Tweet

Zero Tolerance Means Zero Leadership

Guest post by: John Grubbs

Article Overview: We have all heard the horror stories regarding zero tolerance policies in the past. Stories about a teenager being expelled for having a Tylenol in her purse or a five year old removed from the classroom for bringing a toy gun to school are recent examples that have generated buzz in the press. Most of us laugh at the ridiculousness of such examples and consider them to be the exception rather than the rule for today's society. Why do such policies exist and what purpose do these extreme measures provide the organization? Do such extreme positions provide any benefit? How does such a policy reflect on the leadership within these organizations? And finally, what might be the cost for an organization that must act upon the violation of such a policy?

Zero Tolerance Means Zero Leadership

We have all heard the horror stories regarding zero tolerance policies in the past. Stories about a teenager being expelled for having a Tylenol in her purse or a five year old removed from the classroom for bringing a toy gun to school are recent examples that have generated buzz in the press. Most of us laugh at the ridiculousness of such examples and consider them to be the exception rather than the rule for today's society. Why do such policies exist and what purpose do these extreme measures provide the organization? Do such extreme positions provide any benefit? How does such a policy reflect on the leadership within these organizations? And finally, what might be the cost for an organization that must act upon the violation of such a policy? Zero tolerance can be commonly defined as the policy of applying laws or penalties to even minor infringements of a code in order to reinforce its overall importance and enhance deterrence. This can seem to be an optimal approach to controlling behavior at first glance. However, when we look at the implications of such a policy, the actual end-result often leaves much to be desired from a leadership point of view. The attempt to prevent negative behavior in some team members by the threat of sever punishment is similar to "making an example of one person" in order to scare others into compliance. This threat and fear methodology does not require leadership and in most cases actually hinders the leader by creating feelings of mistrust on the team. Potential followers tend to base actions on minimizing the threat of failure rather than creating an opportunity to be successful. Yet, many organizations actually see value in this myopic and leaderless methodology for managing human behavior. The argument that might be made to defend a zero tolerance policy is that we are treating everyone exactly the same no matter what the circumstance. And indeed this would be true. However, the problem with this logic is that as human beings our motivation and rationalization of events are as unique as our fingerprints. We simply cannot objectively prescribe behavior and its implications ahead of time. These archaic methods for management never promote leadership and are actually a very poor attempt at disguising the literal absence of leadership. Too many organizations would rather punish the innocent rather than deal with an individual situation its accompanying risk. Most rational people actually laugh at the ridiculous outcomes of a zero tolerance policy that is put to the test. The idea of such policies and the perspective in application are often opposite. In other words, it may look good on paper and satisfy some legalistic need while looking completely absurd in actual application. The managers of these "tested" organizations often look like complete "idiots" when public scrutiny applies the rational consideration test to a zero tolerance policy. The truth however is much more fascinating. Many readers will acknowledge that the current organization they belong to does have and will continue to have (possibly many) these policies that actually undermine true leadership. The momentum of the past cannot easily be stopped and change is truly difficult without key people assuming leadership positions within the organization. A Harvard study discovered the amazing fact that seventy percent of all change efforts fail. Another study revealed that mismanaging change is the primary reason why executives get fired. This fear of failure is what separates managers from leaders. Eliminating a policy that protects those afraid to lead takes great courage. This rare courage exists in leaders that are willing to break from organizational paradigms and traditions and actually lead change. Even if positive, change is a psychological shock to our emotional systems. We may even seem content with a generally agreed poor status quo rather than endure the emotional investment required to change. Organizations that adopt and maintain zero tolerance policies tend to be very bureaucratic in nature. School districts, government agencies and other similar organizations struggle greatly with true leadership. Success is based less on performance and more on tenure and entitlement. When someone is more concerned for the organization than the people the organization serves, purpose becomes inverted. Leadership is less appealing and the concept of security becomes priority. Leadership becomes perverted when the idea that any organization and its existence serves a greater purpose (greater good) than any one individual. Great organizations and leaders must be willing to risk everything to protect the smallest among them!

Related Articles
  Leadership Development in Different Cultures - What's Your Leadership Model?
  Leadership lesson: Tolerance is paramount
  Leadership by Example
  Identifying Poor & Pathetic Leadership Styles and Related Impacts
  Leadership fails without management
  Twelve Strategic Leadership Actions To Fire Up Your Employees During Change
  The Great Secrets of a True Leader
  Making Your Leadership Your Life
  What is True Leadership?
  LEADERSHIP IS CREATIVE THINKING NOT REACTIVE THINKING
  The Positive Benefits of Being More Tolerant
  Tolerance
  Does product, sales or market leadership equal thought leadership?
  Seven Habits of Highly Defective Sales Managers
  When, How and Why Salespeople Discount Products and Services
  E-Mail Tip #23 - Avoid Using Off Color Remarks
  What Does Leadership Mean
  Assessing and Building Your Leadership Pipeline
  Five Positive Traits to Enhance Flexibility
  LEADERSHIP IS ALWAYS CREATIVE THINKING NEVER REACTIVE THINKING.

