|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |  |
|
Efficiency versus Effectiveness
| Guest post by: Steve Major |
Article Overview: Everyday we are confronted with the message, to be more efficient. We could have the best measurement systems in place to measure the efficiency of the operations, but be producing the wrong thing or focusing on the wrong area - as a result, the business could fail, though it was highly efficient. What is going to build the future of our business does not come through efficiency; it comes through effectiveness.
 |
Free Download - MIND TRAP: Ignoring the Evidence By Steve Major |
Efficiency versus Effectiveness
Everyday we are confronted with the message to be more efficient. There's efficiency rating's on white goods, businesses produce reports about the efficiency of operations and divisions, governments focus on improving the efficiency of various departments. But they have missed the point.
The first criteria should be effectiveness, not efficiency. You can be awfully efficient at the wrong thing.
We could have the best measurement systems in place to measure the efficiency of the operations, but be producing the wrong thing or focusing on the wrong area. As a result, the business could fail, though it was highly efficient.
The efficiency movement started with Frederick Taylor in America where he implemented time and motion studies to improve the productivity of manufacturing operations throughout America, particularly for the car manufacturers. The focus was internal management and cost accounting, but it wasn't a question of whether this activity was effective, the question being addressed was efficiency.
Yes we need to improve efficiency of our business and of our government departments, but effectiveness first please.
To put it in a rather obvious, but often unappreciated way; most motor vehicles that we have at our home are highly inefficient. (Thanks to Ron Baker of Verasage.com for this example). No I'm not talking about when they are operating, but when you consider the amount of time that the motor vehicle actually is running, versus the amount of time that it is sitting idle at our home, workplace or the train station; there is no doubt the majority of its life is spent idle. For the majority of the motor vehicles life it is inefficient, but we as motor vehicle owners are willing to pay for that inefficiency, because when we want to go to a particular destination it is the most effective way to do so. We are willing to allow the inefficiency, so that the effective solution is available.
In business we need to have the same outlook. Sometimes we need to accept inefficiency to gain effective solutions or services. The mindless pursuit of efficiency can be the death knell of business.
The first question needs to be: - "What is the most effective solution, product or service?" We need again to refer to what matters to the customer. We must understand the customer and what the customer sees as success so we can design the effective solution. We could have the most precise, efficient internal operation, but if we are providing the wrong product or service, then the business has no future.
So why is it that so much focus is given to efficiency rather than effectiveness? The answer is simple, because it's easy to monitor efficiency; it's much harder to address effectiveness.
We need to take the time to ask the right questions to get to the root of effectiveness. Efficiency can be done through rules, processes and systems; whereas effectiveness is a much harder battle. Effectiveness takes a true and complete understanding of the customer.
It is only the effective business, the business that is concentrated on the effectiveness of its products and solutions that will survive and thrive.
3M and Google both have a percentage of their time devoted to free time for the employees to develop products or services. For Google this has led to Gmail, Google maps etc. Now this is highly inefficient, but it is very effective for building the future of the organisation.
The key lead measure of the business needs to be focussed around effectiveness of the business not the efficiency. What is going to build the future of our business does not come through efficiency; it comes through effectiveness.
To quote Ron Baker "The buggy whip manufacturers were highly efficient the day before they went out of business."
To use an Australian example Cob & Co Stage Coach had a near national presence. They operated through the eastern seaboard states of Australia transporting people between hundreds of destinations. Yet, with the advent of motor vehicles and trucks they disappeared. They were a highly efficient organisation, but because they weren't focused on what mattered to the customer and weren't considering their effectiveness, the company disappeared. They were delivering a transport solution, but they were looking at their business as a stage coach business and determining how to be more efficient.
In New York in 1905 there was an important environmental meeting held. New York had a big problem with horses.
Unfortunately horses leave manure, and in 1905 the city was under threat. The manure had got to the point of creating an untenable situation. How to deal with it? How to stop it getting into the water system? How to address the cleaning of it? It was an environmental problem of great proportions.
They called together experts from all over the country and they met for 5 days to determine what to do. 10 years later the problem didn't exist, the motor vehicle had taken over.
In 1905 the motor vehicle was in existence, but they were looking at the problem as a horse problem and determining how to be more efficient in the management of horses, rather than looking for an effective solution. An effective solution would have been to look at ways they could have encourage the population to use cars. (Yes I know this was to lead to another environmental challenge we are debating global at the moment.)
