Guidelines for Seamless Introductions
Article Overview: Knowing how to introduce colleagues and friends can make any social situation easier and more enjoyable. This skill will provide you with a sense of self-confidence and professionalism.
 |
Free Download - How to Work a Room By Catherine Bell
|
Guidelines for Seamless Introductions
Knowing how to introduce colleagues and friends can make any social situation easier and more enjoyable. This skill will provide you with a sense of self-confidence and professionalism.
An enthusiastic introduction, followed by a few words about the person is an excellent conversation starter. For example: “Sally, I want you too meet Mr. Brown. He is a talented writer.” Sally does not have to begin a conversation with small talk, but can immediately ask Mr. Brown about his writing. Good networkers practice the art of seamless introductions, leaving everyone at ease and impressed by their politeness. The following suggestions will help you to handle introductions with ease.
The rules of formality in introductions are not always clear. You must take your cues from the age of the people involved, their positions in business and life, their relationships, the circumstances at the time, and even the community customs. There is no specific rule regarding using a title and a last name, such as “Mr. Brown” or just first and last names, such as “Jim Brown.” When in doubt, always take the more formal route.
It is better to attempt an introduction, than to leave people standing there awkwardly because you fear that you will make a mistake. If you do commit an obvious social blunder while introducing someone, do not panic! Graceful spontaneity will come to the rescue when good manners prevail. Say that you are sorry, and then begin the introduction again correctly.
Who is Introduced to Whom?
When you are faced with introducing someone for the first time, the task becomes a pleasure with the knowledge of a few guidelines. The most important rule is set out below:
The younger or less important person is introduced to the older or more important person.
The easiest way to remember this pivotal principle is to always say the name of the older more important person first. Once the person’s name flies from your lips, everything else should easily fall into place.
If you are introducing a teenager named John Smith to Ms. Black, who is elderly, you may want to use the following if it is a very formal setting:
“Ms. Black, I would like to present John Smith.”
Whereas, in an informal gathering you could simply say:
“Ms Black, this is John Smith.”
You will notice that when introducing a young person to someone considerably older, as a sign of respect, the older person’s title. In this case “Ms.” was used. It is up to Ms. Black to give John permission to use her first name.
Additional Guidelines
• Avoid saying: “Mr. Jones, I would like you to meet Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith . . . Mr. Jones.” Use people’s names only once, unless you are adding more information regarding their background to aid in conversation.
• Gender is not an issue in business introductions. Rank, and then age, are the deciding factors.
• Family members are usually considered less important than those outside the family, despite the family member’s rank. An elderly relative may sometimes take precedence.
• Always state the last names when introducing people to each other.
• If the person you are introducing has a title such as “Doctor” or “Major,” include their title in the introduction.
• If you are introducing your spouse to a friend, do not use a formal title such as (Mr., Mrs. or Ms.) for your spouse, even in formal situations. It will sound odd.
• If you are introducing a couple with different last names, it may be helpful to make their relationship clear.
Related Articles
30 Second Marketing
Are Your Salespeople Still Cold Calling? The Ugly Truth
Seamless Integrated Communication
Who Do You Call When Your Sales Forecast is Busted?
Can I Move from QuickBooks Pro to Premier or into QuickBooks Enterprise?
Article Tags:
Related Forum Posts
Importance of web accessibility
- Can’t imagine life without WWW? For the millions of people with disabilities in the world, the web is more than a mouse-click away. With most websites — including government sites — failing to provide even minimum levels of accessibility, equal opportunity for all is still far from a reality.
A report commissioned by the United Nations recently found that many of the websites tested met even the most basic accessibility standards for the disabled. “The results were very disappointing. It is important for commercial, legal and moral reasons that websites put in place a strategy for accessibility,” said Alex Metcalfe of Nomensa, the agency which tested leading websites in five different sectors across 20 countries for the UN.
In order to reach the minimum standards — tested against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) — websites needed to provide adequate text descriptions for graphical content so that visually impaired people could ‘read’ pictures. They also didn’t follow industry web standards for programming code, meaning the foundations for web accessibility simply were not there.
But why don’t more firms keep accessibility in mind? Companies, especially those in e-commerce, just don’t realise the market potential. For just 10% more cost, they can increase access and improve bottomlines. Making a site accessible doesn’t mean replacing attractive graphics with an austere look and a big typeface. The aim is to formulate criteria so that organisations can make their web initiatives accessibility-standards compliant. Some simple changes — such as describing graphics and audio using text, allowing the user to increase typesize or change background — can make a site friendly to those with disabilities.
