Tweet

Team Building Seminars Why New Teams Struggle

Written by: Steven J Stowell

Article Overview: Working as a team in the world of business is absolutely crucial and so in turn having an effective team that works together is vital. Dr. Steven Stowell describes 4 Common and consistent factors that often effect how a team works or doesn't work together and how destructive certain mindsets can be.

Team Building Seminars Why New Teams Struggle

During thirty years of research and observation, we have evaluated countless groups that struggle to become a effective team. These teams had four common issues that whether they were strangers or intact work teams.

Four common and consistent inhibiting these start-up groups from functioning as a team include:

1. Task fixation, process blindness
2. Internal Conflicts
3. Fight or flight response
4. Stereotypes

Task Fixation, Process Blindness

Individuals within teams justify any behavior as okay if it contributes to successful completion of the tasks needed in achieving the goal. When placed in a team building workshop these members demonstrate little or no concern for how the group functioned during a (team building) goal – the process. We were able to magnify this view by placing time constraints on performance of exercises.

With this mindset, any means justify the end, like sacrificing team members, forming sub-groups to the exclusion of others, or not getting the commitment of all team members. They respond to dissent with “We had to do that to get the job done.” Even if there were casualties along the way, who can argue with success,? You can, if you were one of the casualties.

In a new group that is fixated totally on task success, individuals focus on their own needs to the exclusion of the needs of others. There is no support, recognition that individual differences are a potential benefit, deferring of egos, brainstorming, seeking commitment, or flexibility. However subtle or covert, selfish competition is deemed necessary to expedite the achievement of the goal.

Internal Conflicts

Internal conflicts generally make up part of the group dynamics when establishing a new team. Leadership: do we need a leader, who is going to lead, or will we follow the appointed leader? Groups that are asked to perform leaderless tasks or act as a volunteer team struggle most with issues of leadership. In many of our team building seminars, groups explain that many of our exercises would have been easier if we had appointed a leader. Yet, after having experimented with assigning a leader, we observed the group’s behavior did not change. The only difference is that one person, the leader, becomes frustrated by his/her inability to get the groups cooperation and the battle for influence and power still continues.

Overbearing or dominant individuals scramble to be recognized and gain influence with others. Disagreements over ideas quickly are positioned as win-lose alternatives. Accepting my ideas mean rejecting yours. It is not uncommon to see executives’ egos keep them from “dimming their headlights” and deferring to other team members.

Who’s in and who’s out is another conflict which often exists as part of the dominant-individual struggle. “We” versus “Them,” cliques, groups within groups are terms used to describe this situation. In new groups this struggle is fostered by the need to find someone who will support your (team building) ideas. Once found, the divisiveness of positions or lobbying for a majority vote starts. The “outs” resent the “ins” and will resist their ideas, sabotage their plans, or simply refuse to be fully functioning members of the team.

Fight versus Flight

Likewise, in many of our team building seminars, the following fight or flight behaviors were observed:

o Unwillingness to listen to others
o In-fighting for positions or fear of speaking up
o Trust problems with other individuals, resulting in withdrawal
o Taking the task too lightly
o Poor group planning
o Non-involvement
o Silence as preferable to vulnerability

Regardless of the behavior, the outcome is the same: the team loses energy, resources, and creativity. Decisions are made and plans are implemented with less than total group input and support. It is frustrating to be a team member when fight or flight behavior is exhibited. Unless the team is organizationally mandated to remain in existence, this dissatisfaction and frustration among the members will cause it to perish.



Stereotypes

New groups are particularly susceptible to this struggle when individual differences recognized and taken into consideration, or generalizations about motives and behaviors are made about the members of a group?

One of the first common stereotype behavior to emerge, that we have observed, is in male/female roles. More often that not, females are given a secondary role, are not allowed to perform physical tasks like lifting others, and are sometimes listened to as a last resort. A more subtle stereotyping occurs when physical size is equated with strength, balance, and athletic agility. Often, the largest male is often forced into the position of lifting, carrying, or pulling others even when activities in later exercises prove this stereotype, equating size with strength, is false.

