Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header
Share for a Cause









The Art of Projections in a Dotcom 2.0 World

Written by: Guy Kawasaki

Article Overview: The world is running amok with entrepreneurs pitching every sort of Web 2.0, social networking, user-generated-content startup. It’s the attack of the bull-shiitake startup projections, so I’m losing my hearing; there’s a ringing in my head, and I get dizzy every once in a while. Before the world implodes (again), here is a top-tenish list of ways to create realistic projections in this Dotcom 2.0 world.

Free Download - How to Persuade People By Guy Kawasaki
Name: Email:

The Art of Projections in a Dotcom 2.0 World

The world is running amok with entrepreneurs pitching every sort of Web 2.0, social networking, user-generated-content startup. It’s the attack of the bull-shiitake startup projections, so I’m losing my hearing; there’s a ringing in my head, and I get dizzy every once in a while. Before the world implodes (again), here is a top-tenish list of ways to create realistic projections in this Dotcom 2.0 world.

Under-promise and over-deliver. I have never seen a company meet or exceed its initial forecast. Entrepreneurs come up with numbers that they guess investors want to hear, and everything goes down hill from there. As a rule of thumb, dividing sales forecasts by one hundred and adding one year to the projected shipping date is about right for startups without a prototype. For startup with a prototype, dividing by ten and adding six months is about right.

Forecast from the bottom up. Figure out how many business development and sales meetings you can get per week--that is, four or five. Then multiply this number by the percentage that will be successful. Then add six months to close the deal. This forecasting method yields a much smaller number than the “conservative” method of assuming that you can get at least one percent market share.

Once you’re done with the plan, show it to the rest of the management team and demand honest feedback. This is the only way to make a bottom-up plan truly bottom up. Don’t let anyone--for example an ego-maniac chairman--make the company sign up for a plan that isn’t achievable with at least eighty percent certainty.

Don’t go too far out: twelve to eighteen months is the maximum. Anything beyond that is a waste of everyone’s time because you really don’t know when you’ll ship, and you can only fantasize about customer adoption. If you’re into five-year forecasts, go to work for a nice consumer packaged-goods company that’s been around for fifty years.

Plan to re-forecast every three months. Otherwise, forecasting is a joke: You get approval for an annual budget and then re-forecast it in the following board meeting. It’s better to know that re-forecasting is necessary once a quarter than to pretend that “this time we got it right.”

However, there is a danger in the rolling three-month forecast: Employees will start to believe that “investors don’t mind” constant shortfall (I hope you’re not this clueless). In a startup, everything is “near term.” The long term for a startup is a year--get used to this mentality.

Don’t let costs get in front of revenue. I know, I know: Your startup is going to be the fastest growing company in history, so you need to build an infrastructure to support the onslaught of customers. Dream on. Always run leaner than you think is necessary because your challenge will be creating demand, not fulfilling it.

Specifically, keep your net burn under $250,000 per month. How can I pick a number like this out of the air? On the other hand, what good does a vague answer do? You don’t have to believe me, but $250,000/month is the magic number for a “typical” venture-capitalist deal. Anything above this, and you’re probably throwing money away building infrastructure for non-existent customers. Just once in my career, I would like to hear, “We ran too lean and sacrificed growth” instead of what I hear all the time: “Costs got ahead of revenue, so we need to cut back but we’d prefer you tell us we don’t have to because it will harm morale.”

If the $250,000 guideline isn’t appropriate, then at least do a sanity check. Look for insane assumptions like achieving the fastest growth of any company in history and doubling your salesforce in a month. It’s tactical and practical to think like the salesperson on the street trying to make quota and an HR manager trying to fill positions because these functions are easy in Excel but hell in reality.

Collaborate with your investors. It’s just plain dumb to show your Holy Grail of a forecast to investors for the first time at a board meeting. You should feel them out in advance, and never be in the position of guessing what you think they want to see. Collaboration is especially important if you have bad news. Surprising venture capitalists with good news is never a problem.

Think in terms of per-unit profitability. It may be acceptable to lose money on every unit for a time, but at some point you have to make money on every unit. And don’t count on Google to buy you out because “getting lucky” is not a viable strategy. Also, you need to know exactly how much you’re losing on every unit so that you can measure progress towards profitability.

Plan for marketing costs. Don’t depend on wishful-thinking marketing based on virality, buzz, TechCrunch, and a demo at Demo. It’s true that some companies do achieve success this way, but we’ve heard of them because they are few and far between. To use a sports analogy, we all know who Michael Jordan and Wayne Gretzky are because they are rare examples, not because their story is common.

