Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











Is "leadership" dead?

Guest post by: Douglas Long

Article Overview: "Leadership" now seems to be a catch-all term (a bit like "communication"). That being the case, has the time now come when we should be considering whether the term "leadership" has lost its impact and whether we need to radically rethink the whole concept by moving out of all the traditional concepts like "servant leadership", "situational leadership", “contingency leadership”, “leadership habits” etc that are based on attitudes and behaviours?

Free Download - 3 Pointers to Recruiting and Retaining Good Staff By Douglas Long
Name: Email:

Is "leadership" dead?

In 1943 Nietzsche rocked the Christian and theological establishments with his assertion that "God is dead". A few years later (1952) JB Phillips continued this "rocking" in his book "Your God is Too Small". Once the shock and horror from the establishment had abated, these works (and others like the writings of Karl Barth, Rudolf Bultmann, Dietrich Bonheoffer, Paul Tillich etc) lead to many questioning their faith and, for some it lead to a new and deeper understanding of what they believe and why. [More recently, of course, the shock was continued by people such as Bishops John Robinson and John Spong]

Is “leadership” dead?

Just as Nietzsche, Barth, Bultmann, Bonheoffer, Tillich, Robinson, Spong and others forced the Christian and theological establishments to re-examine their beliefs and concepts, has the time come when we need to seriously reconsider our leadership beliefs and concepts?

No matter what any person’s personal views relating to Julian Assange, the current furore around Wikileaks provides a focus for this question.

When I talk with people at any level of virtually any organisation I invariably hear that the problem they face is “leadership”. (A few years ago it was “communication”.) When I ask for clarification I get a shopping list of issues and concerns such that it would wear out a series of magic wands if they were all to be addressed.

It seems to me that "leadership" now seems to be a catch-all term (a bit like "communication"). That being the case, has the time now come when we should be considering whether the term "leadership" has lost its impact and whether we need to radically rethink the whole concept by moving out of all the traditional concepts like "servant leadership", "situational leadership", “contingency leadership”, “leadership habits” etc that are based on attitudes and behaviours?

In “Third Generation Leadership: how to develop commitment and accountability in the 21st century” I suggest that the 1980’s brought about a seismic shift in the way leadership operates. I say in that book: “Gen Y finds rigid reporting structures and narrow sources of information to be a foreign concept. Their whole life has been lived in a world of personal computers, mobile phones, the internet, social networking, and the like. They have learned that by using the internet and the search engine of their choice they can find out almost anything about anyone at any time – and some of what they find out will even be accurate! Gen Y has an expectation that information will be readily available and that they will be involved in determining the accuracy and utility of such information.”

I wrote that long before Wikileaks was forefront of international consciousness but recent events demonstrate how accurate I was. “Leadership” as it largely exists today pertains to power and authority. In such an approach the ownership and control of information and knowledge is a very effective power base that can be used for good or evil but, almost always, to further the ambitions and desires of the leadership elite. This is as true in families as it is in organisations and nations. I suggest that much of the reaction against Julian Assange and Wikileaks relates not so much to what is being released but the very fact of this power base now being eroded. Fear of a new era is extant in the leadership elite!

If this forces us to reconsider the whole concept of “leadership” perhaps its not totally a bad thing. Outside of the power brokers, the broad international response to the whole Wikileaks saga is that many of the people on whose votes and support various Governments and power sources (across the whole political spectrum) usually rely now see many of those in authority as “the opposition”. The blocking of access to sites such as Mastercard and Visa almost certainly was orchestrated but the fact that such broad mobilisation to block major internet sites was even possible further indicates new limits to traditional leadership approaches and power bases.

Again, in “Third Generation Leadership: how to develop commitment and accountability in the 21st century” I suggest that there is a difference between “leadership” and “leaders leading”. I argue that there is “…a potential problem for leaders who continue to operate in a First Generation Leadership or a Second Generation Leadership world – including many of the leaders in the older, established religious faiths (as well as those in the newer denominations, sects and cults) in which compliance with their interpretation of what is in a Holy Book or what they believe is Divine Inspiration or “the way”, is de rigueur. Gen Y sees as being automatic the right to question and to seek alternative answers. Unless they are involved in discussions relating to matters that involve or concern them, and can explore alternatives Gen Y and many others today may well reject even that which is most worth retaining. The fighting of rearguard actions by those in authority – no matter what the sphere – only serves to further alienate those people whose commitment is actually critical to survival.”

From this I suggest that we need to distinguish between the individual leader and the existing common understanding of leadership.

