Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











Regulation D Programs

Guest post by: Ken Hollowell

Article Overview: Which Regulation D Series do I use?

Free Download - What are Angel Investors? By Ken Hollowell
Name: Email:

Regulation D Programs

There are three primary SEC Regulation D Programs that offer support for; the Regulation D 504 Offering, Regulation D 506 Offering, and the Small Corporate Offering Registration ("SCOR") Offering. Determining which program best suits your company is based primarily on transaction size. We normally recommend the standard 504 or 506 offering programs (not SCOR) for most companies.

Regulation D 504 Offerings are typically used for transactions under $1,000,000 in size.

Regulation D 506 Offerings are used for deals over $1,000,000.

504 Program

Regulation D 504 Offering: allows companies to raise up to a maximum of $1,000,000 in a 12 month period - the exemption is renewable meaning the company can use the 504 program again 6 months from their last securities sale under 504.

The 504 is the least restrictive of the Regulation D programs regarding structure, financials, disclosure, and investor suitability. A 504 offering allows a company to sell securities to an unlimited number of purchasers without regard to their sophistication or experience - although some States may limit the company to 35 non-accredited investors while still allowing an unlimited number of accredited investors.

The 504 is the most popular and widely used of the Regulation D programs. Many companies use 504 for an initial round and then float a 506 for a larger second round - both offerings can be done in a 1 year period because they are separate exemption programs.

The 504 program is available for private corporations only. Public reporting companies cannot use the 504 program.

The 504 program is regulated at the Federal level and State level (the State the investor resides). Companies using the 504 program must file a Form D notification filing with the SEC (included in our service) and may be subject to informational filings at the State level depending on the residency of the investor. We have streamlined the State filing process - most companies only need to file in 1-5 States to sell out a 504 offering.

506 Program

Regulation D 506 Offering: allows companies to raise capital through the sale of securities with no principal amount cap per 12 months. The 506 program provides an exemption for limited offers and sales of securities without regard to the dollar amount of the offering. Most companies use the 506 program to raise amounts from $1,000,000 up to $50,000,000 - although there is no cap on how much capital can be raised via a 506.

506 offerings have basic disclosure requirements regarding transaction and company details - our PPM documents exceed the Federal minimum disclosure level. Only financial statements for the most recent fiscal year need to be certified by an independent public accountant. If an issuer cannot obtain audited financial statements without unreasonable effort or expense, or if the company is a start-up with no operating history, only the issuer's balance sheet (to be dated within 120 days of the start of the offering) must be audited. An issuer can forgo providing audited financial information if the offering is made solely to accredited investors or if the information on the balance sheet is not material to the investment decision.

A 506 offering allows up to 35 non-accredited investors and an unlimited number of accredited investors. 506's are exempt from State securities laws - the Federal regulations supersedes the State rules, however most States will want a copy of the Form D submitted if you are selling securities to investors that reside in their State. As with the 504 program a company must file Form D in conjunction with a 506 offering to notify the SEC of the offering.

SCOR Program

Small Corporate Offering Registration ("SCOR") Offering: The SCOR is a more complex version of the 504 offering. The SCOR offering provides a standardized disclosure format that is accepted by 43 States and allows increased freedom of solicitation and advertising over the standard Regulation D 504 exempt program. The standardized disclosure format (the U-7 form) also allows the company to comply with a large number of individual States securities laws utilizing one regional review instead of filing the offering with each individual State the company sells securities in.

The SCOR does require audited financial statements for the past 2 fiscal years for offerings exceeding $500,000 and has a maximum 12 month cap of $1,000,000. You must also have 10% equity relative to the amount of capital you are raising through the offering. We typically recommend the standard 504 over SCOR due to its lack of restrictions, its ease of implementation, and its use of the more sophisticated and professional PPM disclosure document. The SCOR U-7 disclosure document is a question and answer document that we do not feel is very professional in its appearance to investors.

If you have any questions about whether a SCOR or 504 would be best for your transaction please feel free to call us directly to discuss specifics.

Related Articles
  Determining if a Business Plan or Regulation D PPM is your best option.
  Is it time for Commercial Mortgage Brokers to be Regulated?
  Who Should Use a Regulation D Private Placement
  4.0 The Role of Governments: Microfinance in Africa - Experience and Lessons from Selected African Countries
  Financial Regulation: Necessary Evil or Evil Necessarily?
  VII E. Strengthen Regulation and Supervision: PROMOTING STOCK MARKET DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA
  Equity Private Placement vs. Debt Regulation D Non-Public Offering of Securities
  SMEs in Africa - is capitalism really dead?
  Best Affiliate Programs - 7 Ways to Find Them!
  Agency
  An outlook on the future of Debt Consolidation Companies
  SMEs - regulation in Africa
  Uniform Disapproval and Ignoring the Up-sale
  How to use customer incentives to dramatically increase customer loyalty
  How to build customer loyalty
  Training A Salesperson?
  TRADITIONAL SALES TRAINING LEADS TO DECLINE IN SALES
  Creative Debt and Equity Financing Programs for Small and Medium Size Businesses
  International Franchise Association Code of Ethics
  Franchising as an Alternative to an IPO?

