Threats, opportunities and incentives for pro-poor innovation
Threats, opportunities and incentives for pro-poor innovation
One response has been to turn the perceived threat into a challenge — to harness the power of big business through public-private partnerships (PPPs). The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative is one example - a global not-for-profit PPP working to speed up the development of a vaccine to prevent HIV infection and AIDS.
But poor people have the weakest voice in defining understandings of public need, from which pro-poor policies are formed. Public policy to support growth and innovation thus largely ignores employment generation and the scope for technological paths that support 'pro-poor' growth. This shows the importance not just of the public sector holding the private sector to account, but of the public sector itself being accountable to poor people.
The globalised world can offer opportunities for pro-poor innovation — fair trade and ethical goods markets, for example, offer opportunities for pro-poor innovation without having to compete directly with corporate giants or the new Asian powers.
Local knowledge
Rather than tending towards a uniform knowledge, the world holds many types of knowledge. Local knowledge is crucial for survival, but for poor people to be agents of their own development, it is not enough. Innovation concerns the production and application of knowledge. The production of knowledge is achieved by exposing what we know to what we do not know. In this sense two kinds of knowledge network are potentially important inputs to pro-poor innovation:
Networks (local, national or international) where people in the same sector, such as farming, can share and compare their knowledge.
Networks where people in different knowledge domains share and compare their understandings of problems or challenges they have in common.
Motivation
For the potential of pro-poor innovation to be realised, motivation is required. Volunteered motivation is not enough: institutionalised incentives are also needed.
In the public sector, the incentive for pro-poor innovation is linked ultimately to some form of democratic accountability. This is important if PPPs are put forward. Governments are unlikely to make serious demands on the private sector if they are not committed themselves.
Innovation is an essential element of the capitalist economy, where market competitiveness and profit-seeking are the incentives. But corporate business will engage in pro-poor practices if they are seen, for example, to enhance brand image locally or amongst well informed consumers globally.
Employees motivated by the 'professional challenge' of contributing to a better world can be found in the private and public sectors:
Pride in doing a good job and the contribution to a greater social good is important for organisations like UK-based group Engineers Against Poverty, or firms conscious of their corporate responsibility such as design consulting engineers, Arup.
UK municipal authority engineers working with counterparts in Uganda found themselves inspired, and reminded of how the great public works in the UK in the 19th century defined their profession and built its status.
Our unequal, globalised world poses major challenges for pro-poor innovation, for which the mechanism of PPPs is not necessarily the answer. There are opportunities, however, because of our ability to communicate globally. Our different types of knowledge are a potential source of joint learning: a good start would be to leave behind old knowledge divides, such as local versus global, and scientific versus lay. We need instead to build on key incentives for pro-poor innovation.
Gordon Wilson
Development Policy and Practice, Faculty of Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Threats opportunities and incentives for propoor innovation - To learn more about this author, visit id 21's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Many advocates of pro-poor innovation fear a globalised world that is exploited by large corporate enterprises and powerful countries, now including China and India. Perceived threats include loss of local knowledge and powerlessness of low income economies and their enterprises in the face of cheap goods produced elsewhere. Pro-poor innovations, such as drought- or disease-resistant crops or effective and cheap drugs are often not prioritised.
One response has been to turn the perceived threat into a challenge — to harness the power of big business through public-private partnerships (PPPs). The International AIDS Vaccine Initiative is one example - a global not-for-profit PPP working to speed up the development of a vaccine to prevent HIV infection and AIDS.
But poor people have the weakest voice in defining understandings of public need, from which pro-poor policies are formed. Public policy to support growth and innovation thus largely ignores employment generation and the scope for technological paths that support 'pro-poor' growth. This shows the importance not just of the public sector holding the private sector to account, but of the public sector itself being accountable to poor people.
The globalised world can offer opportunities for pro-poor innovation — fair trade and ethical goods markets, for example, offer opportunities for pro-poor innovation without having to compete directly with corporate giants or the new Asian powers.
