Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











Diseases That Can Be Predicted With Gene Tests

Guest post by: Charles Godbout

Article Overview: Anybody can be tested with gene test, a process of examining a person’s genes to determine whether he or she is at risks of obtaining genetic diseases, which can also be passed on to her or his children. Included in the genetic testing are a variety of laboratory techniques to analyze genes or markers near the genes that may help trace the family history of genetic illnesses, and determine symptoms of a possible genetic disorder.

Free Download - What To Expect In A Genetic Consultation By Charles Godbout
Name: Email:

Diseases That Can Be Predicted With Gene Tests

Anybody can be tested with gene test, a process of examining a person's genes to determine whether he or she is at risks of obtaining genetic diseases, which can also be passed on to her or his children. Included in the genetic testing are a variety of laboratory techniques to analyze genes or markers near the genes that may help trace the family history of genetic illnesses, and determine symptoms of a possible genetic disorder.

In predictive gene tests, the researchers may look for illnesses that are already afflicting family members as a consequence of inheriting a faulty gene from parents. Once the gene is mutated, the mutation can be carried in the reproductive cells and inherited by the offspring, which will then be present in the cells throughout the human body. With a genetic testing, such mutation can be detected in the white blood cells in a blood samples.

The said predictive genetic tests can be used to detect diseases like cystic fibrosis, and Tay-Sachs. As of late, researchers are developing diseases to detect more medical conditions including the predisposition to Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ALS, deadly nerve degeneration called Lou Gehrig's disease; Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, which is really fatal and which can lead to dementia or death, and dangerously high cholesterol.

Certain types of cancer that run in the family can also be detected with a Gene test. Researchers are able to identify genes that cause cancers. Many of the diseases are rare that only afflict a few individuals. For example, a childhood eye cancer called as retinoblastoma, Wilm's tumor, a kidney cancer that happens before the age of 5, and the Li-Fraumeni syndrome, in which young adults and children in the family contract different cancers such as brain tumors, acute leukemia, sarcomas in the bones and soft tissues of the legs and arms, and breast cancer. In as early as 1993, scientists were able to identify the specific gene responsible for the familial adenomatous polyposis, which is an inherited predisposition to precancerous polyps, which is believed to be the gene that causes 1% colon cancers.

In more recent researches, scientists have classified gene mutations associated with inherited tendencies toward common types of cancers such as colon and breast. According to scientists, individuals who carry these specific mutated genes are also at risk of developing other types of cancer. For instance, women having a modified copy of BRCA1 breast cancer vulnerability gene are also vulnerable to ovarian cancer.

Those who have inherited cancer genes are likely to contract cancer at a young age because the gene that makes them predisposed to cancer is already present in the cells all throughout their lives, waiting for the cue when the normal allele is inactivated or lost before the uncontrolled growth of cancer sets.

Gene tests are a complex process with varied sensitivity as far as the ability to detect mutations or identify patients with mutated genes or who would likely to develop certain diseases is concerned. In case the gene cannot be directly classified but can be located within particular areas of a chromosome, a linkage analysis is recommended. Linkage analysis is an indirect testing that requires additional DNA from the afflicted family member for comparison.

Related Articles
  Understanding The Process of Ordering A Genetic Testing
  The Processes Of Genetic Testing
  Pointers To Remember In Genetic Testing II
  The Role Of Pharmacoepigenomics In Health
  Pointers To Remember In Genetic Testing
  Applications Of Genetic Testing
  Custom Nutritional Supplements: The Answer to Our Body’s Essential Needs
  How to pass psychometric tests
  Genomics And The New Medicine
  To Ask or Not To Ask, That is the Question
  GINA COMES TO LIFE AS FIRST CASE IS FILED UNDER THIS NEW FEDERAL LAW
  Employee Testing and Assessments
  Online Home Business: Do You Have the "Magic Gene" to Attract Business Success?
  Improving Healthcare using Technology
  Using Pre-Employment Tests Can Save You Money
  What is Nutrigenomics?
  Areas That Benefit From Pharmacogenetics
  Pharmacogenomics: Today’s Future Medicine
  Genomics
  Design your own Employment Test

Home > Home-Based-Business > Charles Godbout > Diseases That Can Be Predicted With Gene Tests >
Article Tags: gene testing, genetic testing
Referred by: http://jaykubassek.com

About the Author: Charles Godbout
RSS for Charles's articles - Visit Charles's website

Learn how your DNA is the real key to Personal Wellness!

One size does not fit all. That's why we makes personalized nutritional supplements and skin care serums based on your unique DNA.

