|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Is "leadership" dead?
|
| Guest post by: Douglas Long |
Article Overview: "Leadership" now seems to be a catch-all term (a bit like "communication"). That being the case, has the time now come when we should be considering whether the term "leadership" has lost its impact and whether we need to radically rethink the whole concept by moving out of all the traditional concepts like "servant leadership", "situational leadership", “contingency leadership”, “leadership habits” etc that are based on attitudes and behaviours?
![]() |
Free Download - 3 Pointers to Recruiting and Retaining Good Staff By Douglas Long |
Is "leadership" dead?
In 1943 Nietzsche rocked the Christian and theological
establishments with his assertion that "God is dead". A few years
later (1952) JB Phillips continued this "rocking" in his book
"Your God is Too Small". Once the shock and horror from the
establishment had abated, these works (and others like the writings of Karl
Barth, Rudolf Bultmann, Dietrich Bonheoffer, Paul Tillich etc) lead to many
questioning their faith and, for some it lead to a new and deeper understanding
of what they believe and why. [More recently, of course, the shock was
continued by people such as Bishops John Robinson and John Spong]
Is “leadership” dead?
Just as Nietzsche, Barth, Bultmann,
Bonheoffer, Tillich, Robinson, Spong and others forced the Christian and
theological establishments to re-examine their beliefs and concepts, has the
time come when we need to seriously reconsider our leadership beliefs and
concepts?
No matter what any person’s personal views
relating to Julian Assange, the current furore around Wikileaks provides a
focus for this question.
When I talk with people at any level of virtually any organisation I invariably
hear that the problem they face is “leadership”. (A few years ago it was
“communication”.) When I ask for clarification I get a shopping list of issues
and concerns such that it would wear out a series of magic wands if they were
all to be addressed.
It seems to me that "leadership"
now seems to be a catch-all term (a bit like "communication"). That
being the case, has the time now come when we should be considering whether the
term "leadership" has lost its impact and whether we need to
radically rethink the whole concept by moving out of all the traditional
concepts like "servant leadership", "situational
leadership", “contingency leadership”, “leadership habits” etc that are
based on attitudes and behaviours?
In “Third Generation Leadership: how to develop
commitment and accountability in the 21st century” I suggest
that the 1980’s brought about a seismic shift in the way leadership operates. I
say in that book: “Gen Y finds rigid reporting structures and
narrow sources of information to be a foreign concept. Their whole life has
been lived in a world of personal computers, mobile phones, the internet,
social networking, and the like. They have learned that by using the internet
and the search engine of their choice they can find out almost anything about
anyone at any time – and some of what they find out will even be accurate! Gen
Y has an expectation that information will be readily available and that they
will be involved in determining the accuracy and utility of such information.”
I wrote that long before Wikileaks was
forefront of international consciousness but recent events demonstrate how
accurate I was. “Leadership” as it largely exists today pertains to power and authority. In such an approach the ownership
and control of information and knowledge is a very effective power base that
can be used for good or evil but, almost always, to further the ambitions and
desires of the leadership elite. This is as true in families as it is in
organisations and nations. I suggest that much of the reaction against Julian
Assange and Wikileaks relates not so much to what is being released but the
very fact of this power base now being eroded. Fear of a new era is extant in
the leadership elite!
If this forces us to reconsider the whole
concept of “leadership” perhaps its not totally a bad thing. Outside of
the power brokers, the broad international response to the whole Wikileaks saga
is that many of the people on whose votes and support various Governments and
power sources (across the whole political spectrum) usually rely now see many
of those in authority as “the opposition”. The blocking of access to sites such
as Mastercard and Visa almost certainly was orchestrated but the fact that such
broad mobilisation to block major internet sites was even possible further indicates
new limits to traditional leadership approaches and power bases.
Again, in “Third Generation Leadership: how
to develop commitment and accountability in the 21st century”
I suggest that there is a difference between “leadership” and “leaders
leading”. I argue that there is “…a potential problem for leaders who
continue to operate in a First Generation Leadership or a Second Generation
Leadership world – including many of the leaders in the older, established
religious faiths (as well as those in the newer denominations, sects and cults)
in which compliance with their interpretation of what is in a Holy Book or what
they believe is Divine Inspiration or “the way”, is de rigueur. Gen Y sees as
being automatic the right to question and to seek alternative answers. Unless
they are involved in discussions relating to matters that involve or concern
them, and can explore alternatives Gen Y and many others today may well reject
even that which is most worth retaining. The fighting of rearguard actions by
those in authority – no matter what the sphere – only serves to further
alienate those people whose commitment is actually critical to survival.”
From this I suggest that we need to
distinguish between the individual leader and the existing common understanding
of leadership.
I suspect we are on the cusp of something
that was unexpected just a few years ago. I suspect we are being confronted by
a new social order – an order in which “the leader” is more important than
“leadership”. In other words, we are being confronted by an order in which it will be the extent and quality of an individual’s
ability to engage his or her followers that will become more important and have
more influence than will governments, organisations, societies, etc. In
this new order we may well find that corporations, national borders and
traditional approaches to management, security and governing are seriously
challenged. I also suspect that only those who are able to grapple with these
new realities will prove to have long-term futures. Part of that grappling will require that we jetison outdated leadership concepts and practices.
Are you ready to deal with this
confrontation in a functional way – a way that enables you to move onward and
upward – or do you face the potential of this confrontation with trepidation
and fear? The works of Nietzsche, Barth, Bultmann, Bonheoffer, Tillich,
Robinson, Spong etc forced Christianity and the theological establishments to
confront new views about faith and religious concepts and practices. Some people avoided the issue by
either throwing their faith away or refusing to consider alternative thinking
from their own. Others moved on to a new and stronger future. The same
alternatives apply now – only this time they apply in relation to that much
abused and, certainly over used, concept “leadership”.
Article Tags: Change, Leadership, Personal Development, Power and Authority, Third Generation Leadership, Wikileaks
|
About the Author: Douglas Long RSS for Douglas's articles - Visit Douglas's website Helping you release potential in yourself and others Author of "Third Generation Leadership and the Locus of Control: knowledge, change and neuroscience" 2012, Gower Publications UK Http://www.dglong.com Click here to visit Douglas's website Tomorrow's leadership |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
20 MORE Must-Have Search Engine Marketing Tools
Hypotheticals, Scenarios and Foresight
LEARNING TO HAVE FUN – EVERYDAY!
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



