Avoiding Horror Words and Phrases in your Resume
Avoiding Horror Words and Phrases in your Resume
This is at the top of my list. I have never seen so many liaisons since that movie with you know who. It seems that almost every person in the world spends a good deal of their time at work liaising. No problem there, but the word covers up a multitude of so many sins. The questions are: With whom did you liaise? Why did you liaise with them? What was the intended outcome of the liaison? and, What did you liaise with them about? Answer these questions and you avoid using the word altogether.
Involved
This is a close second. Everyone seems to be involved in things. Again, the problem is that it does not inform the reader about your responsibilities and could lead them to conclude that you played a bit part when you might have been in a leading role. Using this word could suggest to the reader that you could not be bothered to explain your role or that you don’t understand your role. Neither is a conclusion you want your reader to draw. Explain what your involvement was. Let them know what part you played, how you contributed and what impact your efforts had on the outcome. What was your involvement? What was the level of your involvement? In what way were you involved?
Contributed
Another vague term. What was your contribution? What were you responsible for? What was the level of your contribution. I have read resumes where people contribute to the development of a strategy. Does this mean they copied and collated the document or did they take minutes of meetings or did they develop the ideas behind the strategy or did they do the research or did they present and sell it or what?
Assisted
Same issue as most of the above. What assistance did you provide? What level was this assistance? How did you assist? What were you responsible for?
Participate
Like assist, contribute, involve and liaise, it does not inform the reader about what you actually did. What was your participation? In what way did you participated? What were you accountable for?
Support
Same argument as for “assisted”. What was the nature of your support? What did you do? What were you responsible for ensuring or achieving in supporting.
Key Role
What was your role? What part did you play? What was your input or contribution. Spell it out. Using a few more words is far better than leaving the reader in the dark. After all, the aim is to enlighten the reader. Some people play an integral role. Again, what were you responsible for ensuring or achieving?
Dealt With
Similar to liaise. What were your dealings? How did you deal with them? What did you deal with them about? Why did you deal with them?
Strategic
Far too many people think that what they do is strategic. Everything these days seems to have a strategic impact. Doesn’t anyone just get on and do the job anymore? Strategic is now used as an adjective in front of just about everything. Be careful. Use it sparingly. Don’t suggest that you had a strategic role, when you didn’t. Even if you did have a strategic role, explain what you did rather than trying to cover everything with strategic. Use the word strategically!
Issues
Like strategic, everyone has issues today and people are always managing issues. The issue is that it hides what you did. What was the issue and what did you do to manage it or resolve it or make it go away or whatever you did? Some people say they manage change issues. Fine, but what specific issues associated with the change? Some people resolve customer issues. OK, but what were the issues the customers had that needed to be resolved and what did you do to resolve them?
Facilitate
This literally means “to make easy”. While it might be the correct word to use, too much can be hidden behind it. People often facilitate the implementation of things. But, what was your role and what were you responsible for ensuring or achieving?
Process
As in, processing orders or requests. What were you responsible for ensuring or achieving in processing whatever you processed? And, what was involved in the act of processing?
Successfully
A lot of people say things like: “Successfully implemented….”, “Successfully organised/coordinated….”, “Successfully etc etc…” No need to use it. You would not include in your resume something in which you did not succeed. That would be like including a referee who is going to say negative things about you. That’s the problem with it. It begs the question: “If you did all these things successfully, then what did you do that failed.” Just leave it out. It’s not necessary. It adds nothing.
Effectively
Same as “successfully”. You are not going to talk about things you did that were ineffective. Again, it’s over used and abused. Some people even effectively liaise. This is nice for them, but adds little value to the reader’s understanding of your accomplishments and experience.
Considerable, Substantial and Significant
Be specific. Cite your experience or expertise. Considerable is a largely meaningless word because its interpretation depends on the reader’s frame of reference. One reader might think that five years experience is considerable. Another might think that two years is. If you significantly reduced costs, indicated the $ or % by which you reduced them. If your strategies resulted in a substantial growth in the firm’s client base, indicated the $ value or the number of new clients. This of course, requires you to keep a note of your achievements as you go, which is not a bad idea.
Utilise
Don’t use it. It’s just a fancy word for use. The simpler and clearer the language the more the recruitment consultant and employer will like you. Never use a fancy or complex word when there is a simpler one available. Some people are fond of the word “employed” when they mean used. To employ means to hire or engage or give work to, which is want your resume to help you get.
