The typical notion of engagement is an emotional bond between staff and the company. Factors used to build engagement include mission and vision statements, values workshops, improving supervision and focusing on the relationship with staff and company, social clubs, internal newsletters, and staff benefits and privileges.
Engagement is typically measured by cultural audits that focus on the importance staff place on the company in their life, and that when engaged people are committed to the company and its success. The assumption is that engagement leads to better job performance and this is unquestionably true if engagement as here defined is achieved. The question is whether or not this model of engagement is relevant today.
Today, there is high mobility of staff between companies. A person working for on company this month could be working for the opposition next month.
Today, if revenues falter staff will be shed without a backward glance. As needs to be the case it is people first only in companies strongly in profits: If profits slump…?
Today, commercial loyalty is fully a function of current needs, should needs change then so does loyalty (in both directions staffcompany and companystaff).
Asking staff to commit to the company in face of this commercial reality will always be awkward, feel false and have a very real and definite ceiling; hence staff performance under this model will have a maximum level of performance that can be achieved.
The critical question follows: In this modern commercial environment what can business leaders expect, what can staff be realistic expected to commit to and be consistently loyal to?
If we can find better solution to this question we can then use this understanding to achieve better levels of performance than under the existing model as outlined above: At very least, a better model will significantly raise the level of performance we can and should sensibly expect.
Better understanding of the link between staff attitudes and actions and the business
This existing model or notion of engagement arises from the way the link between strategy and staff behaviour is constructed (the mental model). If we are to review the idea of engagement, then we need review the existing understanding and build a new and improved model from which we then derive the idea of engagement.
1. A business is separate from people. An apparently simple idea that many find difficult to grasp, people come and go, but businesses go on often doing exactly the same thing.
2. Every role (job) in a business is driven by the expected outputs, and often those outputs are not very negotiable.
3. For every goal there are actions necessary to ensure the goal is achieved. The actions needed to ensure the best chance of achieving the goal are called ideals. It follows that there are ideals in every business role derived from the goals and KPIs demanded in the role.
4. The architecture of the business then consists of:
a. Defining in every role the goals/KPIs as derived from the strategy (goal cascade or alignment),
b. Defining the ideals as derived from the goals.
This architecture is independent of people and represents what needs done every role to achieve excellence in that role (that is the ideals must be acted out with due commitment and energy to achieve the results).
The difference in this model is that we have very precise psychological targets.
People and performance
We now need add people to the architecture; I call this populating the architecture. People populate the roles in the business; the roles are quite well defined in terms of outputs and ideals. However, this leaves much for creativity and initiative since the ideals are the current best judgment of how to realize success (defined as achieving the outputs or KPIs), if someone is able to create means to achieve results faster, more efficiently, more successfully then this needs to be integrated into the specification so that the learning is captured by the firm in the form of revised ideals and KPIs, etc, then shared through the firm to all able to use the learning.
We can now be very clear and precise in our understanding of exactly what we want people to do:
o People are asked to accept the ideals as the best way of achieving success in this role, then asked to identify how they will translate the generic ideals into things they will do each day or week to achieve excellence.
The performance of the person is then assessed in relation to them translating the ideals into action on the job so that the goals/KPIs are achieved to the highest level possible. Performance is measured in the person delivery of the ideals; success is measured in achieving the goals/KPIs. Goal achievement may depend on factors beyond the control of the person, and is thus not a measure of the person’s performance. Delivery of ideals on the job is completely under control of the person, and so exactly measures their performance.
The staff – company contract
When a person is recruited into the business they are contracted to deliver the ideals and achieve the goals/KPIs in the role or roles they are contracted into. At recruitment the competencies of the person are most under scrutiny in assessing if their background, experience and skills equip them to perform in the role. Specifically if they are able to deliver the ideals such as to ensure the best possible chance of the best possible result (achieve goals/KPIs).
Within this contract it is simply not necessary for the person to commit to the company, what is required is for the person to commit to their own success in the role.
Specifically, the person is expected to ‘see’ clearly the ideals needed, how to translate those ideals into action on the job, and how to sharpen and improve the ideals and their own delivery of those ideals such that goals/KPIs are progressively improved.
Improved definition of engagement
People are asked to commit to their own success. They are not asked to commit to the company.
If someone is not clear on what is expected or how to achieve it then they will not perform well. It follows that one of the foundations of personal performance is clarity of that expected (goals/KPIs), and how to achieve it (ideals).
A key process for people in pursuing their own success in their work life is for them to ‘see’ or ‘visualize’ the ideals and in particular their own interpretation of those ideals as what they will do on the job. This process of visualization is well known and used by all top sports people in particular to peak personal performance and applies as much at work as in any other endeavor.