We are constantly amazed, how rapidly stereotypes are made about individuals. These generalizations serve as blinders and keep the group from using all the resources available to the team.

Action Items for Start Up Teams

1. Collectively identify how the group will function.

The challenge for a new group is to establish a way of operating that will allow process issues to be noticed, discussed, and taken into account as the group works on the tasks to be accomplished. New groups could profitably invest time in talking about some key issues:

o How should we function as a group
o How should we make and execute decisions
o What do we expect from each other
o How do we monitor our process so that it doesn’t become a problem

Groups that become cohesive and maintain effective teamwork balance attention to tasks and to process issues. Effective team members do not fixate on either; they monitor both and openly discuss needed improvements.

2. Create a win-win partnerships atmosphere.

When teams are functioning effectively, disagreements or differing views are explored not to declare any one view the winner, but to seek the best decision. A team, where the free flow of information is promoted, creates not a win-lose environment but an environment encouraging discussion that leads to better decisions than any of the original positions presented.

The group will go through a phase when power struggles predominate unless the leader or a team member establishes a mode of operation and has courage to point out when power struggles are occurring within the team.

Functioning teams realize that leadership can shift from one to another member of the team depending on the task at hand. The designated leader knows that leadership can be shared or transferred without a any loss of power.

3. Manage fight versus flight behavior.

Teamwork means managing fight or flight behaviors so they do not become counterproductive. All members take the responsibility for monitoring these behaviors and focus the group’s attention on resolving them when they occur.

4. Test out your assumptions about team members.

Teamwork demands clarity with regard to what each member wants, needs, and is willing to do. No assumptions are made or left unchecked. Profitable time can be spent discussing each team member’s answers to these three questions:

A. What should other team members do more of because it helps me be a more productive team member?

B. What should other team members stop doing because it hinders my productivity and contribution as a team member?

C. What should other team members start doing because this will help me be a more active and contributing member of this team?

This process will clarify the multiple roles of team members and prevent stereotypes and assumptions from determining the group’s behavior.

If you would like to learn more about our Team Building Seminars, and how they can help your team operate more effectively, please contact a CMOE Regional Manager. You can reach them at (801)569-3444 or visit our web site at www. cmoe.com

Related Articles
  Team Building Seminars
  Team Excellence Third Ingredient - Trust
  The Profile of Success: Building High Performing Virtual Teams
  High Performing Teams: The Foundation of Successful Organizations
  7 Virtual Teams that Lead Your Company

Article Tags: blindness, casualties, countless groups, dissent, effective team, egos, fixation, flight response, group dynamics, individual differences, internal conflicts, leader groups, mindset, stereotypes, team building, team leadership, team struggle, thirty years, time constraints, volunteer team



Related Forum Posts
Need help in Team Building Activity.. - Hi! I am tasked to organize a Team Building Activity in the office. I would like to seek help from you guys on ideas on how to make it worth the time and effort. I want the team to ask for more team building activities after this one. Thanks! jane
Re: Need help in Team Building Activity.. - Team Building Activities are my favorite part. Last time our team was out for an expedition. We got a map and had to find the cave were we also slept and on our way there were other activities. It was an extreme team building and it was organized by a specialized company.
Type of business with building - If you owned a building and Wal-Mart was opening its doors across the street in a previously unoccupied area (along with 12-14 small shops), what type of business would you start? Here are the considerations: 1. Money is a non-factor 2. Building is fairly large (10,000) square feet 3. Building is on the corner of a busy intersection (about to get much busier)
Re: Making Money with Teleseminars - Hi, Any new free Seminars in the future on the same subject? Myself, and a couple employees from our company would like learn more. Jeff
Re: Anyone Uses Elance.com? Guru.com? Rentacoder.com? - I've had quite a bit of success on oDesk.com. I've never used Elance so I can't compare. I like oDesk.com 'cos I get to sort thru people (e.g. within a certain bid range) with a single click. I find their help response very quick and I like the oDesk Team software that "providers" must install. This gives me the Buyer more insight as to what I am paying for. The Team software takes screenshots of the Providers screen on 10 min increments so I can see that the person is infact doing work for me.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

When Living the Dream isn't enough!

Adjusting Your World

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.