Project Managed
I realise that I may make some enemies out there in IT land, but this is a bit like the use of the term “medalled” adopted by many Olympic Games commentators (particularly former athletes) to denote that a person has won a medal. You can be a project manager and you can manage projects, but something cannot be project managed. This would be like saying “I project managed the project.” No, you managed the project. You managed the implementation of the system. You managed the design of the network. Of course you use a project management methodology in order to manage the project, but you don’t have to say you project managed, particularly if your role is that of a Project Manager.
Capitals
Capital letters, that is. It seems that many people want to capitalise almost everything these days. Call me old fashioned, but capital letters are reserved for the names of people, places, brands, positions/jobs, companies, organisations and so forth.
Abbreviations
When you use an abbreviation it can be taken that you could not be bothered spelling out the full form. If the term or name is so well known and so widely used or consistently used in its abbreviated form (such as BHP or IBM or ISP or the ABC or SDLC) by your readers, then no problem. But, if the reader may not know the term or name, then spell it out. On the other hand, some people use the full name of the term or organisation or whatever and then put the abbreviation in brackets after it when it’s the only time the term or name is going to be used. Why? This is only useful if you are going to use the term several times throughout the rest of the document.
Apostrophes
For whatever bizarre reason, the apostrophe has crept into places where it should not be. Apostrophes denote the possessive form of the word, as in John’s hat or the children’s shoes or the audience’s applause. Or, when there are more than one, the readers’ attitudes or the players’ diets. When the word is simply the plural form of a noun, there is no apostrophe. You just add the “s” or, in some cases “es” with no apostrophe.
I know some of this probably verges on the edge of being pedantic (some will say it’s right in the middle of the pond), but what if the recruitment consultant or HR Manager or employer is? Might as well be safe.
After reading all this, you might get the idea that writing an effective resume is hard work, takes time and effort and quite a bit of thought. I agree. However, it’s worth getting right because it’s often the only link between your current situation and your future.
Avoiding Horror Words and Phrases in your Resume - To learn more about this author, visit Tom Hannemann's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
Liaise
This is at the top of my list. I have never seen so many liaisons since that movie with you know who. It seems that almost every person in the world spends a good deal of their time at work liaising. No problem there, but the word covers up a multitude of so many sins. The questions are: With whom did you liaise? Why did you liaise with them? What was the intended outcome of the liaison? and, What did you liaise with them about? Answer these questions and you avoid using the word altogether.
Involved
This is a close second. Everyone seems to be involved in things. Again, the problem is that it does not inform the reader about your responsibilities and could lead them to conclude that you played a bit part when you might have been in a leading role. Using this word could suggest to the reader that you could not be bothered to explain your role or that you don’t understand your role. Neither is a conclusion you want your reader to draw. Explain what your involvement was. Let them know what part you played, how you contributed and what impact your efforts had on the outcome. What was your involvement? What was the level of your involvement? In what way were you involved?
Contributed
Another vague term. What was your contribution? What were you responsible for? What was the level of your contribution. I have read resumes where people contribute to the development of a strategy. Does this mean they copied and collated the document or did they take minutes of meetings or did they develop the ideas behind the strategy or did they do the research or did they present and sell it or what?
Assisted
Same issue as most of the above. What assistance did you provide? What level was this assistance? How did you assist? What were you responsible for?
Participate
Like assist, contribute, involve and liaise, it does not inform the reader about what you actually did. What was your participation? In what way did you participated? What were you accountable for?
Support
Same argument as for “assisted”. What was the nature of your support? What did you do? What were you responsible for ensuring or achieving in supporting.
Key Role
What was your role? What part did you play? What was your input or contribution. Spell it out. Using a few more words is far better than leaving the reader in the dark. After all, the aim is to enlighten the reader. Some people play an integral role. Again, what were you responsible for ensuring or achieving?
Dealt With
Similar to liaise. What were your dealings? How did you deal with them? What did you deal with them about? Why did you deal with them?
Strategic
Far too many people think that what they do is strategic. Everything these days seems to have a strategic impact. Doesn’t anyone just get on and do the job anymore? Strategic is now used as an adjective in front of just about everything. Be careful. Use it sparingly. Don’t suggest that you had a strategic role, when you didn’t. Even if you did have a strategic role, explain what you did rather than trying to cover everything with strategic. Use the word strategically!
