Article Overview: Most of us don’t have the time to work through some complicated decision-making model and, even if we did have the time, the evidence shows that there is still no guarantee that we will make a “good” decision every (or even most of) the time. In fact there is data that shows only about 15% of organisations have the ability to make and implement important decisions effectively. This article suggests 10 things that management can introduce in order to improve decision making.
Free Download - 3 Pointers to Recruiting and Retaining Good Staff By Douglas Long
10 Things To Improve Decision Making
Chris Stephenson, a highly successful and
well respected CEO who is now a management consultant in Sydney, has recently completed a valuable
study on decision making[1].
There is plenty of material available that
shows the importance of making good strategicdecisionsand, in retrospect, it
is always easy to nominate “good” or “bad” decisions. Of course, there are also
plenty of models around that can work us through a process (usually quite time
intensive) designed to ensure we make the “right” decision.
But most of us don’t have the time to work
through some complicated decision-making model and, even if we did have the
time, the evidence shows that there is still no guarantee that we will make a
“good” decision every (or even most of) the time. In fact there is data that
shows only about 15% oforganisationshave the ability to make and implement
importantdecisionseffectively.
Stephenson interviewed CEOs and Executives
in Australia
about their decision making processes. His interest was to find out how we can
improve thequalityof decision making – in other words, rather than
consideringdecisionsthat had been made and then deciding were these decisions
“good” or “bad”, he wanted to find out those things surrounding the final
decision being made so that the probability of a “good” decision improved.
He found that the key factors that resulted
in poorqualitydecisions were:
No decision-making process – Decisions are made on a case by
case basis often by a small sub-group or by the CEO alone mandating a
direction without any discussion.
Lack of transparency – Excluding stakeholders from
decision-making, withholding information, side-bar discussions between the
CEO and individuals outside of the TMT.
Low tolerance for diversity and alternate views – A low
appreciation of thevalueof diversity and experience.
Disrespect – Treating those with different views as disloyal
and not team contributors.
Data – Ignoring data when it didn’t confirm favoured
outcomes. Over relying on small
data samples when they supported desired outcomes. Pretending everything is OK when it’s
not.
Dominant individuals – A CEO or others dominating the
discussion and chiding anyone that offers alternative inputs.
Self interest – Allowing self interest to be the basis of
decision outcomes rather than organisational best interest.
Emotional factors – Takingdecisionson gut instinct without
cross-checking against the data.
Not appreciating the affect of personal biases on decisions.
Narcissism – Decisions driven by individuals with an over
developed self belief and inability to comprehend other people mattering
or themselves being wrong.
Ego – Decisions driven by one person’s agenda to further
themselves.
All businessdecisionstoday are made in an
environment of increasingly complexity, information overload, reducing
lead-times, personal motives, survival and self-serving instincts, and pressure
associated with meeting market expectations.
There
are 10 things you can do to improve thequalityof your decision making:
1. Knowing who is making the decision and theiraccountabilityfor
it
Decisions are made
at every level in every organisation. The key thing is to know “who” can make
decisions about “what” as well as “when” and “why” they can make them. If your
people are unclear as to whether or not they can make a decision; if they are
trying to second guess what their supervisors or managers would do; or if they
are unclear as to why they need to make the decision, then decision making
quality is likely to be poor. Then make sure everyone in the organisation knows who can makedecisionsabout what and when.
Be explicit as to
who can make the decision and theiraccountabilityfor it.
2. Understanding the timeframe
Not every decision
needs to be made instantly - but, equally, not every decision has the luxury of
time. It is important that everyone understands the time constraints relating
to thedecisionsfor which they are accountable.
Be explicit as to
what is are “timely” decisions.
3. A robust process
Most organisations
have people who will tell you they are not “yes” people – they’ll say “no” if
the boss does! If you have these people in your organisation be alert – be very alert!! It is important not to opposedecisionsfor the sake of opposing, but
healthyorganisationswith a good culture encourage dissent. A lack of dissent
can indicate “group think” – which is always unhealthy. If you can’t get people
to readily express their concerns and/or alternative opinions and choices, give
serious consideration to appointing someone the official “devil’s advocate”
who’s prime job is to challenge your thinking.
Ensure your
decisions are subject to a robust process with dissenters and contrarians
actively encouraged and listened to.
4. Transparency
A CEO of my
acquaintance was sacked because the Board discovered that, while everything he
said was always the truth, often it wasn’t “the whole truth”. Thequalityof
decision making is improved when “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth” is presented and there is total transparency as to the how, what,
when, where, and why a decision was made.
Ensure total
transparency in your decision making processes.
5. Inclusiveness
Be wary of cliques
and alliances in your organisation. Where these exist there invariably also
exists a temptation to involve only those who are in your clique or alliance
because you know where support will be. In one organisation in which I became
involved the problems arose because one Divisional CEO had a penchant for
recruiting only people from his particular evangelical Christian church. The
power of the at-work and out-of-work alliances and friendships of these people
restricted discussion by excluding “non Christians” from the decision making
process – this lack of inclusiveness almost brought the entire company to
bankruptcy.
Ensure
inclusiveness.
