Stock Prices Rise 21% When Firms Announce Energy Management Projects
Stock Prices Rise 21% When Firms Announce Energy Management Projects
If “publicity-gaining” potential is a decision factor during project selection, then a new product line or joint venture would usually be selected over an EMP. But is this a fair comparison? There has not been any research to determine if an EMP announcement increases a firm’s stock price. In theory, it should because most EMPs increase profits (via cost reduction instead of increased revenues). From a cash flow perspective, an EMP is equivalent to any other profit-enhancing project.
This paper seeks to determine whether an EMP announcement correlates with an abnormal increase in a firm’s stock price. If such announcements positively impact stock price, then the firm has one more incentive to implement EMPs.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The purpose of this literature review is three-fold:
1. To demonstrate that EMPs are credible investments, with relatively low risk;
2. To present some background on stock price reaction to announcements of typical capital investments; and
3. To show that abnormal increases in stock prices from EMP announcements have not been measured.
Public announcements (such as mergers, joint ventures or new product lines) correlate with abnormal stock price returns. , When a firm announces a joint venture (or other revenue-enhancing project) it is trying to attract publicity, which can raise the stock price based on expected future profits. However, since such projects can also be unprofitable, the anticipated cash flows are at risk.
When firms implement EMPs, they also expect improved profits by becoming more cost-competitive. EMPs and equipment replacement projects usually have more predictable cash flows (less risk) than many other types of capital investments, especially new product lines or joint ventures. Today, the risk from most EMPs is so low there are many third party lenders who are eager to locate and finance EMPs. In 1995, leasing (which does include third party leasing and performance contacting) accounted for nearly one third of all equipment utilization. Thus, EMPs and other facilities improvement projects are recognized as credible investments, however they are frequently put on the “back burner” relative to revenue-enhancing projects.
Maximizing stock price should be a goal of the corporation. Increasing productivity, offering new product lines, and increasing profits are examples of tangible factors that can increase the firm’s stock price. However, stock price may also increase due to intangible factors; such as investor speculation and reaction immediately following an announcement. Executives may incorporate this investor reaction when deciding which projects to implement.
Although investor reaction has not been assessed for EMP announcements, there has been some research in this area. It has been shown that firms increasing expenditures on general facility and equipment improvements had a 1.98% abnormal stock increase immediately after the announcement. Announcements of joint ventures correlated with a positive abnormal return of 1.95% over a twenty-one day interval, (-10 days to +10 days) centered on the announcement day (day 0). However, not all joint ventures correlate with positive abnormal stock returns.
The correlation between EMP announcements and stock price has not previously been investigated. This paper will examine whether EMP announcements correlate with positive abnormal stock price returns. If they do, then perhaps the capital budgeting process should incorporate this benefit.
METHODS
Using the Nexis/Lexis database, the World Wide Web, and other resources, a search for EMP announcements resulted in over 5,500 citations. Of the 5,500 citations, only 23 announcements fit the following criteria:
1. The firm announcing the EMP was publicly traded and its returns were available on the data files of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP).
2. The announcement was the first public information released about the EMP.
3. The EMP must be large enough to represent a significant investment for the company. For example, if a large fast-food chain was announcing an EMP at only one restaurant, it was deleted from the sample. However, if the EMP was company-wide, it would be included in the sample.
4. The announcement was made in a major US newspaper, newswire service or a monthly trade magazine between 1986 and 1995.
The 23 announcements which represented the “Complete Sample”, consisted of several sub-samples:
• 16 Announcements made within daily newspapers or via electronic wire (“Daily”)
• 3 Announcements within monthly trade magazines (“Monthly”)
• 4 Announcements of post-implementation results (“Post-Implementation”)
An additional sub-sample was created (“Daily + Monthly”) to maximize the sample size of pre-implementation announcements.
For each announcement, the firm’s name, CRSP identification number and announcement date were entered into the Eventus computer program, which tracks daily stock price performance for every U.S. stock listed within the CRSP. Eventus uses a common “event-study” methodology to calculate abnormal stock returns, and indicates statistical significance levels. Statistically, a null hypothesis (Ho) was proposed and tested against an alternative hypothesis (Ha):
Ho = EMP announcements have no impact on
stock price.