I suspect we are on the cusp of something that was unexpected just a few years ago. I suspect we are being confronted by a new social order – an order in which “the leader” is more important than “leadership”. In other words, we are being confronted by an order in which it will be the extent and quality of an individual’s ability to engage his or her followers that will become more important and have more influence than will governments, organisations, societies, etc. In this new order we may well find that corporations, national borders and traditional approaches to management, security and governing are seriously challenged. I also suspect that only those who are able to grapple with these new realities will prove to have long-term futures. Part of that grappling will require that we jetison outdated leadership concepts and practices.

Are you ready to deal with this confrontation in a functional way – a way that enables you to move onward and upward – or do you face the potential of this confrontation with trepidation and fear? The works of Nietzsche, Barth, Bultmann, Bonheoffer, Tillich, Robinson, Spong etc forced Christianity and the theological establishments to confront new views about faith and religious concepts and practices. Some people avoided the issue by either throwing their faith away or refusing to consider alternative thinking from their own. Others moved on to a new and stronger future. The same alternatives apply now – only this time they apply in relation to that much abused and, certainly over used, concept “leadership”.

Related Articles
  Don't Drag a Dead Horse
  “Market Research” Story
  What Ice Climbing Has to do With Business
  Big Doesn’t Mean Slow!
  Poor Ethics Reflect Poor Business Professionalism & Potentially Poor Business Results
  Michael Moore, Capitalism, and Dead Peasants Insurance
  The Last Blog Post
  An Organic Leader Used Power Versus Force
  Eliminating the Fear of Failure
  Don’t Let Dead Links Kill Your Website
  Leadership fails without management
  The Essence of True Leadership
  LEADERSHIP IS CREATIVE THINKING NOT REACTIVE THINKING
  INVENTORIES CAN BE MANAGE BUT PEOPLE SHOULD BE LEAD.
  Sales Lessons from the Grateful Dead - Insurance Sales Training
  Leaders can’t afford to make mistakes
  Succession Leadership is the Success Lynch Pin for Individuals, Businesses and Organizations
  Learning at the Frank Sinatra School of Leadership
  Achieve Sales Leadership Mastery and Grow Sales Revenue
  What is True Leadership?

Home > Leadership > Douglas Long > Is leadership dead >
Article Tags: Change, Leadership, Personal Development, Power and Authority, Third Generation Leadership, Wikileaks

About the Author: Douglas Long
RSS for Douglas's articles - Visit Douglas's website

Helping you release potential in yourself and others

Author of "Third Generation Leadership and the Locus of Control: knowledge, change and neuroscience" 2012, Gower Publications UK

Http://www.dglong.com





Click here to visit Douglas's website
Dashed Line

More from Douglas Long
Tomorrow's leadership


Related Forum Posts
Key Components Key Components - Two key components for success in network marketing are passion and leadership. As others have said, you have to believe in, or be passionate about, what you are selling. But, just as important, is the development of leadership skills. People want to work with a leader -- someone who can show them the way. So you must take the time to study and become a leader if you want to meet with real success in the network marketing industry.
Pitching without getting Poached Pitching without getting Poached - Hi Kevin, This is a great question and one I get ALOT! The short answer is a non disclosure agreement with a strict confidentiality clause and non-compete. Sadly, it doesnt always work. I recently hired a copywriter to edit some of my women's leadership work - and now I find out she is speaking on Women's leadership to my own Women's group. Eek! In any case, I'm the expert so I doubt it will go far. You do need to be careful and follow your gut on who to trust and how much information to share. Most people are honourable but you do need to cover your butt. J
Bad books Bad books - One of my pet peeves: I really, [i:3gjt67s5]really [/i:3gjt67s5]hate those "franchise" books like The __________ For Dummies, or The Idiot's Guide to ______________. The titles offend me, and the way they're written (yes, I have looked at a couple), in a "yes we know you're not a dummy but we'll talk to you like you are, anyway" manner, get on my nerves. So any business books coming out of those franchises.... I never look at. I'm also not too sure about those "gimmick" books - leadership skills of Attila the Hun, or of The Sopranos (how sad that someone actually thought it might be amusing to write a book about the leadership skills of characters in a TV show based on the Mafia...)
Re: Twitter Members, Post Your Twitter ID Here Re: Twitter Members, Post Your Twitter ID Here - Thanks again GT for your leadership in putting that list together!
Re: Message to Mods, and request for feedback, two ideas Re: Message to Mods, and request for feedback, two ideas - David and GT, Glad you both agree on the recommendation. I believe he would do well as he's demonstrated good leadership thus far.


Recommended Article for You close

  Don't Drag a Dead Horse

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

20 MORE Must-Have Search Engine Marketing Tools

Hypotheticals, Scenarios and Foresight

LEARNING TO HAVE FUN – EVERYDAY!

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.