Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











A Legal Analysis of a Preferred Method of Retail Sales

Guest post by: Mitchell J. Kassoff

Article Overview: There are several methods of conducting a business in the area of retail sales. They include private ownership of one or more stores, a “chain store” system, public stock ownership of companies to provide capital for expansion and franchising. This article explores the legal aspects and benefits of conducting a business through the use of franchising.

Free Download - A Legal Analysis of a Preferred Method of Retail Sales By Mitchell J. Kassoff
Name: Email:

A Legal Analysis of a Preferred Method of Retail Sales

Franchising constitutes a huge and growing part of the economy of the United States.More than 300,000 franchised small businesses operating in the United States pump an estimated $1 trillion into the economy each year and provide jobs for some eight million Americans.[2]It is a popular method of conducting retail sales.The Federal Trade Commission has stated that only 6% of the 4,512 complaints received by the Federal Trade Commission concerned traditional franchise relationships.In addition, 74% of therecordsrepresented a single complaint against a single company.[3]

This phenomenon is not limited to the United States.An example is England where franchising is one of the fastest growing sectors of the economy.During the last year, the number of franchisees in England has risen by 17 percent to 35,200, with yearly turnover reaching 8.9 billion British pounds.Approximately 317,000 people are employed in franchising in England with 29.3 percent of all retail trade in being carried out by franchised businesses.[4]

Internationally, regulation of franchising is proceeding on an accelerated basis.An example is that of Australia which had a Franchising Code of Conduct enacted in 1998.[5]This code was amended on June 29, 2001 by regulations that became effective on October 1, 2001.Another example is the Ontario (Canada) ArthurWishartAct[6]whose purpose is torequire fair dealing between parties to franchise agreements, to ensure that franchisees have the right to associate and to impose disclosure obligations on franchisors.

Franchising has entered the Internet era.[7]This shows that this method of doing business should be investigated by all businesses to ascertain if they can profit from selling their products and services using franchising.It should be noted that while the Internet is becoming increasingly important in business it does not circumvent usual legal restrictions.One example of this is a “ponzi” or illegal pyramid scheme.This occurred when the operators of an Internet shopping mall network falsely claimed through the site that investors could earn substantial income from commissions on products purchased through the Internet.In reality, this scheme required the investors to recruit other participants.[8]

Franchising also provides the ability of a business to engage in the dual distribution of products.A United States District Court ruled that a franchisor could sell vitamin products manufactured by the franchisor but marketed under a different brand name than those sold by its franchisees to a competitor of its franchisees.The franchisees alleged the competitor's sales of those products interfered with the franchisees' economic expectancy in being the exclusive seller of the franchisor's vitamin products within a contractually defined territory.This ruling was made because the franchisees' contract gave the franchisees exclusive rights only with respect to a specific brand of products.The franchise agreement specifically allowed the franchisor to sell other brand products within the franchisees' territory.[9]

A franchisor can protect its intellectual property using injunctive relief to stop a former franchisee from using its trademarks.It can also enforce a covenant not to compete by prohibiting a former franchisee from doing business within ten miles of its former location for a period of two years.[10]

Franchising in the United States is governed by both federal law and state law.Federal law is administered by the Federal Trade Commission.[11]Filing of documents with the Federal Trade Commission is not required to franchise.[12]State laws affecting franchising include franchising laws, business opportunity laws and “Little FTC Acts.”[13]In many cases, filing of documentation of approval by the state is required prior to offering a franchise for sale within a particular state.There are also statutes specific to certain industries in some states.[14]In the case of franchising, a state is permitted to enact and enforce laws relating to franchising which act in addition to the provisions of federal law.[15]In addition, franchising is increasingly being regulated by other countries.[16]

Unlike securities laws, franchise related laws are not designed to be “Blue Sky” laws, but to provide information to prospective franchisees to enable them to determine if they should purchase a particular franchise.[17]However, some states analyze a franchisor’s financial statements and franchise agreements to make value judgments as to them.If these documents do not meet the requirements of some state agencies, “Risk Factor” notices[18], escrow requirements[19], bonding requirements[20]or even refusal to register a franchise have been imposed[21].