Ha = EMP announcements have a positive impact
on stock price.
Analysis Intervals
Usually, a firm’s stock price performance is analyzed over several time intervals around the announcement date. Often, a stock price improvement can be noticed between the day of the announcement (day 0) and the next trading day (day 1). In this interval, the range is represented by the following notation: (day 0, day 1) or (0,1). Another typical interval for event-study analysis is a two-day interval, one day before the announcement to the announcement date (-1,0).
EMP announcements frequently appear in monthly trade magazines, which are distributed to readers on different days in different geographic locations. In this case, an exact announcement date can not be determined. Thus, analysis of the stock performance over a wider interval is appropriate. The (-10, 10) interval represents the period at which EMP announcements would most likely be noticed through monthly trade magazines. In addition, since EMP announcements may not capture as much publicity as other announcements, they require a longer period
for the market to “learn” about them.
The (-10,10) interval is useful for identifying if an abnormal stock price increase correlates with an EMP announcement. However, to observe the long-term stock impact, the sub-samples were analyzed over additional intervals, such as (1,100), (1,150), etc.
Applying the aforementioned hypothesis tests to the sub-samples yielded the results that are presented in the following section of this paper. A more detailed explanation of the “event-study” methodology (statistical analysis) is included in the Appendix.
RESULTS
Tables 1 and 2 present the short-term and long-term abnormal returns. The returns are categorized by interval around the announcement date. The level of significance at which Ho was rejected is also indicated.
The Daily + Monthly sub-sample is the most appropriate sample because it is the largest sample possible that excludes Post Implementation announcements. The Post Implementation sub-sample is substantially different in nature because it represents firms announcing cost savings (increased profits) from projects already implemented.
Using the Daily + Monthly sub-sample, EMPs correlate with a 3.90% increase in stock price, measured from ten days prior to the announcement to ten days after the announcement, (-10, 10). The level of significance was 0.01. See Table 1.
Table 1. Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
Table 2. Long-Term Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
Table 2 shows the long-term performance, where the Daily + Monthly sub-sample correlated with a 21.33% abnormal return over the (1,150) interval, at the 0.001 significance level. Figure 1 is a graphical illustration of the abnormal returns over the long-term interval.
Figure 1. Long-Term Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
CONCLUSION
The results from this study indicate that EMP announcements correlate with significant abnormal increases in a firm’s stock price. On average, an EMP announcement correlated with a 21.33% abnormal increase in the firm’s stock price. This increase was experienced from the day after the announcement to 150 days after the announcement. This increase is in addition to the risk-adjusted return the firms would normally experience. For example, during a “bull market” a firm’s expected return was 10%. After the announcement, the return would increase by 21.33%, for a net return of 31.33%. Because these EMPs were announced by a diverse group of firms at various periods over a ten-year time span, the significance of these results is impressive. In other words, the EMP is probably the only event that all firms within the sample have in common.
From these results, it appears that shareholders recognize EMPs as low-risk investments that should increase profits and add value to the firm. With the new information presented here, firms may have an additional strategic incentive to implement EMPs.
Stock Prices Rise 21 When Firms Announce Energy Management Projects - To learn more about this author, visit Eric A. Woodroof's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
The potential for increased profits via cost-reducing Energy Management Projects (EMPs) exists in nearly all firms. However, when allocating capital, priority is often given to revenue-enhancing projects, such as starting new product lines or joint ventures. Frequently, these projects are perceived to be superior to EMPs, even though they may yield the same increased profit and present value. A justification is that revenue-enhancing projects are more likely to attract publicity and investor attention. Investor speculation and reaction to announcements can increase the firm’s stock price. Most EMPs do not generate as much publicity as joint ventures or new product lines.
If “publicity-gaining” potential is a decision factor during project selection, then a new product line or joint venture would usually be selected over an EMP. But is this a fair comparison? There has not been any research to determine if an EMP announcement increases a firm’s stock price. In theory, it should because most EMPs increase profits (via cost reduction instead of increased revenues). From a cash flow perspective, an EMP is equivalent to any other profit-enhancing project.
