Intellectual Property Protection Minimum Standards
Written by:
Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim
Article Overview: Do the minimum rules or standards for intellectual property protection differ between developed and least developed countries?
 |
Free Download - Reorganization protects entrepreneurs prior to the company turns out to be in utter distress. By Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim
|
Intellectual Property Protection Minimum Standards
It is important of importance to note that the minimum rules or standards for intellectual property protection do not differ between developed and least developed countries. The general agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognize that developing and least developed countries are disadvantaged in international trade to the effect that the Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) arrangement as incorporated in the said agreements stands as a fundamental principle of the said two organizations. Again, under the earlier Paris Convention each country is obliged to provide intellectual property protection no worse that its own to other members of the Convention. By demanding a similar level of protection for all countries, the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement no longer permits countries to elect the level of intellectual property protection in line with the level of each country economic development The Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement does not incorporate similar provisions. It is devoid of significant differences in the rules applicable to developing and least developed countries in contrast to developed countries. It is a type of an international agreement structured on the basis of ' one size fits all" as regards the minimum rules for intellectual property protection. Nonetheless, the timing of implementation of the rules differs as regards developing and least developed countries through provisions of longer transition periods.
Related Articles
The importance of Intellectual Property when buying or selling a business
Protecting Your Ideas
Using Trademarks and Patents Together = Double Protection for your Business
Protect Intellectual Property When Employees Leave
Intellectual Property – The 3 Branches: Copyrights, Patents & Trademarks
Article Tags:
differential,
economic development,
fundamental principle,
gatt,
general agreement on tariff and trade,
implementation,
intellectual property protection,
intellectual property rights,
international trade,
least developed countries,
paris convention,
provisions,
special and differential treatment,
tariff,
trade related aspects of intellectual property,
trade related aspects of intellectual property rights,
transition periods,
trips agreement,
world trade organization,
world trade organization wto
About the Author: Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim
RSS for Dr. Mohamed's articles - Visit Dr. Mohamed's website
Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Adam admitted to bar in 1976. Education. University of Khartoum, LL.B (hons) 1974; University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom PhD 1992 Commercial law. Dr. Adam brings a varied and very successful background to his legal practice. Prior to forming his own law firm, Dr. Adam served in the Sudan as a judge and legal counsel at the Attorney General Chambers. He also served as general counsel to a number of major domestic and multi-national companies in Saudi Arabia, including Alsalam Aircraft Company a joint venture between Boeing group and Saudi Airlines and other partners. Dr. Adam also acted as legal advisor for ISCOSA, a subsidiary of Siemens Westinghouse. He also served as legal counsel for Al Baraka Dallah Group, one of the major banking and investment institutions. Dr. Adam also acted as a general counsel for National Industrial Company (NIC) a joint stock company having international activities with about forty (40) subsidiaries. Dr. Adam also acted as consultant for leading Saudi law offices and is a member of the Sudanese Bar, the International Bar Association, the European Association of lawyers and other specialized legal organizations.
Click here to visit Dr. Mohamed's website

More from Dr. Mohamed Ibrahim
Corporate confidentiality
Strict compliance in letters of credit transactions
The adverse consequences of counterfeiting
Some aspects of technology transfer
The importance of efficient construction regulations
|
|
Related Forum Posts
how much for a franchise fee?
- Dear Colleague
There is no easy answer to this question. Things to consider:
[list=]
The sizeof the Franchise
Clent base
Expected Turnover
Intellectual Property costs (recoup)
Number of Franchises
Number of employees
Original Set up costs
Franchise admin costs
An example: A franchise that I was involved in setting was to a simple "lawn mowing/home repair" franchise. The Franchise included national/local advertising - preparation of client lists - general admin - central accounting etc
The Franchise involved 300-500 clients - and an annual turnover of about $300,000 . The annual franchise fee was $30,000.
Hope that this gives you some idea
Take care
Ian[/list]
Is this copyright infringement?
- Hi TheAnonymousMan,
From the resources you've provided, it looks like I'll just have to take my own set of pictures at live tennis events for my site.
But The Canadian Intellectual Property Office's [i:1smac7qr]A Guide To Copyrights[/i:1smac7qr] states that "The Copyright Act provides that any 'fair dealing' with a work for purposes of private study or research, or for criticism, review or news reporting is not infringement. However, in the case of criticism, review, or news reporting, the user is required to give the source and the author's, performer's, sound recording maker's or broadcaster's name, if known" (6).
So if I wanted to report news on Maria Sharapova or make a comment about her, would using an image from her official website be ok if I simply attached a link back to her site (i.e. I gave credit to wherever I got the image)?
Re: Template of Service Agreement/Contractor Agreement
- Shimmy-
I, too, would be happy to share my template contract for a service provider. But beware, a template agreement may not be sufficient to properly address your needs.
Some key differences between Employees and Service Providers:
1. Tax Status. Employers are responsible for withholding tax on employee's earnings. Independent Contractors are responsible for reporting their income/taxes. There is a significant reporting burden and liability associated with this.
2. Confidentiality/Intellectual Property. Often times, employee handbooks will specify an employees confidentiality obligations and many states impute a duty of loyalty. Contractors are under no such obligations absent a written agreement. Same thing for IP/Creative works. The copyright Act draws a sharp and significant distinction between employees and contractors when it comes to ownership of creative works.
3. Liability for tortious acts. Generally an employer is liable for the tortious acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat superior. An entity hiring a contractor may/may not be liable, but without a written agreement for the contractor to indemnify/defend the hiring entity, their may be little recourse against the contractor.
There are many other subtle differences too numerous to mention. I hope you find this helpful.
long-term relationship
- I think most people are happy with attorneys when they have a long-term relationship. Intellectual property really benefits from this type of relationship.
How Well Protected Are The Patent Holders?
- Intellectual property laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. And it is such that the acquisition, registration or enforcement of the rights must be pursued or obtained separately in each territory of interest. Intellectual property in law is a general term for various legal entitlements. The holder of this legal entitlement is generally entitled to exercise various exclusive rights.
Intellectual property laws are designed to protect different forms of subject matter, in this case a Patent. A patent may be granted for a new, useful, and non-obvious invention, and gives the patent holder an exclusive right to commercially exploit the invention for a certain period of time, typically 20 years from the filing date of a patent application. Patents, trademarks, and designs rights are sometimes collectively known as industrial property, as they are typically created and used for industrial or commercial purposes.
Various schools of thought are critical of the term “intellectual property”. Some characterise it as intellectual protectionism. From the perspective of economics, intellectual property is a temporary monopoly on the use or exploitation of that Patent, supported by legal enforcement mechanisms.
There is a debate going on every where that intellectual property laws truly operate to confer the stated public benefits, and whether the protection they are said to provide is appropriate in the context of innovation derived from such things as traditional knowledge and folklore, and patents for software and business methods. Manifestations of this controversy can be seen in the way different jurisdictions decide whether to grant intellectual property protection in relation to subject matter of this kind, and the divide on issues of the role and scope of intellectual property laws.
Most exclusive rights are the right to sue an infringer, which has the effect that people will approach the patent holder for permission to perform the acts to which the patent holder has exclusive right
Recommended Article for You
close
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva.
Over
$50,000 raised and counting -
Please keep sharing! Learn more.