Do you wonder why some of your employees expect the world but do not want to work to earn it? Or maybe you can't find "good" workers. Possibly by understanding how we grade public education performance will help you answer these two questions.
Recently I come across the following scale in a national research report to grade each state's education performance within numerous areas. Do you see anything questionable about this scale?
Grading Curve A (93-100), A- (90-92), B+ (87-89), B (83-86), B- (80-82), C+ (77-79), C (73-76), C- (70-72), D+ (67-69), D (63-66), D- (60-62), F (0-59)
If you aren't scratching your head yet, let me answer you another question. If you are an employer, a human resource or a quality control manager what expectations do you have toward the performance of your employees? In other words, do you expect your employees to know 50%, 60%, 75%, 80%, 90% or 100% of their job skills or job description? At what level of knowledge and years on the job, would you consider that employee's performance to be sub-standard and would not entitle her or him to a promotion or a raise and might be within the area of specific discipline strategies from suspension to termination?
Now you might be thinking what is this lady talking about? Common sense dictates that every employee should know at least 75% or 3 out of every 4 requirements of their job and within a certain time frame progress to 100%. Errors are costly in business and employees' errors are extremely expensive as they have a cascade affect within the organization.
Even though the above scale is for a national research report on education in America, this scale is present in many classrooms throughout this country. What has happened is that the low expectations within the classroom have migrated up. F is failing and everything above F is passing. From a performance perspective, if we don't fail, we have success because success has been defined at 60%.
These low expectations have contributed to the low results that have been documented through such research as the National Assessment of Educational Progress where for example reading scores collectively for 17 year olds over the course of 33 years have not changed.
The high standards of 40 years ago where anything less than 75% was failing are non-existent in the majority American schools. Many young people experience 12 years of conditioning where doing less than your personal best is OK and guess what you even get rewarded by promotion to the next grade. Now, these same young people go into the workforce with a belief that it is OK to just get by as long as you don't fail. (Again, failing is 60%.)
If we, as business owners, truly desire to improve the performance of today's employees, we need to raise the standards within both the schools and the organizations that report on the schools’ and states’ performance. Until we stop this cycle of mediocrity, we will continue to receive employees who expect the world without working hard at acceptable levels of performance. Otherwise, employees will continue to view 60% as success.
Employees Poor Performance Is A Matter of History Where 60 Is Viewed as Success - To learn more about this author, visit Leanne Hoagland-Smith's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
Leaders Aren't Leaders Based on Their 'Say So'
|
| |
Can you be a leader independent of organizational performance? One can be a success in one organization and a bomb in the next. What is the determining factor?
|
Managers Where Are Your Ethics?
|
| |
The U.S. workforce is very tight and finding good employees is extremely difficult. Are your managers contributing to higher turnover because of poor ethics?
|
Here Is A Quick Way To Improve Your Performance Review
|
| |
The annual and dreaded performance review. Do you prepare for it? It is a waste of time? It's your personal review...so prepare!
|
The Art of Leadership: Rewarding Excellence
|
| |
Great leaders know that they cannot expect their employees to do their best work, day after day, year after year, without some sort of meaningful acknowledgement. They understand that to get the most from their peo...
|
Managing Employees Performance
|
| |
Measuring employee performance has come a long way from the annual performance appraisal to an on-going performance management process. In the past, managers and employees met once a year for the annual performance ...
|
|
|
Leanne Hoagland-Smith
(Visit Leanne's Website)
Are you where you want to be? Are you
facing constant struggles in business or
life in general? Would you like to get
"Un-Stuck"?
As your Chief People Officer, we can work
together to create raving fans & quickly
multiply your business and personal
success. Let’s use your strengths for real
change through proven and affordable
solutions such as http://www.proce
ssspecialist.com/coaching-program-emai.htm
Are you seeking loyal customers, great
attitudes, increased sales and improved
profitability? Then we should talk because
my clients have experienced exactly those
types of results.
Learn more about customer loyalty at http://www.processspec
ialist.com/customer-loyalty.htm
Give me a call 219.759.5601 and I look
forward to hearing from you.
|
|
|
|