LEADERS: BORN OR BRED?
LEADERS: BORN OR BRED?
Sadly, in most cases we are left with unfulfilled potential, perpetual vacancies and a negative return on investment.
The question then is: what is missing in our development strategy? If we assume humans are process beings, able to transcend their genetics and environmental influences, why do so many organisations fail to grow and develop effective leaders?
This is a crucial question for South African companies, which have the added responsibility of righting the wrongs of the past and developing a new generation of leaders that must create the African Renaissance.
The answer is of course not a simple one! Complexity is the name of the game when it comes to leadership competence. There are many variables that influence the effectiveness of leaders.
It is well known that the same person with the same competencies who is wildly successful in one organisation, can fail dismally in the next company. Clearly context plays a major role in the success or failure of leaders. What works in one organisation as a leadership style and strategy won’t necessarily work in another.
Important as it is, this fact alone does not explain the large‑scale failure of many leaders out there. If one assumes that our business schools and training institutions are successfully equipping our leaders with business skills and knowledge, as well as skills related to EQ, AQ, SQ and especially leadership competencies, then why are they still not delivering the goods?
To answer this question, one has to focus on the higher levels of human functioning.
These higher levels (called meta‑programmes) include identity, beliefs, values and a whole assortment of thinking preferences and filters.
What we want to focus on is the impact these meta‑programmes have on the effectiveness of leaders.
We call them meta‑programmes because they are meta (above) to our conscious sensory experience; they are habitual neurological pathways in the brain that dictate, distort and filter our perceptions and behaviour. They are the hidden software that determines how we experience the world and what we focus on or not. Meta‑programmes develop slowly over time and mostly we are not even aware of their existence. However, they play a major role in our effectiveness as leaders.
There are over 60 meta‑programmes that have been discovered so far and every human has a unique “fingerprint” of meta‑programmes for every context.
The million dollar question is: What are the meta‑programmes that correlate with effective leadership?
How great leaders think
Sensory channel: seeing, hearing, feeling;
Perspective: own, partner, observer;
Motive: influence, affiliation, achievement;
Reference: Internal (with some external);
Information size: global;
Convincer channel: looking, listening, reading, doing;
Convincer strategy: trustful (empowerment); and
Management style: self and others.
Effective leaders have the following typical thinking preferences (meta‑programmes). There are many more that may influence leadership effectiveness, but we only list some of the more common ones:
1 Effective leaders are able to process information on all sensory modalities. It means that they tend to process information by seeing (visual), hearing (auditory) and feeling (kinaesthetic) means. This makes them excellent communicators as they can connect with people with different preferences for sensory input and processing.
Effective leaders are able to take different perspectives on a situation and switch quite comfortably between these perceptual positions. They can connect with their own emotions, values and thoughts, but they can also stand in the shoes of another and experience the world from their thoughts, feelings and viewpoint. They can then also switch to a third position, where becoming like a fly on the wall, they can survey the situation in a less emotional and more analytical way.
Effective leaders can easily switch between different drivers or motives for engaging the workplace. They can influence people and get others to do what they want (influence/power), and, when necessary, they can focus energy on being popular (affiliation). They are also focused on achieving outcomes and performing to the best of their abilities (achievement). The vital distinction is that they can, at will, and when necessary, pay attention to all three of these meta‑programmes.
Effective leaders have a clear and definitive sense of what is right and wrong, what is good quality and what is not. They have an internal benchmark whereby they measure results and experiences against their own value and belief system. They do not need others to tell them what is right or wrong or whether they have done a good job or not. However, the most effective leaders are able to combine the internal benchmark with an external meta‑programme of asking for, and paying attention to, feedback from others.
Effective leaders process information by way of a global meta‑programme. They focus on the big picture and can see the interaction and relationship between different parts. This enables them to delegate effectively compared to individuals who have a driver meta‑programme for details. They are also able to think more strategically and scan the horizon for threats and opportunities.