This paper seeks to determine whether an EMP announcement correlates with an abnormal increase in a firm’s stock price. If such announcements positively impact stock price, then the firm has one more incentive to implement EMPs.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The purpose of this literature review is three-fold:
1. To demonstrate that EMPs are credible investments, with relatively low risk;
2. To present some background on stock price reaction to announcements of typical capital investments; and
3. To show that abnormal increases in stock prices from EMP announcements have not been measured.
Public announcements (such as mergers, joint ventures or new product lines) correlate with abnormal stock price returns. , When a firm announces a joint venture (or other revenue-enhancing project) it is trying to attract publicity, which can raise the stock price based on expected future profits. However, since such projects can also be unprofitable, the anticipated cash flows are at risk.
When firms implement EMPs, they also expect improved profits by becoming more cost-competitive. EMPs and equipment replacement projects usually have more predictable cash flows (less risk) than many other types of capital investments, especially new product lines or joint ventures. Today, the risk from most EMPs is so low there are many third party lenders who are eager to locate and finance EMPs. In 1995, leasing (which does include third party leasing and performance contacting) accounted for nearly one third of all equipment utilization. Thus, EMPs and other facilities improvement projects are recognized as credible investments, however they are frequently put on the “back burner” relative to revenue-enhancing projects.
Maximizing stock price should be a goal of the corporation. Increasing productivity, offering new product lines, and increasing profits are examples of tangible factors that can increase the firm’s stock price. However, stock price may also increase due to intangible factors; such as investor speculation and reaction immediately following an announcement. Executives may incorporate this investor reaction when deciding which projects to implement.
Although investor reaction has not been assessed for EMP announcements, there has been some research in this area. It has been shown that firms increasing expenditures on general facility and equipment improvements had a 1.98% abnormal stock increase immediately after the announcement. Announcements of joint ventures correlated with a positive abnormal return of 1.95% over a twenty-one day interval, (-10 days to +10 days) centered on the announcement day (day 0). However, not all joint ventures correlate with positive abnormal stock returns.
The correlation between EMP announcements and stock price has not previously been investigated. This paper will examine whether EMP announcements correlate with positive abnormal stock price returns. If they do, then perhaps the capital budgeting process should incorporate this benefit.
METHODS
Using the Nexis/Lexis database, the World Wide Web, and other resources, a search for EMP announcements resulted in over 5,500 citations. Of the 5,500 citations, only 23 announcements fit the following criteria:
1. The firm announcing the EMP was publicly traded and its returns were available on the data files of the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP).
2. The announcement was the first public information released about the EMP.
3. The EMP must be large enough to represent a significant investment for the company. For example, if a large fast-food chain was announcing an EMP at only one restaurant, it was deleted from the sample. However, if the EMP was company-wide, it would be included in the sample.
4. The announcement was made in a major US newspaper, newswire service or a monthly trade magazine between 1986 and 1995.
The 23 announcements which represented the “Complete Sample”, consisted of several sub-samples:
• 16 Announcements made within daily newspapers or via electronic wire (“Daily”)
• 3 Announcements within monthly trade magazines (“Monthly”)
• 4 Announcements of post-implementation results (“Post-Implementation”)
An additional sub-sample was created (“Daily + Monthly”) to maximize the sample size of pre-implementation announcements.
For each announcement, the firm’s name, CRSP identification number and announcement date were entered into the Eventus computer program, which tracks daily stock price performance for every U.S. stock listed within the CRSP. Eventus uses a common “event-study” methodology to calculate abnormal stock returns, and indicates statistical significance levels. Statistically, a null hypothesis (Ho) was proposed and tested against an alternative hypothesis (Ha):
Ho = EMP announcements have no impact on
stock price.
Ha = EMP announcements have a positive impact
on stock price.