6. Appreciating diversity
It’s the old story
of the bumble bee. I’m told that, by the laws of physics, a bumble bee
shouldn’t be able to fly – I understand its body is too big for its wings. As
is clear to every person in New
Zealand who has seen these big black and
gold bees flying around the clover patches, they certainly can fly and they
enable the pollination of the clover. Involve people who don’t fit the mould –
who don’t conform to what others say should be the case. People from different
cultural backgrounds and with different experience can often bring a new way of
looking at things and so facilitate better decisions.
Appreciate and
ensure diversity.
7. A sense of order
There’s the old
story of a man who was asked the reason for his 30 year successful marriage. He
replied that there was a clear understanding in relation to decision making and
that “I make all the bigdecisionslike what should happen on the national and
international scene while my wife makes all the smalldecisionslike what
should happen with the finances, the children, and the home.” Perhaps not
politically correct in today’s environment but it makes the point that there
needs to be a clear sense of order in the decision making process. Both
abdication and micro managing are recipes for disaster. Push decision making
down to the lowest possible level with clear parameters. Ensure people know
who, how, and when to pass things up when close to the edges or beyond the
defined parameters for their level of delegation.
Ensure a clear
sense of order in the decision making process.
8. Accurate data
There is an old
saying that manydecisionsare made under the PHOG factor – prejudice, hope,
optimism, and guesses. While it is true that we seldom have all the data we
would like to have for a good decision, there is no excuse for not using the
data we do have – and this, most emphatically, includes data that doesn’t
support our preferred option. As both a researcher and a Doctoral Supervisor, I
know the temptation to exclude data that doesn’t support one’s opinion. Examine
all the available data and let that guide your decision – don’t try to fit the
available data into your preconceptions.
Ensure accurate
data is available, all data is respected, and the totality of the data is used.
9. Mutual respect
Conditional
respect is found everywhere. This is where people are treated withrespectif
they do as we want but are shown little or norespectif they fail to conform.
In healthyorganisationsthat have a high probability of making good decisions,
unconditionalrespectexists at and among all levels and areas. In such an
environment there is a clear distinction between the person (who is always
acceptable and respected) and his or her actions (which may not always be
appropriate). In an organisation with a high probability of making good
decisions, there is never any room for prejudice, bullying, ostracising,
put-downs, sarcasm, and other associated negative activities.
Ensure the
organisation has a culture of mutual respect.
10. Active debate on issues with everyone involved having a say
Recently I was
called in to help an organisation that had suffered some very serious adverse
affects because a junior person was not listened to. A serious issue was being
confronted and a junior employee (who had drawn the attention of management to
the matter) suggested that an apparently unrelated matter could have
contributed. He was ignored and it was pointed out that he lacked either the
formal learning or experience to know what he was talking about. It was a
classic case of asking the right question out of ignorance – and those with the
formal qualifications and experience “knew” he couldn’t be right! Ignoring his
contribution cost the company millions of dollars. Inorganisationswith a
culture that fosters good decision making, everyone concerned – no matter how
junior or “ignorant” – gets listened to and is involved.
Ensure there is
strong debate on issues with everyone involved having a say.
Where these 10 things exist throughout the
organisation – in other words, this is the organisation’s culture - the quality
of decision making improves significantly. An organisation with the right culture gets rid of management ego and all the other negatives that lead to poor decision making.
What decision making culture exists in your
business?
As this shows, its not hard to make it
positive.
[1] Unpublished DBA thesis
through Southern Cross University.
Related Forum Posts Re: Essential Leadership skills
- Vision
Values
Mission
Strategic Thinking
Decision Making
Communication
Team Bonding
People Development
Coaching / Mentoring / Guiding / Grooming
Presentation
Thanks
Robert
Making Money in 2011
- Hello forum members! As we draw closer to the new year I thought it would be appropriate to change the title of our forum category "Making Money in 2010" to "Making Money in 2011" - I'm looking forward to some interesting discussions and wish everyone a prosperous New Year!
Re: Subject line Etiquette
- [quote="jvprosperity":b50c4a20]Another email rant:
Is there some place on the internet that outlines proper "Subject line" headings?
There mus be a system out there that people use to be more efficient email senders. Not everything that comes into my mail box requires my immediate attention.
I would love to educate myself and the people who send me emails on proper subject lines.
Maybe something like:
"Urgent Review: <<Title of document>>"
"Decision Required: "<<Subject matter>>"
just something for me to quickly scan the subject lines and decide which ones need my immediate attention.
Anyone know of such email standards that exist out there?[/quote:b50c4a20]
The only messages I get that say Urgent or Decision Required etc are spam. I tell people to put something relevant to their business with me in the subject line - this is especially important for the people who fall into my junk mail.
Chris
Re: What I Enjoyed Reading This Week - Oct 14
- I really enjoyed the Improve your vision with an app article in the New Scientist. I don't wear glasses and think a lot of people cripple their vision by wearing specs from an early age instead of exercising their eyes... Nice to see someone has developed an ap that will help.
Re: Quote of the Day - "We are each responsible for our own life
- In one of my articles related to "Is It a Scam or is it YOU" most cry Scam when in fact they have done nothing the with the program, havent followed the bluprint or the training, improperly marketed it. etc.
"One mans scam may be another mans bonanza" is a quote used.
Summing up the article, Do your Own Due Diligence, Make your own decision, and finally "Take Responsibility for your Decision regardless of the outcome Good or Bad"
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva.
Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing!Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.