The Einstein Factor in Leading Science Based Projects Part 1
The Einstein Factor in Leading Science Based Projects Part 1
By Martin Wartenberg and Victoria Tucker, November 2007
When asked if the people, practices and techniques required to lead science research projects are different from those in the general population, the answer is not just YES, but a resounding DUH!
The differences are vast, in part because we believe there’s an Einstein Factor at work. In other words, in science organizations, academic brilliance is astounding. People are passionate about their work, committed and motivated to discover cures that heal a world population or design instruments that unleash the secrets of the cosmos.
And, like Einstein, high science or technology workers tend to push back the established status quo with an expectation of peer defaulting interaction and inclusion. Respect, recognition and reward commensurate with work are all assumed.
On the flip side of the Einstein factor are also those challenges encountered when it comes to emotional savviness. Einstein considered himself somewhat of a dunce on the topic with two failed marriages and only a handful of friendships over the years.
While the statement of emotional impairment may be more stereotypical than not, it does raise an interesting point about the preconceived notion that a trade off is required - the intellectual superseding anything emotional. And yet, according to the State of Engagement Corporate Leadership Council survey in which 50,000 employees from 27 countries were surveyed, knowing how to create an emotional commitment with people is at the very core of increased productivity and performance.
Not only are people differences great, but the way in which project teams are populated and managed also vary from the norm.
Some of the more intriguing differences between coordinating and staffing a Science Based Project Team from those in other industries are highlighted below:
Scientists and Medical Doctors are really, really smart.
* In fact, they tend to be in the 120 to 140 IQ range (Very Superior Intelligence) with some in the 140+ (Near Genius or Genius Level).
* This isn’t to imply that you don’t find smart people in other industries. You do, just not so many gathered together in one spot.
* Note: We certainly know those who hold Ph.D. or M.D. titles and couldn’t communicate directions to their Aunt Matilda’s house. Still, you get our gist- scientists and medical doctors are pretty dog gone bright.
Science based project teams are made up of different specialties.
* The Aubrey Group, a bio-tech consultancy organization, has estimated that the typical medical device project requires 12 different technical/scientific specialties.
* They believe this number also applies to pharmaceutical discovery projects.
* What ifs are the language du jour. The more varied the background of people gathered together, the greater the boundless thinking.
It takes a very long time for a scientist to achieve the necessary proficiency in their field of study (PhD plus post Doctoral efforts)
* Spending roughly 16 years studying their field of expertise, scientists usually end up knowing almost everything about their discipline.
* On the other hand, it also implies that as specialists, they may not necessarily be savvy about general business functions.
Medical Device and Pharma Discovery projects are L-O-N-G, typically requiring many years from inception to product roll-out.
* In fact, projects are often measured in decades.
* This requires several project hand-offs as well as built in transfer of knowledge (both tacit and explicit).
* Patience is paramount as is having a passion for staying the course over the long haul.
Based on extensive research, scientists and technical specialists tend to be “internal thinkers” and highly analytic in their approach to problem solving and decision making.
* Myers and Briggs (originating with Carl Jung’s work) identified basic personality types. Those in high science and technology positions tend to fit in certain dimensions.
* It certainly doesn’t mean they can’t fit into other niches, only that there’s a preference to be highly analytic when it comes to gathering information and very logic focused when making decisions.
* A great deal of “noodling” takes place. Typically speaking, scientists and technical specialists are going to cogitate and extrapolate on the inside before opening their mouths and spouting off on the outside.
The Einstein Factor in Leading Science Based Projects Part 1 - To learn more about this author, visit Jeremy Tucker's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
The Einstein Factor in Leading Science Based Projects - Part 1
By Martin Wartenberg and Victoria Tucker, November 2007
When asked if the people, practices and techniques required to lead science research projects are different from those in the general population, the answer is not just YES, but a resounding DUH!
The differences are vast, in part because we believe there’s an Einstein Factor at work. In other words, in science organizations, academic brilliance is astounding. People are passionate about their work, committed and motivated to discover cures that heal a world population or design instruments that unleash the secrets of the cosmos.
And, like Einstein, high science or technology workers tend to push back the established status quo with an expectation of peer defaulting interaction and inclusion. Respect, recognition and reward commensurate with work are all assumed.
On the flip side of the Einstein factor are also those challenges encountered when it comes to emotional savviness. Einstein considered himself somewhat of a dunce on the topic with two failed marriages and only a handful of friendships over the years.