You need to explain your demand-creation process in a mechanical, not magical, way: ad rates, click through rates, unique visitors per month, conversion rates, revenue per customer, etc. Ultimately, the underlying assumptions in your marketing model is the key to the fundability and viability of your startup. “We’ll get it on TechCrunch and then viral marketing will be easy because we have such a compelling product” doesn’t cut it.

Create a one-page report and stick to it. It seems like thirty minutes of every board meeting is spent explaining a new way to report revenues, costs, and metrics. You would think that you could pick a few numbers that indicate what’s happening at the startup and see the historical trends--but not if you change reporting methods every month. One innovative way to fix this might be to reduce the CEO’s and CFO’s stock options by ten percent every time they change the report.

You’ll impress investors if you present your projections and your results in the same format. For example, if you use QuickBooks categories for your general ledger, then use these same categories for your projections. The good news is that your numbers will be much easier to understand; the bad news is that you’ll be a lot more accountable. :-)

Finally, you’ll astound investors if you show up with what’s called a “Waterfall Forecast,” a report that shows how your forecast has changed over time. (Full credit to Josh Kopelman for blogging about this.) I would add one more calculation to Josh’s model: showing the variance between actuals and projections so that the depth of your fantasies (or achievements) is more noticeable.

Never miss a cost projection. It’s relatively okay to miss a revenue projection because forecasting for a startup is truly a crapshoot. If you miss a cost projection, however, then you’re entering the realm of cluelessness. There is no excuse for it, barring an act of God like a factory burning down that produces the raw material that you need. Even then, you should have had a backup source. You should be able to come up with numbers like twenty percent for payroll taxes; $500/month for employee benefits; $3000/employee for equipment costs; and $25/square foot per year for rent.

Think big. Build on small successes at first, but if you go five years out, find a way to get to $100 million in sales. If you can’t imagine this level of sales without being high on crack, then you should face the facts: your company probably isn’t a “VC deal.” It may be a perfectly viable business, but it probably isn’t one for venture capital. The only way you’ll get to this five-year point is hand-to-hand combat with a ninety-day outlook at the start, but it’s important for everyone that a pot of gold can be at the end of the rainbow.

While writing this blog entry, I referred to a book by Bob Prosen called Kiss Theory Goodbye: Five Proven Ways to Get Extraordinary Results In Any Company, which helped me considerably.

Related Articles
  Part 8: Financials
  Which Business Plan Software is For Me
  Writing The Plan
  Business Plan Key Elements
  How the perfect marketing plan would work

Home > Entrepreneur-Advice > Guy Kawasaki > The Art of Projections in a Dotcom 20 World
Article Tags: business development, conservative method, consumer packaged goods, consumer packaged goods company, customer adoption, ego maniac, fifty years, honest feedback, investors, management team, market share, prototype, rule of thumb, sales meetings, shipping, six months, social networking, startups, three months

About the Author: Guy Kawasaki
RSS for Guy's articles - Visit Guy's website

Guy Kawasaki is a managing director of Garage Technology Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm and a columnist for Forbes.com. Previously, he was an Apple Fellow at Apple Computer, Inc. where he was one of the individuals responsible for the success of the Macintosh computer. Guy is the author of eight books including The Art of the Start, Rules for Revolutionaries, How to Drive Your Competition Crazy, Selling the Dream, and The Macintosh Way. He has a BA from Stanford University and an MBA from UCLA as well as an honorary doctorate from Babson College.

Click here to visit Guy's website
Dashed Line

Guy Kawasaki
More from Guy Kawasaki
How to Get a Free Autographed Copy of The Art of the Start
The Top Ten Lies of Entrepreneurs
How to enchant people with Facebook
Now You Can Rule the Web
How to Enchant Your Customer


