Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting

Guest post by: Richard Matthews

Article Overview: Republican gains in the 2010 gubernatorial race have important implications for redistricting, a process which ultimately determines electoral outcomes.

Free Download - The State of the Sustainable Furniture Industry By Richard Matthews
Name: Email:

Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting

Republican politicians are preparing to use redistricting to serve their own interests and ignore the public good. Although the ramifications largely escape public notice, the influx of Republican governors in the 2010 midterms will significantly influence redistricting. Republicans will control the redrawing of over 200 House districts, compared to only a few dozen for Democrats. This will make it even more difficult to gain electoral support for President Obama's agenda, including energy and climate change. Every 10 years, legislative district lines are redrawn, ostensibly to reflect demographic changes revealed by the census. The redistricting process is also the single most important lever for states to influence the composition of Congress. Ultimately redistricting determines electoral and legislative outcomes. With the exception of a handful of states, these decisions are made with little or no public input or accountability.

There are a total of 36 states on track for redistricting. While the number of Congressional seats is determined by population, each state has its own redistricting process. In 42 states the processes is done in the state legislature and then confirmed by the governor, sometimes the state supreme court. There are seven states that operate on commission systems that includes a review by other governing bodies. However, Arizona's commission of non-elected residents does not need final legislative input or approval. The other seven states have just one Congressional district.

The midterm election of 2010 included three state ballot initiatives that dealt with redistricting decisions through independent commissions. California approved Proposition 20 and Oklahoma voters approved State Question 748.

Florida voters approved constitutional amendments requiring Congressional and state legislative districts to follow city, county, or geographical boundaries. The amendments also stipulate that districts must have similar population distribution, be compact, and must not favor or disfavor a political party or incumbent or disenfranchise any racial or ethnic group.

Republicans control approximately 204 districts, but the passage of Proposition 20 in California means 53 more seats are off the table for Democrats. The control of 27 districts in Florida depends on the outcome of litigation. Democrats control 47, as it stands, with another 27 in the New York State Senate, another 20 in Oregon, Minnesota, and Colorado and another 2 depending on the role Rhode Island governor elect Lincoln Chafee decides to play in the process. North Carolina counts toward the Republican total, as the governor has no sway over redistricting.

Controlling a governorship can often be a boon to a party in a presidential race. Politicians use redistricting as an opportunity to cut unfavorable constituents and potential challengers out of their districts. Incumbents can also use redistricting to move favorable constituents into their districts.

Transparency is the only way to hold politicians accountable for their redistricting efforts. Scholars at the Brookings Institution along with the American Enterprise Institute have consulted with an array of experts in redistricting issues to provide a set of principles for transparency and public participation.

The new slate of Republican governers are planning to gerrymander legislative lines behind closed doors and this does not bode well for America's democracy or the war against climate change.

Related Articles
  Republican Gubernatorial Gains and the Clean Energy Economy
  Republican Gubernatorial Gains and US Carbon Trading Programs
  Barack Obama Election Ushers in A Different World
  The Foxes in the Henhouse: Republicans in Charge of Climate and Energy Committees
  Historical Productivity Gains in Industry Generally
  Free '65 Haircut Sinks Romney's Campaign!
  Mom! He Got More Than I Got!
  4.3 Conclusion: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  Don't Germs Have Rights, Too?
  The Passage of Health Care Legislation and Implications for the Environment
  6.0 The Way Forward: Economic Report on Africa 2007
  A SPIN HISTORY LESSON: KNIFERISMS, SPOONERISMS AND MADDENISMS
  The Wiener That Ate New York!
  Shares
  PPC Versus SEO: Getting The Balance Right Between Short Term Profits Versus Long Term Gains
  Obama and Friends On Stage - Implications for the Sales Force
  The Efficiency and Labour Market Impact Have Varied Across Sectors
  Cost Segregation - Tax Deductions(Business Taxes)
  What are My Business Formation Options?
  Council on Foreign Relations Tracks 2008 Candidates on Africa Policy

Home > Going-Green > Richard Matthews > Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting >
Article Tags: levers of power, political control, power, subversion of democracy, undermining progress

About the Author: Richard Matthews
RSS for Richard's articles - Visit Richard's website

Richard Matthews is a consultant, eco-entrepreneur, sustainable investor and writer. He is the owner of THE GREEN MARKET, one of the Web's most comprehensive resources for information and tools on sustainability. He is also the author of numerous articles on sustainable positioning, green investing, enviro-politics and eco-economics.