For more information about: Customized Supplements based on your own DNA, visit our website:

http://www.PowerOfDNA.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

Charles & Jim

Speak to a GeneWize Expert Now: (866) 201-8526

You may also contact using our Web Form:
http://www.YourDNAStrategy.com/contact



Click here to visit Charles's website
Dashed Line

More from Charles Godbout
4 Network Marketing Strategies
Homebased Business Pillar Candles II
Homebased Business NonMedical Home Care
New Online Business Opportunities
Homebased Business Website Design


Related Forum Posts
Re: Fighting Fair Re: Fighting Fair - [quote="BuzzAroundBooks":2ysrp4em] Hi Shri, You're absolutely right. In fact, I think Trump should take back what he said about being a fan of Omarosa after that night's "performance". I think it can be both funny and entertaining when Gene Simmons is disrespectful with his arrogance, but there was nothing funny nor entertaining about Omarosa and Piers' words.[/quote:2ysrp4em] He's a fan because her *itchy behavior drives up his ratings. I still think he should've called them back in and fired her. The previews look like Piers will be on the hotseat this week, but we'll see. Chris
Re: Fighting Fair Re: Fighting Fair - [quote="litekepr":anp66rj8]Omarosa is a horrible example of a competent and mature woman in business. She was so childish and just obnoxious last night. It would've made my day if Trump had called them back again and fired her. He's the boss - he can break the rules. I've disliked Omarosa on MANY occasions, but she really outdid herself last night in a bad way. I couldn't believe that she kept saying Piers had met his match - I'm not sure there is a match for the way she acted last night. No positive match anyway. Piers and Omarosa both acted horrible, but Omarosa outdid him and frankly, I think she did nothing but embarass herself. IF she had any business credibility - it should be gone after that display. Insulting Piers is one thing, but pulling his family into their childish debate was bad. Shri[/quote:anp66rj8] Hi Shri, You're absolutely right. In fact, I think Trump should take back what he said about being a fan of Omarosa after that night's "performance". I think it can be both funny and entertaining when Gene Simmons is disrespectful with his arrogance, but there was nothing funny nor entertaining about Omarosa and Piers' words.
The Celebrity Apprentice - Episode 4 The Celebrity Apprentice - Episode 4 - I've enjoyed watching the show. Kevin, you mentioned something that I've been thinking, too. You said, 'it's always using the quiet "nice girl" as the scapegoat.' Perhaps the nice girl could step up to the plate more, but I see value in that she doesn't try to usurp the leader, she supports her. I've been thinking something similar. Actually, Gene Simmons brought it up last week when he brought Amarosa back. His explanation was that you want to surround yourself with people you trust. It's great to have women who are assertive, but must business be so hard and cold to be effective? No wonder Donald Trump suggested the corporate world is not a nice world. As an ambitious person, I love being around other ambitious people. I find it fun to bargain, debate or bounce ideas off one another. I see no reason to be mean about it though. In fact, I believe we are far MORE productive when we are enjoying what we do and inviting others to enjoy it with us. I also want to have people on my team that I can trust. I'm curious if others really feel you have to be mean to be effective. Would you hire the person with a cold edge that you really can't trust? This type of behavior is creating incredible stress and costing big corporations more money due to low productivity (caused by fatigue and less job satisfaction); more sick days; increased usage of health care dollars; breakdown in the employee's home life which then affects the office life even more negatively; and loss of great employees who are looking elsewhere for a better place to work. It's a pretty high price to pay.
Re: The Celebrity Apprentice Finale Re: The Celebrity Apprentice Finale - [quote="Tami Szabo":2lamxah0]I really do understand what you are saying, Kevin. I'm complaining because ethics are very important to me. In the real world, I want people on my team who are easy to work with and that I can trust. To me, it's not all about money, but I do understand this is why Piers won. I feel it's important to find the best LEADER who can still make money. A great leader can inspire people on his/her team to use their creativity and all their assets in a very successful way. A sketchy leader could hinder this process in the long run. For example, Piers and Amarosa could be efficient, but working in a toxic environment with either of them could get to me in the long run! I like what you said about Carol... she has been my favourite to win for a long time. I would have chosen her for sure! She knew business was business, but she didn't have to be unethical about it. Quite honestly, Trace was not my choice to win, but he was a better option for me than Piers. I'd love to work with Carol any day. Who would you want to work with?[/quote:2lamxah0] Hi Tami, If you ask me, I think Carol vs Piers would've made a more interesting matchup since it'd not only be good vs evil, but a woman vs a man. But to answer your question about who I would want to work with... I'd say it really depends on the task. For instance, I think... -Jennie Finch and Lennox Lewis seem like really nice people with laid back personalities and would make great co-workers. -I could see myself working for Carol or vice versa. -if I wanted to win on "The Apprentice", I'd pick Piers Morgan for his rolodex and Gene Simmons because he's the ultimate salesperson.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

SEO and the Entrepreneur

Ten Steps to Go from Idea to E-book for Sale

The Right Job - Part Five 'Compensation'

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.