Till then, small tasks like making a railway reservation or checking their bank balance will be out of bounds for the millions who are disabled in the country. Everyone of us should strive and put in our effort to make it possible.
Re: Search Engine Optimization
- Another good tip to remember when considering the value of a link is that all links are not handled quite the same. When we ask about things like whether a link is site specific or page specific, it's a good thing to remember that a search engine does not really see a Web site or even a a Web page. From a simple minded search engine robot's perspective, the whole Web is seen as a world made up of URLs.
Reciprocal linking does not have quite the same value it did years ago. In a way, it is good to link out based on other pages that are related to a similar topic. But if you link to them and they link to you, it somewhat nullifies the value. Not always, but sometimes. The other thing to mindful of is that sometimes if you link to a Web site and are not aware that that site is participating in a link farm or doing something else against Googles Webmaster Guidelines, that you could end up being penalized for linking to that site. Google says that if a nasty site links to you, that's beyond your control, but anyone you link to is well within your control. For example, it could be something that is not readily evident to you, for example suppose you link to a Webmaster who makes a habit of buying high PR links. There have been cases where people are flagged because they are linking to shall we say "bad neighborhoods."
What other types of links hold good value?
Links within your own Web copy tend to have more value than links in your navigation. If a related site links to you and is also includes your keyword in their Title Tag, the link on that will have more benefit than if the Title of the page is unrelated.
Initially, Google use to devalue links in some Social Media sites like keyword rich links coming to you from Facebook, but these days they seem to be carrying more value than they use to. Remember that a link within a caption underneath an image, tends to have a little more value too.
In my own link building actions, I try to stay focused on links to informative pages or Blogs that I think my readers will benefit from and are at least somewhat related to the topic I'm discussing. Remember that if you Blog, that most Bloggers are very generous with links because they just seem to be so focused on their topics (or at least in cases where the Blog has a defined purpose) and many will Blog daily and many Blogger are focused on 2 way dialog and conversation trails about their topic.
Other great places to get links from are authoritative and busy Web sites, places like About.com (but you need to write very useful content of an engaging, useful nature in order to get them to link to you) and of course there are educational sites that tend to deliver a lot of value in their links.
Re: Search Engine Optimization
- [quote="John Alexander":tfpeanna]Another good tip to remember when considering the value of a link is that all links are not handled quite the same. When we ask about things like whether a link is site specific or page specific, it's a good thing to remember that a search engine does not really see a Web site or even a a Web page. From a simple minded search engine robot's perspective, the whole Web is seen as a world made up of URLs.
Reciprocal linking does not have quite the same value it did years ago. In a way, it is good to link out based on other pages that are related to a similar topic. But if you link to them and they link to you, it somewhat nullifies the value. Not always, but sometimes. The other thing to mindful of is that sometimes if you link to a Web site and are not aware that that site is participating in a link farm or doing something else against Googles Webmaster Guidelines, that you could end up being penalized for linking to that site. Google says that if a nasty site links to you, that's beyond your control, but anyone you link to is well within your control. For example, it could be something that is not readily evident to you, for example suppose you link to a Webmaster who makes a habit of buying high PR links. There have been cases where people are flagged because they are linking to shall we say "bad neighborhoods."
What other types of links hold good value?
Links within your own Web copy tend to have more value than links in your navigation. If a related site links to you and is also includes your keyword in their Title Tag, the link on that will have more benefit than if the Title of the page is unrelated.
Initially, Google use to devalue links in some Social Media sites like keyword rich links coming to you from Facebook, but these days they seem to be carrying more value than they use to. Remember that a link within a caption underneath an image, tends to have a little more value too.
In my own link building actions, I try to stay focused on links to informative pages or Blogs that I think my readers will benefit from and are at least somewhat related to the topic I'm discussing. Remember that if you Blog, that most Bloggers are very generous with links because they just seem to be so focused on their topics (or at least in cases where the Blog has a defined purpose) and many will Blog daily and many Blogger are focused on 2 way dialog and conversation trails about their topic.
Other great places to get links from are authoritative and busy Web sites, places like (but you need to write very useful content of an engaging, useful nature in order to get them to link to you) and of course there are educational sites that tend to deliver a lot of value in their links.[/quote:tfpeanna]
That was all very helpful to me. Thanks
Recommended Article for You
close
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva.
Over
$50,000 raised and counting -
Please keep sharing! Learn more.