|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Measuring and managing social performance
Written by: id 21Article Overview: In recent years donors and practitioners have demonstrated a renewed interest in and commitment to understanding how to reach poor people effectively, assess their level of poverty, and judge the social performance of MFIs.
![]() |
Free Download - Sustained growth with equity is needed to halve poverty in Africa By id 21 |
Measuring and managing social performance
In recent years donors and practitioners have demonstrated a renewed interest in and commitment to understanding how to reach poor people effectively, assess their level of poverty, and judge the social performance of MFIs. However, for all the public and increasingly private money that flows to microfinance, there has been limited guidance on how to reach, serve, and have a positive and sustainable impact on the lives of poor and very poor people. It is time MFIs realise and deliver on this vision by becoming more responsible for who they reach and how.
There is growing evidence and recognition that serving poor people requires more intentional outreach to those living below a nation's poverty line. However, matching intent with action requires strong management commitment to improving the lives of poor people through better incentives, leadership, communication, and culture. It also requires effective use of information systems - electronic or manual methods of systematically collecting, analysing and acting on information in a timely manner.
Prizma - an MFI in Bosnia and Herzegovina - faces the challenge of serving people impoverished by war and economic transition. Prizma has sought to strengthen its social performance by building greater understanding of the nature of poverty among staff, management and the executive board. It has also shaped its organisational culture around a pro-poor social mission, designing appropriate incentives to align staff behaviour with this mission, and developing systems to assess the poverty status of clients and changes in this status over time. Prizma uses a scorecard that is integrated in its automated management information system (MIS) to assess and monitor the poverty status of new clients. This has helped to identify ways in which clients were inadvertently excluded from its services as a result of existing policies, procedures, or the design of its products. Other MFIs such as LAPO (Lift Above Poverty Organisation) in Nigeria use a poverty-scoring tool while CARD (Centre for Agriculture and Rural Development) in the Philippines combines several poverty targeting and assessment approaches for similar purposes.
Measuring performance
Use of information systems is fundamental to MFIs' ability to measure and enhance their financial performance. However, using information systems to monitor the profile of incoming and departing clients and drawing out historic data to analyse trends over time can also yield other critical insights. This can show who an organisation is reaching, who it is leaving behind, and what the effects and role of its financial and non-financial services are in the lives of the people it serves. Existing information systems represent a critical resource to measure and strengthen social performance. Rather than gather large amounts of information, emphasis on the collection and use of a few select robust social indicators of clients' poverty status and changes in this status is more useful. By using select indicators institutions can control their existing systems rather than create new ones to balance:
accuracy of results with practicality of their use
proving impact with improving their practices
internal with external stakeholder information needs
cost-effectiveness with timeliness of information.
Managing performance
Several factors are particularly important to understanding and enhancing social outcomes that signal potential longer-term impacts on client, including the need to:
be aware that program design determines whether poor people will access services
ensure focus and clarity of purpose about the primary role of the institution
build management and board commitment to serving poor people with intent
shape organisational culture and staff incentives to support clients' well-being
identify clear indicators for measuring social and financial performance
emphasise vision and mission when recruiting, inducting and training all staff
train management and non-management staff to influence social performance
provide regular, transparent reporting on social performance to all staff.
Prizma has identified these factors through an intensive process to re-evaluate its primary social purpose, which may well have important lessons for other MFIs worldwide.
Social performance management: 6 questions
MFIs committed to social as well as financial performance need to have clear answers to the following questions:
What are your social performance goals?
How do you monitor who uses and who is excluded from using your services?
How do you assess the effect of these services on clients?
How do you assess the reasons why some clients leave?
How do you use your social performance information to improve your services and achieve your social goals?
How do you review and seek to improve the quality of the systems and processes through which you answer these questions?
By clearly defining who to reach, the quality and nature of services to be provided and the intended benefits to clients and non-clients, MFIs will be better able to design strategies to achieve them.
Sean Kline
Freedom from Hunger
1644 DaVinci Court
Davis
CA 95616
Article Tags: automated management, bosnia and herzegovina, developing systems, donors, economic transition, leadership communication, management commitment, management information system, mfi, mfis, organisational culture, poverty line, poverty status, private money, scorecard, social performance, staff behaviour, staff management, strong management, timely manner
|
About the Author: id 21 RSS for id's articles - Visit id's website id21 is a fast-track research reporting service funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). It aims to bring UK-based development research findings and policy recommendations to policymakers and development practitioners worldwide. Click here to visit id's website Managing tradeoffs Assessing social performance costeffectively Microenterprise and the mobile divide The wider impacts of microfinance Gone with the Flow |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Live To Work Or Work To Live?
Why We MUST Reinvent The Wheel
A Guide to Franchise Financing
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