Originally, franchisors had touseddocuments drafted according to the requirements of the Federal Trade Commission Disclosure Rule.[22]This created a situation that required different versions of the franchise disclosure document to comply with different state disclosure requirements.To allow franchisors to use the same document on a nationwide basis a Uniform Franchise Offering Circular (“UFOC”) was developed (and has been amended) by the Midwest Securities Commissioners Association, and its successor the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”).The Federal Trade Commission issued a franchise disclosure rule in 1978 allowing franchisors the option of using the UFOC in lieu of its document.[23]The UFOC is presently used by most franchisors for this reason.

Although different states have different disclosure requirements, in some cases a franchisor can use one UFOC nationwide through the use of state specific language internally in the UFOC and addendums to the disclosure section and the franchise agreement.However, in some cases different states require contradictory disclosures that result in the necessity of having some state specific UFOCs.[24]

The UFOC is composed of several elements.There is generally a federal cover page, a state specific cover page (with different language depending on the state)[25], a Table of Contents (listing the 23 required Items[26](sections of the UFOC), followed by a list of exhibits in the UFOC), the disclosures for the 23 required Items, financial statements (audited financial statements for the past three fiscal years, with unaudited financial statements that are within 90 days of the filing of the UFOC, if necessary)[27], copies of all agreements that the franchisee must execute and a Receipt page for the UFOC.[28]

To register a franchisor to sellin a state additional documentsmust be filed.In New York, franchising is regulated by the office of the New York State Attorney General, Investor Protection and Securities Bureau which requires a facing page, application page, two copies of the UFOC, supplemental information sheet, verification of the application, salesman disclosure forms, consent to service of process, consent to use the franchisor’s financial statements in the UFOC signed by the Certified Public Accountant who prepared them and possibly additional forms depending on specific circumstances.[29]

In certain circumstances, state registration is not necessary.Some states do not require registration if a franchisor has a federally registered trademark or service mark and provides a UFOC to prospective franchisees[30], or if a franchisor has a certain specified amount of networth[31],or an offer is made to a maximum of two persons[32]or an offer is made to an existing franchisee.[33]

The Federal Trade Commission has defined whatis a “franchise.”[34]In addition, each state that requires registration has its own definition of what is a “franchise”[35]to determine if registration or regulation is required by that particular state.

To offer to sell a franchise in or from New York a franchisor must first be registered.[36]This includes the situation whenan offer or sale of a franchise is made in New York when an offer to sell is made in New York, or an offer to buy is accepted in New York, or, if the franchisee is domiciled in New York, the franchised business is or will be operated in New York.An offer to sell is made in New York when the offer either originated from New York or is directed by the offeror to New York and received at the place to which it is directed.An offer to sell is accepted in New York when acceptance is communicated to the offeror from New York.[37]Effectively this means that if a franchisor is located in New York it must register in New York to sell franchises either within or without New York State.

If a franchisor wishes to advertise, in many states the advertisement must first be filed with the state.[38]Also, reports as to sales must be filed in various states.[39]A UFOC must be given at least five business days prior to the date agreements are to be executed according to the federal rule.[40]However, many states require that the UFOC be given to the franchisee earlier.[41]

A significant issue in franchising is the venue that litigation will be permitted in the event of a dispute between a franchisor and a franchisee.This issue is usually addressed in the franchise agreement that usually provides for exclusive venue at the franchisor’s location.Obviously, if a franchisor is located in New York and a franchisee is located in Texas requiring a franchisee to litigate in New York not only gives the franchisor a huge advantage, but also might even stop a franchisee from commencing litigation in the first place.

