Tweet

Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements

Written by: Charles Krugel

Article Overview: General analysis concerning severance and separation agreements from a business owner's perspective.

Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements

One topic I get a lot of questions about is severance and separation agreements.

Generally, severance refers to giving an exiting employee a monetary bonus or settlement above and beyond their regular compensation. A separation agreement usually refers to an agreement wherein the exiting employee promises not to sue, file a regulatory agency complaint, take business or information with them, or compete with their former employer. In return, the employer gives the employee something of value (usually money).

So, a business could give an exiting employee severance without a severance or separation agreement, but usually doesn’t use a separation agreement without awarding some form of severance (i.e., consideration). If this is confusing, the below will hopefully clarify my point.

Recently, a client asked me about a separation agreement for an employee over the age of 40.
Relative to dealing with an employee who’s 40 or older, if the employer is seeking a release of all claims pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), there's a 21/7 rule that applies. Under the rule, which is actually contained in Section 201 of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, a release of claims under the ADEA is only valid if the employee’s release is “knowing and voluntary.” More specifically, in order to be “knowing and voluntary,” the exiting employee has 21 days to review the agreement, with or without legal counsel, and has an additional seven days in which to revoke their signature (beyond the initial 21 day review period). Other requirements may apply given certain considerations. In short, depending on the nature of the separation agreement, the 40 and older employee might have rights not afforded to younger employees.

Regardless of the exiting employee’s age, a separation or severance agreement that’s intended to release the employer from all known or unknown claims is essentially the employer’s purchase of the employee’s agreement not to sue or file a complaint with a government agency, not to take business or information to a competitor, or sometimes, to not even work for a competitor.

When I’m initially contacted about this type of employment agreement, I ask the client why they think they need such an agreement. More specifically, what are your goals/purposes: to reward an exiting employee for tenure and/or quality of service, to prevent a lawsuit or complaint from being filed, to protect the confidentiality of company secrets and information, to prevent an employee from competing with them, or a combination of the aforementioned?

Businesses often ask:

* Should we offer severance to an exiting employee?
* When should we offer it?
* How much should we offer?
* Are the terms negotiable?
* Should we ask an exiting employee to sign a separation agreement that includes noncompete and confidentiality clauses?
* What about protected class considerations (e.g., race, sex, age, disability, etc.)?
* What will my other employees or competitors think if they find out that an employee signed such an agreement or received severance?

In order to help the employer focus on what issues they need to resolve, a business should analyze whether the exiting employee has been contentious or dropped hints of a lawsuit or complaint, or commented about the competition or competing with the employer. In order to help focus the employer on what issues they need to resolve, a business should analyze whether the exiting employee has been contentious or dropped hints of a lawsuit or complaint, or commented about the competition or competing with the employer. If an employer believes that an employee will sue or complain to a regulatory agency, then a separation or separation agreement should be strongly considered. If a lawsuit, complaint or any other factors of the employee’s exit isn’t a concern, then a severance or even no action might be appropriate.

Keep in mind, that unless there’s a contract or agreement to the contrary, or obligations under the Worker Adjustment Retraining & Notification Act (WARN), severance isn’t necessarily required, and in many instances an employee can just leave.

Clients typically ask whether by offering an employee a severance, separation, or some hybrid agreement, they’re setting a legal precedent within their company or creating a feeling or belief of entitlement to such a benefit among employees. In short it’s not likely that the company will be legally obligated to offer the same to other employees. However, if other employees learn about such agreements, there’s a greater degree of possibility that a sense of entitlement will result. So, when deciding whether to use a separation or severance agreement, a business should consider the impact on employee morale, and to at least some extent consider the legal ramifications of using such an agreement.

One way of reaching a bottom line for these agreements is that an employer should not enter into an agreement with an employee, and have to engage an attorney, unless the employer is reasonably sure that they’ll obtain a benefit from the transaction that they wouldn’t get in the normal course of business. Ultimately, as with most business decisions, whether to utilize an agreement or not is a cost versus benefit analysis.

