The Simple Concept of Listening: a franchisee simply wants to be heard.
Article Overview: Listening. It’s a simple concept.
 |
Free Download - The Transparent Franchisor: Five rules for being a transparent franchisor By Brittany Snapp
|
The Simple Concept of Listening: a franchisee simply wants to be heard.
I’m admittedly a little slow getting around to putting down my
thoughts from the IFA conference last month in San Antonio. But I
wanted to highlight what for me was the most beneficial session of the
conference.
I attended a day long Franchise Relations Clinic
lead by renowned franchise relations expert Greg Nathan of The Franchise
Relationships Institute. You probably (or should) know Greg from his
often referenced franchisee-franchisor relationship model – The
Franchise E-Factor. If you are a franchisor, a franchisee, or thinking
about becoming either of these you need to read his materials.
My biggest take away from the day was simple: a franchisee simply
wants to be heard, and a franchisor needs to listen. What does that
mean? At the end of the day a franchisee really just wants the
franchisor to help them be profitable. A franchisee wants to know that
when they have a concern, the support systems are such that they can
pick up the phone or log-on to the company’s intranet site and find an
answer, idea, suggestion, or some other resource to help them be more
profitable. If the franchisee has a suggestion or question, they want
to be treated with respect just like any person would as a valued member
of the team.
What does it mean for a franchisor to really
listen? Well, I think Greg summed it up well during the session when he
said that a franchisee isn’t and shouldn’t be treated as an employee of
the franchisor. That’s what corporate growth is about. Franchisees
consider themselves employers and part of the franchisor’s team. So
it’s important that franchisors recognize this difference. They cannot
simply bark out orders or make significant changes to the system without
effectively communicating why those changes are being implemented. If
they don’t listen to the feedback and concerns from the franchisees on
the ground, franchisors’ efforts will be met with resistance or even
resentment.
Franchisees’ ideas, concerns, and suggestions are
too often mistaken as “complaints” by franchisors. It is important that
franchisors not be knee-jerkish, dismissive, or defensive. The
intelligent franchisor develops a culture of “teamness” (for lack of a
better term), one where support staff is engaged, educated, and
empowered to truly help franchisees become profitable.
Listening.
It’s a simple concept.
Ryan Frandsen
Franchise Foundry
VP of Client Services
Related Articles
Landing That First Franchisee
Franchise Opportunities many don't know about.
Franchisee/Franchisor Relationship Requires Mutual Trust, Respect
A Three Step Solution to the Selling Dilemma
Make the Most of the Franchisee/Franchisor Relationship
Taking Over an Existing Franchise
Franchisees and The 90 Day Window
3 Ways to Improve Your Listening Skills
Franchisee Checklist - assessing the business proposition
The franchise sale
Franchising a Business - Documenting The System
How Franchisees Can Gain More Time and Develop Their Employees
Thinking of Franchising? Ask 20 Questions
Hot Trends in Franchising - Risk and Reward
The Most Important Button on Your Phone
How to Listen like a Detective
What is franchising? My personal definition!
Learn the Powers of Effective Communication
The Truth About Franchise Royalty Fees
Parents Can Accelerate their Children's Ability to Learn
Article Tags:
franchise,
franchisee,
franchising,
franchisor,
listening
Related Forum Posts
Dispute between Supplier and franchisee
- This very much depends on the attitude of the franchiser. A good franchiser would be more than a little concerned about a franchisee not paying the bills purely from the perspective that it might tarnish the brand name. However, be aware that this might be struggling franchisee with a company that couldn't give two hoots about you being owed money.
Personally I would be inclined to approach the person first and inform him or her of your intentions to talk to the franchiser before you actually do. This at least gives the franchisee the chance to rectify the situation.
Dispute between Supplier and franchisee
- The franchisee is a totally legally separate entity from the franchiser, and frankly it is no business of the franchiser.
And the most important reason you are also likely to totally alienate the franchisee.
