|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
100% Positive Employee Performance Appraisal
Written by: Leonard ScottArticle Overview: Performance appraisal meetings between boss and subordinate are too often disastrous encounters in which anxiety is generated in both parties, the motivation and trust the boss generated throughout the year are undermined, and employee dissatisfaction with his/her work and the company is planted. This article explains how to avoid these performance appraisal session mistakes and make employee appraisal 100% positive and motivating every time.
![]() |
Free Download - How To Evaluate The Performance Of Your Top Sales Executive By Leonard Scott |
100% Positive Employee Performance Appraisal
Performance appraisal
meetings between boss and subordinate are too often disastrous encounters in
which anxiety is generated in both parties, the motivation and trust the boss
generated throughout the year is undermined, and employee dissatisfaction with
his/her work and the company is planted. This situation stems from the
performance appraisal instruments, the inadequate training of managers in how
to conduct effective performance evaluation sessions with subordinates, company
policy regarding sharing, or rather, not sharing information with subordinate
employees, and company policy on when unsatisfactory performance should be
dealt with. Formal performance appraisal meetings are in too many cases “gloom
and doom” affairs for both manger and employee instead of motivational
interactions which sends the employee back to his/her work with a positive
attitude and desire to take his/her performance to higher levels of
achievement.
First, a policy should be
established that all unsatisfactory performance be dealt with immediately. If
an employee violates company policy with respect to tardiness, absenteeism,
unacceptable work quantity or quality, interpersonal relations, or any other
aspect of work for which a standard of performance has been established, the
infraction should be handled then and there by warning the employee and placing
his/her on an improvement program. Of course if the infraction is serious, the
employee should be discharged right away. As the famous saying goes, employee
unsatisfactory performance should be “nipped in the bud.” It should never be
allowed to go on until performance appraisal time.
Second, the performance
appraisal instruments should be set up such that they contain no unsatisfactory
rating evaluation scores. (See below for sample 100% positive performance
appraisal forms.)
Third, appraisal sessions
should be on time, frank, open, involve two-way communications regarding
expectations and complaints, cover employee strength and areas where higher
levels of performance could be achieved, establish goals for the future, allow
the employee to bring to the table his/her hopes and aspirations regarding
future assignments and career development, set forth a training and development
program for the employee, provide information on company performance, goals,
and future plans, and answer the employee’s questions honestly. This sounds
like a tall order, but it reflects a sound approach to handling employee
performance appraisal where increased employee motivation is the goal.
Let’s take a minute to cover
how to handle the “OK” performer, the employee who meets all the required
standards of performance, but does not get a rating better than “Good.” It is
easy to conduct performance evaluation sessions with employees who are rated “
“Excellent” or “Outstanding.” The appraisal sessions with “OK” performers, who
will constitute the majority of employees, are the ones that take the most
skill. In these sessions the following terms should be used: “doing a
consistently good job”, handling your job quite satisfactorily”, “getting the
job done in quite an OK manner”, and “ fully meeting your job requirements.”
Now let’s look at what 100%
performance evaluation rating forms should look like. Two forms are presented.
One is for non-managerial employees and the other is for managerial employees.
Employee Evaluation Report
(front side)
Employee_______________________ Date
___________________________
Classification____________________ Department______________________
Confidential
Report
Performance Factors
Quantity of Output Outstanding Excellent Good/Satisfactory
Make an overall judgment as
to 10 9 8
7 6 5
the size of the employee’s
acceptable Very fast worker.Works fast. Well
Work output satisfactory.
output in relation to what is
regarded Consistently exceeds organized. Volume
as satisfactory/good,
excellent, or output standards by of output is above
outstanding. Consider the
employee’s considerable amount. Expected levels.
overall use of time and
resources.
Also, evaluate employee’s
ability
To stay with difficult or
tedious
Tasks or projects, ability to
meet or
Beat deadlines, total hours
worked,
Learning speed, problem
solving
capacity, and sensitivity to
cost control.
Quality of Work Outstanding
Excellent
Good/Satisfactory
Make an overall judgment as
to
10
9 8
7 6 5
The quality of the employee’s
output. Consistent, high
Exceeds minimum Work
quality satisfac-
Consider completeness with
which
degree of quality. Ex-
requirements for tory.
Work solved or prevented
problems, ceeds goals by signifi- quality. Exceeds
capitalized on opportunities,
or cant amount consis- goals and requires
achieved goals. Consider
output tently. Seldom needs little supervision.
format, number of revisions
required, supervision.
incisiveness shown, and
clarity and
impact of communications
involved.
