In my quest to abolish software patents, I've been pondering "short term approaches" since I doubt the Supreme Court is going to wave a magic wand and make my fantasies come true anytime soon.

I've been hearing about something lately that bothers me a lot. More and more companies are paying engineers a bonus to file patents. Not "get patents" - simply generate patent applications. The intended consequence is an obvious one - companies get to file more patents. The unintended consequence is a particularly nasty one - lots of shitty patents get filed and the PTO has to wade through that much more garbage.

A friend of mine - who recently was "paid to file a patent" said he considered requesting that - if granted - the patent only be used defensively. I asked him why. He responded that he felt conflicted and thinks a lot of his peers feel the same way. He didn't think the patent was particularly valuable, useful, or valid. However, he was reluctant to turn down the bonus that he was getting for simply filing the patent. He didn't view it as a good use of his time (or of his company's time or money), but he realized that the patent system is motivating his company to file as many patents as they can. He has little expectation that the patent will be granted, but he was happy to get paid the bonus.

I asked him what would make him feel better. He surprised me when he said "My company should agree to only use the patent defensively if it is granted." I asked him if he thought this was a unique perspective and he said no - he thinks many experienced software engineers are skeptical of software patents. While they are skeptical, they understand the battle going on right now and realize the value of ever increasingly large number of patents for defensive purposes.

Wouldn't it be interesting if there was a grass roots movement of experienced software engineers around software patents for defensive purposes only.

Like this article? Share it with your friends

Related Articles
Let's Make Software Patents "Defensive Only"
	In my quest to abolish software patents, I've been pondering "short term approaches" since I doubt the Supreme Court is going to wave a magic wand and make my fantasies come true anytime soon.
Weekend Books
	I've been in a reading slump lately - I just haven't felt like reading. This happens sometimes and whenever I break my "at least two books a week" rhythm, I just roll with it until it changes.
Intellectual Property – The 3 Branches: Copyrights, Patents & Trademarks
	When you hear the phrase intellectual property, what do you think of? How can something that exists in your mind be considered property? Are your ideas your property similar to that of your house or car?
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS
	Some persons occasionally confuse patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Although there may be some resemblance in the rights of these three kinds of intellectual property, they are different and serve different purp...
Wikipedia for Patents
	John Funk, an entrepreneur (I’m an investor in John’s newest company – Evergreen IP) and friend has a innovative proposal up concerning changing the rules on the current patent system. I’ve been on both sides of th...

Related Forum Posts
	Patent Pending
	It takes a lot, and here's a quite valuable free resource
	Book: From Edison to iPod: Protect Your Ideas and Make Money
	some patent guidelines
	Check References!
	Funny stories
	Have a solid business plan and do your homework
	A very useful tool for managing your fundraising process