|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Complex of Federal and State Laws Regulates Franchise Operations As Their Popularity Grows
|
| Guest post by: Mitchell J. Kassoff |
Article Overview: Franchising is a huge and growing part of the nation’s economy. More than 300,000 franchised small businesses operating in the United States account for an estimated $1 trillion worth of income each year and provide jobs for some eight million Americans. 1
![]() |
Free Download - A Legal Analysis of a Preferred Method of Retail Sales By Mitchell J. Kassoff |
Complex of Federal and State Laws Regulates Franchise Operations As Their Popularity Grows
Franchising has also entered the Internet era. 2 Franchising
in the United States is governed by federal law administered by the Federal
Trade Commission 3 and by a variety of state statutes. Filing of documents with
the Federal Trade Commission is not required to franchise. 4 Applicable state
statutes include franchising laws, business opportunity laws and “Little FTC
Acts.” 5 In many cases, documentation demonstrating approval by the state must
be filed before a franchise is offered for sale within the state. Some states 6
have statutes specific to certain industries. A state is permitted to enact and
enforce laws relating to franchising that add to the provisions of federal law.
7 In addition, franchising is increasingly being regulated by other nations. 8
Unlike securities laws, franchise-related statutes are not
designed to be “Blue Sky” laws; instead their purpose is to provide prospective
franchisees with information that can help them determine whether they should purchase
a particular franchise. 9 In some states, however, the laws analyze a
franchisor’s financial statements and franchise agreements and make value
judgments about them. If these documents do not meet the requirements of some
state agencies, “Risk Factor” notices, 10 escrow requirements 11 and bonding
requirements 12 may be imposed or the agencies may even refuse to register a
franchise. 13
Originally, franchisors had to use documents drafted according
to the requirements of the Federal Trade Commission Disclosure Rule. 14 This
created a situation that required different versions of the franchise
disclosure document to comply with different state disclosure requirements. To
allow franchisors to use the same document on a nationwide basis, a Uniform
Franchise Offering Circular (UFOC) was developed and has since been amended by
the Midwest Securities Commissioners Association and its successor, the North
American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA). The Federal Trade
Commission issued a franchise disclosure rule in 1978 allowing franchisors the
option to use the UFOC in lieu of its document. 15 For this reason, most franchisors
now use the UFOC.
Although the states have different disclosure requirements,
in some cases a franchisor can use one UFOC nationwide by adopting
state-specific language internally in the UFOC and addendums to the disclosure
section and the franchise agreement. Nevertheless, some states have
contradictory disclosure rules that result in the need for a state-specific
UFOC. 16
The UFOC generally contains a federal cover page, a state-specific
cover page (with different language depending on the state), 17 a table of
contents (listing the 23 required items 18 that are sections of the UFOC,
followed by a list of exhibits in the UFOC), the disclosures for the 23
required items, financial statements (audited financial statements for the past
three fiscal years, with unaudited financial statements that are within 90 days
of the filing of the UFOC, if necessary), 19 copies of all agreements that the
franchisee must execute, and a receipt page for the UFOC. 20
Additional documents must be filed to register a franchisor
to sell in a state. In New York, franchising is regulated by the Investor
Protection and Securities Bureau in the office of the state attorney general.
The bureau requires a facing page, application page, two copies of the UFOC,
supplemental information sheet, verification of the application, salesman
disclosure forms, consent to service of process, consent to use the franchisor’s
financial statements in the UFOC signed by the Certified Public Accountant who
prepared them and possibly additional forms depending on specific
circumstances. 21
In certain circumstances, state registration is not
necessary. Some states do not require
registration if a franchisor has a federally registered trademark or service mark
and provides a UFOC to prospective franchisees, 22 or if a franchisor has a
certain specified amount of net worth, 23 or an offer is made to a maximum of
two persons, 24 or an offer is made to an existing franchisee. 25
The Federal Trade Commission has defined what constitutes
“franchise.” 26 In addition, each state that requires registration has its own
definition of what is a “franchise” 27 to determine whether it requires
registration or regulation.
To offer to sell a franchise in or from New York, a franchisor
must first be registered. 28 This applies when an offer to sell a franchise is
made in New York, when an offer to buy is accepted in New York, when the
franchisee is domiciled in New York, or when the franchised business is or will
be operated in New York. An offer to sell is made in New York when the offer
either originated from New York or is directed by the offeror to New York and
is received at the place where it is directed. An offer to sell is accepted in
New York when acceptance is communicated to the offeror from New York. 29 Effectively
this means that if a franchisor is located in New York it must register in New
York to sell franchises either within or without New York State.
If a franchisor wishes to advertise, many states require
that the advertisement first be filed with the state. 30 Many states 31 also
require that reports be filed on sales. The federal rule 32 requires that a
UFOC be given at least five business days before the date that agreements are
to be executed, but many states require that the UFOC be given to the
franchisee earlier. 33
Advantages and Disadvantages of
Franchising
Franchising allows a business to expand its operations and
grow geographically. Unlike a chain system, the franchisor does not have to
provide capital, management or employees for each location. This allows a franchisor
to increase its profits more rapidly than by expanding on its own.
The franchisees, as individuals who own their own business,
have every possible incentive to work hard to make their businesses a success.
Because they are owners, their motivation is likely to be greater than that of
a manager, even one who receives a percentage of the profits of the business.
With each new location, the franchisor immediately earns a
profit in the form of the initial franchise fee, typically $5,000 to $25,000.
The franchisor also receives a continuing royalty, usually 8% to 10% of the
gross income of the franchisee.
One disadvantage is that after franchisees have learned how
to operate a business they resent continued royalty payments. In some cases
they look for a way to terminate the franchise contract. In other cases they
may try to violate the terms of the franchise arrangements because they believe
the franchisor is receiving more benefits than it deserves.
Another disadvantage is that the franchisor may be named in
litigation involving the franchisee. Typically, this occurs when the franchisee
is sued for injuries to its personnel or customers 34 or for various types of
alleged discrimination. In these circumstances, if the franchisor has not
detailed how the franchisee should act in the particular area affected, the
franchisor has usually been successful in defending the lawsuit.
|
About the Author: Mitchell J. Kassoff RSS for Mitchell's articles - Visit Mitchell's website Mitchell J. Kassoff, Esq., (www.franatty.cnc.net) deals exclusively with Franchise matters, has been representing both Franchisors and Franchisees in all matters in all 50 states since 1979. Mr. Kassoff has successfully litigated against Starbucks Coffee Company, Dunkin’ Donuts Inc., Domino’s Pizza LLC, 7-Eleven Inc., The Southland Corporation, Jimmy John’s Franchise, LLC, Jimmy John’s Enterprises, LLC, Great Wraps, Inc., MaggieMoo’s International, LLC, I Can't Believe It's Yogurt Ltd., Candy Express Franchising Inc., Best Western International Inc., Nissan North America, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Black Entertainment Television Inc., United Airlines Inc., The Hertz Corporation, LaSalle National Bank, United States Internal Revenue Service, Attorney General of the State of New York, Woolworth Corporation, Motiva Enterprises L.L.C., Allegiance Telecom Company Worldwide, Allegiance Telecom of New York Inc., Equilon Enterprises L.L.C., Equiva Trading Company, Venator Group Inc., Public Service Electric & Gas, Brice Foods Inc., Fremont Financial Corporation, and numerous other companies which are not nationally known. Click here to visit Mitchell's website Factual Dismiss a Franchise English Violation Franchise Laws Franchise & Distribution |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
How to Conduct a B2B Marketing Content Audit
Google Panda and Your Search Engine Rankings
Starting A Set of Books
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



