Sexual Harassment victim wins $100,000 in damages
Sexual Harassment victim wins $100,000 in damages
The trainee alleged that the neurosurgeon led her into his consulting rooms when he suddenly approached her from behind, embraced her and kissed her on the lips. He then put his hand on her breast, pinning her against a desk, and as she twisted to get out of his grasp, she saw his erect penis out of his fly. He then said to her “do you want to go down on this”. There were no witnesses to the incident.
The incident was investigated by the Hospital’s internal Human Resources department, which found that the complaint could not be established. The neurosurgeon argued that the trainee made up the allegation.
The judge who determined the case said “there is no question that, if the alleged harassment occurred as alleged, the incident would constitute sexual harassment in employment.”
The judge noted that as a civil case the alleged harassment must be proven on the balance of probabilities. The Judge concluded “it is more probable than not that the incident of sexual harassment occurred and that it occurred in the manner deposed to by the Complainant”, and that “her evidence had a ring of truth about it”.
The neurosurgeon was ordered to pay $100,000 to the trainee. The Medical Centre was not a party to the proceedings.
HR Tip: Although the employee in this case chose to take legal action against the surgeon directly it is important to note that employers can be held vicariously liable if their employees sexually harass another.
Employers should be aware that under federal anti-discrimination laws there is no cap on the maximum penalty that can be awarded against an employer for sexual harassment. To reduce the risk of a sexual harassment claim it is important that employers have a properly drafted EEO Policy in place which covers sexual harassment. It is also recommended that employers provide EEO training to employees and other workplace participants.
Sexual Harassment victim wins $100000 in damages - To learn more about this author, visit Jason Donnelly's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
The trainee, who was in her third year of training at the Monash Medical Centre in Melbourne, told the Tribunal that she had developed a supportive professional relationship with the neurosurgeon from around December 2004. He began inviting her into his private consultation rooms for extra tuition, although she did not take up any of those invitations until the night the harassment took place.
The trainee alleged that the neurosurgeon led her into his consulting rooms when he suddenly approached her from behind, embraced her and kissed her on the lips. He then put his hand on her breast, pinning her against a desk, and as she twisted to get out of his grasp, she saw his erect penis out of his fly. He then said to her “do you want to go down on this”. There were no witnesses to the incident.
The incident was investigated by the Hospital’s internal Human Resources department, which found that the complaint could not be established. The neurosurgeon argued that the trainee made up the allegation.
The judge who determined the case said “there is no question that, if the alleged harassment occurred as alleged, the incident would constitute sexual harassment in employment.”
The judge noted that as a civil case the alleged harassment must be proven on the balance of probabilities. The Judge concluded “it is more probable than not that the incident of sexual harassment occurred and that it occurred in the manner deposed to by the Complainant”, and that “her evidence had a ring of truth about it”.
The neurosurgeon was ordered to pay $100,000 to the trainee. The Medical Centre was not a party to the proceedings.
HR Tip: Although the employee in this case chose to take legal action against the surgeon directly it is important to note that employers can be held vicariously liable if their employees sexually harass another.
Employers should be aware that under federal anti-discrimination laws there is no cap on the maximum penalty that can be awarded against an employer for sexual harassment. To reduce the risk of a sexual harassment claim it is important that employers have a properly drafted EEO Policy in place which covers sexual harassment. It is also recommended that employers provide EEO training to employees and other workplace participants.
Sexual Harassment victim wins $100000 in damages - To learn more about this author, visit Jason Donnelly's Website.
Like this article? Share it with your friends
![]() | |
| |
No article feedback found. |
| |
Leave Your Feedback |
|
| |
| |||
|
To learn more about the Evan Elite Author Program please contact us. |
![]() | |
![]()
| |
![]() | |
|
| |
![]() | |
|
| |
![]() | |||||||
|
![]() | ||
|
| ||
![]() |
| Have you written articles that would be of value to entrepreneurs? Become an expert on our site by publishing them! Expose yourself to a wide audience, drive more traffic to your website and get more sales! Click Here for details. |
|
|
![]() |
| Modeling the Masters: Learn the true secrets behind Walt Disney's business success factors & grow your company! Video produced by Phanta Media |
|
|
![]() |
"Learn straight from Evan how you can Make a Full Time Income (And More) from a Website"
Click Here To Learn More |
|
|
|
|
Get advice & tips from famous business owners, new articles by entrepreneur experts, my latest website updates, & special sneak peaks at what's to come!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() | ||
|
Top 50 Marketing Blogs
Top Blogs To Watch In 2008 | ||
|
Top 50 Debt Blogs
Learn To Get Out Of Debt | ||
![]() | ||
![]() | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|





Subscribe to Jason's articles