Effective leaders utilise all four convincer channels when they communicate their ideas to others or try to influence them. They ensure that they present their viewpoints in a way that is visually stimulating (including demonstrations), engage in a lot of discussions with others, prepare sufficient and stimulating reading material and allow their target audience to test run their ideas and become convinced through experience. This makes them masterful at persuasion and influence, because they are able to match the preferences of others.
Effective leaders have a convincer strategy of being trustful. It means that, in general, they trust people without needing to have excessive evidence of competency or character upfront. This enables them to empower others with decision‑making authority and to share the information necessary to make those decisions.
And last but not the least, effective leaders have a management style (norming structure) of self and others. This means that they have a very clear sense of how to attain success in their organisation. They believe that others can follow the same strategy as they do and also be successful. And they are more than willing to tell others what this strategy is and that they should follow it.
All the leadership programmes, coaching, mentoring and motivation in the world cannot transform a person into a great leader, if the individual has meta‑programmes that sabotage their leadership behaviour or are the opposite of the above eight categories. The effect would be the same as having only first gear on a car – you rev the car in the red all the time, going very slowly towards your destination, and eventually overheat or seize the engine (burnout in human terms).
The key question is: how do we identify and measure the driver meta‑programmes of a particular leader and how do we change them or create more flexibility of use?
But that is a story for another time.
Larry Erasmus heads up Training and Coaching Change at the Institute of Neuro‑Semantics Africa (www.INSAfrica.com).
This article was published in the February issue of HR Future Magazine 2007 (www.hrfuture.net)
LEADERS BORN OR BRED - To learn more about this author, visit Alan Hosking's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
One can empathise with HR professionals who seriously consider the notion that great leaders are simply born that way or that it is a lot easier to recruit these great leaders than to nurture and develop them in‑house. We invest millions in the skills development of our leaders, sending them off to business schools and training institutions by the thousands and giving them many opportunities to grow and develop their potential.
Sadly, in most cases we are left with unfulfilled potential, perpetual vacancies and a negative return on investment.
The question then is: what is missing in our development strategy? If we assume humans are process beings, able to transcend their genetics and environmental influences, why do so many organisations fail to grow and develop effective leaders?
This is a crucial question for South African companies, which have the added responsibility of righting the wrongs of the past and developing a new generation of leaders that must create the African Renaissance.
The answer is of course not a simple one! Complexity is the name of the game when it comes to leadership competence. There are many variables that influence the effectiveness of leaders.
It is well known that the same person with the same competencies who is wildly successful in one organisation, can fail dismally in the next company. Clearly context plays a major role in the success or failure of leaders. What works in one organisation as a leadership style and strategy won’t necessarily work in another.
Important as it is, this fact alone does not explain the large‑scale failure of many leaders out there. If one assumes that our business schools and training institutions are successfully equipping our leaders with business skills and knowledge, as well as skills related to EQ, AQ, SQ and especially leadership competencies, then why are they still not delivering the goods?
To answer this question, one has to focus on the higher levels of human functioning.
These higher levels (called meta‑programmes) include identity, beliefs, values and a whole assortment of thinking preferences and filters.
What we want to focus on is the impact these meta‑programmes have on the effectiveness of leaders.
We call them meta‑programmes because they are meta (above) to our conscious sensory experience; they are habitual neurological pathways in the brain that dictate, distort and filter our perceptions and behaviour. They are the hidden software that determines how we experience the world and what we focus on or not. Meta‑programmes develop slowly over time and mostly we are not even aware of their existence. However, they play a major role in our effectiveness as leaders.
There are over 60 meta‑programmes that have been discovered so far and every human has a unique “fingerprint” of meta‑programmes for every context.
The million dollar question is: What are the meta‑programmes that correlate with effective leadership?
How great leaders think
Sensory channel: seeing, hearing, feeling;
Perspective: own, partner, observer;
Motive: influence, affiliation, achievement;
Reference: Internal (with some external);
Information size: global;
Convincer channel: looking, listening, reading, doing;
Convincer strategy: trustful (empowerment); and
Management style: self and others.
