's family and references, and in many cases, follow through with visits to reinforce the repayment culture. It can easily cost US$25 to make a microloan. While that might not seem unreasonable in absolute terms, it might represent 25% of the value of the loan amount, and force the institution to charge a “high” rate of interest to cover its cost of loan administration.

The microfinance institution could subsidize the loans to make the credit more "affordable" to the poor. Many do. However, the institution then depends on permanent subsidy. Subsidy-dependent programs are always fighting to maintain their levels of activity against budget cuts, and seldom grow significantly. They simply aren't sustainable, especially if other microcredit operations have shown that they can provide credit and grow on the basis of “high” rates of interest—and along the way serve far greater numbers of clients.

Evidence shows that clients willingly pay the higher interest rates necessary to assure long term access to credit. They recognize that their alternatives—even higher interest rates in the informal finance sector (moneylenders, etc.) or simply no access to credit—are much less attractive for them. Interest rates in the informal sector can be as high as 20 percent per day among some urban market vendors. Many of the economic activities in which the poor engage are relatively low return on labor, and access to liquidity and capital can enable the poor to obtain higher returns, or to take advantage of economic opportunities. The return received on such investments may well be many times greater than the interest rate charged.

Moreover, the interest rate is only a small part of their overall transaction cost of credit, and if microfinance institutions offer credit on a more accessible basis, substantial costs in terms of time, travel, paperwork, etc. can be reduced, thus benefiting the poor. A long series of studies has shown that many programs that charge subsidized interest rates end up using rationing mechanisms to distribute credit in response to excess demand. These mechanisms cause the borrower to have to “jump through hoops”, increasing the time and money s/he must put out to get the loan. In fact, these transactions costs are frequently higher than the interest costs, which takes away the advantage to the borrower of the interest rate subsidy. However, while increased access to credit for the poor on a long term and sustainable basis can bring significant benefits, MFIs must continue to work to improve efficiency levels, and to increase scale. This will bring down the cost of providing loans, and the benefits transferred to the poor in terms improving loan products, better access to loans, and lower borrowing costs.

Related Articles
  Interest Rates: Tenets of Micro-credit for Poverty Reduction
  Institutional and Operational Arrangements of Micro-finance Institutions
  Micro-finance Policy and Development Framework: Malawi
  Targeting women: Tenets of Micro-credit for Poverty Reduction
  2.2 Formalizing Informal Methods of Financial Intermediation: Microfinance in Africa - Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries

Article Tags: credit, credit, credit, credit, credit, credit, credit, interest rate, interest rate, interest rate, interest rates, Interest rates, interest rates, interest rates, loans, loans, loans, loans, microfinance institution, transaction cost



Related Forum Posts
Re: How's the Canada SBLA lending market doing? - this study found that yields on capital leases were usually higher , sometimes considerably higher , than the interest rates , even with fees added , that rates banks typically charge SME borrowers. more specifically , the SBLA requires that bank lenders charge interest at a maximum rate of 3.0 percent above prime. however , yields on leases vary from 1.9 to 6.9 percent above going prime rate. The amounts of lease financing are consistent with the terms of the SBLA: * the average principal amount being lease financed is less than $250,000; * capital amounts are usually for less than $100,000.................
Re: Gap Between Rich and Poor Widens - The problem ultimately becomes that the rich have access to more through their wealth, like the education one needs to get a good, high paying job, while the poor don't. The poor face a number of challenges (aside from just a lack of wealth) that the rich don't. For example, due to the enormous amount of stress that is usually associated with the sorts of jobs that low-income people can secure, they tend to get sick frequently. Which means that they will either have to miss work or the performance at their job will suffer. Not to mention the hopeless feeling that comes along with working a dead end, minimum wage job. It doesn't surprise me that the gap between the rich and poor is widening to the point that people are starting to take notice. How to fix it however, I have no idea. While I know that some people would jump at the chance to earn more and possibly get the education that they need to get a better job, I know that others would find a way to scam the system and not do anything to better their situation at all. It's a vicious cycle.
Who's best for first time commercial loan? - I truly hope you can prove me wrong on this. If you do, please post your experience for others to benefit from. I think you will be VERY disappointed in the types of financing available to small businesspeople. The SBA is one way to go, but it requires that you put money down and allow them to put leins on everything you own, from your home to your underwear. As for true "commercial" loans, the banks I've spoken to won't even consider it if you've been in business less than 2 years. Even then, they try hard to channel it into an SBA program if they can (because of the partial loan guarantee.) So, basically, the answer near as I can figure is that nearly nobody provides true commercial lending to new endeavors. If you really want a shock, you should see the interest rates that small businesses pay on unsecured small-business loans once they do qualify. Double digit interest rates are more the rule than the exception. You'd be better off taking cash advances at intro rates on your credit card. You might seek sources of venture capital. Allow yourself a repayment provision whereby you buy out initial investors at their initial investment plus a reasonable rate of return.
Very little for small businesspeople - I truly hope you can prove me wrong on this. If you do, please post your experience for others to benefit from. I think you will be VERY disappointed in the types of financing available to small businesspeople. The SBA is one way to go, but it requires that you put money down and allow them to put leins on everything you own, from your home to your underwear. As for true "commercial" loans, the banks I've spoken to won't even consider it if you've been in business less than 2 years. Even then, they try hard to channel it into an SBA program if they can (because of the partial loan guarantee.) So, basically, the answer near as I can figure is that nearly nobody provides true commercial lending to new endeavors. If you really want a shock, you should see the interest rates that small businesses pay on unsecured small-business loans once they do qualify. Double digit interest rates are more the rule than the exception. You'd be better off taking cash advances at intro rates on your credit card. You might seek sources of venture capital. Allow yourself a repayment provision whereby you buy out initial investors at their initial investment plus a reasonable rate of return.
Lease out the Building - I would just lease out the building, as you could charge higher rates with the Wal-Mart across the road. You have much less stress then, and then you would if you had to run your own business as well.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Quick Tips on Buying a Business

Looking for an Easy Online Business Opportunity?

Smart & Simple Internet Techniques

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.