When viewing the various state statutes as to franchise law it seems clear the intent of the legislature is to protect the franchisee.This is apparent as to the forum selection clause.Some states explicitly state that forum selection clauses may not be or are not enforceable for franchisees located in their states.[42]In a relatively recent case, a court in New York came to the opposite result and enforced a forum selection clause that required litigation in the franchisor’s home state outside of New York.[43]

There is also a movement on the federal level to protect franchisees.The Small Business Franchise Act was introduced in 1999.[44]The legislation would provide franchisees with a right of action in federal court in the event that the corporate franchise violates any provision of the bill.It was sent to the House Subcommittee on November 17, 1999.It was tabled during the 106th Congress.There is bipartisan opposition to the bill in the Congress in that the bill tries to establish a “one size fits all” model to franchising.It is felt by many that a fixed set of rules simply will not work with the many differences in franchise businesses and systems.The bill is currently on hold in Congress.

Asummary of the Small Business Franchise Act of 1999 is as follows.[45]The bill prohibits any person, in connection with the advertising, offering, sale, or promotion of any franchise, from: (1) employing a device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) engaging in an act, practice, course of business, or pattern of conduct which operates or is intended to operate as a fraud upon any prospective franchisee; (3) obtaining property, or assisting others in so doing, by negligently making an untrue statement of a material fact or failing to state a material fact; or (4) making any claim or representation which is inconsistent with or contradicts a disclosure document.Requires the franchisor to provide a written statement specifying whether the franchise agreement contains a right of renewal.

(Sec. 4)Prohibits any franchisor orsubfranchisor, in connection with the performance, enforcement, renewal, or termination of any franchise agreement, from: (1) engaging in an act, practice, course of business, or pattern of conduct which operates as a fraud upon any person; (2) hindering, prohibiting, or penalizing the free association of franchisees for any lawful purpose, including the formation of or participation in any trade association made up of franchisees; or (3) discriminating against a franchisee by imposing requirements not imposed on other similarly situated franchisees or otherwise retaliating against any franchisee for membership or participation in a franchisee association.

Prohibits a franchisor from: (1) terminating a franchise agreement prior to its expiration without good cause; or (2) prohibiting a franchisee from engaging in any business at any location after the expiration of a franchise agreement.

(Sec. 5)Sets forth provisions concerning: (1) minimum standards of conduct (good faith, due care, and limited fiduciary duty) for each party to a franchise agreement; (2) a prohibition against requiring the inclusion of a franchise agreement term or condition which violates this Act or relieves a person from a duty or liability under this Act; (3) a prohibition against a waiver from compliance with this Act; and (4) authorized legal actions by State attorneys general on behalf of State residents for alleged violations.

(Sec. 8)Authorizes a franchisee to assign a franchise interest to a transferee, provided such transferee satisfies reasonable qualifications applied by the franchisor in determining whether or not a current franchisee is eligible for renewal.Provides transfer conditions, including 30 days' prior written notice.Outlines events that shall not be considered transfers, such as successor management by a surviving heir or incorporation.

(Sec. 9)Prohibits a franchisor from transferring a franchise interest unless: (1) the franchisor provides 30 days prior notice to all franchisees of such intent; (2) the notice is accompanied by a complete description of the business and financial terms of the proposed transfer; and (3) upon such transfer, the transferee entity has the appropriate business experience and financial means to perform all of the franchisor's obligations.

(Sec. 10)Prohibits a franchisor from prohibiting a franchisee from obtaining equipment, fixtures, supplies, goods, or services (goods or services) used in the establishment or operation of the franchised business from sources of the franchisee's choosing, with the exception that such goods or services must meet reasonable quality standards promulgated or enforced by the franchisor.Requires the franchisor to: (1) provide and continuously update a list of approved vendors for such goods or services; and (2) report at least annually revenues and profits received from the sale of such goods or services to its franchisees.

(Sec. 11)Prohibits a franchisor from placing one or more new outlets of a franchised business within unreasonable proximity to an existing franchise, with an exception.

(Sec. 12)Sets forth provisions concerning: (1) legal actions brought by persons injured or damaged by violations; and (2) the right to arbitration, mediation, or othernonjudicialresolution in lieu of a legal action (with a statute of limitations).