I don’t know enough about your relationship with franchisee to comment on the rights and wrongs: but I do know this - If there was even an ounce of "right" on my side in the non payment, and certainly if my problem was the franchise model was not working, I would make it my mission to delay payment all the way to the courtroom door anyone who was so sneaky as to go behind my back to the franchiser.
franchise consultant's horror stories
- I have seen these types of comments about a franchise consultant 'pushing' someone towards an opportunity that pays more, personally I do not see how that could happen. Presuming that someone is smart enough to pursue an opportunity, why would they be drawn to a company that does not fit their needs in order for a consultant to make more money?
This is not a hand shake and we're finished process, there are many steps involved to assure that people do not get stuck. The franchisors spend a significant amount of time with prospective franchisees just to eliminate such issues. I think this concept is bogus and without specific responses you are perpetuating an urban legend.
Have there been cases of buyer's remorse--absolutely. Have there been cases of buyers that did not believe they would have to work as hard as everyone told them they would--absoultely. But these are not indictments, in fact I have yet to speak with a franchisee that honestly felt they were manipulated at all, and I do this for a living. To make such statements as this shows that one truly does not grasp the multiple levels of qualifying, introductions, paper work review, more time with franchise ownership, concultation with attorney and tax advisors and more time with franchisor management. All of this is in place to cull out those that are uncertain.
Why would a franchisor want an un-qualified franchisee? The money is not enough. A dissatisfied or unqualified franchisee would easily cause more harm to the brand, to the morale and to the system than one franchise fee would be worth. Franchise companies spend their life developing brand recognition and establishing business models that work, why would they risk that for ANY un-qualified franchisee? They would not.
I know this is lengthy and I apologize, but I feel a dis-service is at hand here when 'urban legends' and supposition are espoused as truth.
Buying a franchise can not be forged, like loan documents in fraudulanet transactions. The process is lengthy and requires full engagement of the potential franchisee the whole way or the process is stopped.
I expect what has really been heard (if anything at all) is a dis-heartened franchisee that thought they had found a 'get rich quick with no work involved' and that is not the case. I have never heard a franchisor offer that, ever. But people hear what they want to hear and then say--that wasn't what I was told, an the mis-information cycle repeats itself--just like in this case.
In closing--IF this were the case, how does one explain the longevity and astounding success of franchise operations on the whole? Clearly, by virtually any data reported, franchise operations have an astounding success rate, e.g. 90% still in business after 6 years, 86% still with the original franchisee as owner. Compare that to 22-25% for self start companies still in business (a 75-78% failure rate), I do not think the 'pushing people for commissions' argument can bear the light of day.
I rest.
Franchise Territories
- [quote="franchisebrief.com":1dfdbmhp]This information will be included in the UFOC. If the UFOC states that there is no protected territory, then I would be suspicious. If UFOC states that each franchisee will have its own territory, then there should not be any problem.[/quote:1dfdbmhp]
Any franchises that I'm familiar with have a territory or distance provision that prevents franchisees from overlapping their territories. This is only a problem when you have an underproducing franchisee - but they should also have a provision to give a franchisee a set amount of time to make a go of the location and territrory.
Shri
Re: Franchising Brokers vs Franchising Consultants
- Franchise consultants are free and work with you without any obligation. they do not work for any one franchise but do get a percentage of the franchise fee when a franchisee that was registered with the franchise came from the consultant and the franchisee signs. They will try to match up your interests and skills to franchise businesses that are right for you. They can explain franchise guidelines and help you in any way they can.
Franchise brokers usually get paid by the client and/ or franchise (generally get some type of commission). Additionally, they can get points or referral fee off the deal if they refer you to a lending resource too after they sell you on a franchise. Typcally they will try to sell a prospective franchisee on a larger deal so they get a larger commission.
Recommended Article for You
close
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva.
Over
$50,000 raised and counting -
Please keep sharing! Learn more.