Analysis Intervals
Usually, a firm’s stock price performance is analyzed over several time intervals around the announcement date. Often, a stock price improvement can be noticed between the day of the announcement (day 0) and the next trading day (day 1). In this interval, the range is represented by the following notation: (day 0, day 1) or (0,1). Another typical interval for event-study analysis is a two-day interval, one day before the announcement to the announcement date (-1,0).
EMP announcements frequently appear in monthly trade magazines, which are distributed to readers on different days in different geographic locations. In this case, an exact announcement date can not be determined. Thus, analysis of the stock performance over a wider interval is appropriate. The (-10, 10) interval represents the period at which EMP announcements would most likely be noticed through monthly trade magazines. In addition, since EMP announcements may not capture as much publicity as other announcements, they require a longer period
for the market to “learn” about them.
The (-10,10) interval is useful for identifying if an abnormal stock price increase correlates with an EMP announcement. However, to observe the long-term stock impact, the sub-samples were analyzed over additional intervals, such as (1,100), (1,150), etc.
Applying the aforementioned hypothesis tests to the sub-samples yielded the results that are presented in the following section of this paper. A more detailed explanation of the “event-study” methodology (statistical analysis) is included in the Appendix.
RESULTS
Tables 1 and 2 present the short-term and long-term abnormal returns. The returns are categorized by interval around the announcement date. The level of significance at which Ho was rejected is also indicated.
The Daily + Monthly sub-sample is the most appropriate sample because it is the largest sample possible that excludes Post Implementation announcements. The Post Implementation sub-sample is substantially different in nature because it represents firms announcing cost savings (increased profits) from projects already implemented.
Using the Daily + Monthly sub-sample, EMPs correlate with a 3.90% increase in stock price, measured from ten days prior to the announcement to ten days after the announcement, (-10, 10). The level of significance was 0.01. See Table 1.
Table 1. Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
Table 2. Long-Term Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
Table 2 shows the long-term performance, where the Daily + Monthly sub-sample correlated with a 21.33% abnormal return over the (1,150) interval, at the 0.001 significance level. Figure 1 is a graphical illustration of the abnormal returns over the long-term interval.
Figure 1. Long-Term Abnormal Return of Firms Announcing Energy Management Projects
CONCLUSION
The results from this study indicate that EMP announcements correlate with significant abnormal increases in a firm’s stock price. On average, an EMP announcement correlated with a 21.33% abnormal increase in the firm’s stock price. This increase was experienced from the day after the announcement to 150 days after the announcement. This increase is in addition to the risk-adjusted return the firms would normally experience. For example, during a “bull market” a firm’s expected return was 10%. After the announcement, the return would increase by 21.33%, for a net return of 31.33%. Because these EMPs were announced by a diverse group of firms at various periods over a ten-year time span, the significance of these results is impressive. In other words, the EMP is probably the only event that all firms within the sample have in common.
From these results, it appears that shareholders recognize EMPs as low-risk investments that should increase profits and add value to the firm. With the new information presented here, firms may have an additional strategic incentive to implement EMPs.
