Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! Evan Signature
Evan Carmichael Top Header about About Home Profiles articles Tools forums inspirational quotes About facebook Twitter YouTube Blog
Share for a Cause











The Startup investment paradox - why less is more!

Guest post by: Paul O'Dea

Article Overview: Given that many business investors are on their way to the poor house, most start-ups are not going to secure investment until they become real companies. Here are five reasons why they may be better off.

Free Download - Building a better board By Paul O'Dea
Name: Email:

The Startup investment paradox - why less is more!

In 1998 serial entrepreneur, Greg Gianforte had a ‘crazy idea’ that the internet was changing how businesses communicated with their customers. Instead of consumers going to retailers about products, they were going direct to businesses. Greg figured this increase in consumer communication was going to be a big cost for companies, and wondered if he could create a company to solve the problem.

With just $50,000 he started RightNow in the spare bedroom of his house in Montana. He bootstrapped the company until it reached $6m in revenue. Today RightNow is a market leader in web-based customer experience management, with over $100m revenue and 2000 customers.

Investors in start-ups want their investee companies to grow but paradoxically investment often holds the business back. Too much time is wasted crafting business plans, defending expectations set too high and debating the next move.

Given that many business investors are on their way to the poor house, most start-ups are not going to secure investment until they become real companies. Here are five reasons why they may be better off.

1. Get real - there is no hiding place

Too much funding gives you a place to hide. You can be fooled into thinking you have a business because you have a website and you’re paying rent.

Limited cash forces you to build your business in the real world. To survive, you focus on customer needs, and build a proposition to solve their problems. Focus on making or saving customers money.

Greg Gianforte, probed customers needs before he built his product. He kicked off by making 400 prospect calls. Then he built his initial product, which took just 45 days because he knew the critical pieces customers wanted.

2. In at the deep end – raise money from customers

With limited cash, your customer is your funder. This forces you to learn how to sell at a much earlier stage. Selling is the hardest job of all. To survive, you hone your sales techniques quicker than investor-funded businesses. RightNow had 6 sales folks before they hired an engineer and 30 sales people before they hired someone for marketing.

If you have too much cash, you can hide away in your comfort zone and put off asking for that critical first purchase order. Start-ups sell as if their business depends on it—because it does.

3. Spoilt little rich kids – frugality forces focus

If you have funding, what do you do? You go and spend it. Too much funding encourages money to be wasted before a viable business is proven. Like a spoilt little rich kid, the splurging habits you form in your youth are hard to break – and could even lead to overdose. Too much money results in too many choices and bad decisions. Frugality forces focus.

4. It’s hard to be flexible in an investor straight jacket

You can’t know the answers before you start. Great start-up founders thrive in uncertainty. They have the wit and hustle to spot an opportunity fast and need the freedom to twist and turn without investors on their back.

You have more freedom and flexibility without external funding. You don’t have to justify every learning step (or mistake).

5. Necessity is the mother of invention

If you have limited cash, you have to solve problems creatively. It clears away the clutter. It forces innovative, outside-the-box approaches to everything from design to sales.

Like Greg Gianforte, master the art of doing more with less. The truth is that less is often more. Prove your business with real customers before you seek the fuel from investors to accelerate growth.

INSIGHT IN ACTION

1. Put your start-up time into finding urgent customer problems before you build your first products.

2. Keep the scope of your initial product tight and focused on the main customer pain point.

3. Hone your sales skills to raise customer cash to fund your business until you have a critical number of customers.

4. Learn how to do more with less so that when you secure investment, you can use it wisely to accelerate growth.

Related Articles
  StartUp Costs
  Passive-Aggressive Behavior Is Useless In A Startup
  Finance Start-Up
  The Startup Visa Act of 2011
  The Land Of Purposeful Paradoxes - The Birthplace Of Your Divinely Inspired Life Purpose
  Every Startup Needs an Advisory Board
  Fantastic Post By Calacanis On How To Get PR
  Wanting and getting and having and giving
  Why Africa’s oil riches don’t make Africans richer
  Low Investment Franchise Opportunities
  How startup businesses sabotage their success
  Startups: Top 10 Funding Sources
  A Five Point Strategy for Job Creation
  Breakeven Analysis
  Five Steps to Startup Success
  Are You Managing Paradox?
  Seven Deadly Sins of Startups
  Managing Paradox
  Change Management Can Lead to Rigidity and Resistance to Change
  Don't Start a Business, Buy One!

Home > Leadership > Paul O'Dea > The Startup investment paradox why less is more >
Article Tags: business investors, business plans, consumer communication, consumers, crazy idea, critical pieces, customer experience management, customer needs, customers money, font weight, hiding place, initial product, investee companies, market leader, real world, rsquo, serial entrepreneur, spare bedroom, start ups, ups

About the Author: Paul O'Dea
RSS for Paul's articles - Visit Paul's website

An engineer by background, Paul is an experienced builder of growing companies. A founder of several technology companies that have secured strong market positions or been acquired by companies like Oracle, Compuware and Misys. He has consulted with, and facilitated strategy workshops for, growing companies in the US and Europe. Paul is CEO of Select Strategies, a company which helps make growth happen for entrepreneurial businesses. He is author of The Business Battlecard (Oaktree Press 2009)

Click here to visit Paul's website
Dashed Line

More from Paul O'Dea
Getting your story straight not so Innocent
Upbeat thinking in a Downturn Economy
Focus on the critical few rather than the trivial many
The Startup investment paradox why less is more
Building a better board


Related Forum Posts
Re: Would you buy a house for a dollar? Re: Would you buy a house for a dollar? - Investors with their long term planing always be looking forward for such cheap investment projects. This is not a bad idea I think. One can take initiative on it and can earn handsome amount by doing small investment.
Risking friendship for business Risking friendship for business - Hi Kevin It depends on the personality of your friend and whether the relationship would remain the same no matter how much money you make or lose. If you feel the relationship would take a beating if you lost a lot of money or your friend is hoping for a doubling of his investment in 1 year, maybe it isn't realistic to consider the investment for your new business. Money can always be replaced but a friendship can't always be repaired if a major event comes between 2 people. If the trust or bond between two people cannot be broken on financial matters and the 2 parties can simply "write it off" as a bad experience should the business not work, you could seriously consider the investment offer.
Re: Getting *back* to the next step Re: Getting *back* to the next step - For a lot of people (like those working directly in the investment industry), getting back on track may even require career changes to industries that are less impacted by the "bad times". Do you think now would be a good time to go back to school as a long term investment?
Multiple phase capitalization model Multiple phase capitalization model - Thank you for responding, Evan. What I’m really looking for is a model – ideally a spreadsheet model – that links the various capitalization phases and identifies and perhaps even quanitifies the appropriate variables. You asked about investment amount – let me give you two numbers, $ 5 million and $ 10 million (although presumably the model is identical for both). The business is already established and requires this initial investment for growth. Best regards and thank you, Terry
Re: Invest in Real Estate or Stocks? Re: Invest in Real Estate or Stocks? - I agree with both David and Aneshia that your home is not an investment. Robert Kiyosaki defines and investment or asset as anything that brings money to you. Your home does not do this, it is an ongoing expense even if it is mortgage free, there are other expenses connected to it that are on an ongoing basis. A property that earns you an income is an asset. MichelleJ


Recommended Article for You close

  StartUp Costs

Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.

Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.



Featured Article

Bottom Footer



Newsletter

Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
Name:
Email:
Popular Articles

ROSI Return on SUNK Investment

Starting A Set of Books

12 Principles to Spark Innovation

Suggestions

Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.