Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header
Share for a Cause









Determinants of Enterprise Training: What are the Training Constraints?

Guest post by: OECD Development Centre

Article Overview: Enterprise Surveys have shown that large variances in training incidence exist across firms. A natural question then is why do certain firms invest more in training and others do not. There is a certain amount of cross-country and individual country evidence in the literature to identify why this is the case.

Free Download - BIBLIOGRAPHY - E-COMMERCE FOR DEVELOPMENT: PROSPECTS AND POLICY ISSUES By OECD Development Centre
Name: Email:

Determinants of Enterprise Training: What are the Training Constraints?

Enterprise Surveys have shown that large variances in training incidence exist
across firms. A natural question then is why do certain firms invest more in training and
others do not. There is a certain amount of cross-country and individual country evidence
in the literature to identify why this is the case.
The only cross-country/cross-region survey in developing countries that sheds
light on the training determinant is the WBES. This survey contains questions where
firms are asked to rank on a scale of one (not important) to five (very important) the
relevance of seven statements to their decision to provide little or no training (Batra,
2003):
1) training is not affordable because of limited resources;
2) training is costly because of high labour turnover;
3) firm lacks knowledge about training techniques and organisation;
4) firm used a mature technology, so learning-by-doing is sufficient;
5) informal training is adequate;
6) skilled workers are readily hired from other firms;
7) firm sceptical about the benefits of training.
Among the most important reasons for providing little or no training, East Asian
firms responded: 4) mature technology (45 per cent); 5) adequacy of informal training (35
per cent); and 2) labour turnover (33 per cent), to be the three most important
determinants. Firms in LAC region responded: 6) availability of hiring skilled workers from
other firms (44 per cent); 4) mature technology (35 per cent); 5) adequacy of informal
training (33 per cent), being the three key reasons. For firms already using mature
technologies, there is limited scope for improving on existing techniques and workers can
become more proficient by learning by doing or through informal training (Batra, 2003).

The WBES also indicates that 27 per cent of firms in East Asia and 13 per cent of
firms in the LAC region face training constraints due to 1) non-affordability coming from
limited resources. This is likely to be the case due to the credit constraints faced by many
enterprises in developing countries. While there are increasing numbers of training
grants and subsidy schemes available in developing countries, not all the firms are
eligible for training subsidies and credit availability may thus be important. Small- and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are more likely to face this type of training constraint
since they are the ones who are less likely to have access to the credit market. Indeed,
the WBES show that, in East Asia, 29 per cent of small-sized firms, and 19 per cent of
medium-sized firms cannot afford training due to limited resources, whereas only 13 per
cent of large-sized firms cannot afford it (Batra, 2003).
Lack of knowledge also appeared to be an important reason for providing little or
no training. This was especially true in East Asia (24 per cent). Larger firms are more
likely to have better access to information on training techniques and organisation.
Indeed, in East Asia, only 18 per cent of large firms claimed to have constraints while
more than 28 per cent of small firms lacked access to such information (Batra, 2003).
Firms having a perception of high-labour turnovers is another important reason
why firms provided less or no training. Thirty-three per cent of firms in East Asia and 18
per cent of firms in the LAC region indicated their doubt that training investment is not
worthwhile due to worker turnovers. This is more likely to be the case among small firms
facing difficulties, whether financial or contractual, in providing incentives to keep trained
workers. This is verified by the high percentage of small firms (32 per cent) showing
concerns, while a smaller fraction of large firms (22 per cent) indicate this to be a
problem.
To sum up, the WBES indicates that firms in East Asia and LAC face training
constraints due to a number of market failures including information constraints, credit
constraints and labour turnovers. These constraints were found to be less binding for
larger firms. Larger firms have much wider opportunities to receive information regarding
training techniques and organisation methods. Their training burden per worker is likely
to be lower than smaller firms, since the opportunity cost of losing one employee in
training activities and per worker cost of training is presumably lower.
Studies that focus on individual countries using firm surveys are consistent with
these findings. For example, Zeufack (1999), Tan and Batra (1996), Tan and Lopez-
Acevedo (2003), and Miyamoto and Todo (2003) show that the effect of firm size on
training incidence is significant and large for Mexico, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia.
Miyamoto and Todo (2003) use variables capturing legal status26 in order to capture the
extent of credit constraint among Indonesian firms. They find that having no legal status
reduced the probability of training. Note that the findings that large firm size positively
affects training is consistent with firms not training due to information and credit
constraints and labour turnovers. This is because larger firms are less likely to be credit
constrained, more likely to have access to information on training, and less likely to suffer
from high labour turnovers. Smaller firms on the other hand usually find it hard to gain
credits, participate in training workshops, face difficulties replacing workers engaging in
training activities, and will not be able to provide attractive incentives for workers not to
quit after training.

Another interesting finding from these studies is the positive role of a firm’s
technological sophistication on training determinants. Tan and Batra (1996), Zeufack
(1999), and Tan and Lopez-Acevedo (2003), all show that R&D investment is an
important determinant for training in Mexico, Malaysia, Thailand and Chinese Taipei. For
Mexico this impact becomes even stronger over time (Tan and Lopez-Acevedo, 2003).
This is consistent with firms using a sophisticated production process and R&D requiring
intensive training for workers to adapt to such a mode of operation.

