|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Bruce Tuckman's Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing Team Development Model
|
| Guest post by: Carol Wilson |
Article Overview: This model describes the phases which teams tend to go through from their inception to the successful completion of the project, and highlights the areas which may cause the team and the project to fail.
![]() |
Free Download - Elizabeth Kubler Ross's Change Curve 5 Stage Model By Carol Wilson |
Bruce Tuckman's Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing Team Development Model
There has never been a time of greater conflict between members of newly
formed teams than in today’s world of cyclonic corporate change, where
relationships are made and changed through global mergers, demergers, portfolio
careers, cost cutting redundancies and a widespread lack of ability in
organisations to nurture and retain their home grown talent.
For some 40 years, Bruce Tuckman’s classic model has been delivering
comfort and new perspectives to managers either charged with running a team, or
trying to function within one, assuring the players that they are not alone and
that the discomfort of conflict is a normal part of the journey towards an
effective and enjoyable unit.
Dr Tuckman created the model back in 1965 and a decade later added a
fifth element, ADJOURNING, to
describe the break up of a team after its project is completed. The model was
part of a growing awareness, led by the organisational psychologists of the
period, of the extent to which the success or otherwise of a business depends upon
the relationships between its people. It resonates with Hersey and Blanchard’s well
known Situational Leadership model.
Dr Tuckman first published the FSNP model without any fanfare or presage
of how celebrated it would become, in an article for the Psychological Bulletin
entitled “Developmental sequence in small
groups”. (63, 384-399). His work has gone on to develop many aspects of organisational
psychology without much reference to this early model (he currently holds a
professorship at The
Ohio State University) yet the FSNP model has gained momentum on the strength
of its own elegance and usefulness.
The model describes how the team members first come together, welcoming,
polite and not a little wary, how they descend into conflict while establishing
their positions, how the boundaries are eventually and sometime tortuously
established and, if all goes well, how the team reaches a place of stability
where it can perform to the best of its combined abilities.
The stages Dr Tuckman identified are as follows:
1. Forming
Each member of the team focuses on the leader, accepting only the
leader’s guidance and authority and maintaining a polite but distant
relationship with the others. During this stage the leader must be seen to be
open with information and ready to answer the many questions that will come her
or his way; boundaries, strengths and weaknesses will be tested, including
those of the leader. There is likely to be some baggage regarding the way
people have been treated in the past, which might result in some clinging to
the old ways, if their experience was positive, or suspicion and apathy if it
left scars.
Tip: time
invested by the leader and the team members in listening to and empathising
with the others will pay off substantially further down the line. Expectations
and job descriptions should be clearly laid out and the leader should role
model the behaviour he or she would like to see the team exhibit.
2. Storming
This is a difficult time for all. Team members are more concerned with the
impression they are making than the project in hand; wanting to be respected, battling
with feelings of inadequacy, wondering who will support or undermine them, and
above all proving to the leader their value to the team. This is the time when
curt e-mails written in the heat of the moment should be left to cool overnight
in the Drafts box before being reviewed and moderated in the morning. There is
a danger of factions forming and some members becoming isolated, particularly
in today’s era of virtual teams in far flung places.
Tip: each member should focus on delivering as
much sincere positive feedback to the others as they can, working towards stable
relationships where suggestions will be viewed as contributions rather than criticisms.
Let go of the small stuff; encourage people to do things their way wherever
possible.
3. Norming
If the team can reach the Norming stage they are probably home and dry.
Sadly, I have sometimes been called in to work with directors who have been
storming for as long as 15 years, in businesses which are successful but being
slowly undermined by the tension. If the Norming stage can be reached, it is an
exciting time for all, when big decisions can be made and implemented, new
ideas turned into reality, risks taken and failure seen as simply another step along
the pathway to success. Roles and relationships are now established, freeing
people up to concentrate on exercising the talents that got them into the team
in the first place.
Tip: leaders
should use a coaching style and ask the team for their solutions before giving the
leader’s own; a team at the Norming stage will have much to offer in terms of
experience and ideas which, if accessed, can save leaders time and energy,
leaving them free to focus on the wider horizon, for example, broadening the
scope through strategic partnerships and succession planning.
4. Performing
The team is now a powerful engine running with
all its cogs turning. Plenty of healthy conflict, of the type that does not
damage the fabric of the relationships, is interspersed with fun and humour.
Successes almost seem to create themselves; the leader and team members have learned
to give their very best then get out of the way.
Tip: The leader and team members should recognise the contributions of
others and ensure that credit is awarded where due. This applies as much to
team members validating the leader as the other way round. If anyone is left
feeling that their contribution is not being recognised, the resentment may be
carried through to the next project and storming will be proportionately harder
to overcome in the future.
5. Adjourning
The ‘adjourning’ stage is about bringing a sense of closure to a team
whose project is completed. If the team successfully negotiated the first four
stages, there may be some bonding between members and a sense of loss at
disbanding those relationships. People will also be looking back to the
beginning, noticing how far they have come and measuring what their
contribution has been to the whole. The way in which this is handled can have a
profound effect on the next team each member joins; if an organisation is
constantly forming and reforming teams as people move around the international executive
circuit or develop new initiatives, a collective cultural memory will come into
being, influencing existing team players and absorbed as if by osmosis by
newcomers to the organisation.
Tip: Adjourning is a time for thank-you’s, recognition of individual
achievements and reflection on how far the team has come, the turning points
along the way, and what its members can take forward from the team to the
future. Make sure that all the
stakeholders outside of the team are aware of collective and individual
achievements.
|
About the Author: Carol Wilson RSS for Carol's articles - Visit Carol's website International speaker, writer and broadcaster Carol Wilson is Managing Director of Performance Coach Training, a joint venture with coaching pioneer Sir John Whitmore, and Head of Professional Standards & Excellence at the Association for Coaching, overseeing Accreditation and Supervision. She designs and delivers programmes to create coaching cultures for organisations including the Arts Council, IKEA, NCR, CLM 2012 Olympic Development Partner and various public sector organisations including schools and county councils. She experienced the value of a coaching culture at first hand during a decade working at board level with Sir Richard Branson. Carol was nominated for the AC Awards �Influence in Coaching� and �Impact in Coaching� and is the author of �Best Practice in Performance Coaching� (Kogan Page 2007) featuring forewords by Sir John Whitmore and Sir Richard Branson. Carol has presented at many conferences and workshops, including the HR Forum, Dubai Women in Business Conference, HRD, Coaching at Work Conference, Dept for Education and Skills, Royal Bank of Scotland, Cranfield University School of Management, Sky News, CIPD Coaching at Work, Brunel University Business School and Surrey University, and is a BBC accredited coach. Carol has personally studied with some of the world's pioneering thought leaders in coaching related fields, including Sir John Whitmore (coaching), Tim Gallwey (Inner Game), Richard Barratt (Cultural Transformation Tools), John Grinder (NLP) and David Grove (Clean Language), and is currently working on a doctorate at Middlesex University. She writes for a wide range of publications including a monthly column in Training Journal. Click here to visit Carol's website Developing a Coaching Culture Bruce Tuckmans Forming Storming Norming and Performing Team Development Model The Inner Game Coaching and Coach Training in the Workplace Elizabeth Kubler Rosss Change Curve 5 Stage Model |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Work at home Opportunities for the Disabled
Starting a Business with Bad Personal Credit
Tips for the Novice Traveler
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



