Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header
Share for a Cause









Towards pro-poor innovation

Written by: id 21

Article Overview: Putting public value into science and technology

Free Download - Sustained growth with equity is needed to halve poverty in Africa By id 21
Name: Email:

Towards pro-poor innovation

We live in a rapidly changing world. Technological advances are increasing productivity and income, quality of life and life expectancy… in the developed world, that is. The truth is that technological development is focused on meeting the wants of rich consumers. Scant attention is paid to the vital needs of people in the developing world.

The arrival of new technologies often results in a wider gap between the rich and the poor. Yet some innovations fail to be applied in developing countries where there is a real need. As E.F. Schumacher observed, 'new technologies are developed only when people of power and wealth back the development'.

The International Council for Science argues, as do many other people, that developing countries lack an infrastructure base for exploiting technology and suggests increased investment in universities. Low income countries are not only poor in terms of measures of human wellbeing but also in terms of indicators of technology. They spend a small proportion of GDP on research and development: less than 1 percent, compared to high income countries that spend around 2.5 percent. The number of scientists in low income countries is less than 50 per 100,000 people, compared to over 3,000 per 100,000 in high income countries.

Jonathan Porritt argues that to enable sustainable development people need to work with the market system and not against it. This means understanding market mechanisms, understanding innovation processes, and then working with key stakeholders to enable business models that will deliver on human need rather than on consumer want. With existing technologies this is a challenge because the business models, including the supply chain logistics, are already well established. In the case of new technologies there is a window of opportunity, before products are released into the market, to negotiate new business models.

Many topical issues — for example sustainable development, climate change and democracy — are all influenced by the role of science and technology in society. A major challenge is to release public value from science and technology and to channel that public value into developing countries to help reduce poverty. The concept of public value used here refers to value generated by science and technology that is not solely reaped by the market. Releasing public value from science in a global context is one of the most significant and challenging issues facing societies worldwide.

The challenge might be re-framed as 'how do we enable new science-led technologies to deliver products which fulfil human needs rather than consumer wants?'. Each article in this issue of id21 insights provides some evidence, from recent research, which casts light on this challenge. It is presented below in relation to key questions that will continue to be a useful guide to research.

How can new technologies deliver social and economic progress? This is discussed in relation to China by James Wilsdon. Technology has failed to meet the needs of the poor, with 1.2 billion people living on less than one US dollar per day. At the centre of these deliberations is the essence pointed out by Jeffrey Sachs that 'the single most important reason why prosperity spread, and why it continues to spread is the transmission of technologies and the ideas underlying them'. But is the scale of economic growth implicit in this approach appropriate to a world challenged by climate change?

How can science-led new technologies be made available to poor people? There is often an assumption that benefits from growth will trickle down to the poor. Ian Scoones, however, concludes his study of biotechnology in Bangalore by saying that there is 'no substantial evidence of new products being developed for Indian settings and local needs'.

How can we develop new business models or processes that support the development of science-led new technologies that fulfill a real need? Andrew Adwera Ochieng discusses the 'social entrepreneurship' model based on experience in Kenya and finds that by combining new technologies with a business package, income can be generated and poverty reduced. Gordon Wilson discusses the role of public private partnerships. He stresses the importance of incentives in both the public and private sectors, as well as the 'professional challenge' as a key motivator.

To what extent can the provision of information and an accompanying model for work facilitate the adoption of new technologies in developing countries? Gordon Wilson also draws attention to the importance of knowledge networks and the need to respect local knowledge whilst harnessing new knowledge.

What inhibits the uptake of new technologies in developing countries? Sharad Rai discusses participatory innovation development based on a case study in Nepal and focuses on the human, social and economic factors that inhibit and promote pro-poor innovation.

How do we move on from pilot projects? Many science-led new technologies, especially those using Information Communication Technologies (ICTs), are tested using donor funding for limited time periods. The challenge is to capture the learning, adapt the business model and implement sustainable change. Paul Matthews and John Young discuss recent ODI research suggesting there is a need for content owners and other local stakeholders to form productive partnerships with technology providers.

The research discussed above all contributes to our understanding of a more fundamental question about the nature of the drivers of science. Can we re-frame the drivers of science so that the ultimate outcome is public value? (See the box on the nano-dialogues article).

