Tweet

Building a Leadership Team - Part 1

Written by: Michael Schutzler

Article Overview: Talent is necessary for building a winning leadership team, but talent is not sufficient. You can recruit the very best in every functional area of responsibility in your organization, but unless they work well together, you will fail to create sustainable value. And in a competitive environment, you will lose to teams with far less talent if they work well together but you don’t. There is a tongue in cheek axiom that comes as a corollary to this – “I’d rather be lucky than good.” If you believe in blind luck, go with God and stop reading. If you believe we make our own luck, I’d like to share three principles for creating a great leadership team and some practical insights into each: agreement on the mission, clear communication, and balance. Pat1 = Agreement on the mission.

Building a Leadership Team - Part 1

Part I: Agreement on the mission

I have seen many leaders use the Moses Model to building a mission statement. They go off on a retreat or vacation or a hot shower, have an inspired moment there, and then come back to their teams proclaiming the answer. They proceed to sell that mission to their teams – and since they are the boss, declaring their answer with passion and personal force, constructive debate vanishes. This approach is useful for entrepreneurs forming a raw start-up, but once a team is in place to grow an organization, this model fails. Agreement on the mission sold by our would-be Moses usually only lasts until the first rough spot on the way. At the first substantive challenge, doubt overwhelms action and debate about direction overwhelms collaboration among the leadership team – usually as mumblings without the leader present.

There are leaders who declare themselves knowledgeable and self-aware (which is always a tip-off to the wise) who conduct an offsite to create their strategy, mission statement, vision statement, product roadmap – it comes in many flavors! This process ends in the same failure case as the Moses Model because of the Trump Effect. When Mr. Trump speaks, his lieutenants adjust their world view (intentionally or subconsciously) to more closely align with his. Sometimes the Trump Effect is blunt. I’ve seen a well-known CEO publically impugn the intellect and character of an exec who had the audacity to present an idea not in alignment with his own view. But even if the leader is benign and merely declares a firm belief, they suck the creativity right out of the room just by speaking. Inevitably these well meant offsite exercises result in missions accepted by the leadership team rather than embraced by them. And again, at the first sign of trouble, doubt overwhelms action.

Getting a group of human beings with diverse personal and professional needs and wants to agree on a mission is not easy. It requires a Socrates Model: a leader must ask questions, not just in an offsite, but as a course of daily practice with the leadership team. It means listening without debating. In group settings, it means calling directly on those who are silent to express their view. It requires a leader to offer assertions as a foil for debate; to foster a respectful and rational discussion to challenge those assertions. The leader’s role is to seed the discussion, provoke the team to aspire to something more challenging than they would otherwise do on their own, and push the team in to making a conscious choice. And all the while, listening carefully for tone, for ideas, for fears, and assumptions.

A team sometimes needs the leader to decide direction – especially if an ambivalent set of choices are reached. Using a Socrates Model, the leader suspends judgment until the last reasonable moment. After dissenters and creative thinkers have voiced their ideas and heard those of others, if the discussion doesn’t naturally resolve to an agreed upon mission, the team will usually call on the leader to choose. At that point, a leader can impose will and do so effectively. In a Socrates Model, the team is pulling the leader into a choice they can embrace, whereas in a Moses Model or Trump Effect, the leader is pushing his choice upon the team.

It is important to note, that even if everyone says “We are agreed!” there will always be one straggler in the group. They might not voice it, but you can be certain they are still quite unsure of the merit of the mission. Your job as the leader is to flush them out. It’s alright if they voice doubts in a leadership team setting. It is not acceptable if they voice those doubts outside the team.

Andy Grove made popular a process of cutting through this issue: Agree and commit or disagree and commit, but commit you will. I have also used this methodology and watched it used, but you have to be very careful. Some human beings are good at declaring “all for one and one for all” in a group setting, while still harboring what they believe to be a better idea and then complaining about it among those not on the leadership team. Inevitably this behavior will surface and when it does, you need to challenge that person privately about their ability to commit fully to the mission. Assuming they do re-commit, it can only be on the condition that the next time they subvert privately, they forfeit their role on the team.