Stock Prices Rise 21 When Firms Announce Energy Management Projects - To learn more about this author, visit Eric A. Woodroof's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
David AchesonDavid Acheson is the founder of DCJA Consultancy. DCJA Consultancy is a management consultancy business specialising in B2B sales consultancy. They offer bespoke and packaged sales consultancy including Sales Optimisation Review, Interim Sales Management, Sales & Marketing Review, 1:1 Sales & Management Staff Analysis, Management Training, Solution Sales Training, Creation of New Pay Plan, KPI's, run Customer Feedback Campaigns, assist with Recruitment, Coaching, Appraisals and set up Strategic Marketing Campaigns. David spent his early career in accountancy and then moved into sales in 1982, working in Office Equipment, IT, Advertising, Training, Outsourcing and Consultancy. He has held many Senior Positions in SMBs and Global Organisations including Head of Sales Operations & Head of Business Development. His knowledge, skills and great experience of the Sales Industry has led to David making keynote speeches and running educational sessions to key businesses through organisations including The Chamber of Commerce and Business Link. - Visit David Acheson's Website |
|||
Dave KurlanDave Kurlan is the founder and CEO of Objective Management Group, Inc., the industry leader in sales assessments and sales force evaluations, and the CEO of David Kurlan & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in sales force development. Dave has been a top rated speaker at Inc. Magazine's Conference on Growing the Company, the Sales & Marketing Management Conference and the Gazelles Sales & Marketing Summit. He has been featured on radio and TV, including World Business Review with General Norman Schwarzkopf, in Inc. Magazine, Selling Power Magazine, Sales & Marketing Management Magazine and Incentive Magazine. He is the author of Mindless Selling and Baseline Selling – How to Become a Sales Superstar by Using What You Already Know about the Game of Baseball. He created and wrote STAR, a proprietary recruiting process for hiring great salespeople, and he writes Understanding the Sales Force, a popular business Blog and is a contributing author to The Death of 20th Century Selling and 101 Great Ways to Improve Your Life, Volume 2. - Visit Dave Kurlan's Website |
|||
George LudwigGeorge Ludwig is a recognized authority on sales strategy and peak performance psychology. An international speaker, trainer, and corporate consultant, he helps clients like Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Laboratories, Northwestern Mutual, CIGNA, and numerous others improve sales force effectiveness and performance. Though it's George's strategies and processes that help corporations increase productivity and performance, it's his tremendous energy and dynamism that spark the transformation. Again and again, clients remark on his amazing ability to unleash human capacity and inspire men and women to break out of their comfort zones. The result is a whole new type of salesperson. His customized presentations teach achievers to make stunning advances in their lives. From helping salespeople realize cherished dreams to helping corporations exponentially accelerate revenue streams, George Ludwig leaves audiences and individuals empowered, emboldened, and clamoring for more. George is the best-selling author of Power Selling: Seven Strategies for Cracking the Sales Code and Wise Moves: 60 Quick Tips to Improve Your Position in Life & Business. - Visit George Ludwig's Website |
|||
Linda RichardsonLinda Richardson is the Founder and Executive Chairwoman of Richardson, a global sales training and performance improvement company. As a recognized leader in the industry, she has won the coveted Stevie Award for Lifetime Achievement in Sales Excellence and she was identified by Training Industry, Inc. as one of the “Top 20 Most Influential Training Professionals.” Ms. Richardson is credited with the movement to Consultative Selling and is the author of ten books on selling and sales management, including Sales Coaching — Making the Great Leap from Sales Manager to Sales Coach, and Stop Telling, Start Selling. She teaches sales and management at the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania and the Wharton Executive Development Center. Linda is a frequent speaker at industry and client conferences, has been published extensively in industry and training journals, and has been featured in numerous publications, including The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Nation’s Business, Selling Power, Success, and The Conference Board Magazine. Learn more about Richardson's sales training and performance improvement solutions at http://www.richardson.com web - Visit Linda Richardson's Website |
|||
Stephanie RobeyStephanie Robey is President and CoFounder of Pivot Positive, LLC - an Internet marketing business focused on helping people start work at home ventures. Previously, she was employed at The Search Agency with over 20 years experience in graphic design and 10 years experience in online marketing. She was responsible for launching the Conversion Path Optimization (CPO) unit where she and her team have conducted hundreds of optimization tests for online companies across multiple verticals. She is a successful entrepreneur having started and sold 2 companies and remains on the board of directors of the third, PhotoSpin.com Stephanie began her career in the direct marketing realm creating and producing direct mail for many of the major cable television companies and directly attributes her understanding of Internet marketing to those early offline experiences. Stephanie is a graduate of San Diego State University with a BFA in Graphic Arts and also holds an Executive MBA from the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University. Read Steph's Blog Meet Steph and Dave Sign up for our Free 7-Day BootCamp: Self Employed & Rich - Visit Stephanie Robey's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Eric's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
|
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Funding Worksheet Business / Personal Plan Managing the Unimaginable Loyalty Strategies Breakdown, Breakthrough |
|
 | ||
 |
More PR Resources
Press Release Builder | |
 |
Top 50 Political Blogs
Top Political Blogs of 2009 | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