Home > Franchises > Ken Hollowell > Regulation D Programs >
Article Tags: funding your company, ppm, private placement offering, sing capital

About the Author: Ken Hollowell
RSS for Ken's articles - Visit Ken's website

– Ken M. Hollowell, founder of both Prfran Consultants, Inc. and Profran Capital Group, Inc. and is a leader in the field of franchise development and non traditional methods of raising capital since 1980. Mr. Hollowell has lectured before many business organizations, Universities and Colleges on the subject of franchising and hosted a radio talk show of radio for years.

He conducts numerous seminars annually on franchise development and investing in a franchise business throughout the United States. He is regularly requested by the Small Business Administration in Washington, D.C., S.C.O.R.E., Learning Annex and the International Franchise Association to speak on franchising. Mr. Hollowell's well-rounded experience and practical knowledge in both development and marketing have led him to be one of the most sought after franchise consultants in America. Mr. Hollowell has written many articles on both developing a franchise network and buying a franchise. Mr. Hollowell sits on no less than a dozen boards of directors. Mr. Hollowell works with as many as 120 new clients each year on teaching techniques and methods of raising capital through the SEC's Reg D Series of Offerings


Click here to visit Ken's website
Dashed Line

More from Ken Hollowell
THE HISTORY OF FRANCHISING
Newsworthy Trends in Franchising
FRANCHISING
Open Letter To Business Owners About Franchising
A Practical Look At Franchising