The process of seeking fulfillment in their work life I call commitment. The process of visualizing the interpretation of the ideals in their roles/job at work I call ‘engagement’.
People guided to pursue engagement in order to realize fulfillment and success at work.
Toward a better understanding and application of engagement - To learn more about this author, visit Graham Little's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
 Are you or your employees engaged with your organisation?
|
| |
Although the term 'employee engagement' is relatively new, the underlying concepts have been around for many years. Cultural change programs often have a similar focus, as do internal branding programs.
Do you ha...
|
|
And Just What Does That Mean?
|
| |
Any & all definitions can be found at the USPTO but I thought it'd be nice to take it a step further and put these explanations in easy to understand language. The material in quotes is straight from the USPTO's mou...
|
|
Do Your Due Diligence
|
| |
Once your Federal trademark application is filed, it's on you, the applicant, to keep an eye on your status, any emails & any requests from the USPTO. Failure to do so could result in your application becoming cance...
|
|
Getting To Your Personal and Professional Best
|
| |
"Living your best personal and professional life" is a goal means different things to different people. On your journey to "living your best," you have a powerful choice of three levels of commitment and engagement...
|
|
Federal Trademark Application Timeline, In Use Application
|
| |
A detailed timeline for a Federal trademark application for those applicants that are currently using the mark in at least 2 states or between the US & another country.
|
 |
Related Businesses - Evan Elite Authors |
|
Vwodek Wojczynski
Business Coach and Consultant Vwodek Wojczynski (pronounced Voy-chin-ski) brings fun, awareness, accountability and fresh perspectives based on his diverse experiences in life and business.
Born in Poland and educated in Greece and Canada, he is trilingual with 8 years experience in business development with clients in Canada, USA, Switzerland and Poland.
His approach is systematic and process-driven. He fuses the know-how of proven business methods with his commitment that entrepreneurs experience satisfaction and joy based on their values, motivations and strengths. He believes that businesses succeed based on their ability to generate value by providing what’s needed and wanted.
Ultimately, he trains executives and true business owners - people who work less, produce more, own businesses that run automatically after a while and make a difference globally.
His current research focus is the development of intelligent business systems and the application of emerging artificial intelligence technologies in business.
He is also an avid traveler, spoken word performer and visual artist. He resides in Toronto, Canada. - Visit Vwodek Wojczynski's Website |
|
Dave Kurlan
Dave Kurlan is the founder and CEO of Objective Management Group, Inc., the industry leader in sales assessments and sales force evaluations, and the CEO of David Kurlan & Associates, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in sales force development.
Dave has been a top rated speaker at Inc. Magazine's Conference on Growing the Company, the Sales & Marketing Management Conference and the Gazelles Sales & Marketing Summit.
He has been featured on radio and TV, including World Business Review with General Norman Schwarzkopf, in Inc. Magazine, Selling Power Magazine, Sales & Marketing Management Magazine and Incentive Magazine.
He is the author of Mindless Selling and Baseline Selling – How to Become a Sales Superstar by Using What You Already Know about the Game of Baseball.
He created and wrote STAR, a proprietary recruiting process for hiring great salespeople, and he writes Understanding the Sales Force, a popular business Blog and is a contributing author to The Death of 20th Century Selling and 101 Great Ways to Improve Your Life, Volume 2. - Visit Dave Kurlan's Website |
|
The Evan Elite Authors program is currently in beta phase. For details please contact us.
|
|
|
Graham Little
(Visit Graham's Website)
Dr Graham Little is founder of OPD
International specialising in applying his
SHRM model in small and large
organisation. He has written nine books on
leadership, numerous articles and coaching
workbooks. His speciality is human
behavior and development in authority
systems and he has been a consultant to
large and small organisations for thirty
years. He has also researched social
science for thirty years and has his own
web site at www.grlph
ilosophy.co.nz. He is an Associate
Fellow of the New Zealand Institute of
Management, Member of the New Zealand
Institute of Chemistry, Member of the
Human Resource Institute of New Zealand
and Member of the Institute of Directors.
He can be contacted via info@opdco
ach.com.
OPD International (www.opdcoach.com
) is a web based system for achieving
improved alignment between business
strategy and goals and staff behaviour
that will guide team leaders: (1) to
better identify the ideal actions that
enable the best possible result; (2) to
engage staff minds with the ideals; (3) to
increase staff professionalism so that the
ideals are acted out more often, more
precisely and with greater intensity. The
result is improved performance.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
![[Get Copyright Permissions]](http://license.icopyright.net/images/icopy-w.gif){kind=small}
