Ritu Anand of GE India sent me the below questions concerning my October 28, 2007, post concerning severance and separation agreements.
Hi Charles,
Thanks for throwing light on this subject! However, I have a few doubts and would appreciate if You could help resolve them:
1. What is the guarantee that the exiting employee would not reveal the secrets/sue the firm even after signing the severance agreement/taking the money ?
2. is this a common practice in US/other parts of the world?
3. If this is a common practice with the organizations in the US , most of the companies would end up busting their HR budgets by paying severance to the exiting employees and all working population must be aware of this .. your views ..
Regards
Ritu Anand
HR
GE - India
My response to Ritu follows:
Hi Ritu,
Thanks for your questions. They’re excellent and thoughtful. I’m going to post them and my responses to the HR Community’s list serve and on my website.
I’m answering your questions in the same order and number you asked them.
1. What is the guarantee that the exiting employee would not reveal the secrets/sue the firm even after signing the severance agreement/taking the money?
Answer: As a means to discouraging the employee conduct you refer to, all severance and separation agreements should permit the employer to recover damages, costs and expenses from the employee (assuming the legal system permits such recovery). This won’t absolutely prevent an exiting employee from talking, but it increases the likelihood that they won’t breach the agreement.
Even if a severance or separation agreement prohibits disclosure, if the ex-employee breaches, the employer still needs to take enforcement action. This does not necessarily mean that the employer has to sue the ex-employee. The employer can issue some type of warning (letter, phone call, etc.), or the employer can contact competitors and warn them about using such secrets. The latter action poses its own risks due to ethical concerns, antitrust, defamation, libel and slander concerns. Obviously, the most extreme action an employer can legally take is to actually sue the ex-employee for breaching the agreement. A lawsuit will cost the business time and money, even if they can recover damages, costs and expenses from the employee.
With respect to a lawsuit or some other sort of complaint by the ex-employee, this is easier to deal with. As long as the terms of the agreement’s confidentiality, nondisclosure and other prohibitions are legally compliant, no court or other sort of tribunal should adjudicate a lawsuit or complaint, and all costs, expenses and damages should be awarded to the employer.
2. Is this a common practice in US/other parts of the world?
Answer: Yes, this is a common practice in the U.S., and it has been increasing in popularity. These agreements used to be reserved for top executives and are now being used for employees at all levels. The confidentiality and noncompete aspects of these agreements are also commonly used for pre-employment agreements between employers and employees.
With respect to its popularity in other parts of the world, it depends on the nation’s, province’s or region’s legal system. Common law and “Westernized” legal systems are likely to uphold severance and separation agreements as they’re mutually agreed to contracts with valuable consideration exchanged between the parties. Additionally, more capitalistic economies (e.g., former Soviet-bloc nations) might be more prone to honor such agreements as the protection of the employer’s property (capital) is paramount to innovation and profitability. However, these same legal systems will take measures to protect and ensure an individual’s ability to apply their skills, trade, knowledge and abilities in an unrestricted manner. After all, if individuals cannot freely earn a living, then they cannot consume the goods and services employers produce, and businesses will lose money.
3. If this is a common practice with the organizations in the US, most of the companies would end up busting their HR budgets by paying severance to the exiting employees and all working population must be aware of this .. your views ..
Answer: I briefly discussed your concern in my article. Excerpted below:
“Clients typically ask whether by offering an employee a severance, separation, or some hybrid agreement, they’re setting a legal precedent within their company or creating a feeling or belief of entitlement to such a benefit among employees. In short it’s not likely that the company will be legally obligated to offer the same to other employees. However, if other employees learn about such agreements, there’s a greater degree of possibility that a sense of entitlement will result. So, when deciding whether to use a separation or severance agreement, a business should consider the impact on employee morale, and to at least some extent consider the legal ramifications of using such an agreement.”
To expand further upon this, you might be right to say that “[i]f this is a common practice with the organizations in the US , most of the companies would end up busting their HR budgets by paying severance to the exiting employees.”
