Tweet

Employee Performance Management: Time to Reinvent the Wheel

Guest post by: Leslie Allan

Article Overview: Performance-management systems are broken at the majority of companies in every corner in the world. By teasing apart results of a recent worldwide survey of HR professionals, we've seen how evaluations are viewed as a joke by employees, a waste of time by many managers and a non-actionable talking point by some senior executives.

Employee Performance Management: Time to Reinvent the Wheel

Performance-management systems are broken at the majority of companies in every corner in the world. By teasing apart results of a recent worldwide survey of HR professionals, we've seen how evaluations are viewed as a joke by employees, a waste of time by many managers and a non-actionable talking point by some senior executives.

Even HR managers, who in most companies lead the performance-review charge, see formidable roadblocks in the way of successful evaluations. Here are the top three, based on Sibson Consulting's mid-2010 survey of HR professionals:

1. Managers are reluctant to have difficult conversations about performance with employees. (63%)

2. Evaluations are seen as an HR-driven process rather than something that's critical to the business. (47%)

3. The appraisal cycle begins with little or no goal setting. (36%)

Let's start at the beginning of the appraisal process. In order to make progress, an employee needs to know what his or her goals are. Yet only half the respondents to the survey said their organization uses any kind of goal settingin the appraisal process. And only half of those use quantitative measures. Is there any mystery as to why employees see the appraisal process as subjective and unpredictable? It's also not too hard to figure out why respondents estimate only a third of employees actually trust the evaluation system.

In the 50% of companies where goals are part of the evaluation process, the connection between individual and organizational goals weakens with decreasing employee seniority. Senior managers, for instance, are "completely" or "largely" aligned 70% of the time. Middle managers? 45%. Frontline employees? 17%. It's no surprise why the majority of the latter group sees appraisals as a waste of time.

Then there's the issue of participation. Three-quarters of the survey respondents said employees at their organization are asked to complete a self-appraisal. Only 61% say the organization allows employees to have input into forming their goals. In other words, many organizations give employees a chance to chime in on their appraisals, but do not empower them.

Besides the lack of goals and a lack of input, little more than half of the respondents reported that they evaluated "goals based on performance against quantitative metrics." Smaller numbers report that reviews are based on "demonstration of competencies" or "acquisition of new skills".

It's no wonder that employees see the review process as subjective. Nor should there be any mystery as to why the appraisal process generates confrontation. Appraisals are perceived as subjective because they are subjective; they're perceived as confrontational because they are confrontational.

The bad feelings are further fueled by the nature of the appraisal. A five-point scale for ratings is used by more than half of the respondents' organizations. At 37%, the HR department audits the results, 30% specify a ratings distribution and 29% require forced rankings. Managers at nearly half of the organizations receive rating distribution reports. As a result, individual employees must fight for a number, which they believe will equate to greater status and money. It's not exactly the kind of environment that fosters collaboration and teamwork among employees.

The situation isn't any better for managers responsible for checking the boxes. Only 56% of organizations conduct training sessions on using the performance-management system. And at two-thirds of the companies (68%), appraisals are tied to the annual budget and organizational goal-setting processes. In other words, managers are tasked with evaluating everyone at once. The old practice of evaluating employees on their anniversary dates has apparently fallen out of practice.

It should be no surprise, then, that only 55% of respondents said managers completed performance evaluations on time. And only 36 percent of HR professionals said managers completed thorough evaluations.

Some of the administrative work has shifted online, easing the burden somewhat on overworked managers. The entire process has shifted to online forms at a third of the respondents' companies; the process is online and offline at about 40% of the organizations. (Paper forms are still the norm at smaller companies, however.)

Even with more companies introducing online components to performance evaluations, less than half of the survey respondents said they see the system helping the organization achieve its strategic objectives and less than a third (30%) report that employees trust the system. And the most dismal statistic of all: More than one in four respondents reported than their managers viewed the performance appraisal process as a paper-pushing exercise rather than an opportunity to have quality discussions with employees.