Also, evaluate output
accuracy,
Dependability of results, and
depth of
analysis. Is employee capable
of
dealing with and solving
highly
complex problems or just
average
level difficulty? Is employee
concerned
about cost control as it
relates to quality
of work.
Interpersonal Relations Outstanding
Excellent Good/Satisfactory
Judge employee’s
cooperativeness,
10
9 8
7
6 5
Influence on fellow workers,
nature of A strong influence on Very effective in Gets along with others
Upward and downward impact,
and
positive interpersonal working
and
satisfactorily. Generally
Overall company loyalty and
spirit. relations in the work dealing with positive.
Consider whether employee is
a positive, unit. Considerate of
others. Solidly
Negative, or neutral member
of the work others’ views. Elicits positive.
Group. Measure employee’s
overall. cooperation. Very
Interpersonal behavior to
determine its
positive.
effect on other employees’
performance
and on personal outside the
firm.
Initiative and Ingenuity Outstanding
Excellent Good/Satisfactory
Judge the employee ability to
originate 10
9 8
7
6 5
or develop ideas and to get
things started Very high level of High level
of Satisfactory
level of
and moved toward
completion.
initiative. Strongly
initiative. Shows
initiative and ingenuity.
self-directed and
good self-
makes many good
direction and
suggestions
for
makes a number
improving
of suggestions
operations. for improving
operations.
Points Rating
38-40 Outstanding
31-37 Excellent
20-30 Good/Satisfactory Total
Points_______________
Rating____________________
Compensation
Increase
Recommendation___________
Manager
Signature__________ HR Approval
____________ Final Approval
______________
Employee Evaluation Report
(reverse side)
Future Goals and Objectives:
Employee Training &
Development Program
On an Employee Evaluation
Report form for Managers, the factors of Innovation and Leadership &
Managerial Skills should be added and the factor Initiative and Ingenuity
should be deleted. Doing this will increase the total rating points to 50.
Therefore, the Outstanding rating will have a point range of 48-50, the
Excellent rating will have a point range of 40-47, and the Good/Satisfactory
rating will have a point range of 25-39.
The expected performance
rating distribution using this performance rating system usually comes out as
follows: Outstanding—2% to 5%; Excellent—5% to 10%; Good/Satisfactory 85% to
93%. Remember, there are no
Unsatisfactory ratings in this system. All instances of unsatisfactory employee
performance are handled immediately by placing the employee on an improvement
program or discharging the employee.
This performance appraisal
system has the result of nipping poor performance in the bud, saving
“salvageabale” employees, ridding the work group of poor performers promptly,
allowing employees to reach their highest potential, strongly encouraging
employees to develop positive interpersonal relations, teamwork, and work unit
cooperation, stimulating suggestions for improving operations, and providing a
work environment that consistently aims at motivating workers to increasingly
higher levels of productivity. The benefits of a 100% positive performance
appraisal system are many, and setting up such a system is well worth the time
and effort.
Article Tags: amp company, div, employee dissatisfaction, endif, family auto, font definitions, gte, leonard scott, mso, o company, orphan, panose, paper source, paragraphs, performance appraisal, span style, style definitions, style font, subordinate, times new roman
|
About the Author: Leonard Scott RSS for Leonard's articles - Visit Leonard's website A human resources professional with more than twenty-five years in the field, Leonard Scott has established competitive advantage work forces at companies which enabled them to become industry leaders, has provided executive search services to firms seeking to build high performance executive teams so as to accelerate their growth rate and leapfrog over competitors, and has worked with firms to maintain their union-free status. His watchwords are: professionalism, making things happen, and exceeding client expectations. His consulting assignments do not result in numerous meetings and voluminous reports but in significantly improved metrics, teamwork, and leadership effectiveness. He has worked in top human resource executive positions at major corporations, at highly successful entrepreneurial companies, and at major national consulting firms. His articles have appeared in major business journals and national publications. He teaches business and management at the college level. Consult his website: www.lenscottandcompany.com for his client list, programs, and testimonials. Click here to visit Leonard's website How To Evaluate The Performance Of Your Top Sales Executive A Progressive High Motivation Wage Payment Plan Productivity Wages and Prices Whats This About Quick ChecklistIs Your Firm Ready For Success In The Coming Economic Rebound How To Build A TurboCharged Sales Force |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