Regardless of what process you use to come to agreement on a mission, the most important point is forming enough conviction. Your team will need that conviction to face with courage the seemingly insurmountable challenges that are always encountered along the way to achieving any mission worthy of pursuit.

(c) 2008 BlueSevenPartners.com

Related Articles
  Easy Team Building Tactics - Making The Most Of More Of Your People
  The Steps of Leadership
  Want to Skyrocket Your Career During This Recession?
  INVENTORIES CAN BE MANAGE BUT PEOPLE SHOULD BE LEAD.
  7 Steps to Improve Your Virtual Leadership and Virtual Team Effectiveness

Article Tags: alignment, audacity, belief, constructive debate, creativity, exercises, flavors, human beings, intellect, leadership team, lieutenants, mission statement, missions, moses, offsite, product roadmap, rough spot, substantive challenge, trump, vision statement



Related Forum Posts
Need help in Team Building Activity.. - Hi! I am tasked to organize a Team Building Activity in the office. I would like to seek help from you guys on ideas on how to make it worth the time and effort. I want the team to ask for more team building activities after this one. Thanks! jane
Re: Need help in Team Building Activity.. - Team Building Activities are my favorite part. Last time our team was out for an expedition. We got a map and had to find the cave were we also slept and on our way there were other activities. It was an extreme team building and it was organized by a specialized company.
Type of business with building - If you owned a building and Wal-Mart was opening its doors across the street in a previously unoccupied area (along with 12-14 small shops), what type of business would you start? Here are the considerations: 1. Money is a non-factor 2. Building is fairly large (10,000) square feet 3. Building is on the corner of a busy intersection (about to get much busier)
Re: Anyone Uses Elance.com? Guru.com? Rentacoder.com? - I've had quite a bit of success on oDesk.com. I've never used Elance so I can't compare. I like oDesk.com 'cos I get to sort thru people (e.g. within a certain bid range) with a single click. I find their help response very quick and I like the oDesk Team software that "providers" must install. This gives me the Buyer more insight as to what I am paying for. The Team software takes screenshots of the Providers screen on 10 min increments so I can see that the person is infact doing work for me.
Re: Business Women Peer Mentoring Spotlight - Hi Everyone, Gosh, I REALLY appreciate your concrete feedback. This was far more than I expected and I'm glad you said what you thought straight out. Each of you have shared something of value and I want to take some more time to think and really go over what each of you have said. However, I can see there are some things I need to change right away. What an interesting point about a NEW program perhaps making people think they are guinea pigs! This is NOT what I want to convey! It's funny how we can see some things so clearly in others while not always seeing it for ourselves! I must admit there are a few things I've been meaning to change (like my bio which is very outdated). Obviously, these things need to be higher on my priority list. You caught me like the plumber who puts his clients first and doesn't get around to fixing his own tap! As far as my target market, I do feel quite strongly about working with Women Leaders and doing Leadership Coaching with them. It's non-negotiable in my books. In my Executive Coaching training, the terms "Leaders" and "Executives" are interchangable. To me, an Executive is a Leader and so is the Business Woman or Entrepreneur who is CEO of her own business. I love working with decision makers! What I did learn is that I need to avoid opening up the Leadership term beyond what I described above. I'm also wondering if there is a misunderstanding with the general public as to what Leadership Coaching really is. Leadership Coaching is all about developing your leadership skills, both as a people manager and in more effectively running and growing the business. There is ALWAYS room for growth in some way. As well, sometimes, we just need a sounding board to clarify what our next BEST step is. In fact, if a woman thinks she has nothing to work on, then we aren't a good Client/Coach fit anyway. How can she grow if she doesn't see the value of expressing ALL of the great ability within her? How can her company grow if she doesn't see the value of strategic planning for the next best level? Thanks again to you all! I will go back to my website and really question whether I am conveying the right message. I got more than I bargained for in this Spotlight... you generously offered way more than I was asking. I think we could be on to something great for the Forum. Now it's time to let someone else have the spotlight. It would be great if everyone took a turn! In gratitude, Tami


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Tweet

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

How To Improve Your CTA (Call To Action)

Resolving A Conflict Between Two Sales Staffs

Adapting to Technology and the Internet

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.