Tweet

Get Rich or Die Tryin' - Inequality, Education and the American Dream

Guest post by: Matt Harrison

Article Overview: The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in America, and nowhere else. This reality is popular in the news these days, as it both provokes maximum interest and also opens itself to be manipulated by all sorts of political spinmasters, which in turn creates more news. The Left savors every glimpse of middle-class struggles during economic expansion, which they tout as the golden nugget of proof finally adjudicating the free market as inherently bad for workers. Europeans lead this chorus, where they are already aghast at America's assumptions of the free market's social value. But the data is welcomed on the Right, too, to the extent that it "proves" the economically-injurious impact of immigration.

Get Rich or Die Tryin' - Inequality, Education and the American Dream

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in America, and nowhere else. This reality is popular in the news these days, as it both provokes maximum interest and also opens itself to be manipulated by all sorts of political spinmasters, which in turn creates more news. The Left savors every glimpse of middle-class struggles during economic expansion, which they tout as the golden nugget of proof finally adjudicating the free market as inherently bad for workers. Europeans lead this chorus, where they are already aghast at America's assumptions of the free market's social value.

But the data is welcomed on the Right, too, to the extent that it "proves" the economically-injurious impact of immigration. Rich business owners hire illegals, lowering costs and getting richer, so goes the argument, while poor white Americans are left without jobs.

Independent of ideology, the fact remains that despite low unemployment and high growth, the prosperity of the current economic boom is noticeably bypassing the have-nots. It is too rarely noted, however, that there are legitimate and positive reasons for this that neither side of the current debate mentions.

1. The Problem of Poverty: Some Americans are on the losing end of progress

The core causes of widening inequality, observed correctly by both the Right and Left, are technology, globalization and immigration. However, they are both wrong about the lasting impact of all three.

Technology displaces workers who do tasks that can be replicated by machines, computers and robots. Not surprisingly, those whose jobs can be performed by machines, computers and robots are neither the most educated nor the wealthiest. Thus, technology's impact makes them worse-off, even while it helps many more (see point 2).

Globalization transfers positions to where they can be performed for cheaper than in the United States. These jobs, in contrast to those affected by technology, tend to be white-collar, middle class jobs. Countering this effect, however, the savings from outsourcing positions are passed on to the consumer in the form of lower prices or invested in future production.

Immigrants work for less and compete for the jobs of natives. Like technology, they tend to threaten the poorest and least educated native workers. Yet there are several well-documented advantages to effective immigration. American Latinos, for one, are three times more likely to start their own businesses than the national average, spurring economic growth. Anecdotal tales abound of immigrants, such as Arnold Schwarzenegger, who rose from penury to incredible success through the same economic system currently derided as anti-poor.

These three factors increase the competition for jobs. These are unique challenges. For how those threatened by these factors can win the competition, see point 3.

2. The rich are on the winning end, for better or for worse

The rich are getting richer because they, by contrast, successfully harness and exploit the advantages and opportunities inherent in technology, globalization and immigration.

They use technology, as it was intended, for greater productivity. Advancements in telecommunications, for example, allow business to be conducted with more flexibility and efficiency. Those who can translate this potential into value for a company are duly rewarded.

They successfully use globalization to efficiently offer their resources and services to a worldwide audience. It is profitable, not only because successful globalization create value-added efficiency and cost savings for an organization, but also because a global market exponentially multiplies the size of the market for your product or service.

This is not to say that all rich exhibit these characteristics. As will always be the case, America's elite is full of lazy, ineffectual snobs. Such is inevitable - but it is worth noting two facts. First, the point of this article is to show that the present polarization of wealth (i.e. why lately only the rich have substantially seen their fortunes increase) is the result of those who are hard-working and successful. Trust fund babies blow their money on Ferraris - they don't grow richer through market capitalization and entrepreneurship. Second, the modern globally competitive market has made the idle rich a scarcer species. In America in 1916, only about 20% of the richest 1% made their wealth through paid work. Today, it is over 60%.

So we see these artifacts of modern progress displace and threaten the poor and middle class and are mastered and applied by the rich. Is this a good thing? Well, that doesn't matter much, as it turns out...

3. The Way Out: How quality education can alleviate inequality, anyway

The mere existence of wealth inequality should not be cause for alarm, despite the frantic noises made by John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi, or other hyperventilating socialists. Successful societies can develop three palliatives.

First is sustained economic growth, which through tax revenue and public spending, achieves gains for the rich and poor, independent of individual income. John F. Kennedy stated this well with his famous analogy, "a rising tide lifts all boats." American economic growth, at present, is still the envy of the Western world.