Franchising is an excellent way for a business to expand its operations and grow geographically.Unlike a chain system, the franchisor does not have to provide capital, management and employees for each location.This allows a franchisor to increase a company’s profits, much more rapidly than if it expanded on its own.

As a franchisor, the company will have franchisees, people who own their own business, working for it.Therefore, the company’s franchisees will have every possible incentive to work extremely hard to make their business a success.A person who owns his own business will have a far greater stake in the business and work much harder than a manager, even a manager who receives a percentage of the profits of the business.

The franchisor will also have the advantage that with each new location it will immediately make money in the form of the initial franchise fee.The franchisor typically receives $5,000 to $25,000 as an initial franchise fee.In addition, the franchisor will receive a continuing royalty, usually in the amount of 8% to 10% percent of the gross income of the company’s franchisee.

One disadvantage of franchising is that after a franchisee has learned all there is to know about a business he resents paying a continuing royalty.In some cases, he will try to find a way to terminate the franchise contract.In other cases, he might try to cheat the franchisor since he believes in his mind that he is being cheated.

One other disadvantage to franchising is that the franchisor might be named in litigation involving the franchisee.Typically, this occurs when the franchisee is sued for injuries to its personnel or customers[46]or for various types of alleged discrimination.At this time, if the franchisor has not detailed how the franchisee has acted in this particular area, franchisors have usually been successful in defending these lawsuits.

In conclusion, franchising is an excellent way for a business to expend.Due to the many federal and state requirements as to the various laws that affect franchisors, it is advisable that competent legal counsel who is thoroughly familiar with these laws be retained to avoid potentially devastating pitfalls.

Related Articles
  5 reasons to automate your Retail
  Height Weight Chart - Gauging Your Life Insurance Risk Factors
  Boost Salon Spa Sales with Client Focused Retailing
  PoP (Point of Purchase) Visual Merchandising
  Breakeven Analysis
  Determining Value
  All Business Communications are Not Equal
  Consumer Packaged Goods Marketing - Retail Freebies
  Using Freebies To Leverage Retail Brands
  Analysis Paralysis
  Risk Assessment & Analysis Techniques
  Essential Steps Needed To Start An Online Retail Store
  Digital Retail Sales Growing in 2011
  How To Assess Your Sales Intelligence Quota
  Learning to Win in the Stock Market
  Merchant Cash Advance
  7 Reasons Why There Are So Many MLM Companies.
  What to look for when buying a Business?
  Google Adsense Profits and Affiliate Marketing Is An Ideas Business
  Holiday Rush?

Home > Franchises > Mitchell J. Kassoff > A Legal Analysis of a Preferred Method of Retail Sales >
Article Tags: chain store, legal aspects, preferred method, private ownership, public stock, retail sales, stock ownership, store system

About the Author: Mitchell J. Kassoff
RSS for Mitchell's articles - Visit Mitchell's website

Mitchell J. Kassoff, Esq., (www.franatty.cnc.net) deals exclusively with Franchise matters, has been representing both Franchisors and Franchisees in all matters in all 50 states since 1979. Mr. Kassoff has successfully litigated against Starbucks Coffee Company, Dunkin’ Donuts Inc., Domino’s Pizza LLC, 7-Eleven Inc., The Southland Corporation, Jimmy John’s Franchise, LLC, Jimmy John’s Enterprises, LLC, Great Wraps, Inc., MaggieMoo’s International, LLC, I Can't Believe It's Yogurt Ltd., Candy Express Franchising Inc., Best Western International Inc., Nissan North America, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Black Entertainment Television Inc., United Airlines Inc., The Hertz Corporation, LaSalle National Bank, United States Internal Revenue Service, Attorney General of the State of New York, Woolworth Corporation, Motiva Enterprises L.L.C., Allegiance Telecom Company Worldwide, Allegiance Telecom of New York Inc., Equilon Enterprises L.L.C., Equiva Trading Company, Venator Group Inc., Public Service Electric & Gas, Brice Foods Inc., Fremont Financial Corporation, and numerous other companies which are not nationally known.