Effective leaders have the following typical thinking preferences (meta‑programmes). There are many more that may influence leadership effectiveness, but we only list some of the more common ones:
1 Effective leaders are able to process information on all sensory modalities. It means that they tend to process information by seeing (visual), hearing (auditory) and feeling (kinaesthetic) means. This makes them excellent communicators as they can connect with people with different preferences for sensory input and processing.
Effective leaders are able to take different perspectives on a situation and switch quite comfortably between these perceptual positions. They can connect with their own emotions, values and thoughts, but they can also stand in the shoes of another and experience the world from their thoughts, feelings and viewpoint. They can then also switch to a third position, where becoming like a fly on the wall, they can survey the situation in a less emotional and more analytical way.
Effective leaders can easily switch between different drivers or motives for engaging the workplace. They can influence people and get others to do what they want (influence/power), and, when necessary, they can focus energy on being popular (affiliation). They are also focused on achieving outcomes and performing to the best of their abilities (achievement). The vital distinction is that they can, at will, and when necessary, pay attention to all three of these meta‑programmes.
Effective leaders have a clear and definitive sense of what is right and wrong, what is good quality and what is not. They have an internal benchmark whereby they measure results and experiences against their own value and belief system. They do not need others to tell them what is right or wrong or whether they have done a good job or not. However, the most effective leaders are able to combine the internal benchmark with an external meta‑programme of asking for, and paying attention to, feedback from others.
Effective leaders process information by way of a global meta‑programme. They focus on the big picture and can see the interaction and relationship between different parts. This enables them to delegate effectively compared to individuals who have a driver meta‑programme for details. They are also able to think more strategically and scan the horizon for threats and opportunities.
Effective leaders utilise all four convincer channels when they communicate their ideas to others or try to influence them. They ensure that they present their viewpoints in a way that is visually stimulating (including demonstrations), engage in a lot of discussions with others, prepare sufficient and stimulating reading material and allow their target audience to test run their ideas and become convinced through experience. This makes them masterful at persuasion and influence, because they are able to match the preferences of others.
Effective leaders have a convincer strategy of being trustful. It means that, in general, they trust people without needing to have excessive evidence of competency or character upfront. This enables them to empower others with decision‑making authority and to share the information necessary to make those decisions.
And last but not the least, effective leaders have a management style (norming structure) of self and others. This means that they have a very clear sense of how to attain success in their organisation. They believe that others can follow the same strategy as they do and also be successful. And they are more than willing to tell others what this strategy is and that they should follow it.
All the leadership programmes, coaching, mentoring and motivation in the world cannot transform a person into a great leader, if the individual has meta‑programmes that sabotage their leadership behaviour or are the opposite of the above eight categories. The effect would be the same as having only first gear on a car – you rev the car in the red all the time, going very slowly towards your destination, and eventually overheat or seize the engine (burnout in human terms).
The key question is: how do we identify and measure the driver meta‑programmes of a particular leader and how do we change them or create more flexibility of use?
But that is a story for another time.
Larry Erasmus heads up Training and Coaching Change at the Institute of Neuro‑Semantics Africa (www.INSAfrica.com).
This article was published in the February issue of HR Future Magazine 2007 (www.hrfuture.net)
LEADERS BORN OR BRED - To learn more about this author, visit Alan Hosking's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
| |||
| Great format
Commented on LEADERS BORN OR BRED. |
|||
| Leave Your Feedback | |||
|
|||
|
| |||
| It's a question that has captured the attention of kings, military leaders, business leaders, academics and philosophers for as long as people have pulled together to make a single dream, a vision come true. In this... |
|||
|
| |||
| Leaders are born not made, right? This leadership myth continues even into the 21st century. Now is the time to vanquish this myth once and for all. |
|||
|
| |||
| Why is it that some people become leaders and others don’t? There is no simple answer to this question; it depends on a complex mix of variables. Let this article de-mystify things for you. |
|||
|
| |||
| These are quotes taken from an article by Bill George former chairman and CEO of Medtronic.