Click here to visit Richard's website
Dashed Line

The Green Market:  Convergence of Sustainable Capitalism and the Global Environment
More from Richard Matthews
Mobile Electronics are Driving Demand for Lithium
EcoInvesting
The Overwhelming Logic of Sustainable Business
Republican Gubernatorial Gains and Redistricting
Koch Industries Financing Climate Denial


Related Forum Posts
Re: Obama or Mcain will not change anything Re: Obama or Mcain will not change anything - [quote="ideasuniversity":3lof0wbg]A lot of people are thinking that either Obama or Mcain will change things in America. Entrepreneur are to look inward and strategies on how to make their businesses to be successful. No ruler had ever change the way we grow our businesses. Their policies may try to delay us but we have way of scaling all the hurdles.[/quote:3lof0wbg] Oh, I don't know about that... If politicians start taxing the "achievers" so high that there is no longer any incentive to achieve... then we'll go the way of England or some other socialist country... From what I've read there's little to choose between Obama and McCain..though McCain is running on the Republican democrat his ideals are more on the Democrat side...
Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals - This monring I got a mail from the newswatch magazine I subscribed for that: Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals! Millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. Barack Obama’s plan gives a driver’s license to any illegal who wants one. But that’s not all. Obama’s plan gives illegals social security benefits and raises taxes for his health care plan to cover them. Who pays? You do. Driver’s licenses and government benefits for illegals. Higher taxes for us. That’s Obama’s plan. Obama. Too radical. Too risky. The National Republican Trust PAC is responsible for the content of this advertisment. In think this is a political propaganda, in order to discredit the candidancy of Obama. Or will it be true? What impact do you think will have on entrepreneurs in america?
Re: Obama or McCain? Re: Obama or McCain? - I'm a Republican... but I'm not very happy with McCain... I won't vote for Obama... he's friends with a known terrorist (Bill Ayers), has the Tony Rezko property deal, didnt' bother to visit wounded soldiers in Germany, couldn't remember the name on the KIA bracelet he was wearing during the recent debate, and frankly just speaks in a very condescending manner. It's all media hype with him. Take him away from his prepared speeches, and he does not come across as half so poised. I'm a woman and Sarah Palin's a woman, so I suppose I should vote for her, just to make history as the first female VP of the US... ; ) But she's too religious for me... Although I like the fact that she hunts! I see that the polls have Obama leading by 7 points... the problem with polls is that "they" poll 1,000 people, and then report it as if they talked to thousands of people, and *that* is what sways public opinion.
Re: Obama or Mcain will not change anything Re: Obama or Mcain will not change anything - [quote="OmnivoreInk":1nr9f27v][quote="ideasuniversity":1nr9f27v]A lot of people are thinking that either Obama or Mcain will change things in America. Entrepreneur are to look inward and strategies on how to make their businesses to be successful. No ruler had ever change the way we grow our businesses. Their policies may try to delay us but we have way of scaling all the hurdles.[/quote:1nr9f27v] Oh, I don't know about that... If politicians start taxing the "achievers" so high that there is no longer any incentive to achieve... then we'll go the way of England or some other socialist country... From what I've read there's little to choose between Obama and McCain..though McCain is running on the Republican democrat his ideals are more on the Democrat side...[/quote:1nr9f27v] From the history of capitalism, they love rich people and achievers more than the poor. Rich people pay less tax than the poor, that is why they put their assets in trust
Re: Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals Re: Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals - [quote="wizzymi":2qb0dt9r]This monring I got a mail from the newswatch magazine I subscribed for that: Obama Wants Social Security for Illegals! Millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. Barack Obama’s plan gives a driver’s license to any illegal who wants one. But that’s not all. Obama’s plan gives illegals social security benefits and raises taxes for his health care plan to cover them. Who pays? You do. Driver’s licenses and government benefits for illegals. Higher taxes for us. That’s Obama’s plan. Obama. Too radical. Too risky. The National Republican Trust PAC is responsible for the content of this advertisment. In think this is a political propaganda, in order to discredit the candidancy of Obama. Or will it be true? What impact do you think will have on entrepreneurs in america?[/quote:2qb0dt9r] Sounds like his idea to give "tax breaks" to people who don't even pay taxes. But, he finally changed his answer to that one and supposedly his website says that there will be some employment requirements for these supposed "tax breaks". There appear to be plenty of potential reprecussions for entrepreneurs with Obama's plans. There isn't enough money in the Social Security system now - giving more away to people who haven't paid into it could be the final nail in that coffin. Shri


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

Download a template or see a lawyer?

Selling What Sizzles vs. Delivering Real Value

SEO and the Entrepreneur

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.