Consistent with the disclaimer on found on my website, the above is a general discussion–i.e., every specific issue or case leads to its own specific resolution and should be handled accordingly.

Related Articles
  Severance and Separation Agreements
  More Questions Concerning Severance & Separation Agreements
  Rehiring After Layoff
  Protect Intellectual Property When Employees Leave
  What Are You Legally Required to Pay Employees at Termination?

Article Tags: adea, age discrimination in employment, age discrimination in employment act, benefit, bonus, discrimination in employment, gove, legal counsel, money, older workers, protection act, regulatory agency, section 201, separation agreement, separation agreements, seven days, severance agreement, signature



Related Forum Posts
Re: Marketing ideas? - Questions will set you free... And make you Rich [quote="KH_Global":349pds7c]Just ask ask ask. That is it.[/quote:349pds7c]
Re: Contact Information - Another idea would be to have an email form in place to accept "ticketed" inquires (if people are afraid of spammers seeing their email address). However, I hate how some sites try to persuade you out of sending an email by bombarding you with lists of "Frequently Asked Questions & Answers" as I find they're rarely helpful.
Synergy and Other Creative Insights - Truth is that there is [u:2iwgooi1]C[/u:2iwgooi1]ollaboration - on a formal basis and [u:2iwgooi1]c[/u:2iwgooi1]ollaboration which is informal. Let's say that you have a great new product. Before it launches you get loads of buddies in the same business as you to tear it apart and let you refine it. Creative people will get others in as well. people from outside the business - or those who are in the business who might not have anything to do with it and seek their input - listening hard. These aren't focus groups, they are way beyond this - they are real outsiders and thus have very open minds, asking the dumb, the stupid questions, which are often the most valuable. Questions like these help me be a good coach too! I once worked in a business where the backshop (the store room) was always untidy. They held a team meeting and had the cook in as well (you know the one who ran the employee facility). She knew nothing about the storeroom and its processes, but boy did she ask some tricky questions of them. Sometimes, little 'c' collaboration is real good at the mocro level, without which the big 'C' collaboration would be worthless.
Re: link exchange strategy - [quote="RussellWebb":2xvcpjwz]Questions that pop into mind... Does PR ranking effect 'who' you would exchange links with? Do you really need thousands of links to rank higher in the SE's? Are one-way links better than reciprocal links?[/quote:2xvcpjwz] Hi Russell, While I know you posed these SEO questions for Samin, I thought I'd help you get the conversation started by putting in my 2 cents. 1.) I think it's all about getting "quality" and high ranking/trusted sites (that are related to the content of your site and industry) to link back to you. 2.) While it's somewhat true that the more links you have the better, I'd suggest focusing on "quality" links rather than quantity. Poor sites and ones that aren't related to your field can actually hurt your rankings. 3.) Absolutely, it's much better if someone only links to you. However, reciprocal links are still good for those who have just launched a new site and are getting started. If I'm wrong about any of these comments, please feel free to correct me.
How to protect my trade mark? - Affirmative commercial action might be, for example, to increase spending on advertising, in order to make better known his use of the mark, or it might be to attend a national trade show associated with his business for the same purpose. Maybe he's just been lazy and hasn't had any serious lack of means. None of the questions was rhetorical. But I readily can imagine that you found the questions irrelevant to the legal discussion. I do not think that they are. Questions about the fairness of outcomes seem to me to be always relevant to legal discussions, with this reservation: that usually nothing can be done about clusters of unfair outcomes from within a particular legal system (ours, or canon Law, the Sharia, continental statute law, etc.) at a particular time. They need to get addressed politically first. In this connection, a lobby-related forum might be useful. Many patent and trademark related issues get very heavily lobbied. It's not that I found your points irrelevant to the legal discussion, it's just that most of your points missed the mark. I represent the "little guy" almost exclusively, and my clients have been very able to protect their marks against infringers large and small. You should educate yourself on the way things actually work, not how you think they might work, and then come back for a real discussion. I'd gladly discuss policy issues with you.


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

In the Year 2020 . . . Process

What should your free giveaway be?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.