While the statement of emotional impairment may be more stereotypical than not, it does raise an interesting point about the preconceived notion that a trade off is required - the intellectual superseding anything emotional. And yet, according to the State of Engagement Corporate Leadership Council survey in which 50,000 employees from 27 countries were surveyed, knowing how to create an emotional commitment with people is at the very core of increased productivity and performance.
Not only are people differences great, but the way in which project teams are populated and managed also vary from the norm.
Some of the more intriguing differences between coordinating and staffing a Science Based Project Team from those in other industries are highlighted below:
Scientists and Medical Doctors are really, really smart.
* In fact, they tend to be in the 120 to 140 IQ range (Very Superior Intelligence) with some in the 140+ (Near Genius or Genius Level).
* This isn’t to imply that you don’t find smart people in other industries. You do, just not so many gathered together in one spot.
* Note: We certainly know those who hold Ph.D. or M.D. titles and couldn’t communicate directions to their Aunt Matilda’s house. Still, you get our gist- scientists and medical doctors are pretty dog gone bright.
Science based project teams are made up of different specialties.
* The Aubrey Group, a bio-tech consultancy organization, has estimated that the typical medical device project requires 12 different technical/scientific specialties.
* They believe this number also applies to pharmaceutical discovery projects.
* What ifs are the language du jour. The more varied the background of people gathered together, the greater the boundless thinking.
It takes a very long time for a scientist to achieve the necessary proficiency in their field of study (PhD plus post Doctoral efforts)
* Spending roughly 16 years studying their field of expertise, scientists usually end up knowing almost everything about their discipline.
* On the other hand, it also implies that as specialists, they may not necessarily be savvy about general business functions.
Medical Device and Pharma Discovery projects are L-O-N-G, typically requiring many years from inception to product roll-out.
* In fact, projects are often measured in decades.
* This requires several project hand-offs as well as built in transfer of knowledge (both tacit and explicit).
* Patience is paramount as is having a passion for staying the course over the long haul.
Based on extensive research, scientists and technical specialists tend to be “internal thinkers” and highly analytic in their approach to problem solving and decision making.
* Myers and Briggs (originating with Carl Jung’s work) identified basic personality types. Those in high science and technology positions tend to fit in certain dimensions.
* It certainly doesn’t mean they can’t fit into other niches, only that there’s a preference to be highly analytic when it comes to gathering information and very logic focused when making decisions.
* A great deal of “noodling” takes place. Typically speaking, scientists and technical specialists are going to cogitate and extrapolate on the inside before opening their mouths and spouting off on the outside.
The Einstein Factor in Leading Science Based Projects Part 1 - To learn more about this author, visit Jeremy Tucker's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
 | |
 |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
 | |
| |||
Kim CastleWith nearly two decades in the advertising and design business, with clients like Domino's Pizza, General Motors, Direct TV, Pedigree, Wolfgang Puck, Higher Octave Music, Hollywood Celebrity Products, Disney, and Paramount, as well as thousands of entrepreneurs around the world define, structure, communicate, and position their business for greater profits, BrandU(R) co-creators Kim Castle and W. Vito Montone discovered that entrepreneurs could experience the same power that big brands command for a fraction of the cost with the world's only process-based results-drive Integral approach to business creation. BrandU(R) is helping entrepreneurs grow with the power of extreme clarity from idea...to brand...to market(TM) and helping one million entrepreneurs become successful and whole so that they can make a difference in the world. Are you one of them? If you want to experience clarity all the way to the bank(TM), get started now at http://www.brandu.com. - Visit Kim Castle's Website |
|||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. | |||
 | |
|  |
Subscribe to Jeremy's articles
 | |
|
|  |
 | |
|
| |
 | |||||||
|
 | ||
 |
||
 |
||
 |
||
|
| ||
 |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
 |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
 |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
|
|
 Pro-Forma Template Get 'em Good or Get 'em Gone! The Entrepreneurial Sweet Spot Your Marketing Mindset Get a Top 20 Ranking |
|
 | ||
 |
Top 50 Political Blogs
Top Political Blogs of 2009 | |
 |
Top 50 Franchising Blogs
Top 50 Franchising Blogs | |
| ||
 | ||||
| ||||
|
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Email us your ideas on how to make our website more valuable! Thank you Sharon from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for your suggestions to make the newsletter look like the website and profile younger entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez and Sean Combs!
|
|
|
