Tweet

The Shocking Truth about Super Co-Contributions

Written by: Rob Bourne

Article Overview: If losing money was a crime, there would be over 2 million Australians facing trial every year. That’s how many Australians are throwing money away by not participating in the government’s superannuation co-contributions scheme.

The Shocking Truth about Super Co-Contributions

If losing money was a crime, there would be over 2 million Australians facing trial every year. That’s how many Australians are throwing money away by not participating in the government’s superannuation co-contributions scheme.

The scheme was introduced in 2003 and designed to help low to middle income earners build on their superannuation for retirement. It’s been well documented that the majority of people will not have sufficient savings at retirement to enjoy a ‘comfortable’ retirement. The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia defines this as an annual income of around $51,000 for a couple or $38,000 if you are single. A ‘modest’ income is defined as approximately $28,000 for a couple.

Despite compulsory employer superannuation of 9%, many Australians will fall well short of being able to reach this type of income. Particularly low to middle income earners and people who may not work for many years of their lives while raising a family. Come retirement, these people will rely more on government support just to achieve a ‘modest’ income let alone getting anywhere near to a ‘comfortable’ retirement.

Hence, the government’s incentive to avoid this problem, by encouraging low to middle income earners to save more for retirement, by giving away free handouts.

At least $1,000 every year if you earn less than $31,920. For every dollar you earn over that figure the co-contribution is reduced by 3.33 cents which means you can still receive a part co-contribution until your income reaches $61,920.

All you have to do is save less than $3 a day into super and the government will match it. That’s a return of 100%. And by 2015, the government will increase their contribution to $1,500.

Where else can you get that sort of return on any investment? 150%!

And its government guaranteed.

And yet so many Australians are throwing money away by not participating in the scheme. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics there are approximately 10.8 million people in the workforce and included in that figure are approximately 3.2 million part time workers. 3.2 million part-time workers who would all, most likely, be earning less than $32,000 p.a. There are also many full time workers who would be earning under $32,000 p.a.

Many 16 – 21 year olds would fall into this group. So we have at least 3.2 million people and probably closer to 4 million Australians who would qualify for the super co-contribution scheme and yet according to the Australian Taxation Office’s Co-Contribution Annual Report for 2008 only 1,278,957 people participated in the scheme. That’s over 2 million people throwing away the opportunity of making guaranteed returns up to 150%. Let’s not forget also, that many of these people may earn less than $32,000 for many years and even more may never earn $32,000 in a year throughout their whole life.

If an 18 year old participated in the scheme until retirement at 65 (assuming they earned under $32,000p.a. throughout their life), they could end up with a super balance of $2,425,368.

Not bad, for less than $3 a day.

With a balance of $2.4 million you can afford a lot more than even a ‘comfortable’ lifestyle.

This assumes a saving of $1,000 a year and getting a net return of 8% p.a. plus franking credits as shown in the attached table.

So, if you think that low income earners cannot retire wealthy, then think again. The government superannuation co-contribution scheme is more than generous and a great way for the younger generation to build a substantial sum for retirement.

Related Articles
  Assumptions Anyone?
  Time for Apple to release a 25th anniversary Mac
  Wonder Woman Wannabe?
  Entrepreneurs: The New Superheroes
  To Tell the Truth

Article Tags: cocontribution scheme, low income, retirement, superannuation
Referred by: http://jaykubassek.com



Related Forum Posts
Re: Super Mario Dethroned - You people are crazy. Super Mario will NEVER be dethroned! Vive la Mario & Luigi! I'm sorry, but remembering those days playing Super Maria for Nintendo and wondering when I would finally hit the last level and be able to beat the evil dragon for my perfect princess will never die. Wii is fantastic, but I'd still prefer the rights to Mario - if even for sentimental value.
Me Too - So.... - I write. Its a form of 'pull' marketing that suits me, though I'm quite an outgoing person. I know all the stuff about it not being me, 'they're just not ready yet'. Truth is I'm not good with rejection and will walk if I get too much of it - so I do it differently. Each to his own I guess. Still, I wish I had the guts to do those 500, just to say 'I did it'! Will read that article!
Video Resources - Awesome resources - thank you Andy. I've been working on the book trailer creation and promotion chapters in my next promo book and this info is wonderful. There will be a couple more links to resources included in the book. Can you tell us some more about the Super program? I'd have to run it on my desktop after looking at the system requirements. It looks like it will do all sorts of things. Shri
Victoria's Secret - Too Sexy? - This will be upsetting for some men. I just heard a report about Victoria's Secret and it was interesting. Their sales were down drastically in the 4th quarter of 2007 and the report was about how they are thinking the company has gotten too far away from the heritage that made it the blockbuster company it is. They are thinking the ads etc have become too sexy and the plan (at the moment) is to make the ads more sophisticated. That would be like the Super Bowl commercial which was very tasteful, but very different from any Victoria's Secret I've seen lately. Who do you all think the current sexy ads are targeting? I think its the men that they hope will buy these items for their female significant others. I hate to give Omarosa any kudos - but most women aren't "sold" on an item by an ad of a near naked sexy woman. Shri
Re: Cash up front ... or Royalties? - There are so many amazing stories here. Most my inventions were created on the job and are the property of my employer. Cash up front if you are out of options is what some people must do. These people may consider a 5 year contract. This would allow them to renegotiate another license when they are stronger financially. Truth is most people that are in financial trouble today are still in trouble 5 years later. Discipline and control of your own life is priceless. An example of cash up front versus royalties is "Star Wars" Harrison Ford (Hans Solo) took cash up front. He needed the money. Alec Ginness (Obiwankonbi) took royalties. I believe the force is still paying.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Improve E-mail: Avoid the Quicksand

Local Marketing: 3 Simple Low-Cost Strategies

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.