The pursuit of efficiency can lead to a tendency to pull each component part of the business apart and improve that sections efficiency. But there is interdependence between each part of business. That means that sometimes if we make an area each by themselves efficient, we actually decrease the effectiveness of the organisation overall. Some of the parts are actually less than the whole, because of this interdependency.
The interdependence of each part of the business must be considered in designing our measures/metrics. These need be designed with a view to giving an insight to the effectiveness of the business now and in the future. We need to be constantly asking the question of what is the effective solution for our clients and customers moving forward.
Now remember the efficiency pursuit started with Frederick Taylor in the US Car Makers. In 2008 & 2009 the US car makers had to be bailed out by the government and GM & Chrysler went bankrupt. This was not the first time in their history had they received government assistance. The pursuit of efficiency cost the business.
Under Promise and Over Deliver
Efficiency vs. Effectiveness: Knowing the Difference Can Alter Your Marketing Results
Optimize Effective and Efficient Behavior for Increased Success
The Importance of Strategic Marketing Consulting in Marketing Vendor Management
How effective is your Advertising?
FREE Salesforce Grader Tool
How One Might Apply Employee Scheduling Software For Increasing Efficiency In Organizations
What is an Efficiency Expert? Part 1
Moral Hazards of Metrics
Value Over Price Preserves Profitability
LEADERS SPEAKS ONLY ONE LANGUAGE:" RESULT"
Get Exactly What You Want Everytime
LEADER SPEAKS ONLY ONE LANGUAGE: ” RESULT”
Time Management Sales Effectiveness
How You Could Apply Employee Scheduling Software For Increasing Efficiency In Organizations
Things to Know About Call Center Service Outsourcing
Flat Rate Managed IT Services Help Companies with Tighter Technology Budgets
4 Ways To Increase Personal Effectiveness
5 Easy Ways To Improve Your Work Efficiency
Kurlan's Law of Increased Sales Effectiveness
Article Tags: business, customer, effectiveness, efficiency, measurement systems
Referred by: http://www.dglong.com
|
About the Author: Steve Major RSS for Steve's articles - Visit Steve's website Click here to visit Steve's website   MIND TRAP Following Fads and Fashion All Metrics Will Be Gamed MIND TRAP Perspective Moral Hazards of Metrics Lead versus Lag Future versus Past |
Related Forum Posts
Outsourcing sales activity
- The concept of completely outsourcing all aspect of the sales operations has always intrigued me.
Does anyone have any experience with this? What are the pitfalls versus the benefits?
Do webinars really work?
- Since I began this website I've received numerous offers to put on webinars. My concern has always been the time and effort put into creating the webinars versus written content and the ability to rank in search engines for webinats versus articles.
To date I have not done a webinar from my site.
I was reading Inc's Sales & Marketing section and they had an article profiling a company, LeanLogistics which tested newsletter vs. webinar marketing campaigns.
The results? The newsletters yielded double the sales leads at one sixth the cost of the webinars.
According to LeanLogistics it was because:
- Newsletters can be emailed multiple times
- Newsletters can sit in a client's inbox for many days
- If a client does not visit the webinar at the appointed time they will not get the information and will not go back to it even if it is available online anytime afterwards
Have any of you found success with webinars or do you prefer the traditional written content method of marketing?
Re: Brag: 100 Confirmed email opt-ins
- Hi David - the difference really was night and day between having the free download behind the opt in versus before the opt in.
At the same time I also created a thank you page that clearly shows them what they will be receiving and how to confirm their email address.
Press Releases
- I would like to hear of people who have used a press release. Specifically, what their goal was for it and what they got out of it.
Also, what sources were used (traditional/online/both?).
Perhaps a little discussion of Free PR Release website versus paid PR sites.
Giving and receiving business cards
- When you go to a seminar or business/networking event, I'd like to know approximately how many business cards you give out versus how many you receive. And more importantly, how many of those connections do you actually follow up on? What's the percentage? Like 1 in every 5?
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Featured Article
by: 
Build Your List with Joint Venture Giveaway Events
May 2012 Top 100 Social Media Experts to Follow on Twitter
What to measure to be phenomenally successful in business
10 mistakes of media relations
Making Money Blogging Can Be Tons Of Fun 
Newsletter
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Popular Articles
Ready for a Fresh Image?
Smart & Simple Internet Techniques
Resolving A Conflict Between Two Sales Staffs
Ready for a Fresh Image?
Smart & Simple Internet Techniques
Resolving A Conflict Between Two Sales Staffs
Suggestions
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.