|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Recent Decisions: Retail Leases
Written by: Meredith DorhamArticle Overview: There have been recent decisions in the New South Wales Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Tribunal) which are of significance. It is important that you take into consideration the following aspects to avoid disputes between landlords and tenants.
![]() |
Free Download - Government Releases Proposed Laws and Plan for National Employment Standards By Meredith Dorham |
Recent Decisions: Retail Leases
Termination of a Lease for Ongoing Late Rent Payments
In Parallel Lines International Pty Ltd v Video Drama Pty Ltd (2007) NSW ADT 160, the landlord had terminated the lease with the tenant and denied access to the premises. The landlord’s argument was that continuing late rent payments constituted a repudiation of the lease and therefore the landlord was entitled to terminate. The question before the Tribunal was “do late rent payments constitute a basis for terminating a lease?” The Tribunal said no and held in favour of the tenant on the basis that the termination notice was incorrectly worded and that late rent payments were not, alone, sufficient to establish repudiation.
Pursuing a Claim Against the Landlord
In International Enterprises Company Pty Limited v Kingmede Pty Limited & Anor (2007) NSWADT 15, the Tribunal set out factors that could, if proved, amount to unconscionable conduct on behalf of the landlord. Actions could be unconscionable if there was evidence to show:
the landlord’s “desire to inflict harm” upon the tenant or have “reckless disregard” of the tenant’s best interests; and
the landlord ignoring or paying no significant attention to an offer made by a person preferred by the tenant to take over the lease after the tenant’s departure.
Even though the tenant was not successful in this case, the Tribunal found that the above, if proven, would most probably be unconscionable and could entitle a tenant to some form of relief.
In another case of De Luca & Anor & Scuccimarra & Anor (2007) NSWADT 63, the Tribunal held that the landlord’s failure to register an extended lease was a breach of the provisions of the Retail Leases Act. This failure to register an extended lease had cost the tenant an opportunity to sell its business to a prospective purchaser and accordingly, the tenant was able to claim damages from the landlord.
The above is not an exhaustive list, but rather some recent cases that both tenants and landlords should be aware of when dealing with retail leases. If you require any assistance or further advice in relation to retail leases, please do not hesitate to contact Tal Williams on (02) 9458 7241 or Andrew Seaton on (02) 9458 7632.
Article Tags: adt, anor, breach, de luca, favour, international pty ltd, landlord, landlords, parallel lines, premises, prospective purchaser, pty limited, reckless disregard, repudiation, retail leases, terminating a lease, termination notice, tribunal, unconscionable conduct, video drama
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
How do you keep it together on a daily basis?
Using Social Media Marketing
Ways to Improve Your Landing Page Conversions
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



