|
|
Like this article? PLEASE +1 it! |
|
Conducting a faulty investigation can lead to an employee’s success in an unfair dismissal claim
Written by: Jessica LeeArticle Overview: The AIRC ordered Melbourne’s St Vincent Hospital to reinstate an employee and ordered compensation for lost earnings after it found that a pathology courier employee’s (Ms Nicolson) dismissal was unfair.
![]() |
Free Download - Duty of care includes protecting employees from violence outside of work By Jessica Lee |
Conducting a faulty investigation can lead to an employee’s success in an unfair dismissal claim
In this case the Hospital’s HR practitioner conducted an internal investigation in which it wrongly accused Ms Nicolson of assaulting a fellow employee during a dispute over rosters. As a result of the internal investigation Ms Nicolson’s employment was terminated.
The AIRC found that the investigation was faulty and had been conducted in a “completely unprofessional” way by the Hospital’s HR practitioner. Part of the reasons for the decision was that the HR practitioner had refused to make copies of all records available to Ms Nicolson, including copies of all of the allegations made against Ms Nicolson. The AIRC also found that a senior employee was biased in his evidence against Ms Nicolson in the investigation. The AIRC specifically stated that Ms Nicolson was entitled to full disclosure of everything that was going to be used against her. The AIRC was particularly critical of the Hospital’s HR Practitioner, finding that her actions smacked of a poor concept of Ms Nicolson’s rights, particularly in light of the HR Practitioner’s claimed experience.
The AIRC concluded that there was no basis for the finding in the investigation that Ms Nicolson had assaulted a fellow employee during a rostering dispute. In fact, the AIRC found that Ms Nicolson was the victim of assault by a fellow employee rather than the perpetrator of the assault.
The AIRC also found that the HR practitioner’s conduct was in breach of the Hospital’s own Code of Conduct and the values expressed by the Hospital.
The AIRC ordered that Ms Nicolson was to be either reinstated to her former position or to a different but equivalent position. The AIRC provided the option of reinstating her to an equivalent position because of the poor attitude of the more senior employees in the area Ms Nicolson had worked in the Hospital. The AIRC also ordered that the Hospital pay to her compensation for lost earnings.
HR Tip : Employers must ensure that investigations conducted by the Company are procedurally fair and that any findings made from the investigation can be supported by the evidence provided in the investigation. Usually, this does not require providing an employee with all material relating to allegations against the employee, however, the employee should be informed of all details of the allegations against her.
|
About the Author: Jessica Lee RSS for Jessica's articles - Visit Jessica's website Jessica joined Australian Business Lawyers in March 2004 and is a Senior Associate with the firm. She regularly provides advice and represents clients ina wide range of employment and industrial law matters including industrial disputes, unfair contracts and unfair dismissals. Jessica has also represented the interests of various emplyoers in a number of different tribunals and Courts. Jessica’s achievements in discrimination law were awarded with the NSW Bar Association Prize for excellence in the subject Anti-Discrimination Law after her studies at University. Since then, Jessica has provided advice to clients in relation to discrimination matters and assisted in preparing responses to the relevant government bodies in the event that a discrimination claim is made. Jessica has conducted numerous independent investigations into complaints of bullying, harassment and sexual harassment and provides assistance to employers that are conducting investigations into workplace grievances and complaints. Click here to visit Jessica's website Duty of care includes protecting employees from violence outside of work Employer successfully questions an employees medical certificate Conducting a faulty investigation can lead to an employees success in an unfair dismissal claim Flawed investigation leads to monetary compensation for former employee |
Related Forum Posts
Share this article with your friends. Fund someone's dream.
Leave a comment below or share on the left and you'll help support entrepreneurs in Africa through our partnership with Kiva. Over $50,000 raised and counting - Please keep sharing! Learn more.
Get advice & tips from famous business
owners, new articles by entrepreneur
experts, my latest website updates, &
special sneak peaks at what's to come!
How to Ask for a Flexible Work Arrangement
Leading with Discernment
Coaching - An Effective Tool for Managers
Email us your ideas on how to make our
website more valuable! Thank you Sharon
from Toronto Salsa Lessons / Classes for
your suggestions to make the newsletter
look like the website and profile younger
entrepreneurs like Jennifer Lopez.