Second is a welfare system that shields all from destitution. For this, there are several excellent proposals to provide unemployment benefits without unnecessarily discouraging work, including PI's negative income tax, and targeted subsidies in use in Latin America.

Third is the constant opportunity for all Americans to freely climb the social ladder through hard work. Called the American Dream by us patriotic folk, it is the maintenance of a system of unlimited opportunity for all who seek it.

Romantic ideals aside, it is here where the bone of contention is found. Socialists distrust the market's ability to provide this meaningful opportunity for upward mobility, fantasizing instead that firms mostly conspire to enslave and destroy the American worker. Conservatives, opposing them, tend to oversimplify the issue, assuming always that the American system is perfectly liquid even in the face of contradictory evidence.

Unquestionably the biggest current obstacle to the American Dream is also its incubator: education. America's K-12 educational system is in miserable shape, inexcusably falling behind nearly every other nation in the rich world in all measures of success.

Despite this, a quality American education is still, in many ways, the golden ticket to success: it is the greatest opportunity for advancement available to every American. Despite several shortfalls, a degree remains a peerless tool to guarantee future earnings. Those who pursue a CPA, a J.D., an MBA, or a medical degree, among many others from a prestigious university, are nearly all swiftly placed in a six-digit position immediately upon graduation, assuring themselves of a lucrative career and commodious lifestyle.

Whether the argument is dressed in populism or otherwise, the best and only way to compete against the competition from technology, globalization or immigration is education. The American worker has the best system in the world to learn how to do something a computer, Indian or Mexican can't. Unemployment among college graduates in the US is a Lilliputian 2%, simply because neither Jose nor a machine can replace an MBA.

Education, as the best method of advancement, becomes a necessity for the workers facing new competition. These workers face a strong economic incentive (socialists call it being "forced by the system") to get educated and become a more competitive, productive worker. If they don't, they risk losing their jobs to the machines and/or foreigners. Despite their grievances, a more educated workforce and society sounds like a good idea. And it would most certainly reverse the current inequalities of wealth - it would allow the poor and middle class to join the rich in their upward mobility.

4. American education is the solution, but has its problems. Vouchers help

America's universities are the gold standard of educational institutions. They dominate the world of academia in all measures of quality. The Institute of Higher Education at Shanghai's Jiao Tong University ranks the world's universities on a series of objective criteria such as the number of Nobel prizes and articles in prestigious journals. Seventeen of the top 20 universities in that list are American, as are 35 of the top 50. American universities employ 70% of the world's living Nobel prize-winners, produce about 30% of the world's output of articles on science and engineering and 44% of the most frequently cited articles.

But it is not only the elite who benefit. A community college system without equal in the world offers all adults the opportunity to transfer into more prestigious institutions or attain smaller degrees. Many states give high achieving or underrepresented students nearly-free schooling, guaranteed. A staggering plethora of institutions gives every student the unequalled opportunity to find the "perfect" school.

Why are American universities so good? The answer is because they are free to compete.

Administration is not state-controlled, as in many European countries. Independent universities receive private funding from many different sources, widening the landscape of influence and ballooning the number of institutions available. Individual schools can pursue individual subjects, goals and methods without the approval of the lumbering state.

Universities also compete for resources, most importantly, professors and students. Their existence is dependent upon their ability to offer something of value over their fellow academies. They also freely accept and reject students, allowing them to enhance the quality and value of their teaching and scholarship.

European universities, not surprisingly, often resemble American K-12 institutions in their operations, and their results are similarly dismal. They are nationalized, egalitarian, and inefficient. America, for obvious reasons, is by large margins the first-choice destination for foreign college students. It's the competition, stupid.

Most importantly to their success, American universities are supported with private funds. From tuition and voluntary donations from alumni, they secure their budgets by providing valuable service, not effective lobbying. As a result, their responsiveness and quality is without equal. They serve as yet another shining example of the wisdom of privatization and deregulation. By terrible contrast, America's K-12 institutions are free at the point of consumption, publicly funded, nationalized, and homogenized.

Unfortunately, there are still numerous careers lacking an educational support structure. College athletes, for example, are often well-served economically by leaving school before graduation. Unorthodox career paths, such as those of rappers, have no mainstream educational institution. Will the market adapt? It may, but the only certainty is that the state will not.

The best method to develop K-12 education along the competitive, innovative, and successful model of higher education is through school vouchers. Such a system would ensure both that all children have an opportunity to attend a quality school and that the schools themselves will be high quality. It would allow every parent ultimate control to determine the ideal educational institution for his or her child, and it would spur the independent, competitive behavior which keeps this country's universities at the top of the global list. Most importantly, it would force institutions to compete for students, the core factor driving the world-class quality of American universities.