|
|||
|
| |||
| These are quotes taken from an article by Bill George former chairman and CEO of Medtronic.
|
|||
| |||
| Re: Great at one thing OR good at everything? | |||
| |||
Bernard ReberBack in late 1992, MS Access hit the streets. About that time the company I managed needed new software to handle their growing client base and I decided to try this new product. I had little difficulty writing and adapting a database to suit us and discovered a hidden talent for programming. A business was born. With business studies and 25 years of management experience in three different countries under my belt, I could offer a unique combination of skills and my customers agreed. From these humble beginnings my software 'invoiceit' emerged in 1999 and has since been taken to 49 states (hello Wyoming, won't you join us?), all across Canada and more than 70 other countries. From the very beginning the program included cashbook accounting, the simplest form of keeping financial business records. The Dictionary.com defines 'cashbook' as "A 'book' in which to record money received and paid out". For 'book' substitute 'simple software' and that's what I'm about. Now I have published Simple Accounting, an inexpensive spreadsheet solution which even you can master. For just $14.95 it costs less than a takeout meal! More at http://www.scrambled-card.com/simple_accounting_main.htm - Visit Bernard Reber's Website |
|||
Jay Kubassek(Jay's Full Bio: EvanCarmichael.com/jaykubassek) Jay Kubassek is a Canadian born entrepreneur, internet marketing genius, professional speaker, international real estate developer/investor, executive film producer, extreme sport enthusiast and a passionate supporter of several charities worldwide. In 2007, Jay's vision and dedication to help other entrepreneurs and business owners duplicate his marketing success led to the creation of his fourth company CarbonCopyPRO, an internet marketing firm already worth over 15 million dollars that has over 20 employees and contract workers with clients is 12 different countries. Jay resides in NYC with his girlfriend Jamie, three year old son Milo and dog Cooper. As executive producer he recently premiered his first film in the 2008 Cannes Film Festival. As an adventurist he is racing the 2008 Baja 1000 off-road race and is a member of the 2008 U.S. National Elephant Polo Team, The New York Blue who will be representing the US in the 2008 World Championships in Nepal. Visit Jay's Blog: www.JayKubassek.com - Visit Jay Kubassek's Website |
|||
Michel NerayMichel Neray has over 25 years of experience as an award-winning copywriter, an Internet pioneer, a tradeshow pitchman and a senior sales and marketing executive. An online pioneer, he was one of the first marketing professionals to embrace the Internet by building websites as early as 1993. In 1994, Michel co-authored a book entitled "The Great Crossover: Personal Confidence in the Age of the Microchip", which made it to Jack Canfield's Achiever's Recommended Reading List. Michel founded Portfolios.com in 1995, the world's first online source directory for creative professionals and one of the first websites based on community generated content. Since creating The Essential Message in 2003, Michel has helped thousands of independent professionals and entrepreneurs as well as growing corporations find a better way to differentiate, position and brand themselves. In 2005, his chapter "Everything Starts With A Conversation" was selected as the lead for the book, "Sales Gurus Speak Out" and re-published in 2008 for 'Awakening The Workplace Volume 3'. He is also a co-author of "In the Company of Leaders" (2008) with 40 top North American leadership experts. - Visit Michel Neray's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
![]() | |
![]() Alan Hosking (Visit Alan's Website) HR Future is an independent human resource magazine published by Osgard Media as a support to all HR Executives, Chief Executive Officers, Managing Directors, Financial Directors, HR practitioners and Senior Line Managers who are committed to creating shareholder value through human capital. Our cream of the crop contributors are all dedicated experts in their field providing content to the continent. www.hrfuture.net< /a>
| |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
![]() |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
![]() | ||
|
| ||
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() | ||
|
Top 50 Debt Blogs
Learn To Get Out Of Debt | ||
|
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | ||
![]() | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||



