The key policy implications include:

Collaborate rather than compete, ensuring the continued involvement of scientists and local communities.
The assessment of the appropriateness of new technologies will need to take account of the risks and costs in addition to the opportunities for real benefits to poor people.
Alternative business models, such as social entrepreneur, should be encouraged.
Local communities should choose the technologies they wish to adopt and participate in the process of innovation.
Upstream dialogues between scientists and local communities should be encouraged as a way of engaging scientists in the provision of needs based development.

David J Grimshaw
Practical Action, Schumacher Centre for Technology & Development, Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby CV23 9QZ, UK

Related Articles
  TIDE Innovation Series-Self Innovation
  100 Ways to Succeed #93
  It's Not the Size that Counts
  The Tale of the Toothache
  Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Home > African-Accounts > id 21 > Towards propoor innovation
Article Tags: business models, climate change, developing world, e f schumacher, exploiting technology, human wellbeing, increasing productivity, infrastructure base, innovation processes, jonathan porritt, life expectancy, low income countries, market mechanisms, scant attention, supply chain logistics, technological advances, technological development, topical issues, understanding market, window of opportunity

About the Author: id 21
RSS for id's articles - Visit id's website

id21 is a fast-track research reporting service funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). It aims to bring UK-based development research findings and policy recommendations to policymakers and development practitioners worldwide.

Click here to visit id's website
Dashed Line

More from id 21
The wider impacts of microfinance
Mobile phones and development
Microfinance and the MDGs
Unleashing entrepreneurship Making business work for the poor
Measuring and managing social performance