Private K-12 schools, many of which already exhibit the efficient success of universities, will certainly flourish under vouchers, attracting students and expanding their market to offer the diverse quality private colleges exemplify.

However, all would not be lost for America's public school system under vouchers, despite the whining protestations of the public school teachers' unions. Competition among colleges is fierce, yet state schools are often among the greatest performers. It is only from a lack of faith in their own abilities to attract students that public schools should fear vouchers. They may well successfully compete alongside private schools. To have a chance, however, control over all aspects of education must immediately be ceded from Washington to the principals, teachers and parents in individual schools.

We see that unique challenges of the 21st-century world, technology, globalization and immigration, have unequal impacts on the rich and poor. However, rather than punish the wealthy, America should be concerned with helping the poor meet these challenges and become rich themselves. To do so will require education. But to ensure the education is up to the task, competition and free choice must triumph over bureaucracy and regulation.

Related Articles
  One Percent Rap, Dog!
  When I Grow Up I Want To Be Rich!
  SMB-Speak: Small Business & the American Dream
  Trading Toward the American Dream
  Why We Want You to Be Rich
  2.0 Gender in African economies: Gender Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness in Africa, 2007
  The Right To Be Rich
  Sustained growth with equity is needed to halve poverty in Africa
  The Four Types of Education You Require to Become a Successful Business Entrepreneur
  Quote of the Day
  The Financial Rollercoaster of Americas Economy
  The American Dream- Are You Truly Living It?
  Row Sow Tow Your Boat
  Have You ever heard of the Entrepreneurs Business School
  What to Expect When Starting a Business
  The Poorest Man is the Man who does not have a Dream.
  The Trump / Kiyosaki Road to Riches
  Business Opportunity Dreams Big and Aims Higher
  The Art of Passion
  American Rejection - Successful entrepreneurs must ignore the experts!

Article Tags: american dream, economic expansion, education, free markets, immigration, matt harrison
Referred by: http://www.westwindcos.com



Related Forum Posts
Re: How To Be Rich - [quote="TheRainmaker":tst8wsa8]Sounds great. What exactly have you found to be eye opening??[/quote:tst8wsa8] The first eye opener was measuring wealth by your total assets 1 Million - 2 Million Pounds The Comfortable Poor 2 Million - 5 Million Pounds The Comfortably Off 5 Million - 15 Million Pounds The Comfortably wealthy 15 Million - 40 Million Pounds The Lesser Rich 40 Million - 75 Million Pounds The Comfortably Rich 75 Million - 100 Million Pounds The Rich 100 Million - 200 Million Pounds The Seriously Rich 200 Million - 400 Million Pounds The Truly Rich 400 Million - 999 Million Pounds The Filthy Rich Over 999 Million Pounds The Super Rich
Ivy League vs. Affordable school - To play devils Advocate .... Prestigious school vs. Education I can afford? Does going to a prestigious school gaurantee success? I'm sure it helps - imagine the contacts made - powerful I assume. Also there is the pressure of being an alma mater of a school where everyone else is driven to succeed by thier parents. But, what if you got the "Education you can afford". It's still education. You are forced to analyze, engage in relationships, manage your school mates, and deliver on deadlines. What's the common denominator when you get out of school? Is it the ability to take action? The ability to see the big picture and then take the necessary actions to bring a project to completion? There's that action word again! what do you think?
Re: Internet Marketing is the best business in the world - 17. Education is freely available
Re: Are Economic Recessions Good for Franchising? - [quote="RussellWebb":6xh1ztbv]As I understand it, when there are more corporate layoffs you have more workers looking into starting their own business. It makes sense in a backwards sort of way. My first impression is that Franchising would take a hit like everyone else... but the more I look into it: [i:6xh1ztbv]The opposite occurs[/i:6xh1ztbv]. There's a larger pool of very qualified workers that are disenchanted with the corporate world. They are often more than willing to take a bigger risk and seek self-employment, whether it's a franchise or not. In my opinion, there are lots of good opportunities out there, it's just a matter of doing your research and finding a nice fit.[/quote:6xh1ztbv] I agree with Russell. Initially everything looks like its taking a slight to moderate (and in some cases very "moderate") hit. But owning your own business is really (not to be cheesy) what the American Dream is all about - and this can most definitely be done in the cast of a successful franchise business. If you just think of a franchise as a very successful business plan, isn't that a pretty good place to start?
Off to get married, Congrats - Hi Evan, I am married over 34 years. So go for the long haul. It's worth it every minute. I hope you will have a 24/7 time away from the Forum. Forget all about it and enjoy each other. Your Dream begins..... Regards Beat


Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.

Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!

Name:
Email:

Popular Articles

International Employment Background Checks

Are You An Accidental Consultant?

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.