Related Forum Posts
Name for website Name for website - Hmmmm Authors World Authors Network Authors World Wide Weblog World Wide Authors Arboretum (or some other alliterative word) WritertoWriter Writer to Reader WritersWorld WritersConnect AuthorsandtheirReadersBlog
Who Said Twitter Doesn't Work...? Who Said Twitter Doesn't Work...? - Last month, the BBC World Service programme, The Strand, featured 21 year-old Icelandic pianist/composer Olafur Arnalds. Arnalds achieved extraordinary success through his internet-led project to compose 7 tunes in 7 days, post them on his website and then post links to it via TWITTER. As a result his website got thousands of visitors eager to listen to his music, catapulting him to fame and bringing his music to the attention of the BBC, who featured an interview with him on the World Service programme, The Strand! So who says Twitter doesn't work? (HINT: It does help if you have something uniquely your own that other people want to get hold of...)
How to valuate a business How to valuate a business - Hi Garth - here is how we did it at Northern Crown Capital when I was helping them raise venture capital for Toronto-based entrepreneurs. Assume the start date is 2003 so 2008 projections are 5 years out: How Northern Crown Capital Valuates a Business 2008 Financial Projections Earnings Before Tax $5,865,000 Tax Rate 42% Taxes $2,463,300 Net Earnings $3,401,700 Amount Seeking to Raise Today $3,500,000 Discounted Value of Future Opportunity, 5 Years Out 2008 P/E Ratio 15 Value of Company in 2008 $51,025,500 Discount Rate Applied 30% Year 2008 $51,025,500 Year 2007 $35,717,850 Year 2006 $25,002,495 Year 2005 $17,501,747 Year 2004 $12,251,223 Value of Company at Investment in 2003 $12,251,223 Less: Investment Amount $3,500,000 Present Value $8,751,223 Discount for Risk & Private Company 40% Less: Discount for Risk & Private Company $3,500,489 Private Company Value $5,250,734 Present Value (What the Owner Keeps) $5,250,734 60.00% Financing (What the Investor Gets) $3,500,000 40.00% Total $8,750,734 100.00% I hope this helps!
Re: Exotic Tea Shop Website for Review Re: Exotic Tea Shop Website for Review - Hi David, - Background is nice and fitting, but I don't like the header. The title completely blends in with the background? - About Us shouldn't be second from the left on the navigation bar. People read from left to right. The commercial intent is to buy, the online store should probably be second. - Online Tea Store... too many choices without supplementary information. No description of product choice. oz and pricing should be stylized separately from the name of the product. - Online Tea Store.... Visuals is definitely very important in raising commercial intent. Someone who comes to the site through SEO is searching for exotic teas and not particulars. Meaning they're browsing. Text is not enough for a browsing shopper. - World of Tea... the information can be organized a bit better. Again, visuals. Some of this info belongs to online tea store. I'm not too sure on the name. - Tea & Treasure... not sure on this name either... mainly because you have "World of Tea" next to it. Navigation should be transparent in conveying information to the users. Why not call it "Find Us" or "Visit Us"? - Email newseletter.... "occasional updates" containing what exactly? Again, my humble opinion. Hope you find it useful!
Tale of a success story! Tale of a success story! - First, Shonika, thanks for that link! I'll check it out. Now, yahoooo! I'm so excited right now that I hope I'll be forgiven if I gush gush gush on what's turning out to be a success story. And one that I planned. I had a feeling, back in September when the Red Sox were leading their division so comfortably (before those dang Yankees made it tight!) that the Sox would be going to the World Series. So, I'm thinking to myself, they've got this rookie, Jacoby Ellsbury, first Navajo in the major leagues. That type of thing always draws readers, as does the first Japanese player, etc. etc. And not only was the the first Navajo, but he was also an exciting, star in the making type of player. So I created a website for him, really only a two page biography...and the site took off immediately. Everyone who saw him on TV wanted to read about him. And my google ads on the site took off as well. (But not the Amazon ads, darn it!!!! Never the Amazon ads!) Then, at the end of September the injured player he'd been subbing for came back, and Jacoby went back to the bench. And the hits - and Google clicks - dropped off dramatically when he was on the bench during the ACLS, while their regular center fielder, stuck it up on offense. But, finally yesterday, he got the start in center field because their regular center fielder couldn't hit anything at hte plate. And Jacoby got a hit, scored a run, and made some good plays in the field. And the hits - and clicks - to the website started ramping up again, and tonight, with him also making two "highlight" reel type catches in the field as well as delivering a timely hit, they're going through the roof. Also, he is bound to be on the sports news tomorrow - along with his teammates of course - because of those two plays in the field. So all this free publicity is playing right into my hands - just as I planned and expected it to do. And, even better, the World Series starts on Wednesday and he will be starting in center field again. I expect his defense to be stellar, which will catch people's eyes again, and if he can only do well at the plate.. Even if people aren't baseball fans, they usually tune in to the World Serious. And with Jacoby's background, people are going to be bound to want to read about him. So I am expecting much, much more traffic to my site, and I'm just so proud of myself for seeing this opportunity and capitalizing on it, and I am sooo happy that the Red Sox got into the World Series, because they were down 1 - 3 and I came *that* close to losing all my free publicity! Whew. Okay, sorry for the gush, but I am just really looking forward to seeing what happens in the next few days. Of course it will tail off after the World Series ends, but next year will be Jacoby's first official season as a Rookie, so then it should ramp up again... Now I've got to find a rookie football player whom people might like to read about, on a football team that [i:3c74rhpr]should [/i:3c74rhpr]get to the Superbowl... for example the Colts, and see if lightning will strike twice!


Recommended Article for You close

  Part 8: Financials

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article


Bottom Footer
Share for a Cause












Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

What should your free giveaway be?

Fighting the Saw-Tooth Affect

Quick Tips on Buying a Business

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.