Related Forum Posts
Any experience with McManus UK Ltd.? Any experience with McManus UK Ltd.? - Did anybody already deal with any of the McManus UK Ltd offshore entities? I do have a program, but not enough cash. I have been advised that they can fund investors with access to Private Placement Programs but they don’t want to joint venture with me. They want a fee for the service. This is why I want to find out if anybody has had first hand experience with this group? Patrick Ohara, Financial Consultant
Re: You don't need to go to a "real" school to get Re: You don't need to go to a "real" school to get - [quote="OmnivoreInk":cwl01a6m]There are, I think, two types of people who go to school. Those who want to learn, and those who don't.[/quote:cwl01a6m] Hi Barbara, I agree with your comment 110% and that's why I could probably argue that it doesn't even matter if you go to a community college or distinguished University. At the end of the day, you're all given: a) an instructor and b) a textbook and it's really up to the individual to decide what he/she wants to get out of it. The [u:cwl01a6m]only[/u:cwl01a6m] real difference between "schools" is the level of student competition since all grading is done on a curve. For example, my grades at Seneca College's Continuing Education Programs are about 15% higher than what I got during my UofT undergrad! But another reason why online courses aren't that great is because I don't know why I need to pay $300-600 to read a bunch of "cookie cutter" content (via course website and textbook) and then have an "instructor" grade my paper or test? I mean, if you're really interested in learning more about something and have the self-discipline, why not just save your money and read a bunch of related articles on the web for free or buy a textbook for $100 to read at home? One might even argue that taking courses and getting degrees and diplomas are really only beneficial to people who want to have a career working for someone else.
HRPreneur HRPreneur - Hi everyone, I am new to the forum and I recently started my own Human Capital (HR) consulting firm called HRPreneur Inc. HRP focuses on making human capital a strategic differentiator for SME's. Below is a summary about HRP; Who We Are: HRP is a Human Capital consulting firm with 30 years of experience that becomes an extension of your company by providing a full array of services to help you create a highly engaged workforce focused on achieving strategic results in order to build a long lasting great company! Mission: HRP provides small and medium sized businesses a Strategic HR Business Partner to increase employee engagement, resulting in cost savings, increased productivity and results at an affordable rate! Vision: To inspire and warrant SME's reach their full competency! Cost Effectiveness: We provide over 30 years of experience at a fraction of the cost at a strategic executive HR business level You will save between 50% to 60% in costs per year on salary, bonus, benefits, training, office space alone We will provide you additional cost efficiencies through our services Services: • Strategic Human Resources Planning • Organizational Redesign • Change Management • Organizational Culture Development • Employee Engagement Programs • Leadership Assessment and Development • Compensation Design • Talent Acquisition • Assimilation and On-Boarding • Performance Management • Talent Management & Succession Planning • Human Resources Due Diligence • Human Resources Audit • Full Service HR Outsourcing
Information about doing franchise business in China Information about doing franchise business in China - CHINA’S FRANCHISE LEGAL SYSTEM Introduction Franchises has a history of more than one hundred years in foreign countries, now it has developed to be a mature business mode, and it is widely used in many countries, especially the developed ones. Recently, franchises has been developing fast in China, covering more than sixty industries and trades such as catering, retailing, clothes-washing, indoor decorations and gym. However, the market order of franchises is chaotic in some industries and areas. There are also some illegal and criminal activities under the guise of franchises. Under such circumstances, several important laws have been promulgated to regulate the commercial franchising activities. Applicable Legislation The main legislative provisions governing the commercial franchising in the PRC are: the Measures on Administration of Commercial Franchises; and the Measures on Administration of Archival Filing of Commercial Franchises; and the Measures on Administration of Information Disclosure of Commercial Franchises Qualification for Franchisors According to the laws, the franchisors as those enterprises who own such business sources as registered trademarks, enterprise logos, patents and proprietary technology, and license these business sources to franchisees. Firstly, the franchisors shall be enterprises, excluding other economic organizations and individuals. Secondly, the trademarks which can be licensed to franchisees shall be registered trademarks. According to the Trademark Law, the trademarks, whether registered or not, are protected under the laws, though there is difference in the vigor and extents of protection. It seems that the Ministry of Commerce has restrictions in recognizing trademarks, since it only provides “own trademarks to be licensed to others” at large, which causes chaos in practice. In the cases relevant to franchising disputes which we provided legal service to, all of them involve the situation that the franchisors granted licenses of non-registered trademarks or the trademarks which were in application to others, and when there was infringement on trademarks, the franchisors were unable to prevent infringement on trademarks. Then the interests of the franchisees could not be realized. What’s more, franchising activities with non-registered trademarks also, to some extent, encourage commercial frauds. Thirdly, the logos, patents and proprietary technology of enterprises are included in the business sources to be licensed to others for the first time, which enlarges the application scope of franchises and will improve the development of franchises. Requirements to be Met in Carrying on Franchising Activities In addition to the condition that only the enterprises will be allowed to carry on franchising activities referred to above, the franchisors shall also have mature business modes, and are able to provide business guidance, technology support and training. The enterprises which copy the manuals, websites and enlisting documents of others, and have no service abilities for providing business guidance, technology support and training shall be excluded. What needs pointing out is that even these enterprises that are allowed to carry on business may face with the suits claiming them for unfair competition and infringements on intellectual properties. In addition, the Measures clearly request that the franchisors shall operate at least two directly operated shops, and the period of operation shall be more than 1 year, which aims to prevent frauds by the way of franchising. Information Disclosure Requirements and Regulation on Franchisors Information disclosure system is the core system of franchising. The laws provides that the franchisors shall establish and implement a perfect information disclosure system, and provide the relevant information and franchising contracts in written form, at least thirty days before execution of franchising contracts. It also sets out the specific provisions on the information which shall be provided by franchisors, including the basic conditions and commercial reputation records of the franchisors and their legal representatives, business sources owned by franchisors, abilities of franchisors to provide service to franchisees and management and supervision on business of franchisees, franchisee fees and the payments, and budgets for investment in franchising shops. To the franchisors that violate these provisions, the authorities in charge of commerce will order them to rectify, charge penalties and make public statements. Archival Filing and Public Announcement Systems To protect the franchisees’ lawful rights and interests, considering the asymmetric information between franchisors and franchisees, in addition to intensifying information disclosure requirements and regulating the activities of franchisors, the Measures also bring in the archival filing and public announcement systems. The Measures provides that the franchisors shall make a filing with the commerce administrative department within 15 days after the execution of franchising contracts for the first time. Anyone who intends to engage in any commercial franchise activities within a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall go through the archival filing formalities in the commerce administrative department of the people’s government of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government where the franchisors are located. Anyone who intends to engage in any commercial franchise activities beyond a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall go through archival filing formalities in the commerce administrative department of the State Council. Any franchisor having been engaging in franchise activities before May 1, 2007 shall apply for archival filing at the commercial administrative department. The Ministry of Commerce has established the national network for archival filing work relating to commercial franchise. Any franchisor shall go through the archival formalities through the government website. The general public may obtain the following information through the government website of the Ministry of Commerce: (1)The registered trademark(s), enterprise mark(s), patent(s), know-how and other business resources of the franchisor; (2)The franchisor’s archival filing date; (3)The location of the legal business place, contact information and name of the legal representative of the franchisor; and (4)The location of the business place of the franchisee(s) within China. The authorities in charge of filing will cancel the archival filing if there is any following activities of franchisors, and make public announcement on the government website: (1) the business licenses of the franchisors have been withdrawn by the registration administrative authorities for illegal business; (2) the authorities in charge of filing receive judicial suggestion letter on cancellation of archival filing from the judiciary for illegal business by franchisors; (3) the franchisors conceal the relevant information or provide false information, which has been proved; (4) the franchisors carry on cancellation by themselves. In addition, the illegal activities of the franchisors will be announced to the public. By Erex Chen, a Chinese lawyer based in Shanghai.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

Work at home Opportunities for the Disabled

Get Your Business on Google Places

Marketing & Sales tools – going back to basics

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.