Tweet

Understanding California Labor Laws and the WARN Act

Guest post by: Ari Rosenstein

Article Overview: California labor laws differ greatly from Federal guidelines. One such example is the WARN Act. Created in 1988, the Federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act ('WARN" Act) requires employers to notify their staff at least sixty days prior to a mass layoff or closing of a plant. Several states, including California, have different variations of the WARN Act.

Understanding California Labor Laws and the WARN Act

Created in 1988, the Federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act ('WARN" Act) requires employers to notify their staff at least sixty days prior to a mass layoff or closing of a plant. The law is intended to provide employees sufficient time to find work before being laid off, or to make other arrangements in advance of their upcoming separation of employment. Several states, including California, have different variations of the WARN Act, as well as other California labor laws. The California WARN Act was established in January, 2003 and expands the obligations of the Federal Act.

The California Act differs from the Federal Act in a number of ways. For example:

• The California Act applies to layoffs that affect 50 or more employees within a 30-day period, regardless of what percentage those employees comprise of the total workforce. For example, a 600 employee company laying off 60 employees (only 10% of the workforce) would still be subject to California WARN. The Federal Warn Act defines a "mass layoff" as a layoff of 50 or more employees that comprise at least of 1/3 of the entire workforce (or 500 employees regardless of percentage).
• California WARN applies to businesses that employ 75 or more employees, while the Federal WARN applies to businesses with more than 100 employees.
• The California Act applies to part-time employees in addition to full-time employees, while the Federal Act only applies to full-time employees.

Collins v. Gee West Seattle

A recent court decision highlights the complexity of the WARN Act, and how a misinterpretation of the law is not a viable defense by an employer who violates it. On January 21, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Collins v. Gee West Seattle that employees who quit after being notified of the impending shutting of operations, but prior to the actual closure, are still considered towards the minimum count of 50 employees.

In September, 2007 Gee West Seattle, an auto franchise with 150 employees, notified its staff that it would be shutting the business in 10 days. By the time they closed their doors, only 30 employees remained, a net loss of 120 employees. Several employees later sued Gee West claiming their employer had violated the WARN Act by not providing the minimum 60 days notice required by the law.

Gee West argued that only 30 employees remained at the time of the closure, and that all the prior employees had left their jobs of their own free will. Gee West claimed the WARN Act did not apply to their closure, and therefore were not required to provide 60 days notice.

In their decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled against Gee West and stated that employees who quit after being notified that they will be laid off are not considered "voluntarily departing", but rather terminated employees as part of the shutting of operations.

The Court said that Gee West would have to prove that the employees left for reasons other than upcoming closure, and short of doing so, would be found guilty of violating WARN.

In Conclusion

This lawsuit, like so many others, reinforces that employers cannot claim "ignorance" as a defense against violating the law. The burden of proof lies with the employer to prove their innocence, and the courts will invariably rule in favor of the employees where the law has been violated, and the employer cannot prove otherwise. Another conclusion is that California labor laws differ from the federal laws in may ways, and employers must be more diligent in their compliance in this state.

For help with understanding the WARN Act, or any other State or Federal law, please contact one of our California Human Resources Experts who can assist you.

Related Articles
  What You Need To Know Before You Terminate
  California Labor Laws and the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights Movement
  3 Lawsuits That Are Changing the California Labor Law Landscape
  Employment and Labor Law in California Updates
  The Differences Between Federal and California Labor Laws
  Meal & Rest Periods – California Labor Law May Hold Employers Liable for Additional Hours of Pay
  Government Takeover Just Doesn't Work
  California Labor Law Update: Recent Court Decisions Favor Employers
  California Labor Law Challenges and Solutions
  Victory for Starbucks in Tip-Pooling Class Action
  Companies Insist Suppliers be more Socially Conscious
  Undocumented Worker Legislation - A New Reality for California Employers
  Educated Management Will Help Keep Your Business in Labor Law Compliance
  Labor Law in California: Proactive Efforts Can Help Reduce HR Risks
  Why Incorporate In Delaware?
  What is the Equal Employment Commission EEOC and Does it Cover Small Biz
  Employers Face Greater Employment Immigration ScrutinyBeware of Little Mistakes That Cost You Big
  Unfair Business Practices
  What are Human Resources Labor Employment Law Labor Employee Relations and Why Should It Matter to You
  How To Succeed In Your "Home Based Online Business Opportunity"

Article Tags: California labor laws, employment law, labor laws in California, WARN Act



Related Forum Posts
Re: Books for the Entrepreneur - Here's one of my most recent books The 100 Absolutely Unbreakable Laws of Business Success By Brian Tracy
Re: Best Month For Getting Financed? - Let me suggest that May/June are the best months to inquire about funding and investment. Once tax season is over, banks and investors have plenty of budgeted or reserved funds waiting for commercial clients. Funds start to become limited around Labor Day!
Re: HI@All - Hi David from from California, Welcome to the forum.
Re: The 10 Goal Method for personal success - Great Post. I've read this before. I believe it was from his "100 Unbreakable Laws of Business." I've also done this and it works like MAGIC. The only problem is I sometimes forget to write down more goals once I've accomplished them...LOL If you haven't tried it yet, you should. It works.
Re: An Assessment Tool for Making Dreams Come True - Sounds a bit like getting what you want through the Laws of Attraction aka LOA. I've seen people use mind visuals to expedite goals such as: (Affiliate links removed by forum administrator) You can also cut and paste magazine pics. When I remember to use them, they are VERY effective. It may take a few weeks, monhts or even years but it comes together beautifully and perfectly. The more often you do it, the faster it happens. Be sure you know what you want! A study with measurable results would be nice. I just don't have the schedule for it though. Good Luck!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Ready for a Fresh Image?

What is an Adaptive Organization

The Biggest Domain Name Myth

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.