|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Employee Background Screening Helps Bosses and Workers
|
| Guest post by: Lester Rosen |
Article Overview: Employers that hire a worker that is dangerous, unqualified, unfit or dishonest can face a legal and financial nightmare. Background checks have become mission critical for keeping an employer productive and out of court. Without exercising due diligence, firms are likely to hire problems just waiting to happen. However, job applicants should not feel that background checks are an invasion of privacy. Federal law gives applicants a great deal of rights in the process, and a safe workplace with qualified and honest workers benefits everyone.
![]() |
Free Download - Employers Must Manage Risks of Using Internet for Employment Screening Background Checks of Job Applicants By Lester Rosen |
Employee Background Screening Helps Bosses and Workers
Employers are increasingly turning to background screenings of job applicants as a way of minimizing legal and financial exposure from a bad hiring decision. Concerns about workplace violence, negligent-hiring lawsuits, false resumes, the high cost of employee turnover, wrongful termination threats and other problems are leading many employers to be more careful about who is hired in the first place.
A firm that hires an employee that is dangerous, unqualified, unfit or dishonest may find themselves more focused on dealing with the problem employee than growing their business. Employers not only have a duty to exercise due diligence in hiring, but background checks have become mission critical for any business of any size that wants to hire the best employees possible.
For applicants, however, background screening can create an uneasy feeling that they are mistrusted from the start or that Big Brother is watching. The fact is, however, that background screenings of job applicants benefit employers and employees alike. And under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, job applicants have a great deal of legal protection. A number of states also afford protection to consumers as well.
For job applicants and employees, the advantages of working for a company that requires employment screening is that efforts have been made to ensure that co-workers have the qualifications and credentials they say they have. No one wants to work along side someone that got a job by lying about their qualification, such as past employment or education. There is increasing evidence that if a person got a job dishonestly, then they are more likely to be dishonest once in the job.
In addition, employers typically screen for criminal records, especially those involving violence or dishonesty. Maintaining a safe workplace is a critical consideration for everyone.
For the employer, screening saves the time and money wasted in recruiting, hiring and training the wrong candidates and eliminates potential difficulties in the work force, not to mention the threat of lawsuits. Of course, a background screening is not a full-fledged FBI-type investigation. Screening companies are typically looking for red flags indicating potential problems or resumes that are not factual or omit important information.
Job applicants have been afforded substantial new legal rights to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the process. Consumers must be informed about exactly what is going on and be given the opportunity to voice their objections in case of errors or mistakes. An applicant’s rights are listed in detail on the Federal Trade Commission Web site.
Under the FCRA, when an employer uses a background screening company to prepare a report, several steps must occur:
• The employer must clearly disclose to the applicant in a separate document that a report is being prepared. The disclosure can no longer be buried in an application in the fine print.
• A signed release is required before checking records such as criminal convictions or pending criminal cases, driving records, credit reports or educational credentials.
• An additional notice is required when a background firm checks references, such as asking previous employers about job performance.
• If an employer intends to deny employment based upon information in the report, the job applicant must receive a copy of the report and a notice of legal rights.
• If an applicant believes the information is wrong, the applicant can inform the screening agency, which must remove or correct inaccurate or unverified information, usually within 30 days.
• Applicants have the right to inspect their files.
The law is designed to strike a balance between an employer’s need to exercise due diligence in hiring and an applicant’s right of accuracy and privacy. For applicants who are genuinely the victims of mistaken identity or bureaucratic errors, there is an opportunity to know what is being said about them and to fix the record so they are not denied opportunities unfairly.
For a job applicant, honesty is always the best policy. Negative information honestly disclosed in an interview with an explanation may well have no effect. However, if the employer discovers it through a third party, then the lack of honesty may be the reason for not getting the position. Even a criminal conviction cannot legally automatically disqualify a person from employment, without considering the nature of the offense, when it occurred, what the applicant has done since and whether it is related to job performance.
The bottom-line: Employees are typically a businesses biggest asset and expense. Unless employers choose carefully, a bad hire can become a firm’s biggest liability. A well thought out hiring plan including background screening can help any seize business stay productive and focused on their business instead of being sidetracked unnecessarily by bad hiring decisions.
Article Tags: background checks, due diligence, employee background screening, honest workers, invasion of privacy, job applicants, nightmare
|
About the Author: Lester Rosen RSS for Lester's articles - Visit Lester's website Lester S. Rosen is an attorney at law and President of Employment Screening Resources (www.ESRcheck.com), a national background screening company located in California. He is the author of, "The Safe Hiring Manual--Complete Guide to Keeping Criminals, Imposters and Terrorists Out of Your Workplace." (512 pages-Facts on Demand Press), the first comprehensive book on employment screening and safe hiring. He is also the author of, "The Safe Hiring Audit." His blog on human resources and hiring issues is a leading site on for HR professionals. , http://www.esrcheck.com/wordpress/ He is also a consultant, writer and frequent presenter nationwide on employee screening nackground checks and safe hiring issues. He has qualified and testified in the California, Florida and Arkansas Superior Courts as an expert witness on issues surrounding safe hiring and due diligence. His speaking appearances have included numerous national and statewide conferences. See: http://www.esrcheck.com/ESR_Speaks.php Mr. Rosen was the chairperson of the steering committee that founded the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) a professional trade organization for the screening industry which has over 500 members. He was also elected to the first board of directors and served as the first co-chairman in 2004. Click here to visit Lester's website Sample RFP Backgrond Screening Employment Reference Worksheet Telephone Screening Form |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Resolving A Conflict Between Two Sales Staffs
Five keys to business success
Why SEO is important for your online success
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