Local knowledge
Rather than tending towards a uniform knowledge, the world holds many types of knowledge. Local knowledge is crucial for survival, but for poor people to be agents of their own development, it is not enough. Innovation concerns the production and application of knowledge. The production of knowledge is achieved by exposing what we know to what we do not know. In this sense two kinds of knowledge network are potentially important inputs to pro-poor innovation:
Networks (local, national or international) where people in the same sector, such as farming, can share and compare their knowledge.
Networks where people in different knowledge domains share and compare their understandings of problems or challenges they have in common.
Motivation
For the potential of pro-poor innovation to be realised, motivation is required. Volunteered motivation is not enough: institutionalised incentives are also needed.
In the public sector, the incentive for pro-poor innovation is linked ultimately to some form of democratic accountability. This is important if PPPs are put forward. Governments are unlikely to make serious demands on the private sector if they are not committed themselves.
Innovation is an essential element of the capitalist economy, where market competitiveness and profit-seeking are the incentives. But corporate business will engage in pro-poor practices if they are seen, for example, to enhance brand image locally or amongst well informed consumers globally.
Employees motivated by the 'professional challenge' of contributing to a better world can be found in the private and public sectors:
Pride in doing a good job and the contribution to a greater social good is important for organisations like UK-based group Engineers Against Poverty, or firms conscious of their corporate responsibility such as design consulting engineers, Arup.
UK municipal authority engineers working with counterparts in Uganda found themselves inspired, and reminded of how the great public works in the UK in the 19th century defined their profession and built its status.
Our unequal, globalised world poses major challenges for pro-poor innovation, for which the mechanism of PPPs is not necessarily the answer. There are opportunities, however, because of our ability to communicate globally. Our different types of knowledge are a potential source of joint learning: a good start would be to leave behind old knowledge divides, such as local versus global, and scientific versus lay. We need instead to build on key incentives for pro-poor innovation.
Gordon Wilson
Development Policy and Practice, Faculty of Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
Threats opportunities and incentives for propoor innovation - To learn more about this author, visit id 21's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
David BarrDavid Barr is the President of Venture Opportunities, Inc. David has been a professional business broker/intermediary since 1980 focusing on General Business Brokerage and Mergers and Acquisitions representing client transaction value from $400,000 to $20,000,000. Mr. Barr has handled the sale of over four hundred and fifty companies. David earned a university degree from the State University of New York majoring in economics and business. David holds the Mergers and Acquisition Master Intermediary and the Certified Business Intermediary designations from the International Business Brokers Association. He is also a Senior Business Analyst and a Texas licensed Real Estate Agent. For more information about David and Venture Opportunities, visit www.bizdealmaker.com. - Visit David Barr's Website |
|||
John PowerJohn Power, founder of Biltmore Franchise Consulting, has extensive experience developing and marketing franchises and business opportunities. He has been in and around franchising for over twenty years. From 1980 through 1990 he conceptualized, organized, and developed the American Video Association. He grew AVA to 2,000 national members, before selling the company it 1990. It was later merged into another home video marketing company. From 2000 to 2005 he worked as a contract marketing and human resources consultant to several local and national companies. In 2005 Mr. Power began working as a franchise development consultant on a full-time basis. Since that time he has helped more than three dozen companies initiate and develop their franchising program. He notes that there are many companies interested in developing a franchise program, and who need his specialized assistance. Mr. Power is a “hands-on” franchise consultant. He said, “I am the ‘nuts and bolts’ person who tends to the details for my clients.” Mr. Power holds a B.S. degree with a major in Marketing. See: www.biltmorefranchise.com You may contact Mr. Power at: jpower@biltmorefranchise.co - Visit John Power's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to id's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Consultative Selling ebook Internet Marketing Secrets Loyalty Strategies Customer Focus Instant Press Release |
|
 | ||
 |
Choose A PR Topic
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Top 50 Franchising Blogs
Top 50 Franchising Blogs | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||