Article Tags: extreme, failure, leadership, policy, ridiculous, zero tolerance
Referred by: http://www.thetrainingbank.com/



Related Forum Posts
Re: Business Women Peer Mentoring Spotlight - Hi Everyone, Gosh, I REALLY appreciate your concrete feedback. This was far more than I expected and I'm glad you said what you thought straight out. Each of you have shared something of value and I want to take some more time to think and really go over what each of you have said. However, I can see there are some things I need to change right away. What an interesting point about a NEW program perhaps making people think they are guinea pigs! This is NOT what I want to convey! It's funny how we can see some things so clearly in others while not always seeing it for ourselves! I must admit there are a few things I've been meaning to change (like my bio which is very outdated). Obviously, these things need to be higher on my priority list. You caught me like the plumber who puts his clients first and doesn't get around to fixing his own tap! As far as my target market, I do feel quite strongly about working with Women Leaders and doing Leadership Coaching with them. It's non-negotiable in my books. In my Executive Coaching training, the terms "Leaders" and "Executives" are interchangable. To me, an Executive is a Leader and so is the Business Woman or Entrepreneur who is CEO of her own business. I love working with decision makers! What I did learn is that I need to avoid opening up the Leadership term beyond what I described above. I'm also wondering if there is a misunderstanding with the general public as to what Leadership Coaching really is. Leadership Coaching is all about developing your leadership skills, both as a people manager and in more effectively running and growing the business. There is ALWAYS room for growth in some way. As well, sometimes, we just need a sounding board to clarify what our next BEST step is. In fact, if a woman thinks she has nothing to work on, then we aren't a good Client/Coach fit anyway. How can she grow if she doesn't see the value of expressing ALL of the great ability within her? How can her company grow if she doesn't see the value of strategic planning for the next best level? Thanks again to you all! I will go back to my website and really question whether I am conveying the right message. I got more than I bargained for in this Spotlight... you generously offered way more than I was asking. I think we could be on to something great for the Forum. Now it's time to let someone else have the spotlight. It would be great if everyone took a turn! In gratitude, Tami
Re: 3 Ways I Used Twitter To Grow My Business This Week - Hi Olivia, It seems you are working in the area of leadership area. Is Leadership = Learning? I am looking for some good books on strategy? Which one do you recommend? Thanks, Robert
Re: LEADERS - Nice post, i like the Doers and the listeners comments from my handbook 8.5 HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW ABOUT LEADERSHIP? Planning Problem Solving Vision Innovation Leadership Emotional Intelligence Delegation Communication Self-Development Relationship Building Commercial Financial skills Personal Energy Ethics Transparency Even there I see that we are missing "PASSION"
Different Hats - CEO Sales & Marketing & Leadership Development Company Strategic Vision 10 Alliances & Growth Strategies 10 Hiring & Managing People 8 Mentoring 8-9 Strategic Planning for Clients 10 Execution of Marketing Campaigns 9-10 (i have great people who do the nitty gritty) Financial Management 9 Bookkeeping 3 (outsourced as I really hate the fine details like GST0 Administrative Follow Up 6-7 (again have great staff) Writing & Publishing 9 (getting better all the time!) Speaking 10 (so I have been told) Self Promotion 9-10 Web development & Promotion 6-7 (learning more and have brought on players who are 10+) Babysitting Employees (1 - wont do it, that's why I work so hard to hire and motivate the people I have) Great topic Kevin!! Jude
Why A Project Fails? - Hello Everyone As the size and complexity of ones business grows, so does their need to effectively manage projects. I have been thinking about the major reasons why a project can go wrong and my limited experience comes up with the following. 1 Leadership: A project manager with leadership skills and not just management skills. 2 Failure to (Foresee and) Plan 3 Failure to Manage: Ineffective change management control methods. Unclear decision making guidelines. 4 Talent: Finding, allocating and developing people 5 Scope: Setting an overly ambitious or amibigious project scope 6 Alignment: When projects are not prioritized in alignment with the business strategy, or project members personal objectives are not in tandem with that of the project / company 7 Lack of Candor: Communication Breakdowns I would be interested in knowing everyone's thoughts on this, especially on ways to overcome the above mentioned obstacles. Cheers!


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

Fear Factors in Small Business: Sales & Marketing

Promoting your company and self with verve

SEO – Link Building Secrets

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.