There are U.S. companies which have a reputation for caving in to exiting employee demands for large severances because they’re afraid of the public relations ramifications of lawsuits, complaints, ill-will, etc. Some companies just think it’s cheaper to offer money than to defend their record. But, as I indicated above, the likelihood of a legal precedent being set is minimal.
The concerns regarding employee morale and feelings of entitlement can be combated by offering severance and separation agreements infrequently or in extreme circumstances (e.g., in order to protect company confidentiality, capital, etc.), and making it clear to employees that they are at-will employees (if applicable). In other words, it’s relatively easy in an article like this to state in a generic and sterile manner what should or shouldn’t be done. It’s a completely different matter to actually draft and execute an agreement in a way that sufficiently communicates to a particular employee and the entire workforce that this is an isolated and unique circumstance, and a serious and binding agreement with provisions that must be honored. In short, how individual businesses and practitioners implement severance and separation agreements is crucial. Issues with execution are what leads to misunderstandings, disputes and your questions. I personally believe that many of the issues you allude to are avoidable and resolvable via a professionally drafted and executed severance or separation agreement and the advise of competent legal counsel.
Now, a few caveats. My original statement, as well as my response to your questions, are general statements and not intended as legal advice nor do my statements create any sort of attorney-client relationship. Moreover, as stated above, every circumstance is unique and might require its own unique agreement, contract and mode of execution. Again, consult competent legal counsel before taking any action.
I hope that this answers your questions. Feel free to ask for additional information or opinions. Moreover, thanks for taking the time to read the article.
More Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements - To learn more about this author, visit Charles Krugel's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 |
Related Articles |
|
Severance and Separation Agreements
|
| |
One topic I get a lot of questions about is severance and separation agreements. Although there's a distinct difference between the two, and some overlap, with some guidance the costs and benefits of both types of ...
|
Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements
|
| |
General analysis concerning severance and separation agreements from a business owner's perspective.
|
More Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements
|
| |
A reader asks me more questions based on my prior article regarding severance and separation agreements.
|
Joint Venture and NonDisclosure Agreements
|
| |
Many business owners are intimidated by the belief that they need intricate and expensive joint venture agreements and non-disclosure agreements. They are literally held back from massive increases and profits by th...
|
Cohabitation Agreements
|
| |
In Canada, there remains a great deal of misunderstanding about the rights and responsibilities of common-law couples. There are no statutory property rights for common-law couples regardless of how long they have c...
|
 |
Related Businesses - Evan Elite Authors |
|
The Evan Elite Authors program is currently in beta phase. For details please contact us.
|
|
|
Charles Krugel
(Visit Charles's Website)
As a labor and employment attorney and HR
consultant, Charles Krugel, www
.charlesakrugel.com, has represented
management in hundreds of proceedings and
has 13-plus years of experience in the
field. For the past 6 years, Charles has
run his own management side practice and
is Director of Legal & Compliance Services
for the Human Resource Store (www.hrsto
re.com). Besides having earned his
Juris Doctorate from Ohio Northern
University, he has a Master of Arts in
Industrial/Organizational Psychology from
the University of North
Carolina-Charlotte. Charles is a published
author, has been the subject of numerous
TV, radio and newspaper interviews and
frequently gives seminars and speeches in
his field. He is on the boards of
directors of 4 organizations (Urban
Gateways, Time Dollar Tutoring, YMCA
Alliance and Youth Communication). He
serves as Vice President and Treasurer for
2 of them. Charles is also on the
Advisory Board of the Law & Policy
Institutions Guide. He is a member of the
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce (serving
on the Employment Law and Workforce
Quality Committees), the Greater O'Hare
Association (member of the Government
Affairs Team) and the World Trade Center
Chicago.
|
|
 |
|
Charles A. Krugel, Labor Lawyer - My website is dedicated to my practice & profession. Content contains media interviews, articles, analysis & photos focusing on the working world.
|
|
|
|