After reviewing the performance of employee evaluation systems, one conclusion is clear: It's time to start over. No amount of tinkering around the edges - revamping forms, recombining processes or pontificating on our belief in the system - will make the problems go away. The first step is to understand what the Sibson Consulting study is telling us. Second, we need to understand what it is we hope to achieve by evaluating performance. Third, the system that emerges needs to be prove that it's having an impact and is the result of a true collaboration among senior executives, management and employees. Finally, its impact has got to be measurable both by the employee and the overall organization. Such changes have got to start somewhere. Why not at your organization?

References:

The Segal Group, (2010) Study on The State of Performance Management

The Segal Group, (2010) Information About the Respondents to the WorldatWork/Sibson 2010 Study on The State of Performance Management

© Leslie Allan. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
  Assess – Are You a Victim or a Victor?
  Organizational Readiness To Performance Management
  Managing Employees Performance
  Eliminate Information Overload: Keep it Simple
  Appealing As Part Of Performance Managment
  Designing A Performance Management System
  Balance Yourself With Your Life Wheel
  The Wheel of Life
  Reviewing The Perfomance Management Effectiveness
  Engaged Employees Increase Bottom Line Performance
  Talent Development and The Wheel of Becoming
  Employee Warnings: One Strike and You're Out
  How To Run A Staff Appraisal
  4 Building Blocks of an Effective Talent Management System
  Here Is A Quick Way To Improve Your Performance Review
  Performance Review Disagreements
  Money and Security -- Want to be a Millionaire?
  How to Deal: Performance Reviews
  Are Organizations Utilizing Employee Performance Appraisal Systems optimally?
  5 Secrets To Gain Insight To Successful Email Marketing Trends

Article Tags: employee, HR, management, organization, performance, survey, system
Referred by: http://www.businessperform.com



Related Forum Posts
No B.S. Time Management - A great book I read on Time Management is No B.S. Time Management for Entrepreneurs by Dan Kennedy.
HRPreneur - Hi everyone, I am new to the forum and I recently started my own Human Capital (HR) consulting firm called HRPreneur Inc. HRP focuses on making human capital a strategic differentiator for SME's. Below is a summary about HRP; Who We Are: HRP is a Human Capital consulting firm with 30 years of experience that becomes an extension of your company by providing a full array of services to help you create a highly engaged workforce focused on achieving strategic results in order to build a long lasting great company! Mission: HRP provides small and medium sized businesses a Strategic HR Business Partner to increase employee engagement, resulting in cost savings, increased productivity and results at an affordable rate! Vision: To inspire and warrant SME's reach their full competency! Cost Effectiveness: We provide over 30 years of experience at a fraction of the cost at a strategic executive HR business level You will save between 50% to 60% in costs per year on salary, bonus, benefits, training, office space alone We will provide you additional cost efficiencies through our services Services: • Strategic Human Resources Planning • Organizational Redesign • Change Management • Organizational Culture Development • Employee Engagement Programs • Leadership Assessment and Development • Compensation Design • Talent Acquisition • Assimilation and On-Boarding • Performance Management • Talent Management & Succession Planning • Human Resources Due Diligence • Human Resources Audit • Full Service HR Outsourcing
Your Intial Mistakes Business - Hi, When I started my business I had made a lot of mistakes initially. These helped me in learning the art of the trade and today when I look back, I feel that these mistakes were quite silly. I had made my learnings then and those learnings have helped me time and again. Some of the mistakes I made were - i. Wrong Time Management ii. Wasting money on glossy Brochures and Business cards iii. Believing what they taught me at school was 100% correct iv. Giving too much when it was not required...... I would like to find out what have been your faltering moments in Business when you had started and what/how did they help you grow. Regards
Re: UPDATES: New Campaign! New Layout! New Ideas! - We've also expanded the list for Contest and All-Time Leaders. It's great to now see David and Yinka on the All Time list and recognize the contributions they've made to the forums!
Re: I call my invention "The Wheel" but so far I've been unable - Words words words The problem our friend has here is that he thought he was inventing a Wheel, when in reality he has a designed a perfectly good junction for incoming and outgoing pipes used all over the world - most often made of brinks and concrete in the same shape Isn't innovation grate, sorry great!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Small Business Internet Marketing

Self Employed Business Ideas

What is an Adaptive Organization

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.