Click here to visit Mitchell's website
Dashed Line

More from Mitchell J. Kassoff
Federal Antitrust Laws
Franchise & Distribution
Dismiss a Franchise
English
Violation Franchise Laws


Related Forum Posts
Happy Worker as of Dec 31 2007 Happy Worker as of Dec 31 2007 - Here's mine... I'm now off to make an offering to the business planning gods for their help in getting to these goals & beyond. To the combined success of Prophets 2 Profits! ----------------------------------------- 1) Corporate a) Retail - Sales reps covering all major markets (1M or more) - Retail product launch plan - 1 more retail release (TBD) b) The Toy Agency - Systems for: o Creative process o Pricing o Manufacturing o Logistics - Marketing agency strategy in place - 1 new customer every 2nd month (5 new customers); 1 of which will be rev of >= 500K/year c) Business - Creative talent pool management strategy & process - Outsourced and/or weekly bookkeeping - Monthly budgeting & forecasting - Better banking organization (Line of Credit, CCs, automate billing for appropriate vendors) - Team total of 5 - Larger office d) Web site - Daily updates - Start of separation of Blog/TTA/Retail 2) Personal - Most weekends “off”! - Entirely separate personal finances; basic personal financing plan - Family….?
New Small Business Topic New Small Business Topic - Hello everyone, I'm on the lookout for new topics to add to my site. We just launched a Franchising section and are planning Human Resources section. Do you have any thoughts for a new section? Here's a list of what we currently have: Angel Investors Branding Bank Loans Business Coaching Business Plan Franchises (New) Insurance Legal Marketing Public Relations Sales Small Biz Loans Venture Capital
Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional - Hi Evan, I am noticing that many of the posts in the Sales/Marketing section deal with online marketing, SEM and and SEO and Affiliates. I was wondering if it might be a good idea to separate that section into two; 1) Online Sales and Marketing; 2) Traditional Sales and Marketing
Re: Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional Re: Online Sales and Marketing vs Traditional - [quote="ltrahan":31w9r2iz]Hi Evan, I am noticing that many of the posts in the Sales/Marketing section deal with online marketing, SEM and and SEO and Affiliates. I was wondering if it might be a good idea to separate that section into two; 1) Online Sales and Marketing; 2) Traditional Sales and Marketing[/quote:31w9r2iz] I second the request...
Seek Venture Capital & Funding Seek Venture Capital & Funding - Hello, Greetings from India. I am Seeking Venture Capital for Offshore Software Company Start-up. Need advise along with Business Model Sample. I have a basic outline for an offshore company. 1. Technology - like Microsoft Dot Net, Java, LAMP 2. Talent Team - Found Good Technology Developers. 3. Where I can get the leads/potential customers - Leads have been identified who are willing to move forward offshore projects. 4. I do not have resources like funding. It is a very critical factor to me Industries: Manufacturing, Real Estate, Retail, Insurance, Distribution & Logistics, Healthcare, Industry Associations and Software Product Development, Agricultural Industries and Etc. Services: Offshore Software Development Company. Offices to be located: Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India and USA. Products/Services/Applications in areas like POS & Billing, Sales & Distribution, Production Planning, Material Management, Inventory Control, Plant Maintenance, Purchasing, Accounting and Logistics. Dynamic Web Programming with Database Driven Content Management Systems, Online Stores for E-Commerce, B2B Solutions, Community Portals, Website Redesign and Development, Custom ERP with Enterprise Wide Functional Modules such as Marketing, CRM, Accounting, Inventory Control, Sales & Distribution, Production Planning, Purchase & Stores, Logistics and Supply Chain. Seek your further questions and help. Thank you, Best Regards, Jayapratap.


Recommended Article for You close

  5 reasons to automate your Retail

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

What I Really Want Is...

Google Panda and Your Search Engine Rankings

When Living the Dream isn't enough!

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.