Issues
Like strategic, everyone has issues today and people are always managing issues. The issue is that it hides what you did. What was the issue and what did you do to manage it or resolve it or make it go away or whatever you did? Some people say they manage change issues. Fine, but what specific issues associated with the change? Some people resolve customer issues. OK, but what were the issues the customers had that needed to be resolved and what did you do to resolve them?
Facilitate
This literally means “to make easy”. While it might be the correct word to use, too much can be hidden behind it. People often facilitate the implementation of things. But, what was your role and what were you responsible for ensuring or achieving?
Process
As in, processing orders or requests. What were you responsible for ensuring or achieving in processing whatever you processed? And, what was involved in the act of processing?
Successfully
A lot of people say things like: “Successfully implemented….”, “Successfully organised/coordinated….”, “Successfully etc etc…” No need to use it. You would not include in your resume something in which you did not succeed. That would be like including a referee who is going to say negative things about you. That’s the problem with it. It begs the question: “If you did all these things successfully, then what did you do that failed.” Just leave it out. It’s not necessary. It adds nothing.
Effectively
Same as “successfully”. You are not going to talk about things you did that were ineffective. Again, it’s over used and abused. Some people even effectively liaise. This is nice for them, but adds little value to the reader’s understanding of your accomplishments and experience.
Considerable, Substantial and Significant
Be specific. Cite your experience or expertise. Considerable is a largely meaningless word because its interpretation depends on the reader’s frame of reference. One reader might think that five years experience is considerable. Another might think that two years is. If you significantly reduced costs, indicated the $ or % by which you reduced them. If your strategies resulted in a substantial growth in the firm’s client base, indicated the $ value or the number of new clients. This of course, requires you to keep a note of your achievements as you go, which is not a bad idea.
Utilise
Don’t use it. It’s just a fancy word for use. The simpler and clearer the language the more the recruitment consultant and employer will like you. Never use a fancy or complex word when there is a simpler one available. Some people are fond of the word “employed” when they mean used. To employ means to hire or engage or give work to, which is want your resume to help you get.
Project Managed
I realise that I may make some enemies out there in IT land, but this is a bit like the use of the term “medalled” adopted by many Olympic Games commentators (particularly former athletes) to denote that a person has won a medal. You can be a project manager and you can manage projects, but something cannot be project managed. This would be like saying “I project managed the project.” No, you managed the project. You managed the implementation of the system. You managed the design of the network. Of course you use a project management methodology in order to manage the project, but you don’t have to say you project managed, particularly if your role is that of a Project Manager.
Capitals
Capital letters, that is. It seems that many people want to capitalise almost everything these days. Call me old fashioned, but capital letters are reserved for the names of people, places, brands, positions/jobs, companies, organisations and so forth.
Abbreviations
When you use an abbreviation it can be taken that you could not be bothered spelling out the full form. If the term or name is so well known and so widely used or consistently used in its abbreviated form (such as BHP or IBM or ISP or the ABC or SDLC) by your readers, then no problem. But, if the reader may not know the term or name, then spell it out. On the other hand, some people use the full name of the term or organisation or whatever and then put the abbreviation in brackets after it when it’s the only time the term or name is going to be used. Why? This is only useful if you are going to use the term several times throughout the rest of the document.
Apostrophes
For whatever bizarre reason, the apostrophe has crept into places where it should not be. Apostrophes denote the possessive form of the word, as in John’s hat or the children’s shoes or the audience’s applause. Or, when there are more than one, the readers’ attitudes or the players’ diets. When the word is simply the plural form of a noun, there is no apostrophe. You just add the “s” or, in some cases “es” with no apostrophe.
I know some of this probably verges on the edge of being pedantic (some will say it’s right in the middle of the pond), but what if the recruitment consultant or HR Manager or employer is? Might as well be safe.
After reading all this, you might get the idea that writing an effective resume is hard work, takes time and effort and quite a bit of thought. I agree. However, it’s worth getting right because it’s often the only link between your current situation and your future.
Avoiding Horror Words and Phrases in your Resume - To learn more about this author, visit Tom Hannemann's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. |
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Tom's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
Referred by: http://www.kyliehammond.com.au
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Aromatic Networking Caprino Career Path Assessment 7 Strategies to Take Action Conversations of Leadership One Size Success |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | |
 |
Email The Reporters
Press Release Builder | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
