|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Empowerment and Other "Programs"
|
| Guest post by: Robert Whipple |
Article Overview: Be careful when management wants to do another "program." Short term bursts of energy may be well intended, but they actually sap the energy of an organization. This paper describes the pitfalls and gives some antidotes.
![]() |
Free Download - Death by Micromanagement By Robert Whipple |
Empowerment and Other "Programs"
Overused words become a problem when their original meaning becomes twisted and obscured. For a time in the mid-nineties, this was the case with the word "empowerment." Originally, it was a helpful way to describe using one's personal power to engage in the business. As managers, consultants, HR, and training personnel started using the word in every imaginable context to describe different things, it became an albatross.
Whenever a manager would say they had a program and they were "going for empowerment," it was time to raise the caution flag. People would ascribe all kinds of meanings to the word that were confusing and detrimental. For example, some people believed empowerment meant everyone got to do what they wanted and nobody was really in charge. Imagine the chaos.
Recently the stigma has worn away and the word can again find a helpful place in our vocabulary. However, the lesson is useful. Be alert for words becoming overused.
Program of the Month
Be sensitive to the word "program" and avoid using it. It is so easy to describe a thrust that includes much training and effort as a program. The subconscious mind interprets this as a short-term thing that can be either ignored or complied with begrudgingly. A more helpful way to describe it is a new dimension - a permanent enhancement to our set of beliefs. If you substitute the word "initiative" for "program," you will be better off.
If you view everything in the context of a learning organization, where people are growing all the time, you can reduce a problem called "program-of-the-month." Programs are started abruptly with great fanfare. Significant time and energy are invested in generating a training program. Trainers use the words "put everyone through the program," which is another red flag. They get engrossed in the training events and measure progress by the percentage of people trained. The progress may be less than hoped. Real progress comes from real change, not attendance rosters.
Often the organization is still in the implementation phase of a current effort when a new improvement program comes along. The old program is not killed off, but is allowed to atrophy as all attention is focused on the new one. The most effective antidote to the program-of-the-month issue is to have an environment of trust. If this exists, people won't allow initiatives to get out of control. If the initiative has many parts, link them together as phases instead of calling each one a separate program.
In "Principle-Centered Leadership," Steven Covey describes it this way:
"These well intentioned training efforts try to create a spirit of cooperation. But the culture is so polarized, so based on defending positions and coercive power, carrot and stick motivations, that people resist these initiatives. The culture becomes cynical. The next new initiative is perceived as another fruitless, dramatic, desperate, frantic effort to make good things happen. Gradually the culture gets fatigued and demoralized."
The cure is to select improvement efforts with care. Invest in them until the new methods have been fully assimilated into the culture. Then, if there is another effort, make sure it fits well with the previous one. Work hard to demonstrate how these efforts fit synergistically to take you to the vision.
One Size Fits All
Another danger is the "one size fits all" issue. Leaders may become excited about a specific "program." Some may feel it is important for everyone in the organization to get exactly the same training. Others may view it as being thrust upon people, and the effort becomes compromised before it ever starts. For some groups, this training may not be of highest value. A group could be far beyond what is being taught. They may be reluctant to push back because they will not appear as good team players. This is not the best mindset to get maximum benefit from training.
One litmus test is to ask a group to consider skipping a course after they have been scheduled for it. If they push back, indicating how much they will benefit from it, you have a good chance for success. If they turn around, yell "YESSSS!" and start with the "high fives" all around the room, you might want to reconsider. Most people feel overworked in their jobs. Any time allotted for training will result in more work later to catch up on. When people feel a training program is a waste of their time it is easy to detect. Be alert and test for commitment. If it is low, find out why before charging ahead.
There is a better way to manage improvement efforts. First, there must be a strong local ownership for the training. If it is an untargeted, canned program from company headquarters put on by hired facilitators, chances for success are low. If the senior managers really believe in a venture enough to teach it themselves and have their underlings teach it to the next level, it shows an entirely different commitment. When this kind of effort can be tailored to meet the needs of each group as it permeates the organization, you get a win-win scenario.
Article Tags: Empowerment, Leadership, program of the month, trust
|
About the Author: Robert Whipple RSS for Robert's articles - Visit Robert's website Robert Whipple is CEO of Leadergrow Incorporated, an organization dedicated to development of leaders. He has spoken on leadership topics and the development of trust in numerous venues across the country. He is author of three leadership books: The Trust Factor: Advanced Leadership for Professionals, Understanding E-Body Language: Building Trust Online, and Leading with Trust is Like Sailing Downwind. His ability to communicate pragmatic approaches to building Trust in an entertaining and motivational format has won him top ranking wherever he speaks. Audiences relate to his material enthusiastically because it is simple, yet profound. His work has earned him the popular title of The TRUST Ambassador. Mr. Whipple has been published in several Leadership and Training journals including Leadership Excellence Magazine and T+D Training + Development Journal. He is a frequent contributor to The Rochester Business Journal. He has been named one of the top 50 thought leaders on the topic of leadership development by Leadership Excellence Magazine and one of the top 100 Thought Leaders on Trustworthy Business Practices by Trust Across America. Mr. Whipple has a BSME, MSChE, MBA and is a Certified Professional in Learning and Performance (CPLP). Contact at www.leadergrow.com or 585-392-7763 Click here to visit Robert's website Dont be Opaque Identifying a Better State for Your Organization Addition by Subtraction What Puts Success in Succession Put On Your Listening Hat |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
How To Be Happy at Work? Acknowledge Yourself
What is Give Back Marketing?
Do You Have An Entrepreneurial Vision?
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