OECD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE
Working Paper No. 211
HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION
AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
by
Koji Miyamoto

Related Articles
  Human Capital Formation by MNEs and Domestic Firms: Determinants of Enterprise Training
  The Nature of Growth Oriented Enterprises: Constraints of growth-oriented enterprises in the southern and eastern African region
  10.0 Training – business management and technical skills: Support for Growth-oriented Women Entrepreneurs in Tanzania, 2005
  Constraints of growth-oriented enterprises in the southern and eastern African region
  Stretching the Training Budget

Home > African-Accounts > OECD Development Centre > Determinants of Enterprise Training What are the Training Constraints
Article Tags: adequacy, affordability, asian firms, credit constraints, cross country, determinant, determinants, developing countries, east asia, east asian, high labour turnover, key reasons, lac region, limited resources, mature technologies, mature technology, natural question, relevance, skilled workers, variances

About the Author: OECD Development Centre
RSS for OECD's articles - Visit OECD's website

Created in 1962 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Paris, the Development Centre is an interface between OECD Member countries and the emerging and developing economies. The Development Centre occupies a unique place within the OECD and in the international community. It is a forum where countries come to share their experience of economic and social development policies. The Centre contributes expert analysis to the development policy debate. The objective is to help decision makers find policy solutions to stimulate growth and improve living conditions in developing and emerging economies.

Click here to visit OECD's website
Dashed Line

More from OECD Development Centre
Human Capital Formation by MNEs Supporting Formal Education
BIBLIOGRAPHY ECOMMERCE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS AND POLICY ISSUES
Lessons Learned
Prospects of Human Capital in the Future Background
Questions Posed HUMAN CAPITAL FORMATION AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES


Related Forum Posts
7 words or less for Structogram 7 words or less for Structogram - Some "7 words or less" (more or less) for Structogram for your comments: Training to get your message across(6) Secrets to get your message across (6) Training so people will listen to you (7) Helping you get your message across (6) Training to learn to get your message across (8) Communications training for yourself and your team (7)
Budget. Budget. - I believe the biggest barrier is related to budget. Training tends to be a normal practice for a big company. But I have to consider it seriously as an entrepreneur.
Marketing vs Web Optimizers vs Usability Marketing vs Web Optimizers vs Usability - Hi BigJim22, I must be honest - I haven't really read a lot of Seth's articles on web site strategies. What I have found though is that there always seems to be a three way conflict between marketing ideas, SEO strategies and usability issues when doing web development. The secret is to balance between the ideal situation for each of these. Since a website needs to be found, visited and acted upon we need a strong combination of marketing, SEO and usability to be successful. It's something we struggle with constantly at Last Minute Training and I'm sad to say - we still haven't found the right combination.
Re: Looking for partners to start career consulting business Re: Looking for partners to start career consulting business - Hi Mike, 1) I'm moving this to the Looking For section 2) I think a good start would be to seek out local, potential competing or related organizations/companies in your area. Universities, job centres, head hunters, HR professionals...etc. [quote:34k2gxrf]It will target professionals who want to start working at executives or higher level positions but lack necessary experience.[/quote:34k2gxrf] And I think it'll definitely help if you align your products/services with your target customer group. i.e. How do you plan to seek out this group? -------> Find the necessary talent that can accomplish this. i.e. Providing internship --------> Training in-house? Or training outsourced? Again, seek talent that aligns with your objectives. Break down what your business operations would be like, then seek the appropriate talent to cover that area. Of course, you don't want to give up too much equity by seeking out too many partners. Usually lower number of founders the more likely the start-up will survive. Good luck
Re: 40 cents per dollar is spent in a franchised business Re: 40 cents per dollar is spent in a franchised business - Hey Ringo, In general terms the location itself isn't even looked at until the franchise agreement is signed and the fees are paid to the franchisor. Then and only then do they start looking for a location. This is common practice and with the plethora of commercial locations that are available right now we are seeing landlords bend over backwards on negotiations to get a good tenant. That being said, the area is what the franchisor will look at on the demographics, they won't generally put a franchise in an area just because a buyer wants it there, most times the buyers have a preconceived notion of what they consider "the right spot". The franchisor has the data to support specific demographics, so that is where the help comes into play. The due diligence items I recommend looking into prior to buying are: 1. Average Expenses. 2. Average Revenues. 3. Litigation. 4. Business model. 5. Training. 6. Existing franchisees. Most of the time once you get through those things the rest is easy to get through. You need to know how much it cost, how much you can make, what is your exposure legally, is the model right, who/how are you trained and talk to as many existing franchisees as you can. You are looking for consistency. There is absolutely no way that every single franchise owner is happy with the home office, it is just impossible. You are looking for consistency, hearing the same things in general. Numbers, support, training, advertising, marketing, ongoing training, growth, industry etc... If you don't hear consistent things, most likely the model isn't working in all markets or there is something else affecting it like industry or distribution or training.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article


Bottom Footer
Share for a Cause












Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Log On

How do I finance a franchise?

Designing Employee-Enhancing Training Programs

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.