Related Forum Posts
Entrepreneurs come up with "The Big Idea" Entrepreneurs come up with "The Big Idea" - A question we have been asked more than once recently, by both aspiring entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship researchers, is: How do entrepreneurs come up with "The Big Idea"? The most recent case was an MBA student who really wanted to become an entrepreneur but felt he could never come up with a "big idea". Well, in our experience the reality is that most successful entrepreneurs didn't think they were going to come up with a big idea either! Our advice to this MBA was straightforward. Don't look for big ideas, look for problems that need solving. Problems are a much easier starting point and act as a focus for creativity and innovation - providing you can be passionate about it and are prepared to devote an obsessive level of attention to the important details. At our core we are all resourceful, creative creatures once we have a problem in front of us. Ideally the problems that you should seek should be in an area where you have experience / expertise. That will help ensure you really understand the problem and increase the likelihood of you being able to formulate an intelligent and practical solution, incorporating the potential for a competitive advantage. Virtually all the ventures we know arose out of dissatisfaction with the current state of things. Viewing innovation and entrepreneurship as the process of identifying problems, devising potential solutions and then implementing those solutions is often more useful and productive as a perspective.
Re: Famous Entrepreneur Blog? Re: Famous Entrepreneur Blog? - Hi Evan, This is a very great innovation to motivate and help entreprenurs to learn more. The video is a welcome development, but please let it be edited for people with low bandwitdth so every one can benefit from it. Especially people like us from Africa whose connection is not as fast as you guys in America and Canada. Kudos to you, keep it up
Re: help wanted in u.k. Re: help wanted in u.k. - I got a very sarcastic comment on my invention this morning, which I admit I still find these upsetting sometimes. I looked up the senders site to get some feedback on where I might have gone wrong in life, in inventing this training device. Then I find the commenter is a 19 year old, who still watches cartoon videos (at 19) Is it just me that is out of sync or what ?? Let the boxerballs adventure unfold I say !! LET REALITY WIN OVER THE MASSES, MAD ESCAPISM ! Let the boxerballs adventure unfold I say !! Cheers Brendan P.s. I got a great break just yesterday as well, but I can not talk about it because of confidentiality rules. Also I gave some ideas to a business person who I met at the patent library, who has an up and running product, She called me a genius, mind you I must admit the ideas were brilliant she will probably make a million out of them, but that is what innovation is all about most of the times really. You got to interact and help people with their product if you can.
SEEKING PRIVATE OR ANGEL INVESTOR SEEKING PRIVATE OR ANGEL INVESTOR - We are the inventors of a very affordable, easy to install, dual headed shower product named Superb Shower, that we envision will replace the traditional shower, and become the shower of the 21st century. Superb Shower showers a bather from the front and back simultaneously, creating a warm, soothing feeling all over the body. Superb Shower eliminated the need to turn several times during the course of a shower to stay warm and get rinsed off. In addition to transforming an ordinary shower into a luxurious showering experience for one, it offers great versatility. It is a therapeutic shower for those with sore muscles, and a very safe shower for the elderly. Superb Shower is also a convenient, time saving shower for two children or two adults. It is also extremely advantageous for the handicapped, who can now sit in their shower chair and hold a hand-held-shower-head for the front part of their body as they are being showered from behind. To achieve this versatility without our product would necessitate thousands of dollars in renovation costs and be extremely disruptive to the entire household. We received our first patent (5,564,139) on October 15, 1996 for our dual headed shower product originally named Super Shower, Reg. & TM # 1,776,397 on June 15, 1993. The plastic was extruded to our specification, and all units were hand assembled in three sizes (and custom when necessary), and came in two colors, white and almond. We came up with the idea of making our product in kit form. Our new and improved shower product is now patent-pending. We have a great working prototype and we are ready to have our product injection molded. We also have our own design for shower heads. Superb Shower will retail for between $100 to $140, depending on the finish. We have a very strong desire to have our product manufactured in the U.S.A., and we want to be able to employ the handicapped and senior citizens. We hold the belief that innovation is not just to be different, but innovation is also to render improvement. Our new dual headed shower product is a tremendous improvement over the single shower head and all other shower heads of today that only shower a bather on one side of the body. Our research into current market trends reveals that consumers today demand a lot from their shower besides just getting clean, and they are always looking for ways to enhance their shower. Our product meets these needs and desires, and there is no other product like ours currently being sold. During the past several years, we have put over $125,000 of our own money to fund the development and sales of our product. Here is where we need help. We are unable to move our business forward at this point because of lack of funds. We are seeking a Grant, Private Investor, Angel Investor or Venture Capital who would be interested in investing $425,000.00 You can contact us at ems50@comcast.net
the BDC the BDC - Hi Renee, the BDC is a great lender to many Canadian businesses. I've heard many horror stories from businesses that have had problems with the BDC, but I think it all depends on which account manager you deal with (that's the case with most lenders). Anyways, I have a great relationship with the BDC Toronto office, and was successful earlier this year in getting two service based companies loans under the BDC Innovation financing program ($100,000 and $150,000, both for marketing and growth initiatives). Here's an article I wrote about the BDC late last year for an Accounting Firm's newsletter: The Business Development Bank of Canada is a financial institution belonging to the Government of Canada, with the mandate: “to encourage innovation and stimulate the growth of small and medium-size Canadian companies.” The BDC usually looks for companies with a sound management team that possess solid growth potential. The BDC can provide working capital solutions to complement traditional bank financing. The BDC’s lending practices are somewhat different from the traditional chartered banks. With the BDC, borrowers receive a guaranteed term, meaning that financing cannot be recalled without due cause. As opposed to the chartered banks, where facilities are typically demand loans and can be recalled at any time. The BDC has very flexible repayment terms, including deferring principal payments, amortizing loans for up to an 8 year term, or offering seasonal and/or progressive payment options. This allows businesses to structure their cash flow accordingly. The BDC is willing to lend to companies that are more leveraged than traditional banks would consider. As well the BDC is willing to finance higher loan-to-value ratios than the chartered banks max out on. The BDC also offers subordinated debt, where they will postpone their claim to a chartered bank. Sub-debt can be very advantageous to many companies, because the BDC ties the repayment terms to the company’s cash flow projections. The pricing model can be setup as normal interest payments, royalties on sales, bonus interest based on milestones, warrants or some combination of these items. The BDC lends sub-debt to businesses based on historical cash flow, management and growth potential. The innovation financing program provides small businesses with funds to carry out marketing and/or growth plans, increase inventory, and/or develop new products. The BDC funds all types of businesses including start-ups, however will not fund any business that earns 50% or more of their profits from alcohol sales or gambling. The cost of borrowing from the BDC is generally higher than the chartered banks. The BDC’s base rate generally starts at two points above regular bank prime, and then the risk premium is applied to these rates based on each project's potential and the amount of risk involved. The BDC may not be ideal for all businesses, but as an alternative and/or complement to traditional bank financing, the BDC could be a very attractive solution.


Recommended Article for You close

  TIDE Innovation Series-Self Innovation

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article


Bottom Footer
Share for a Cause












Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

Common Sense Stress Management

Track Your Time for Increased Productivity

Building a Business From 30,000 Feet

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.