|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Five Myths about Knowledge Management
|
| Guest post by: Ian Windle |
Article Overview: Knowledge Management is a common business phrase that is often misunderstood. Here is a short article that dispels the myths around it and demonstrates what it really is.
![]() |
Free Download - BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING TEAM By Ian Windle |
Five Myths about Knowledge Management
There are a number of myths
surrounding knowledge management and how it affects business.
The first myth
is that it is based in information technology. Knowledge management did not
arrive with modern technology: it is
about people, not IT. Technology merely enables knowledge to be captured
more efficiently. But knowledge management can exist in a simple form between
two people. If Mr A tells Mr B how a particular machine works and Mr B then
goes on to explain this to some staff, the knowledge is being managed. IT has
an important part to play in large conglomerates, where vast amounts of
information have to be captured. But merely capturing knowledge in a database,
no matter how sophisticated it is, is not enough. Access to information placed
by someone else is not access to knowledge. Knowledge can be acquired only through learning and learning can
take place only when a subject is understood and new information can provide
new insights. Just as learning by rote may help people pass exams, knowledge
management is little use unless there is a true understanding of the subject. A
formal programme helps people to learn for themselves and share information
more freely. For this to work properly, a number of things must be in place.
People have to be motivated to search out information, through people or
systems; in other words, information has to be perceived to add value to the
individual’s role. Once it has been “accessed” it has to be user-friendly and
relevant. It is no good being an expert and telling people all you know,
because the recipient will not necessarily take it in. If the information is
relevant and meaningful, people will listen or read and think about it. They need
to be able to use others as a sounding board to confirm their thoughts and will
need time to consider the information. From an organisational point of view,
the important thing is that the conclusion, or the learning, is the “right”
one. If the information is confusing, obtuse or incorrect, then so will be the
conclusion. The idea of lining people up in the direction the organisation has
mapped out is then lost.
The second myth is that
knowledge management is new. Knowledge management is a philosophy of allowing
people to perform to the best of their abilities, using knowledge available to
them from sources within and outside the organisation. It was around long
before the first intranet. Organised agriculture was developed in the eastern
Mediterranean and spread to Europe 4,000 years ago as an early form of
knowledge management. A group of people took their knowledge and shared it with
others, developing processes along the way.
The third myth, knowledge
management is not a fancy new management tool; it involves everyone in the
organisation. If a company is going through a change such as a merger or
acquisition, staff need to know the reasons for the change and how it will
affect them before they will “buy into” it. A memo from the chief executive is
not enough. Consider the acquisition of a small company with a strong brand
presence by a large global blue-chip company. Staff in the smaller company will
have many questions about the rationale for the acquisition - who they will
work for, whether the brand will be protected and so on. The senior team from
both organisations may have sat down over many months, to analyse the market,
the acquired company, the competition, the value of the brand and internal
issues such as the restructuring. The senior team’s conclusions are then sent
out in slide presentations, e-mails and corporate newsletters. What they
overlook is that people need to hear the story for themselves and then be
allowed time to understand the issues for themselves. They need to figure out
that the acquisition was essential for both organisations and that the merger
will provide a more successful organisation than two separate entities. Only
when people have been allowed to reach these conclusions themselves will they
have really transferred knowledge, learnt and bought into the change. Of
course, true knowledge-sharing and learning do not always mean agreement. But
they do allow people to understand the issues and, if they feel strongly, they
can always leave.
The fourth myth is that
knowledge management is a passing fad. Many blue-chip companies have long had
knowledge officers and departments. Shifts in job expectations mean that
employees will not just go to the company offering the highest salary but to an
organisation that develops and nurtures its employees, allowing creative input
and self-development. Companies need to trust their staff and allow them
greater freedom. The culture of a company has a big impact on whether people
share knowledge or just keep it to themselves. You cannot manage knowledge; you
can only manage the environment that leads to the knowledge being shared.
The final myth is that
knowledge management is expensive to implement and makes no difference to the
bottom line. If you think knowledge is expensive, try ignorance. Knowledge
management programmes are not there just to increase staff morale. A knowledge
management strategy is a commercial one. It is true that at 5.30pm, a company’s
most expensive assets walk out through the door. To improve the bottom line,
your assets must work efficiently. Do they?
Article Tags: change, engagement, knowledge management, leadership, learning
|
About the Author: Ian Windle RSS for Ian's articles - Visit Ian's website Ian Windle. Owner and Managing Director, LiveChange Ltd LiveChange Ltd www.livechange.co.uk Founded LiveChange in 2006. At the heart of LiveChange is a behavioural change model that is applied to the way we think and therefore the way we design and deliver all our client programmes. LiveChange works with leadership teams, and middle management through to whole organisations to create alignment behind their vision, goals and strategies. This is achieved through a team of consultants, learning designers and graphic designers who work in partnership with clients to really get underneath their key issues, agree a pla n and create a programme that addresses their issues and delivers success. LiveChange work covers a number of areas including the Improving sales, Leadership development, Innovation, Vision and strategies, Product launches, Organisational and brand values, Organisational systems and processes and Mergers and acquisitions. Click here to visit Ian's website BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING TEAM 10 Organisational predictions for 2010 MAKING GREAT PRESENTATIONS Great Stories Change Cultures Your Core Values may be a waste of time |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Is the Media to blame for losses in super?
ROSI Return on SUNK Investment
Are You My Mentor
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



